Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 2003; 9(12): 2866-2869
Published online Dec 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2866
Table 1 Relations between MVD and TGF-β1 (under 400×)
Grade of TGF-β1 stainingn%MVDP value
+++~++2138.1823.22 ± 5.8< 0.01a
+916.3617.56 ± 7.2> 0.05b
-2545.4617.46 ± 3. 9< 0.01c
Total55100
Table 2 Relations between VEGF/MVD and clinical pathological parameters in colorectal carcinoma (under 100×)
Clinical pathological parametersCases (n)VEGFPx valueMVD (CD105)P value
Histological grade
Well differentiation118.50143.1
Moderate differentiation3822.28 ± 14.49> 0.05144.8 ± 31.9> 0.05
Poor differentiation521.89 ± 14.44146.4 ± 47.4
Infiltrating depth
Serous membrane (-)59.37 ± 4.79< 0.05119.0 ± 17.2= 0.05
Serous membrane (+)3922.55 ± 12.32150.0 ± 32.7
Lymph node metastasis
(-)2414.76 ± 9.62< 0.01126.3 ± 20.8< 0.01
(+)2027.31 ± 12.17167.7 ± 30.3
Dukes stage
A39.37 ± 4.79< 0.01119.0 ± 17.2< 0.01
B1617.00 ± 10.37129.3 ± 22.1
C and D2527.31 ± 12.16167.7 ± 30.3