Minireviews
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2013; 5(9): 428-432
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.428
Table 1 The published studies on hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery of gastric subepithelial tumors
Author, year and number of patientsOperation time, minIntraoperative bleeding, mLTumor size, mmNumber of linear staplers usedPostoperative complicationsHospital stay, dTumor locationType of growthPathologic diagnosis, n
Hiki et al[20], n = 7169.0 ± 17.07.0 ± 2.046.0 ± 3.0 (35-60)2.2 ± 0.107.4 ± 8.1U4M1L1Remnant stomach, posterior 1Extragastric type 1Intragastric type 6GIST, 6Schwannoma, 1
Tsujimoto et al[21], n = 20157.5 ± 68.4 (89-316)3.5 ± 6.4 (0-20)37.9 ± 11.0 (18-63)2.7 ± 0.5 (2-3)011.6 ± 9.5 (6-13)U8 (40%)M8 (40%)L4 (20%)Extragastric type 2 (15%)Intragastric type 17 (85%)GIST, 16 (80%)Inflammation for parasite, 1 (5%), leiomyoma, 1 (5%),glomus tumor, 1 (5%), aberrant pancreas, 1 (5%)
Abe et al[22], n = 4221.5 ± 129.438.0 ± 46.738.0 ± 7.1 (22-43)NA07.5 ± 0.7U1M3NAGIST, 1Lipoma, 1Ectopic pancreas, 1Schwannoma, 1