Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Diabetes. Jul 15, 2022; 13(7): 532-542
Published online Jul 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i7.532
Table 1 Baseline data between the two groups
Baseline data
Compaq group (n = 48)
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)64.8 ± 7.266.3 ± 6.9-1.0420.300
BMI (kg/m2)23.5 ± 2.323.2 ± 2.80.5740.568
Before treatment: BCVA (LogMAR)0.78 ± 0.120.80 ± 0.11-0.8510.397
Gender, n (%)2.0430.153
Male27 (56.25)20 (41.67)
Female21 (43.75)28 (58.33)
Distribution of affected side, n (%)0.6670.414
Left22 (45.83)26 (54.17)
Right26 (54.17)22 (45.83)
Table 2 Comparison of estimated values of best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
BCVA (LogMAR)
IOP (mmHg)
Before treatment
1 mo after treatment
3 mo after treatment
Before treatment
1 mo after treatment
3 mo after treatment
Compaq group (n = 48)0.78 ± 0.120.72 ± 0.130.51 ± 0.1016.84 ± 2.7716.40 ± 2.8116.39 ± 2.64
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)0.80 ± 0.110.75 ± 0.140.57 ± 0.1316.50 ± 2.8016.72 ± 2.7616.81 ± 2.82
t value-0.851-1.088-2.5350.598-0.563-0.753
P value0.3970.2790.0130.5510.5750.453
Table 3 Comparison of estimated values of macular retinal thickness, macular choroidal thickness, foveal no perfusion area between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Before treatment
1 mo after treatment
3 mo after treatment
CMT (μm)
Compaq group (n = 48)445.8 ± 89.6372.1 ± 76.0210.6 ± 66.4
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)452.7 ± 93.2384.0 ± 80.6243.1 ± 73.5
t value-0.370-0.744-2.273
P value0.7120.4590.025
SFCT (μm)
Compaq group (n = 48)335.1 ± 55.9323.4 ± 59.5281.6 ± 54.0
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)340.5 ± 58.3330.5 ± 63.0306.2 ± 57.3
t value-0.463-0.568-2.165
P value0.6440.5720.033
FAZ (mm2)
Compaq group (n = 48)0.74 ± 0.100.72 ± 0.120.73 ± 0.11
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)0.75 ± 0.120.74 ± 0.140.74 ± 0.11
t value-0.444-0.751-0.445
P value0.6580.4540.657
Table 4 Comparison of vascular density in the shallow capillary plexus between the two groups (mean ± SD, %)
Groups
Before treatment
1 mo after treatment
3 mo after treatment
Fovea
Compaq group (n = 48)20.64 ± 4.4020.30 ± 3.9520.28 ± 3.77
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)20.90 ± 4.8320.48 ± 4.2020.37 ± 4.14
t value-0.276-0.216-0.111
P value0.7830.8290.912
Parafovea
Compaq group (n = 48)38.56 ± 4.8238.10 ± 4.5037.73 ± 4.72
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)39.10 ± 5.5738.67 ± 5.5338.38 ± 5.28
t value-0.508-0.554-0.636
P value0.6130.5810.526
Overall macular area
Compaq group (n = 48)35.74 ± 5.1035.43 ± 4.8534.92 ± 5.51
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)36.30 ± 5.3435.67 ± 5.1134.58 ± 5.18
t value-0.525-0.2360.311
P value0.6010.8140.756
Table 5 Comparison of vascular density in the deep capillary plexus between the two groups (mean ± SD, %)
Groups
Before treatment
1 mo after treatment
3 mo after treatment
Fovea
Compaq group (n = 48)18.58 ± 3.8018.23 ± 3.7517.86 ± 4.12
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)19.14 ± 4.0018.78 ± 4.2418.47 ± 3.96
t value-0.703-0.673-0.740
P value0.4840.5020.461
Parafovea
Compaq group (n = 48)40.92 ± 5.7340.51 ± 4.8540.38 ± 5.22
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)40.40 ± 5.5140.10 ± 5.2839.56 ± 4.87
t value0.4530.3960.796
P value0.6510.6930.428
Overall macular area
Compaq group (n = 48)39.64 ± 4.8539.40 ± 4.7738.78 ± 4.62
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)40.43 ± 5.1839.93 ± 5.0339.52 ± 4.85
t value-0.771-0.530-0.765
P value0.4420.5980.446
Table 6 Comparison of clinical efficiency between the two groups, n (%)
Groups
Markedly efficiency
Efficient
Invalid
Compaq group (n = 48)34 (70.83)13 (27.08)1 (2.08)
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)25 (52.08)19 (39.58)4 (8.33)
Z value-1.993
P value0.046
Table 7 Comparison of incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups, n (%)
Groups
Bulbar conjunctival hemorrhage
Too high intraocular pressure
Adverse reaction
Compaq group (n = 48)213 (6.25)
Ranibizumab group (n = 48)426 (12.50)
χ2 value1.333
P value0.248