Original Article
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2014; 20(45): 17037-17048
Published online Dec 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17037
Table 1 Performance of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 staining in distinguishing progressors from non-progressors
Using TRAP1 expression in different histologic grades as a biomarker (n)Controls (n)AUC valueSensitivity at
90% specificity80% specificity
LGD (29)Non-progressors (38)0.8669%79%
HGD (14)Non-progressors (38)0.9786%100%
Cancer (17)Non-progressors (38)0.8782%88%
Progressor rectal tissue (39)Non-progressors (38)0.7141%59%
Highest TRAP1 in dysplasia (36)Non-progressors (38)0.9486%94%
Highest overall TRAP1 (42)Non-progressors (38)0.8876%83%
Table 2 Expression pattern of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 among different histologic grades within each progressor
Progressor caseHighest histologic grade present in the progressorRectumLGDHGDCA
1LGD--NANA
2LGD--NANA
3LGD--NANA
4LGD--NANA
5LGD++NANA
6LGD--NANA
7LGD++NANA
8LGD--NANA
9LGD--NANA
10LGD++NANA
11LGD++NANA
12LGD--NANA
13LGD++NANA
14LGD--NANA
15LGD--NANA
16LGD--NANA
17LGD++NANA
18LGD++NANA
19LGD++NANA
20HGD++NANA
21HGD--NANA
22HGD+++NA
23HGD+++NA
24HGD+++NA
25CA--++
26CA++++
27CA++++
28CANANANA+
29CA--+-
30CA++++
31CA+++NA
32CA--NA-
33CA++NA+
34CANANA++
35CANANANA+
36CA++++
37CA++++
38CA++NA+
39CA++++
40CA++NA+
41CA++++
42CA++NA+