Jung JI, Kim GH, I H, Park DY, Kim TK, Cho YH, Sung YW, Choi MK, Lee BE, Song GA. Clinicopathologic factors influencing the accuracy of EUS for superficial esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6322-6328 [PMID: 24876754 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6322]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Gwang Ha Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan 602-739, South Korea. doc0224@pusan.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6322-6328 Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6322
Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of 114 superficial esophageal carcinomas n (%)
Characteristics
No. of lesions
Location
Upper esophagus
18 (15.8)
Mid-esophagus
72 (63.2)
Lower esophagus
24 (21.1)
Histologic type
Squamous cell carcinoma
108 (94.7)
Adenocarcinoma
3 (2.6)
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
3 (2.6)
Differentiation degree
Well differentiated
43 (37.7)
Moderately differentiated
61 (53.5)
Poorly differentiated
10 (8.8)
Macroscopic shape
Elevated
62 (54.4)
Flat
38 (33.3)
Depressed
14 (12.3)
Circumferential spread
< 1/4
44 (38.6)
1/4–2/4
35 (30.7)
2/4–3/4
16 (14.0)
≥ 3/4
19 (16.7)
Tumor size (cm)
< 3
74 (64.9)
≥ 3
40 (35.1)
Table 2 Endosonographic assessment of the depth of lesions with superficial esophageal carcinoma
EUS
No.
Histopathology
Accuracy of EUS
Overestimation of EUS
Underestimation of EUS
Mucosal
Submucosal
Advanced
Mucosal
55
45
10
0
81.8%
0%
18.2%
Submucosal
56
11
42
3
75.0%
19.6%
5.3%
Advanced
3
0
0
3
100%
0%
0%
Total
114
56
52
6
78.9%
9.6%
11.4%
Table 3 Accuracy of endosonographic assessment of invasion depth in superficial esophageal carcinoma, according to clinicopathologic characteristics
Characteristics
No. of accurately assessed lesions
Pvalue
Location
0.379
Upper esophagus
16/18
Mid-esophagus
57/72
Lower esophagus
17/24
Histologic type
0.767
Squamous cell carcinoma
85/108
Adenocarcinoma
2/3
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
3/3
Differentiation degree
0.617
Well differentiated
35/43
Moderately differentiated
46/61
Poorly differentiated
9/10
Macroscopic shape
0.486
Elevated
46/62
Flat
32/38
Depressed
12/14
Circumferential spread
0.136
< 1/4
37/44
1/4–2/4
29/35
2/4–3/4
13/16
≥ 3/4
11/19
Tumor size (cm)
0.002
< 3
65/74
≥ 3
25/40
Table 4 Accuracy of endosonographic assessment of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal carcinoma, according to clinicopathologic characteristics
Characteristics
No. of accurately assessed lesions
Pvalue
Location
0.137
Upper esophagus
15/16
Mid-esophagus
43/54
Lower esophagus
22/23
Histologic type
1.000
Squamous cell carcinoma
75/88
Adenocarcinoma
2/2
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
3/3
Differentiation degree
0.182
Well differentiated
24/25
Moderately differentiated
48/58
Poorly differentiated
8/10
Macroscopic shape
0.225
Elevated
47/58
Flat
22/23
Depressed
11/12
Circumferential spread
0.356
< 1/4
25/28
1/4-2/4
28/31
2/4-3/4
14/16
≥ 3/4
13/18
Tumor size (cm)
0.769
< 3
47/54
≥ 3
33/39
Table 5 Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with overestimation of invasion depth by endoscopic ultrasonography in superficial esophageal carcinoma
Characteristics
No. of overestimated lesions
Pvalue
Location
0.074
Upper esophagus
2/18
Mid-esophagus
4/72
Lower esophagus
5/24
Histologic type
0.464
Squamous cell carcinoma
10/108
Adenocarcinoma
1/3
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
0/3
Differentiation degree
0.805
Well differentiated
4/43
Moderately differentiated
7/61
Poorly differentiated
0/10
Macroscopic shape
0.491
Elevated
7/62
Flat
2/38
Depressed
2/14
Circumferential spread
0.266
< 1/4
7/44
1/4-2/4
2/35
2/4-3/4
0/16
≥ 3/4
2/19
Tumor size (cm)
0.513
< 3
6/74
≥ 3
5/40
Table 6 Multivariate analysis for endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy according to clinicopathologic factors
Table 7 Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with underestimation of invasion depth by endoscopic ultrasonography in superficial esophageal carcinoma
Characteristics
No. of underestimated lesions
Pvalue
Location
0.160
Upper esophagus
0/18
Mid-esophagus
11/72
Lower esophagus
2/24
Histologic type
1.000
Squamous cell carcinoma
13/108
Adenocarcinoma
0/3
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
0/3
Differentiation degree
0.903
Well differentiated
4/43
Moderately differentiated
8/61
Poorly differentiated
1/10
Macroscopic shape
0.379
Elevated
9/62
Flat
4/38
Depressed
0/14
Circumferential spread
0.001
< 1/4
0/44
1/4–2/4
4/35
2/4–3/4
3/16
≥ 3/4
6/19
Tumor size (cm)
0.001
< 3
3/74
≥ 3
10/40
Citation: Jung JI, Kim GH, I H, Park DY, Kim TK, Cho YH, Sung YW, Choi MK, Lee BE, Song GA. Clinicopathologic factors influencing the accuracy of EUS for superficial esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6322-6328