Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. May 8, 2016; 8(13): 591-596
Published online May 8, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i13.591
Innovative surgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma
Riccardo Memeo, Nicola de’Angelis, Vito de Blasi, Zineb Cherkaoui, Oronzo Brunetti, Vito Longo, Tullio Piardi, Daniele Sommacale, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Patrick Pessaux
Riccardo Memeo, Vito de Blasi, Zineb Cherkaoui, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Patrick Pessaux, Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67091 Stra-sbourg, France
Riccardo Memeo, Vito de Blasi, Zineb Cherkaoui, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Patrick Pessaux, IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive Tract, 67091 Strasbourg, France
Riccardo Memeo, Vito de Blasi, Zineb Cherkaoui, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Patrick Pessaux, IHU-Strasbourg, Institute for Image-Guided Surgery, 67091 Strasbourg, France
Riccardo Memeo, Patrick Pessaux, Inserm U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques, 67091 Strasbourg, France
Nicola de’Angelis, Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, 94010 Créteil, France
Nicola de’Angelis, Université Paris-Est, Val de Marne UPEC, 94010 Créteil, France
Oronzo Brunetti, Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer institute “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70100 Bari, Italy
Vito Longo, Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital “Di Miccoli”, 70124 Barletta, Italy
Tullio Piardi, Daniele Sommacale, Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Robert Debré, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51000 Reims, France
Author contributions: Memeo R, de’Angelis N, de Blasi V and Cherkaoui Z performed the study conception and design; Brunetti O, Longo V and Piardi T acquired the data; Sommacale D and Marescaux J analyzed the data; Marescaux J, Mutter D and Pessaux P reviewed the paper.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest associated with any of the senior author or other coauthors con-tributed their efforts in this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Dr. Riccardo Memeo, MD, PhD, Depart-ment of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hopital, 67091 Strasbourg, France. riccardo.memeo@chru-strasbourg.fr
Telephone: +33-3-69550552 Fax: +33-3-69550532
Received: February 26, 2016
Peer-review started: February 29, 2016
First decision: March 23, 2016
Revised: March 30, 2016
Accepted: April 14, 2016
Article in press: April 18, 2016
Published online: May 8, 2016

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with an increasing diffusion in Europe and the United States. The management of such a cancer is continuously progressing and the objective of this paper is to evaluate innovation in the surgical treatment of HCC. In this review, we will analyze the modern concept of preoperative management, the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery, the intrao-perative use of three dimensional models and augme-nted reality, as well as the potential application of fluore-scence.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver resection, Hepatectomy, New prespectives, Innovative surgical approaches

Core tip: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with an increas-ing diffusion in Europe and the United States. The mana-gement of such a cancer is continuously progressing and the objective of this paper is to evaluate innovation in the surgical treatment of HCC.


Citation: Memeo R, de’Angelis N, de Blasi V, Cherkaoui Z, Brunetti O, Longo V, Piardi T, Sommacale D, Marescaux J, Mutter D, Pessaux P. Innovative surgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2016; 8(13): 591-596
INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most com-mon cancer worldwide, with at least 1 million new cases each year[1]. Even if liver transplantation remains the ideal treatment, hepatic resection remains the only curative treatment for HCC. Considering the early experience of liver resection for HCC in the 1980s, results were discouraging, with a mortality rate in the range of 10% and a considerable morbidity. Improvements in patient selection, early diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative management, surgical technique and development of new technologies have allowed to obtain a lower mortality and morbidity, achieving 0% in certain high-volume centers. The development of laparoscopic and robotic surgery, associated with the application of new technologies in patient care and progress in the medical treatment of HCC, represent a modern era challenge to optimize the management of HCC with the objective of improving overall and disease-free survival. The aim of this article is to describe all innovations in the surgical treatment of HCC.

