Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2019; 25(16): 1986-1996
Published online Apr 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i16.1986
Table 1 Quantitative parameters [median (P25, P75)] for metastatic vs non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
ParameterMetastatic (group P)Non-metastatic (group N)P-value
Maximal short axis diameter (cm)1.25 (0.90, 1.80)0.60 (0.50, 0.80)< 0.001
IC (mg/mL)AP10.46 (9.41, 11.36)8.64 (7.62, 9.82)< 0.001
PP22.70 (19.08, 26.35)13.26 (9.91, 16.26)< 0.001
DP19.03 (16.18, 21.34)14.09 (12.14, 15.71)< 0.001
NICAP0.12 (0.10, 0.13)0.08 (0.06, 0.11)< 0.001
PP0.54 (0.37, 0.82)0.10 (0.07, 0.18)< 0.001
DP0.57 (0.49, 0.77)0.34 (0.23, 0.44)< 0.001
λHUAP0.64 (0.57, 0.73)0.49 (0.41, 0.58)< 0.001
PP1.53 (1.26, 1.90)0.87 (0.60, 0.94)< 0.001
DP1.30 (1.15, 1.74)0.85 (0.71, 1.40)< 0.001
Table 2 Quantitative parameters [median (P25, P75)] for lymph nodes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with active vs non-active hepatitis
Metastatic
P-valueNon-metastatic
P-value
Active hepatitis (group P1)Non-active hepatitis (group P2)Active hepatitis (group N1)Non-active hepatitis (group N2)
Maximal short axis diameter (cm)1.50 (1.12, 2.00)1.40 (0.90, 1.70)0.0580.70 (0.58, 0.90)0.60 (0.50, 0.78)0.083
IC (mg/mL)AP10.12 (7.63, 12.87)11.02 (8.40, 13.68)0.8999.07 (6.35, 11.53)7.73 (5.46, 9.58)0.099
PP20.75 (18.40, 24.28)18.83 (14.95, 21.31)0.64715.03(10.21, 18.02)13.82 (10.40, 19.05)0.001
DP14.19 (11.59, 17.47)13.49 (10.53, 18.77)0.79319.65 (14.47, 22.62)18.03 (13.78, 21.13)0.908
NICAP0.12 (0.08, 0.15)0.11 (0.08, 0.14)0.2690.10 (0.07, 0.12)0.10 (0.07, 0.13)0.598
PP0.39 (0.27, 0.51)0.34 (0.26, 0.43)0.1650.31 (0.23, 0.39)0.19 (0.16, 0.26)0.013
DP0.55 (0.42, 0.68)0.51 (0.43, 0.65)0.7850.40 (0.35, 0.56)0.35 (0.25, 0.44)0.647
λHUAP0.62 (0.48, 0.82)0.70 (0.53, 0.84)0.1950.49 (0.35, 0.64)0.57 (0.40, 0.73)0.161
PP1.45 (1.15, 1.67)1.38 (0.89, 1.43)0.730.95 (0.65, 1.16)0.80 (0.68, 1.19)0.002
DP1.23 (0.90, 1.44)1.17 (1.01, 1.33)0.8120.91 (0.75, 1.11)0.87 (0.66, 1.12)0.726
Table 3 Cut-off values, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of dual-energy computed tomography for metastatic vs non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
ParameterAUCCut-off valueSensitivity, %Specificity, %
Maximal short axis diameter(cm)0.8830.95073.388.7
IC (mg/mL)AP0.6979.84568.672.0
PP0.90218.06081.982.4
DP0.75516.00573.676.9
NICAP0.7560.10672.873.9
PP0.9180.27283.984.1
DP0.8360.46774.579.2
λHUAP0.7550.58273.875.6
PP0.8891.09881.884.1
DP0.8361.07778.179.0
Diameter + λHU (PP)0.945Combined diagnosis in parallel86.289.8
Diameter + IC (PP)0.88484.583.0
Diameter + NIC (PP)0.96086.993.6