Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1100-1115
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1100
Table 1 Worksheet for readers to use for interpretation of multidetector computed tomography post-processing images
Presence or absence of obstructionExternal hernias
Presence (≥ 2.5 cm)Bezoars/stones
Absence (< 2.5 cm)Vascular lesions
Severity of obstructionInflammatory lesions
Mild (2.5 to < 3 cm)Others (e.g., foreign body, abdominal cocoon, hematoma and so on)
Moderate (3 to < 4 cm)Findings of secondary bowel ischemia
Severe (≥ 4 cm)Main sings
Obstruction siteIncreased bowel wall attenuation
Proximal (duodenum to proximal jejunum)Decreased bowel wall enhancement
Middle (distal jejunum to mid-ileum)Vascular embolus/thrombosis
Distal (distal ileum)Vascular stenosis/occlusion
Multisegmental (more than one segment)Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas
CauseSecondary sings
AdhesionsBowel wall thickening
NeoplasmsIncreased bowel wall enhancement
IntussusceptionMesenteric fluid/haziness
NeoplasmsMesenteric vascular engorgement
Non-neoplasmsSmall bowel feces sign
VolvulusAscites
HerniasOthers (solid organ infarction, free gas and so on)
Internal herniasOther findings (fistula, leakage or perforation, pneumoperitoneum and so on)
Table 2 Use frequencies of multiple post-processing techniques in the protocol 3 n (%)
Assessment parameterReader 1Reader 2P-value
Presence or absence of SBO (n = 106)1 (0.9)2 (1.9)1.000
Severity (n = 106)00
Obstruction site
No (n = 16)1 (6.3)2 (12.5)1.000
Proximal (n = 9)00
Middle (n = 37)2 (5.4)1 (2.7)0.556
Distal (n = 44)3 (6.8)4 (9.1)0.694
Total (n = 106)6 (5.7)7 (6.6)1.000
Cause
No (n = 16)1 (6.3)2 (12.5)1.000
Adhesions (n = 20)2 (10.0)1 (5.0)0.548
Neoplasms (n = 11)1 (9.1)3 (27.3)0.269
Intussusception
Neoplasms (n = 9)2 (22.2)2 (22.2)1.000
Nonneoplasms (n = 5)3 (60.0)2 (40.0)0.527
Volvulus (n = 8)6 (75.0)7 (87.5)0.522
Hernias
Internal hernias (n = 6)6 (100)6 (100)1.000
External hernias (n = 9)1(11.1)2 (22.2)0.527
Bezoars/stones (n = 7)02 (28.6)0.127
Vascular lesions (n = 8)8 (100)8 (100)1.000
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7)1 (14.3)2 (28.6)0.515
Total (n = 106)31 (29.2)37 (34.9)0.377
Findings of secondary bowel ischemia
Increased bowel wall attenuation00
Decreased bowel wall enhancement00
Vascular embolus/thrombosis5 (4.7)5 (4.7)1.000
Vascular stenosis/occlusion18 (17)15 (14.2)0.570
Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas1 (0.9)2 (1.9)1.000
Bowel wall thickening00
Increased bowel wall enhancement00
Mesenteric haziness/fluid2 (1.9)00.477
Mesenteric vascular engorgement8 (7.5)10 (9.4)0.622
Small bowel feces sign00
Ascites00
Total (n = 106)34 (32.1)32 (30.2)0.767
Table 3 Average confidence scores among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction (n = 106)
Assessment parameterProtocol 1
Protocol 2
Protocol 3
P-value
Reader 1Reader 2P-valueReader 1Reader 2P-valueReader 1Reader 2P-value
Presence or absence of SBO
Presence4.8 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.60.0704.8 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.30.1034.9 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.40.1840.110
Absence4.6 ± 0.74.8 ± 0.60.2704.9 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.40.1644.7 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.30.1880.341
Severity of obstruction
No4.6 ± 0.74.8 ± 0.60.2704.9 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.40.1644.7 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.30.1880.341
Mild4.4 ± 0.74.5 ± 0.70.1624.8 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.4284.7 ± 0.64.6 ± 0.60.6660.753
Moderate4.8 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.40.3234.8 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.40.7104.7 ± 0.64.8 ± 0.40.1330.418
Severe4.9 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.40.3264.9 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.41.0004.9 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.40.6630.872
Obstruction site
Proximal4.4 ± 0.74.4 ± 0.51.0004.8 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.30.5944.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.6810.323
Middle4.2 ± 0.94.3 ± 0.80.0544.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.0584.4 ± 0.74.6 ± 0.60.7100.004b