ADVANCES IN THE ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING OF SURGICAL TREATMENT

The onset of HCC in a normal liver is an extremely rare situation. It is associated with the presence of path-ological liver, and cirrhosis in most cases (80%). The presence of a pathological liver requires a comprehensive study of liver function and patient condition, in order to prevent any postoperative liver failure which occurs in approximatively 8% of patients after major hepatic resections[2]. The preoperative planning of a surgical procedure has improved the safety of liver resection in cirrhotic patients. The introduction of the concept of future remnant liver (FRL)[3] as a predictor of liver failure has contributed to the development of the concept of liver volumetry. In case of pathological liver, FRL was usually set at 50% of functional liver to prevent any postoperative liver failure[3]. The necessity to calculate liver volumetry has increased the diffusion of three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning software[4], with the double function of simulating surgery and calculating liver volumes. Even if conventional 2D images [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT)-scanning] reveal all the required information con-cerning tumors, major vessels and the biliary tract, surgeons could come across difficulties in perceiving the relationships of these structures before surgery, and during surgical planning. This platform allows to explore hepatic veins and portal triads from the hepatic pedicle up to segmental branches, allowing to evaluate spatial relationships with the tumor. This software allows to identify the vascular territory supplied by isolated vessels, allowing to simulate anatomical segmentectomy and easy planning of major and minor hepatectomies[5]. Many software tools are now available to create a 3D model, offering a visualized model of patient organs and pathologies.

PORTAL VEIN EMBOLIZATION AND STEM CELLS APPLICATION

As previously mentioned, any hepatic resection must guarantee volume of FRL to prevent postoperative liver failure. In case of cirrhotic liver, the most common scenario in the presence of HCC, namely a portion of 40% to 50% of FRL, should be guaranteed so that liver function should not be affected. In case of insufficient FRL, portal vein embolization was suggested by Makuuchi et al[6] in 1990, in order to stimulate liver hypertrophy before surgery. This hypertrophy usually requires 4 to 6 wk, but in some cases, more time could be necessary, especially in case of pathological parenchyma. However, during this period, the tumor could continue its progression, and the patient could well become inoperable. One possibility to reduce this risk is to obtain a quicker hypertrophy, reducing the time between portal vein embolization and hepatectomy. Several studies have suggested that stem cells could have an important role in the process of tissue regene-ration[7]. In case of acute or chronic liver suffering, stem cells can be stimulated from bone marrow. Among them, a subpopulation of cells (CD133+) have been recognized as potentially involved in liver regeneration after portal embolization, with encouraging results in some case series, demonstrating an augmented capacity of liver parenchyma regeneration[7-11].

3D PRINT OF LIVER MODELS

Based on the data acquired by CT-scan which provide 2D information on geometrical measurements of tumors, portal vein, hepatic vein and liver parenchyma, a 3D software edited model has been elaborated. 3D printing is a procedure which creates a solid 3D object based on a previous digital model. It is obtained via a 3D printer, which lays down thin layers of material in order to form a perfect 3D replica of the computer model. Initially developed to plan living donor liver transplantation[12], an application is currently being found for it in liver surgery[13]. The main objective for the development of this physical liver model is to overcome the limitation of conventional 3D models and 2D images such as the absence of reliable liver surface markers, the difficult appreciation of depth, and difficulties in identifying liver segmentation as well as the relationships between vas-cular and biliary structures. Another advantage is the possi-bility to use the 3D-printed model during liver surgery, packing the prototype into a sterilized nylon bag[14], which allows to adjust the model to the surgical situation and the surgical field in order to obtain a better understanding.

REAL-TIME IMAGE FUSION FOR RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION

Radiofrequency is currently considered an important support for the surgical treatment of HCC or in some cases it is considered an alternative to surgical rese-ction[15]. This treatment is highly operator-dependent, especially for targeting, monitoring and controlling, as well as in cases of very small lesions in a pathological parenchyma. The development of a real-time image fusion system is based on the fusion of real-time sono-grams with images previously obtained on CT-scan or MR[15-23]. To obtain this image fusion, a probe is equipped with a magnetic sensor, which generates a magnetic field interfaced with previously stored images. This fusion could lead to the detection of small HCCs, with an extremely high tumor-targeting success rate of 90% to 100%[21-23]. Such encouraging results could improve the performance of RFA treatment for nodules, which could not be revealed by means of sonography. The development of this tool associated with a needle tracking system could be used to assess the efficiency of RFA, hence allowing for a 3D evaluation of the treated zone.

LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR HCC

Hepatic surgery still represents one of the most chal-lenging and technical procedures requiring considerable experience. Despite such difficulties, some pioneers in laparoscopic surgery described the first laparoscopic liver resection in 1993[24]. Initially considered a standard procedure for patients with a single and subcapsular lesion of less than 5 cm, located in the left liver or in the anterior sectors of the right liver, it currently represents a valid alternative to open surgery for major hepatectomies, as it is considered a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of malignant lesions[25]. Even if the diffusion of this minimally invasive approach has rapidly gained consensus, laparoscopic resection of pathological livers was considered contraindicated due to the quality of parenchyma and condition of patients. A continuous progression of surgical devices over the last decades has improved the diffusion and safety of these complex procedures. The development of an ultrasonic scalpel (Ultracision™, Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH, United States) allows for a bloodless dissection of liver parenchyma. The ultrasonic dissector (Dissectron, Satelec, Mérignac, France) allows to divide and identify pedicles before being divided and clipped. Large vas-cular elements were divided after being secured with Hem-o-lok™ clips. Hemostasis and biliostasis of small elements were performed using saline-assisted bipolar electrocautery. Automatic vascular staplers allow for a safer and quick division and suture of large vascular structures, thereby reducing technical difficulties of manual suturing of large vessels. A crucial role during laparoscopic hepatic resection is the one played by ultrasonography, as it is used to localize hepatic veins and portal pedicles, allowing for a continuous control during parenchymal transection to check for safety margins. All these improvements, associated with the enhanced postoperative management of patients and augmented surgical skills have allowed the development of laparoscopic liver resection on cirrhosis, becoming a gold standard for treatment of HCC[26]. Despite a strong association with augmented mortality and morbidity as compared to hepatic resection on non-pathological livers, liver resection guarantees several advantages, especially in the postoperative period[27-30], reducing blood loss, postoperative pain, abdominal wall infection, length of stay, and facilitating the surgical operation in case of future liver transplantation[31,32] due to a reduction of adhesions. As for non-pathological livers, and this is also true for HCC on cirrhosis, major hepatectomies, even associated with vascular resection[33], are feasible with similar morbidity and mortality rates[34].

ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR HCC

The development and diffusion of the da Vinci™ robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, United States) have introduced a novel approach in general surgery with an enormous potentiality of integration. The system is made up of a patient-site with four robotic operating arms and a surgeon-site equipped with a stereoscopic 3D camera. Using the robot, this system allows to replicate human hand movements with precise downscaling. As laparoscopy had reached a standardization in hepatobiliary surgery, difficult procedures could benefit from the integrated function of robotic surgery. The aim of robotic surgery is to improve clinical outcome. The two main limitations of laparoscopic surgery (visual and ergonomic limitations) have been totally overcome by the robotic system, allowing to perform advanced procedures with safety. Precise dissections could be achieved, due to the possibility of using articulated systems with seven degrees of freedom and advanced 3D views. Major limitations of robotic surgery include operating costs and lack of haptic feedback. Once this limitation is overcome, the diffusion will be faster, and more cases will be described in the literature. Currently, regarding HCC, few case series[35-39] are available and about 500 cases are described in the literature for liver malignant conditions. No benefits have been described as compared to lapar-oscopic surgery in terms of morbidity, mortality, and oncological results[35,38]. This is probably due to the shor-tage of series and of patients and will require further studies.

