Basic Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2007; 13(34): 4566-4573
Published online Sep 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i34.4566
Table 1 Comparison of ascites volume in all groups [M(QR)]
Groups3 h6 h12 h
Sham operation group0.50 (0.00)0.70 (0.50)0.60 (0.30)
Model group7.20 (2.00)6.40 (2.30)7.90 (1.70)
Table 2 Comparison of ascites/body weight ratio [M(QR)]
Groups3 h6 h12 h
Sham operation group0.20 (0.04)0.30 (0.30)0.22 (0.10)
Model group2.38 (1.10)2.58 (0.70)2.54 (0.71)
Table 3 Comparison of different indexes level in blood [M (QR) or (mean ± SD)]
Index Sham operation group
Model group
3 h6 h12 h3 h6 h12 h
Amylase (U/L)1582 (284)1769 (362)1618 (302)5303 (1373)6276 (1029)7538 (2934)
Endotoxin (EU/mL)0.016 (0.005)0.016 (0.01)0.014 (0.015)0.053 (0.029)0.059 (0.037)0.060 (0.022)
ET-1 (ng/L)15.293 (4.231)16.275 (3.180)14.173 (2.556)24.745 (1.011)25.625 (7.973)24.725 (3.759)
NO (μmol/L)7.500 (5)7.500 (5)10.000 (5)65.000 (7.5)62.500 (38.8)74.100 (26.2)
TNF-α (ng/L)3.900 (3.200)4.000 (1.7)5.300 (3.000)41.438 (37.721)92.151 (23.119)65.016 (26.806)
IL-6 (ng/L)1.846 (0.346)1.743 (0.838)2.036 (0.818)5.437 (1.025)6.817 (0.81)5.356 (0.747)
PLA2 (U/mL)18.70 ± 4.4016.70 ± 3.8318.52 ± 11.32103.69 ± 20.82119.85 ± 17.74121.29 ± 17.00