Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2025; 17(5): 103809
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103809
Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics among rectal cancer patients by T stage, mean ± SD/n (%)
Group
Early-stage group (n = 72)
Late-stage group (n = 54)
t/χ²
P value
Age (year)58.25 ± 10.3259.46 ± 11.240.6290.531
Sex0.3820.537
Male42 (58.33)29 (53.70)
Female30 (41.67)25 (46.30)
BMI (kg/m²)23.45 ± 3.2123.82 ± 3.150.6430.521
KPS score85.62 ± 7.8584.93 ± 8.120.4830.630
Smoke0.2950.587
Yes31 (43.06)26 (48.15)
No41 (56.94)28 (51.85)
Alcohol0.4280.513
Yes28 (38.89)24 (44.44)
No44 (61.11)30 (55.56)
Hypertension0.3170.573
Yes25 (34.72)22 (40.74)
No47 (65.28)32 (59.26)
Diabetes0.3940.530
Yes18 (25.00)16 (29.63)
No54 (75.00)38 (70.37)
Family history0.2730.601
Yes12 (16.67)11 (20.37)
No60 (83.33)43 (79.63)
Tumor location0.5180.772
Upper section24 (33.33)16 (29.63)
Middle section28 (38.89)24 (44.44)
Lower section20 (27.78)14 (25.93)
Differentiation degree1.3860.239
Low differentiation25 (34.72)24 (44.44)
Medium to high differentiation47 (65.28)30 (55.56)
Table 2 Comparison of general information of rectal cancer patients, mean ± SD/n (%)
Group
Early-stage group (n = 49)
Late-stage group (n = 77)
t/χ²
P value
Age (year)58.92 ± 10.8558.63 ± 10.680.1470.883
Sex0.2860.593
Male29 (59.18)42 (54.55)
Female20 (40.82)35 (45.45)
BMI (kg/m²)23.56 ± 3.1823.64 ± 3.200.1380.891
KPS score85.12 ± 8.0285.48 ± 7.920.2520.801
Smoke0.3170.573
Yes24 (48.98)33 (42.86)
No25 (51.02)44 (57.14)
Alcohol0.3940.530
Yes22 (44.90)30 (38.96)
No27 (55.10)47 (61.04)
Hypertension0.2730.601
Yes19 (38.78)28 (36.36)
No30 (61.22)49 (63.64)
Hypertension0.3280.567
Yes14 (28.57)20 (25.97)
No35 (71.43)57 (74.03)
Family history0.2950.587
Yes10 (20.41)13 (16.88)
No39 (79.59)64 (83.12)
Tumor location0.4820.786
Upper section15 (30.61)25 (32.47)
Middle section21 (42.86)31 (40.26)
Lower section13 (26.53)21 (27.27)
Table 3 Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves
Evaluation factors
AUC
95%CI
Threshold value
True positive rate
Selectivity
Yoden
T installment
Ktrans0.8350.762-0.9080.28679.82575.6320.555
Ve0.8120.736-0.8880.37577.23473.5210.508
DCE-MRI parameters0.8920.832-0.9520.46285.76381.9240.677
Degree of differentiation
Ktrans0.8210.748-0.8940.27378.63274.8250.535
Ve0.8030.728-0.8780.36276.52372.9340.495
DCE-MRI parameters0.8830.821-0.9450.45384.92580.7630.657
Table 4 Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves
Evaluation factors
AUC
95%CI
Threshold
True positive rate
Selectivity
Yoden
T installment
CA19-90.8120.736-0.88837.25378.52373.4650.520
CA1250.7980.723-0.87332.86476.35271.9230.483
DCE-MRI indicators and cancer markers0.9230.865-0.9810.52689.73485.6230.754
Degree of differentiation
CA19-90.8030.728-0.87835.92177.46272.8450.503
CA1250.7850.711-0.85931.53275.28370.9420.462
DCE-MRI parameters + tumor markers0.9120.855-0.9690.51288.65384.3720.730
Table 5 DeLong test results for the area under the curve of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging metrics and tumor biomarkers in differentiating T staging and degree of differentiation
Inspection results
Z-score
Significance level
AUC
Mean error
95%CI
T installment
CA19-9 and CA125 serum biomarkers0.8620.3890.0140.016-0.018 to 0.046
CA19-9 alongside DCE-MRI measurements and cancer markers4.253< 0.050.1110.0260.060 to 0.162
CA125 in conjunction with DCE-MRI parameters and tumor markers4.682< 0.050.1250.0270.072 to 0.178
Degree of differentiation
CA19-9 and CA125 serum biomarkers0.9230.3560.0180.020-0.021 to 0.057
CA19-9 alongside DCE-MRI measurements and cancer markers4.132< 0.050.1090.0260.058 to 0.160
CA125 in conjunction with DCE-MRI parameters and tumor markers4.521< 0.050.1270.0280.072 to 0.182