Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2017; 23(23): 4293-4302
Published online Jun 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4293
Table 1 Characteristics of patients
Characteristics
Sex (male/female), no.31/24
Age (yr)72.56 ± 10.67
BMI (kg/m2)24.42 ± 72.56
Comorbidity, n (%)35 (66.04)
ASA score, n
I8
II19
III28
IV0
Tumor location, n
Lower third12
Middle third30
Upper third13
Table 2 Operative results
Outcomes
Overall operative time, min354.21 ± 68.8
Incision for specimen extraction, n
Right McBurney incision55
length of minilaparotomy, cm5 (4-6)
Intraoperative blood loss, Ml126.55 ± 73
Intraoperative morbidity, n0
Intraoperative Mortality, n0
Conversion, n0
Extent of lymphadenectomy, n
D10
D1+5
D250
Table 3 Clinical outcomes during hospitalization and complications
Outcomes
Time to peristalsis, d1 (1-3)1
Time to resume liquid diet, d2 (2-5)1
Time to resume solid intake, d3 (3-6)1
Length of hospital stay, d5 (3-17)1
Postoperative 30-d complications, n0
Reoperations, n0
30-d mortality, n0
Table 4 Histopathological data
Outcomes
Diameter of the tumor, cm4.25 (1-8)1
Proximal margin, cm6 (2-11)1
Number of harvested lymph nodes, n35 (15-47)1
TNM staging, n (%)
Stage 00
Stage IA8 (14.55)
Stage IB9 (16.37)
Stage IIA12 (21.82)
Stage IIB11 (20.00)
Stage IIIA7 (12.72)
Stage IIIB6 (10.91)
Stage IIIC2 (3.63)
Stage IV0
Residual tumor, n
R055
R10
R20
Table 5 Literature review on robotic total gastrectomy, overall number of reported cases
YearTypeSubjectCountryInstitutionPeriodNo.
Present study2017Prospective CSRTGItalySt. Mary’s Hospital of Terni2014-201655
Jiang et al[24]2015Retrospective CSRAGChinaNanjing University Medical College2010-201265
Kim et al[14]2012nonRCTRAG vs LG vs OGSouth KoreaYonsei University College of Medicine2005-2010109
Son et al[15]2014nonRCTRTG vs LTG
2005-201051
Woo et al[11]2011nonRCTRAG vs LG2005-200962
Song et al[7]2009Prospective CSRAG2005-200733
Park et al[20]2013Retrospective CSRAGSouth KoreaNational Cancer Center2009-201246
Yoon et al[17]2012nonRCTRTG vs LTG
2009-201136
Kang et al[13]2012nonRCTRAG vs LGSouth KoreaAjou University School of Medicine2008-201116
Hur et al[8]2010Retrospective CSRAG20102
Hyun et al[18]2013nonRCTRAG vs LGSouth KoreaKorea University Anam Hospital2009-20109
Son et al[15]2012nonRCTRAG vs LGSouth KoreaSeoul University Bundang Hospital2007-20111
Junfeng et al[21]2014nonRCTRAG vs LGChinaThird Military Medical University2010-201326
Liu et al[19]2013Prospective CSRAGChinaSubei People's Hospital of Jiangsu2011-201354
Giulianotti et al[25]2003Retrospective CSRAGItalyMisericordia Hospital of Grosseto2000-200210
Coratti et al[26]2015Retrospective CSRAGItaly2000-201438
D'Annibale et al[10]2011Retrospective CSRAGItalyS. Giovanni Addolorata Hospital2004-200911
Caruso et al[9]2011nonRCTRAG vs OGItalyHospital of Spoleto2006-201012
Suda et al[23]2014nonRCTRAG vs LGJapanFujita Health University2009-201230
Huang et al[12]2012nonRCTRAG vs LG vs OGTaiwanTaipei Veterans General Hospital2010-20127
Vasilescu et al[16]2012Retrospective CSRAGRomaniaFundeni Clinical Institute2008-201219
Zawadzki et al[27]2014CRRAGPolandWroclaw Medical University20141
Parisi et al[5]2015Prospective CSRTGItalySt. Mary’s Hospital of Terni2014-201522
Total1466
Table 6 Literature review on robotic total gastrectomy, details of the reported data
Robot - Assistance
TypeE-J anastomosisAnastomosis performanceSite of minilaparotomyOperative and clinical dataPatients and tumor details
LymphadenectomyStomach mobilizationReconstruction
Jiang et al[24]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerNot providedProvidedProvided
PerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnNot provided
Kim et al[14]Not providedNot providedNot providedRoux-en-YNot providedNot providedNot providedLackLack
Son et al[15]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerUpper midlineProvidedProvided
Roux-en-YINTRA LAPCircular staplerLeft lower port
Woo et al[11]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRANot providedNot providedLackLack
Roux-en-YINTRA LAPNot providedNot provided
Song et al[7]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerUpper midlineLackLack
Roux-en-YINTRA LAPCircular staplerNot provided
Park et al[20]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRANot providedUpper midlineProvidedLack
Yoon et al[17]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerNot providedProvidedProvided
Kang et al[13]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerUpper midlineLackLack
PerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnNot provided
Hur et al[8]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnNot providedLackLack
Hyun et al[18]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerUpper midlineLackLack
Not providedRoux-en-YINTRANot providedUmbilical port
Son et al[15]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRANot providedNot providedLackLack
Junfeng et al[21]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YEXTRACircular staplerUpper midlineProvidedProvided
Liu et al[19]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnCamera portLackLack
Giulianotti et al[25]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRACircular staplerNot providedLackLack
Coratti et al[26]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnNot providedProvidedProvided
D'Annibale et al[10]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRACircular staplerSuprapubicLackLack
Caruso et al[9]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRACircular staplerUpper midlineLackLack
Suda et al[23]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRALinear staplerNot providedProvidedProvided
Huang et al[12]PerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRA LAPCircular staplerPeriumbilicalLackLack
Vasilescu et al[16]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRACircular staplerNot providedLackLack
Parisi et al[5]PerformedPerformedPerformedRoux-en-YINTRARobot-sewnMcBurneyProvidedProvided