Frontier
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2016; 22(3): 906-916
Published online Jan 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.906
Table 1 Summary of selected clinical studies of bisphosphonates in digestive cancers
Study DesignCancer typePopulationTherapyMain Findings
Prospective studies
Phase I pilotEsophagus, gastricAdvanced diseaseIMAB362 + ZA +/- IL-2Ongoing
(NCT01671774)Claudin 18.2 expression+
Phase IPancreasn = 23 with resectable diseaseZA once pre-op, and twice post-opMedian/1 yr/2 yr OS:
18 mo/86%/33%
Median/1 yr/2 yr PFS:
12 mo/27%/9%
No improvement
Phase IIHCCAdvanced diseaseSorafenib + ZAOngoing
(NCT01259193)
Observational studies
Restricted open cohort study[15]ColorectalRegion: Denmark 30505 postmenopausal female BP users matched 1:4 BP non-usersAlendronateAlendronate associated with decreased incidence (HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.6-0.79), risk of death (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.52-0.72) and longer survival (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.7-0.97, P < 0.05)1
Systematic review and meta-analysis[16]ColorectalCountry: variousAlendronate, pamidronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronate, ZASignificant decrease in cancer incidence (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.90)
20001 cancer cases
392106 patients total
Case control[17]ColorectalCountry: IsraelAny oral BP (95% alendronate)BP use > 1 yr associated with significant decrease in cancer risk (RR = 0.5, 95%CI:I 0.35-0.71)2
Postmenopausal women
933 cancer cases matched 1:1 with controls without cancer
Case control[46]Esophagus, gastricCountry: United KingdomAny BP except pamidronate and ibandronateEsophagus cancer risk significantly higher in female BP users than non-users (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.18-1.72)3
8636 cancer cases matched 1:4 with controls without cancerHigher risk with alendronate
No difference in gastric cancer risk
Nested case control[47]Esophagus, gastric, colorectalCountry: United KingdomAny oral BP
15613 cancer cases matched 1:5 with controls without cancerRx for BP associated with significant increase in risk of esophagus (RR = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.02-1.66, P = 0.02) but not gastric or colorectal cancer4
Matched cohort[48]Esophagus, gastricCountry: DenmarkHighest risk: ≥ 10 Rx, ≥ 3 yr
History of fractureAny oral BP85 cancer cases total
13678 cases who filled BP Rx matched 1:2 with controls who did not fill BP Rx(alendronate > etidronate > ibandronate, risedronate, clodronate)BP use associated with significantly decreased risk of esophagus cancer (HR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.14-0.85, P = 0.02)5 No effect on gastric cancer risk
Matched cohort[49]Esophagus, gastricCountry: United KingdomAny oral BP207 cancer cases total
41826 cases Rx BP matched 1:1 with controls not Rx BPNo increase in risk of esophagus or gastric cancer. Risk not affected by NBP vs non-NBP, duration of use, history of GERD6
Nested matched case control[50]EsophagusCountry: United StatesEtidronate, tiludronate,< 2% of cases and controls filled Rx for BP
History of Barrett’s esophagusalendronate, ibandronate, risedronateNon-significant association between BP
116 with cancer matched 1:6 with controls without canceruse and esophagus cancer risk (incidence density ratio 0.92, 95%CI: 0.21-4.15)7
Nested case control using 2 datasets[51]Esophagus, gastric, colorectalCountry: United Kingdom 55952 cancer cases matched 1:5 with controls without cancerAlendronate, etidronate, ibandronate, risedronateBP use not associated with risk of esophagus or colorectal cancer Short but not long term alendronate associated with increased risk of gastric cancer (OR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.34-2.72, P < 0.001) in one dataset8
Case control[52]EsophagusCountry: TaiwanAlendronate, risedronate,No relationship between BP use and esophagus cancer risk
16204 cancer cases matched 1:4 with controls without cancerclodronate, etidronateInverse relationship between esophagus cancer risk and BP duration and frequency of use
Meta-analysis observational data[53]EsophagusCountry: various 3778 cancer cases 173612 BP users 483797 BP non-usersIbandronate, etidronate, clodronate, zoledronate, pamidronate, alendronateNo association between BP use and esophagus cancer risk
Cohort study[55]Esophagus, gastricCountry: United States 1.64 million patients > 68 yr old with history of osteoporosis and/or BP useAny oral BPNo association between BP use and esophagogastric cancer risk9
2308 cancer cases
624840 BP users
Meta-analysis of observational data[56]Esophagus, gastric, colorectalCountry: various 16662 cancer casesAny oral BPNo significant association between BP use and overall digestive cancer risk
79379 controls without cancer
Meta-analysis of observational data[61]ColorectalCountry: various 63363 cancer cases 200047 BP usersAny oral BPNo significant change or borderline significant decrease in risk of colorectal cancer
1038526 BP non-users
Case series[70]HCCCountry: Italy n = 15 patients with boneZADecreased pain score and analgesic requirements
metastases, heavily pre-treatedMedian OS 10 mo
Retrospective cohort study[73]HCCCountry: Japan n = 31 patients with bone metastases treated with radiation, 12 also received ZAZASignificant decrease in 6-mo time to pain progression of radiated (0% vs 34%, P = 0.045) and non-irradiated (20% vs 66%, P = 0.005) bone metastases Significant decrease in 3-mo radiographic progression rate of non-irradiated bone metastases (29% vs 91%, P = 0.009)