ROBOTIC AND DEVELOPMENT OF AUGMENTED REALITY

The advent of robotic surgery has allowed the integration of the da Vinci™ robotic surgical system using virtual reality. During the surgical procedure, the 3D model reconstruction could be superimposed with real-time model mobilization, with the possibility to selectively view biliary structures, portal veins, the arterial system, hepatic veins, and lesions. This fusion is defined as augmented reality. This technique, initially described by Pessaux et al[40], use different skin landmarks associated with intra-abdominal landmarks to obtain a computer-assisted fusion of the 3D model with a real-time stereo-scopic image of the operative field obtained via the 3D robotic camera. The superimposed image was used as a guide for the surgeon who, with the possibility to increase and decrease the transparency of the virtual model, could easily identify vascular structures as well as the correct localization of the lesion in order to obtain oncological resection margins. This modern era principle has found an application in other fields of surgery[40-44], with an extremely interesting application of the lesion initially detected on CT-scan or MRI but impossible to detect preoperatively with ultrasound, called missing lesions[45]. This superimposition of 3D model reconstruction of the first bi-dimensional imaging in which the lesion was available allows the robotic image to guide resection of the liver segment in which the lesion is supposed to be located, hence allowing to achieve satisfying oncological margins.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPLICATION OF FLUORESCENCE

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a non-toxic, non-radioac-tive and highly safe fluorophore with the capacity to appear green when excited by light in the near infrared spectrum. Historically used to predict liver failure[46], its elimination from blood depends on hepatic blood flow. Cellular uptake and biliary excretion are measured using the ICG-plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR). In case of augmented values of ICG-PDR[46,47], major hepatectomies could be contraindicated to prevent postoperative liver failure. Considering the integrtion of a fluorescence camera in the robotic da Vinci™ system and laparoscopic camera, fluorescence could be inte–grated in operative strategies during hepatectomies. Arteries and veins are the first structures to be visualized after venous injection of ICG (5-60 s), and this could allow for an easier recognition of anatomical variations and identification of structures in the hepatic hilum. After vascular capitation, approximately 45 to 60 min after injection, ICG accumulates in the liver and is secreted in the bile. This application could be valuable to prevent complications during difficult cholecystectomies[48], as it could allow to identify bile duct and cystic duct. In the future, it could well reduce the interest in using a perioperative cholangiogram, thereby reducing the exposure of patients to radiation.

Concerning the identification of liver neoplastic tissue, hemodynamic, metabolic and biliary excretion of ICG allow for the identification of tumoral parenchyma[49]. Poorly differentiated HCCs are characterized by a low capitation of the lesion with a fluorescent rim, due to a perilesional alteration of biliary excretion[50]. Well-differentiated HCCs have an intense fluorescent pattern[50]. This finding, as demonstrated for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, could allow to detect undetected lesions with previous conventional preoperative imag-ing[51], with a potentially significant impact on disease-free survival[52].

CONCLUSION

HCC still represent a challenge for the surgeon of the next era. Considering the rapid evolution and quick technological progress applied to surgery, additional solutions will be put forward to achieve lower morbidity and mortality rates, guaranteeing a more precise re-section, which will offer better oncological results. This progress, associated with progress in diagnosis[53], ad-vances in medical treatment, and an improvement of radiology and oncology will ensure a better future for our patients.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: de Santibañes E, Wang DS, Zhang ZM S- Editor: Gong ZM L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

