Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2013; 19(2): 219-226
Published online Jan 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.219
Table 1 Characteristics and acoustic radiation force impulse values of focal liver masses
VariablesTotal masses (n = 47)HCC (n = 24)CCC (n = 7)Metastases (n = 8)Hemangioma (n = 5)FNH (n = 3)
Histologic confirmation34 (72.3)15 (62.5)7 (100)8 (100)1 (20.0)3 (100)
Size, cm5.0 (1.4-20.5)4.9 (1.4-18.3)9.4 (7.4-18.8)8.0 (1.6-20.5)1.9 (1.5-4.7)2.7 (2.0-3.0)
Depth, cm5.6 (2.7-7.8)5.7 (2.7-7.8)6.4 (4.8-7.2)4.9 (3.5-7.6)5.3 (4.5-6.5)5.6 (2.8-7.8)
Right/left lobe34 (72.3)/13 (27.7)19 (79.2)/5 (20.8)5 (71.4)/2 (28.6)5 (62.5)/3 (37.5)4 (80.0)/1 (20.0)1 (33.3)/2 (66.7)
ARFI value, m/s
Masses2.23 ± 0.982.48 ± 0.841.65 ± 1.432.35 ± 1.181.83 ± 0.620.97 ± 0.48
Surrounding parenchyma1.83 ± 0.732.14 ± 0.591.07 ± 0.491.45 ± 0.511.10 ± 0.141.63 ± 0.40
P value0.0290.1340.0150.0430.0130.581
Table 2 Optimal cutoff acoustic radiation force impulse values and corresponding diagnostic indices for discriminating malignant masses and hepatocellular carcinoma from benign liver masses
Malignant vs benign
HCC vs benign
MassesMasses with surrounding liver parenchymaMassesMasses with surrounding liver parenchyma
Cutoff ARFI value, m/s1.8213.7221.8213.792
AUROC (95%CI)0.724 (0.566-0.883)0.853 (0.745-0.960)0.813 (0.649-0.976)0.948 (0.896-0.992)
Sensitivity, %71.871.879.287.5
Specificity, %75.010075.0100
Positive predictive value, %93.310090.5100
Negative predictive value, %35.342.154.572.9