Distal4.4 ± 1.04.5 ± 0.90.0834.7 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.5704.6 ± 0.64.6 ± 0.60.6600.221
Cause
Adhesions3.6 ± 0.83.7 ± 0.80.0834.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.4284.5 ± 0.64.6 ± 0.60.1630.001b
Neoplasms4.1 ± 0.74.2 ± 0.60.3414.9 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.40.5884.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.5880.001b
Intussusception
Neoplasms4.1 ± 1.14.2 ± 1.00.5944.9 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.40.5944.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.5940.019a
Nonneoplasms4.2 ± 0.84.0 ± 0.70.3744.8 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.41.0004.6 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.3740.029a
Volvulus4.4 ± 0.74.5 ± 0.80.3515.0 ± 0.04.9 ± 0.40.3514.6 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.50.5980.041a
Hernias
Internal hernias3.3 ± 1.43.5 ± 1.00.6114.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.6114.3 ± 0.84.5 ± 0.50.6950.002b
External hernias4.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.70.3474.9 ± 0.35.0 ± 0.00.3474.9 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.31.0000.054
Bezoars/stones4.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.3565.0 ± 0.04.9 ± 0.40.3564.9 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.50.3560.492
Vascular lesions3.2 ± 1.33.3 ± 1.10.5944.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.5944.4 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.50.6810.001b
Inflammatory lesions3.9 ± 1.34.1 ± 1.10.3564.7 ± 0.54.4 ± 0.50.1724.3 ± 1.04.4 ± 0.50.6040.581
Findings of secondary bowel ischemia
Increased bowel wall attenuation4.4 ± 0.54.5 ± 0.50.5394.7 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.51.0004.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.6640.819
Decreased bowel wall enhancement4.5 ± 0.54.4 ± 0.50.5724.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.5364.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.7210.282
Vascular embolus/thrombosis4.0 ± 0.94.1 ± 1.00.5984.9 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.50.5984.6 ± 0.54.5 ± 0.50.5980.010a
Vascular stenosis/occlusion3.8 ± 0.83.9 ± 0.90.5034.8 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.50.2654.4 ± 0.54.5 ± 0.60.5740.001b
Pneumatosis/portomesenteric gas4.1 ± 0.34.3 ± 0.70.4474.4 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.40.0814.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.6810.814
Bowel wall thickening4.5 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.3214.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.1094.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.2540.059
Increased bowel wall enhancement4.6 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.2314.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.1614.8 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.50.5360.441
Mesenteric haziness/fluid4.3 ± 0.64.3 ± 0.60.5714.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.2924.6 ± 0.54.7 ± 0.50.5710.003b
Mesenteric vascular engorgement4.2 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.60.7484.8 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.40.4944.7 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.40.7160.001b
Small-bowel feces sign4.4 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.60.3294.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.5764.5 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.60.4280.748
Ascites4.7 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.50.5834.9 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.40.6714.8 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.50.5830.848
Table 4 Inter- and intra-reader agreement (κ value) among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction
Assessment parameterInter-reader agreement
Intra-reader agreement
Protocol 1
Protocol 2
Protocol 3
Reader 1
Reader 2
Reader 1-2Reader 1-2Reader 1-2Protocol 1-2Protocol 1-3Protocol 2-3Protocol 1-2Protocol 1-3Protocol 2-3
Presence or absence of SBO (n = 106)0.9020.8970.9660.8660.9020.9640.9330.8970.967
Severity of obstruction (n = 106)0.8680.8690.8940.8300.8820.8950.8810.9070.921
Obstruction site (n = 106)0.8730.9260.9250.8550.8900.9250.9080.8700.963