References
1.  Lau WY. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:389-399.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Vibert E, Pittau G, Gelli M, Cunha AS, Jamot L, Faivre J, Castro Benitez C, Castaing D, Adam R. Actual incidence and long-term consequences of posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Surgery. 2014;155:94-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1545-1559.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Bégin A, Martel G, Lapointe R, Belblidia A, Lepanto L, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Vandenbroucke-Menu F. Accuracy of preoperative automatic measurement of the liver volume by CT-scan combined to a 3D virtual surgical planning software (3DVSP). Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3408-3412.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, Inoue K, Maruyama Y, Miyazaki A, Makuuchi M. Planning of anatomical liver segmen-tectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. Am J Surg. 2013;206:530-538.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunvén P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Ozaki H. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1990;107:521-527.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Theise ND. Liver stem cells: the fall and rise of tissue biology. Hepatology. 2003;38:804-806.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Franchi E, Canepa MC, Peloso A, Barbieri L, Briani L, Panyor G, Dionigi P, Maestri M. Two-stage hepatectomy after autologous CD133+ stem cells administration: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Fürst G, Schulte am Esch J, Poll LW, Hosch SB, Fritz LB, Klein M, Godehardt E, Krieg A, Wecker B, Stoldt V. Portal vein embolization and autologous CD133+ bone marrow stem cells for liver rege-neration: initial experience. Radiology. 2007;243:171-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  am Esch JS, Knoefel WT, Klein M, Ghodsizad A, Fuerst G, Poll LW, Piechaczek C, Burchardt ER, Feifel N, Stoldt V. Portal application of autologous CD133+ bone marrow cells to the liver: a novel concept to support hepatic rege-neration. Stem Cells. 2005;23:463-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Bellizzi A, Sebastian S, Ceglia P, Centonze M, Divella R, Manzillo EF, Azzariti A, Silvestris N, Montemurro S, Caliandro C. Co-expression of CD133(+)/CD44(+) in human colon cancer and liver metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:408-415.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD, Samaan M, Eghtesad B, Quintini C, Miller C, Yerian L, Klatte R. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver trans-plantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:1304-1310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Takagi K, Nanashima A, Abo T, Arai J, Matsuo N, Fukuda T, Nagayasu T. Three-dimensional printing model of liver for operative simulation in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatoga-stroenterology. 2014;61:2315-2316.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Igami T, Nakamura Y, Hirose T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Mizuno T, Mori K, Nagino M. Application of a three-dimensional print of a liver in hepatectomy for small tumors invisible by intraoperative ultrasonography: preliminary experience. World J Surg. 2014;38:3163-3166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Tiong L, Maddern GJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and disease recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1210-1224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Diana M, Halvax P, Mertz D, Legner A, Brulé JM, Robinet E, Mutter D, Pessaux P, Marescaux J. Improving Echo-Guided Procedures Using an Ultrasound-CT Image Fusion System. Surg Innov. 2015;22:217-222.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Makino Y, Imai Y, Igura T, Hori M, Fukuda K, Sawai Y, Kogita S, Fujita N, Takehara T, Murakami T. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:102-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Mauri G, Cova L, De Beni S, Ierace T, Tondolo T, Cerri A, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L. Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:143-151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Park HJ, Lee MW, Rhim H, Cha DI, Kang TW, Lim S, Song KD, Lim HK. Percutaneous ultrasonography-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas: usefulness of image fusion with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:387-394.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Toshikuni N, Tsutsumi M, Takuma Y, Arisawa T. Real-time image fusion for successful percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:2005-2010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Kawasoe H, Eguchi Y, Mizuta T, Yasutake T, Ozaki I, Shimonishi T, Miyazaki K, Tamai T, Kato A, Kudo S. Radio-frequency ablation with the real-time virtual sonography system for treating hepatocellular carcinoma difficult to detect by ultrasono-graphy. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2007;40:66-72.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Lee MW, Rhim H, Cha DI, Kim YJ, Choi D, Kim YS, Lim HK. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: fusion imaging guidance for management of lesions with poor conspicuity at conventional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:1438-1444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Nakai M, Sato M, Sahara S, Takasaka I, Kawai N, Minamiguchi H, Tanihata H, Kimura M, Takeuchi N. Radiofrequency ablation assisted by real-time virtual sonography and CT for hepatocellular carcinoma undetectable by conventional sonography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:62-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg. 2011;146:348-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Parks KR, Kuo YH, Davis JM, O’Brien B, Hagopian EJ. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:109-118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Memeo R, de’Angelis N, Compagnon P, Salloum C, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Azoulay D. Laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma of cirrhotic liver: a case-control study. World J Surg. 2014;38:2919-2926.