Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2017; 23(5): 876-884
Published online Feb 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i5.876
Table 1 Association between demographics and hepatitis B surface antigen status among relatives of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma n (%)
CategoryHBsAg
OR (95%CI)Adjusted OR (95%CI)1
PositiveNegative
Total family members314415
Sex
Male171 (54.46)196 (47.23)1.25 (0.97-1.61)
Female143 (45.54)219 (52.77)
Index sex
Male229 (72.93)302 (72.77)1.07 (0.70-1.62)1.25 (0.97-1.60)
Female85 (27.07)113 (27.23)
Age, mean ± SD40.49 ± 10.8937.87 ± 11.691.01 (1.00-1.03)1.28 (1.00-1.64)
Relation to index
Parent10 (3.18)20 (4.82)0.78 (0.37-1.64)0.81 (0.38-1.71)
Index generation86 (27.39)36 (8.67)3.89 (2.32-6.51)a3.97 (2.38-6.63)a
Child206 (65.61)347 (83.61)
Grandchild12 (3.82)12 (2.89)1.43 (0.66-3.13)1.39 (0.65-3.00)
Maternal HBsAg
Negative86 (27.38)244 (58.80)
Positive129 (41.08)53 (12.77)5.03 (3.16-8.01)a5.00 (3.13-7.97)a
Unknown99 (31.53)118 (28.43)2.01 (1.30-3.38)a2.04 (1.33-3.13)a
Index HBsAg2
Negative48 (15.43)203 (49.03)
Positive263 (84.57)211 (50.97)5.57 (3.56-8.71)a5.51 (3.53-8.61)a
Table 2 Multivariate analyses using generalized estimating equation to find predictive factors for hepatitis B surface antigen status
FactorItemOR (95%CI)P value
SexMale1.26 (0.94-1.70)
Index sexMale1.28 (0.78-2.10)
Age1.03 (1.01-1.05)0.0037
Relation to indexParent0.24 (0.09-0.69)0.0076
Index generation2.25 (1.29-3.94)0.0044
Grandchild2.06 (0.78-5.45)
Maternal HBsAgPositive2.65 (1.51-4.67)0.0007
Unknown1.21 (0.72-2.03)
Index HBsAgPositive4.19 (2.50-7.04)5.98 × 10-8
Table 3 Association between demographics and hepatitis B virus viral load in 303 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive relatives n (%)
FactorHBV DNA
OR (95%CI)P valueAdjusted OR (95% CI)1P value
≥ 100000 cps/mL< 100000 cps/mL
Total family members132171
Sex
Male84 (63.64)79 (46.20)2.12 (1.34-3.39)0.0013
Female48 (36.36)92 (53.80)
Index sex
Male99 (75)121 (70.76)1.83 (0.69-2.04)1.17 (0.68-2.01)
Female33 (25)50 (29.24)
Age, mean ± SD40.51 ± 12.1839.15 ± 10.551.01 (0.99-1.03)1.02 (0.99-1.04)
Relation to index
Child and grandchild83 (62.88)128 (74.85)
Parent7 (5.30)2 (1.17)4.77 (1.12-20.31)0.03484.57 (1.15-18.14)0.0307
Index generation42 (31.82)41 (23.98)1.51 (0.87-2.62)0.64 (0.36-1.14)
Maternal HBsAg
Negative33 (25)51 (29.82)
Positive61 (46.21)64 (37.43)1.55 (0.84-2.87)1.57 (0.84-2.92)
Unknown38 (28.79)56 (32.75)1.08 (0.57-2.06)1.20 (0.62-2.33)
Index HBsAg
Negative12 (9.16)32 (18.93)
Positive119 (90.84)137 (81.07)2.32 (1.13-4.76)0.02212.47 (1.19-5.15)0.0158
HBV genotype20.0017
N32 (1.53)21 (12.88)0.11 (0.03-0.44)0.09 (0.02-0.39)0.0011
B97 (74.62)120 (73.62)
C31 (23.85)22 (13.50)1.71(0.94-3.14)0.0081.80 (0.97-3.36)0.0640
Table 4 Multivariate analyses using generalized estimating equation to find predictive factors for hepatitis B virus viral load
FactorItemOR (95%CI)P value
SexMale2.65 (1.51-4.64)0.0007
Index sexMale1.47 (0.73-2.95)
Age1.01 (0.98-1.03)
Relation to indexParent6.49 (1.13-37.27)0.0359
Index generation1.19 (0.60-2.37)
Maternal HBsAgPositive1.50 (0.71-3.17)
Unknown1.02 (0.49-2.15)
Index HBsAgPositive1.51 (0.68-3.38)
HBV genotypeN0.12 (0.03-0.56)0.0066
C1.22 (0.59-2.51)
Table 5 Intra-family comparison of hepatitis B virus viral load among hepatitis B surface antigen-positive siblings n (%)
HBV DNA level1Maternal HBsAg
Total
PositiveUnknownNegative
Total male siblings129728
All high level7 (58.33)22 (22.22)2 (28.57)11 (39.3)3
All low level1 (8.33)22 (22.22)1 (14.29)4 (14.3)3
Older > younger3 (25.00)3 (33.33)3 (42.86)9 (32.1)
Younger > older1 (8.33)1 (11.11)1 (14.29)3 (10.7)
Other0 (0.00)1 (11.11)0 (0.00)1 (3.6)
Total female siblings113418
All high level2 (18.18)20 (0.00)0 (0.00)2 (11.1)3
All low level6 (54.55)21 (33.33)3 (75.00)10 (55.6)3
Older > younger1 (9.09)1 (33.33)0 (0.00)2 (11.1)
Younger > older1 (9.09)0 (0.00)1 (25.00)2 (11.1)
Other1 (9.09)1 (33.33)0 (0.00)2 (11.1)