Cause
No (n = 16)0.9020.8970.9660.8660.9020.9640.9330.8970.967
Adhesions (n = 20)0.7250.8200.8200.7250.7860.7590.8200.8201.000
Neoplasms (n = 11)0.9461.0000.9460.9460.9461.0001.0000.9460.946
Intussusception
Neoplasms (n = 9)0.9270.9350.9350.8630.9270.9350.8630.9350.935
Nonneoplasms (n = 5)0.7380.8830.8830.8830.7380.8830.7380.8830.883
Volvulus (n = 8)0.9270.9270.9270.8450.9270.9271.0000.9270.927
Hernias
Internal hernias (n = 6)0.5540.9030.7880.7890.6490.9030.7390.7391.000
External hernias (n = 9)0.9350.9351.0000.9351.0000.9350.9350.9351.000
Bezoars/stones (n = 7)0.9170.9171.0000.9171.0000.9170.9170.9171.000
Vascular lesions (n = 8)0.5540.9270.7510.5220.4190.8450.5180.7110.845
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7)0.3710.5860.6370.4440.4110.6370.3630.3330.751
Total (n = 106)0.7330.8610.8480.7480.7600.8480.7720.7970.924
Presence or absence of secondary bowel ischemia (n = 106)0.5720.8630.8400.6750.6450.7950.6900.6960.863
Table 5 Detection rates for assessment parameters among three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction n (%)
Assessment parameterProtocol 1
Protocol 2
Protocol 3
P-value
Reader 1Reader 2P-valueReader 1Reader 2P-valueReader 1Reader 2P-value
Presence or absence of SBO
Presence (n = 90)85 (94.4)87 (96.7)0.46989 (98.9)87 (96.7)0.31288 (97.8)88 (97.8)1.0000.378
Absence (n = 16)15 (93.8)14 (87.5)0.54415 (93.8)16 (100)0.31015 (93.8)16 (100)0.3100.430
Obstruction site
No (n = 16)15 (93.8)14 (87.5)0.54415 (93.8)16 (100)0.31015 (93.8)16 (100)0.3100.430
Proximal (n = 9)8 (88.9)7 (77.8)0.5279 (100)8 (88.9)0.3038 (88.9)8 (88.9)1.0000.570
Middle (n = 37)34 (91.9)33 (89.2)0.69134 (91.9)35 (94.6)0.64335 (94.6)34 (91.9)0.6430.775
Distal (n = 44)40 (90.9)41 (93.2)0.69443 (97.7)43 (97.7)1.00042 (95.5)43 (97.7)0.5570.160
Total (n = 106)97 (91.5)95 (89.6)1.000101 (95.3)102 (96.2)1.000100 (94.3)101 (95.3)1.0000.129
Cause
No (n = 16)15 (93.8)14 (87.5)0.54415 (93.8)16 (100)0.31015 (93.8)16 (100)0.3100.430
Adhesions (n = 20)18 (90.0)19 (95.0)0.54819 (95.0)20 (100)0.31119 (95.0)20 (100)0.3110.434
Neoplasms (n = 11)10 (90.9)11 (100)0.30611 (100)11 (100)1.00011 (100)10 (90.9)0.3060.597
Intussusception
Neoplasms (n = 9)7 (77.8)8 (88.9)0.5279 (100)8 (88.9)0.3038 (88.9)9 (100)0.3030.414
Nonneoplasms (n = 5)4 (80.0)4 (80.0)1.0005 (100)4 (80.0)0.2924 (80.0)5 (100)0.2920.749
Volvulus (n = 8)7 (87.5)8 (100)0.3027 (87.5)8 (100)0.3028 (100)7 (87.5)0.3021.000
Hernias
Internal hernias (n = 6)4 (66.7)3 (50.0)0.5586 (100)5 (83.3)0.2965 (83.3)5 (83.3)1.0000.045a
External hernias (n = 9)9 (100)8 (88.9)0.3038 (88.9)9 (100)0.3039 (100)9 (100)1.0000.595
Bezoars/stones (n = 7)7 (100)6 (85.7)0.2996 (85.7)7 (100)0.2997 (100)7 (100)1.0000.592
Vascular lesions (n = 8)3 (37.5)4 (50.0)0.6148 (100)7 (87.5)0.3026 (75.0)7 (87.5)0.5220.004b
Inflammatory lesions (n = 7)6 (85.7)6 (85.7)1.0006 (85.7)5 (71.4)0.5156 (85.7)5 (71.4)0.5150.857
Total (n = 106)90 (84.9)91 (85.8)1.000100 (94.3)100 (94.3)1.00098 (92.5)100 (94.3)1.0000.001b
Presence or absence of secondary bowel ischemia
Presence (n = 38)28 (73.7)27 (71.1)1.00036 (94.7)35 (92.1)0.64434 (89.5)36 (94.7)0.3950.001b
Absence (n = 68)65 (95.6)67 (98.5)0.30865 (95.6)66 (97.1)0.64766 (97.1)65 (95.6)0.6470.928
Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of three protocols for assessment of small bowel obstruction
Assessment parameterProtocol 1
Protocol 2
Protocol 3
Reader 1Reader 2Reader 1Reader 2Reader 1Reader 2
Presence or absence of SBO
Sensitivity94.4%96.7%98.9%96.7%97.8%97.8%
Specificity93.8%87.5%93.8%100%93.8%100%
PPV98.8%97.8%98.9%100%98.9%100%
NPV75.0%82.4%93.8%84.2%88.2%88.9%
Accuracy94.3%95.3%98.1%97.2%97.2%98.1%
Obstruction site
Sensitivity94.3%96.4%98.9%96.6%97.7%97.7%
Specificity78.9%63.6%78.9%94.1%78.9%84.2%
PPV95.3%91.0%95.6%98.9%95.5%96.6%
NPV75.0%82.4%93.8%84.2%88.2%88.9%
Accuracy91.5%89.6%95.3%96.2%94.3%95.3%
Cause
Sensitivity93.8%96.3%98.8%96.6%97.6%97.7%
Specificity57.7%53.8%75.0%84.2%71.4%80.0%
PPV87.2%86.5%94.4%96.6%93.3%95.5%
NPV75.0%82.4%93.8%84.2%88.2%88.9%
Accuracy84.9%85.8%94.3%94.2%92.5%94.3%
Secondary bowel ischemia
Sensitivity73.7%71.1%94.7%92.1%89.5%94.7%
Specificity95.6%98.5%95.6%97.1%97.1%95.6%
PPV90.3%96.4%92.3%94.6%94.4%92.3%
NPV86.7%85.9%97%95.7%94.3%97%
Accuracy87.7%88.7%95.3%95.3%94.3%95.3%