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009;250:772-782.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopic major hepate-ctomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techni-ques. Ann Surg. 2013;257:205-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825-830.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Truant S, Bouras AF, Hebbar M, Boleslawski E, Fromont G, Dharancy S, Leteurtre E, Zerbib P, Pruvot FR. Laparoscopic resection vs. open liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3668-3677.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Cherqui D, Laurent A, Mocellin N, Tayar C, Luciani A, Van Nhieu JT, Decaens T, Hurtova M, Memeo R, Mallat A. Liver resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term survival and role of secondary liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:738-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Kluger MD, Memeo R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D. Survey of adult liver transplantation techniques (SALT): an international study of current practices in deceased donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:692-698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Morise Z, Kawabe N, Tomishige H, Nagata H, Kawase J, Arakawa S, Isetani M. How Far Can We Go with Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Laparoscopic Sectionectomy of the Liver Combined with the Resection of the Major Hepatic Vein Main Trunk. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:960752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Komatsu S, Brustia R, Goumard C, Perdigao F, Soubrane O, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepa-tocellular carcinoma: a matched pair analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015; Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205:697-702.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Smith MH, Flanagan CL, Kemppainen JM, Sack JA, Chung H, Das S, Hollister SJ, Feinberg SE. Computed tomography-based tissue-engineered scaffolds in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3:207-216.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Felli E, Santoro R, Colasanti M, Vennarecci G, Lepiane P, Ettorre GM. Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit. Updates Surg. 2015;67:27-32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: Current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:295-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Salloum C, Subar D, Memeo R, Tayar C, Laurent A, Malek A, Azoulay D. Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases. J Robot Surg. 2014;8:119-124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, Piardi T, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Towards cybernetic surgery: robotic and augmented reality-assisted liver segmentectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:381-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Hallet J, Soler L, Diana M, Mutter D, Baumert TF, Habersetzer F, Marescaux J, Pessaux P. Trans-thoracic minimally invasive liver resection guided by augmented reality. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:e55-e60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Marzano E, Piardi T, Soler L, Diana M, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Pessaux P. Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreatico-duodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1980-1983.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, Piardi T, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Robotic duodenopancreatectomy assisted with augmented reality and real-time fluorescence guidance. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2493-2498.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3:73-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Ntourakis D, Memeo R, Soler L, Marescaux J, Mutter D, Pessaux P. Augmented Reality Guidance for the Resection of Missing Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Initial Experience. World J Surg. 2016;40:419-426.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Hoekstra LT, de Graaf W, Nibourg GA, Heger M, Bennink RJ, Stieger B, van Gulik TM. Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review. Ann Surg. 2013;257:27-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Lee CF, Yu MC, Kuo LM, Chan KM, Jan YY, Chen MF, Lee WC. Using indocyanine green test to avoid post-hepatectomy liver dysfunction. Chang Gung Med J. 2007;30:333-338.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Calatayud D, Milone L, Elli EF, Giulianotti PC. ICG-fluorescence identification of a small aberrant biliary canaliculus during robotic cholecystectomy. Liver Int. 2012;32:602.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Daskalaki D, Aguilera F, Patton K, Giulianotti PC. Fluorescence in robotic surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:250-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Kokudo N, Ishizawa T. Clinical application of fluorescence imaging of liver cancer using indocyanine green. Liver Cancer. 2012;1:15-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  van der Vorst JR, Schaafsma BE, Hutteman M, Verbeek FP, Liefers GJ, Hartgrink HH, Smit VT, Löwik CW, van de Velde CJ, Frangioni JV. Near-infrared fluorescence-guided resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2013;119:3411-3418.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Murakami T, Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Bouvet M, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Improved disease-free survival and overall survival after fluorescence-guided surgery of liver metastasis in an orthotopic nude mouse model. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:119-124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Gnoni A, Santini D, Scartozzi M, Russo A, Licchetta A, Palmieri V, Lupo L, Faloppi L, Palasciano G, Memeo V. Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment over sorafenib: epigenetics, microRNAs and microenvironment. Is there a light at the end of the tunnel? Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19:1623-1635.  [PubMed]  [DOI]