Original Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2010; 16(1): 42-47
Published online Jan 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i1.42
Table 1 Characteristics of the subjects
HGM (+)HGM (-)
n686692
Sex
Female (%)36 (53.1)3173 (47.4)
Male (%)32 (46.9)3519 (52.6)
Female/male1.120.88
Age range (yr)(17-56)(16-90)
Mean age (± SE)37.29 ± 1.85a47.5 ± 0.3
Endoscopic Barrett’s esophagus9 (13.2)a166 (2.4)
Erosive esophagitis7 (10.3)636 (9.5)
Globus (%)48 (70.6)a0
Dyspepsia(%)60 (88.2)6550 (97.8)
Table 2 Clinicopathologic classification and characteristics of CHGM patches
ClinicopathologicNumber (%)Symptoms/findings
HGM I12 (17.6)Asymptomatic
HGM II53 (77.9)48 GS, 4 cough, 1 hoarseness
HGM III2 (2. 9)1 ulcus , 1 polyp
HGM IV0
HGM V1 (1.4)Esophageal adenocarcinoma
Table 3 Histological characteristics of heterotopic gastric mucosal patches
Histological characteristicsn
Type of patch
Fundic44
Antral15
Foveolar epithelium8
Complete IM1
Chronic inflammation68
IM (+), Hp (-)6 (3 antral-type, 2 fundic-type, 1 complete IM)
IM (-), Hp (+)15 (3 antral-type, 12 fundic-type)
IM (+), Hp (+)1 (1 fundic-type)
IM (-), Hp (-)46 (9 antral-type, 29 fundic-type, 8 foveolar epithelium)
Table 4 Comparison of the HP (+) and Hp (-) subjects with CHGM
Hp (+) CHGM (n = 16)Hp (-) CHGM (n = 52)
Globus, n (%)16 (100)32 (61.5)a
Age (yr)35.6 ± 2.338.6 ± 2.5
Female n (%)11 (68.8)a25 (48.1)
Male n (%)5 (31.2)27 (51.9)a
Fundic-type13 (81.2)31 (59.6)a
Antral-type3 (18.8)12 (23.1)
Intestinal metaplasia-1 (1.9)
Foveolar epithelium-8 (15.4)