Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 5049-5055
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5049
Table 1 Summary of included studies
Ref.YearSurgical techniqueMedian FU (mo)RecurrenceConstipation (improvement-worsening/new on set)Incontinence (improvement-worsening)Conversion and morbidity
Formijne Jonkers et al[12]2014Laparoscopic420159%-W 25%172%1 conversion (injury of small bowel), 1 ileus, 2 myocardial infarctions
Germain et al[13]2014Robotic51.813167%-W 14%182%3 conversions (adhesion, rectal tear, presacral hemorrhage)
van Geluwe et al[14]2013Laparoscopic25.34.6171%-W 2.3%184%8 conversions (5 adhesiolysis, 3 bleeding), 23 UTI, 2 ileus, 9 hematomas, 6 cardiac problems, 1 bowel perforation, 1 examination under anesthesia, 1 secondary adhesiolysis, 1 strangulation, 5 mesh erosions, 5 port site
Gosselink et al[15]2013Laparoscopic12NSW 8%174%-W 11%7 urinary retentions, 1 UTI, 1 port site infection, 1 mesh erosion
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen et al[16]2013Laparoscopic (50%) Robotic (50%)32.5W 2.5%W 2.5%1 conversion (bleeding), 1 vaginal perforation, 1 wound infection
Faucheron et al[17]2012Laparoscopic753NANA2 brachial plexus palsy, 3 UTI, 1 ureteral lesion, 1 small bowel perforation, 1 mesh erosion
Wijffels et al[18]2011Laparoscopic233NANA1 myocardial infarction, 1 small bowel obstruction, 1 wound infection, 3 port site infections, 1 UTI, 1 chest infection