Basic Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 15, 2003; 9(5): 1020-1027
Published online May 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i5.1020
Effect of vanadium on colonic aberrant crypt foci induced in rats by 1,2 Dimethyl hydrazine
P Suresh Kanna, CB Mahendrakumar, T Chakraborty, P Hemalatha, Pratik Banerjee, M Chatterjee, Division of Biochemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032 (Calcutta), India
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by financial assistance of Department of Science & Technology, Government of India for during execution of the study (Ref No. SP/SO/B36/2000 dated 4/7/2002)
Correspondence to: M Chatterjee, PO.17028, Division of Biochemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032 (Calcutta), India.
Telephone: +91-33-24146393 Fax: +91-33-24146393
Received: January 14, 2003
Revised: January 23, 2003
Accepted: February 19, 2003
Published online: May 15, 2003


AIM: To investigate the chemo preventive effects of vanadium on rat colorectal carcinogenesis induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH).

METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley Rats were randomly divided into four groups. Rats in Group A received saline vehicle alone for 16 weeks. Rats in Group B were given DMH injection once a week intraperitoneally for 16 weeks; rats in Group C, with the same DMH treatment as in the Group B, but received 0.5-ppm vanadium in the form ammonium monovanadate ad libitum in drinking water. Rats in the Group D received vanadium alone as in the Group C without DMH injection.

RESULTS: Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) were formed in animals in DMH-treated groups at the end of week 16. Compared to DMH group, vanadium treated group had less ACF (P < 0.001). At the end of week 32, all rats in DMH group developed large intestinal tumors. Rats treated with vanadium contained significantly few colonic adenomas and carcinomas (P < 0.05) compared to rats administered DMH only. In addition, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in colon tumor burden (sum of tumor sizes per animal) was also evident in animals of Group C when compared to those in rats of carcinogen control Group B. The results also showed that vanadium significantly lowered PCNA index in ACF (P < 0.005). Furthermore, vanadium supplementation also elevated liver GST and Cyt P-450 activities (P < 0.001 and P < 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Vanadium in the form of ammonium monovanadate supplemented in drinking water ad libitum has been found to be highly effective in reducing tumor incidence and preneoplastic foci on DMH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis. These findings suggest that vanadium administration can suppress colon carcinogenesis in rats.


Colon cancer is one of the most common malignancies in many regions of the world[1]. The idea that this cancer might be a root cause for chemoprevention stems from epidemiological evidence that some factors in the diet may play important roles in its development, where others may reduce the risk[2,3]. Experimental Colon carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving three distinct stages, initiation, that alters the molecular message of a normal cell, followed by promotion and progression that ultimately ends up with a phenotypically altered "transformed cell"[4]. In animal studies, treated with a carcinogen, such as, 1,2 dimethylhydrazine (DMH), methylnitrosurea, N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrsoguanidine will induce colon tumors in experimental animals particularly in rodents[5,6]. Colon carcinogenesis models using DMH or the related azoxymethane, with putative preneoplastic aberrant crypt foci (ACF) as end-point marker lesions have been used to assess the influence of modulatory factors[7,8].

ACF are readily discernible ‘preadenomatous’ morphological putative lesions within the colonic mucosa of rodents and even in cancer patients that may contribute to the stepwise progression to colon cancer[8-10]. The formation and growth of ACF are associated with the induction of colon tumors in rats and are influenced by exposure to chemopreventive agents[11,12]. Natural compounds that inhibit ACF induced colon carcinogenesis have proved to be protective against colon cancer in rodents[13].

Besides the DMH-target tissue colon, the liver was preferentially selected for assaying the biotransformation and detoxification pattern[14,15]. Many chemical changes of the liver are detectable prior to the onset of secondary pathological and nutritional changes associated with conditions such as neoplasia. The pathological alterations in the liver often act as an indicator of overall damage caused by a carcinogen since liver enzymes provide more sensitive indicators of pathogenesis than blood[16]. Efficient inactivation of both xenobiotics and endogenous toxins result in the preservation of cellular integrity and inhibition of cytotoxic events, which lead to several diseases including cancer[17]. Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are a family of multifunctional proteins, which act as binding proteins and also as enzymes in various detoxification processes[18-20]. GSTs have been acknowledged as preneoplastic and neoplastic markers[21]. Cytochrome P-450s, also known as mixed function oxidases having a very broad range of substrate specificity in both exogenous and endogenous including drugs, chemical carcinogens and xenobiotics[22,23] carry out biotransformation and reduction. Aberration in epithelial colonic crypt cell proliferation leads to hyperplasia with higher risk of colon cancers both in humans and experimental animal models[24]. Assessment of PCNA expression as an indicator of colonic crypt cell proliferation is suggested as a putative intermediate marker of colon cancer risk[25].

Vanadium, an element of complex chemistry is of considerable scientific and biological interest nowadays, because of its diverse physiological properties with narrow thresholds between essential and toxic doses[26]. Various studies from our laboratory have established vanadium for the very first time to be a novel biological regulator in assessing the physiological and biochemical state of animals in a dose related manner in the detoxification of a number of xenobiotics, including electrophililic chemical carcinogens. Vanadium is observed to be capable of exhibiting some unique beneficial effects particularly, its anticarcinogenic potential under a very low dose[27-29] without any adverse toxicity. Our laboratory has documented a number of works involving vanadium as a potential antineoplastic agent in rat liver carcinogenesis. Furthermore, this element has shown to be able to inhibit chromosomal and molecular damages by abating the generation of DNA single stranded-breaks and thereby maintaining the genomic integrity[30]. Thus, there are good reasons to suspect that this micronutrient vanadium may be considered as a potential cancer chemopreventive agent.

In the present study, we had focused on the inhibitory effect of vanadium against the early stages of neoplastic transformation in a defined DMH-induced rat colon carcinogenesis model, since no reports from any other laboratories have documented the same, by morphometric evaluation of the ACF in colonic mucosa and colonic tumors in terms of tumor incidence, colon tumor multiplicity and tumor burden along with histological typings. Furthermore, the chemopreventive efficacy of the trace element was also investigated on certain hepatic drug metabolizing and phase II detoxifying enzyme activity patterns e.g. on liver glutathione S-transferase [GST] and Cytochrome P-450 [Cyt P-450) activities. Finally, PCNA expression as an indicator of cellular proliferation was carried out to correlate the morphometric and enzymological parameters with the protein expression to establish the possible antineoplastic potential of the said element at the cellular level.


40 Male Sprague Dawley rats (3-4 weeks old) weighing 80-100 grams were purchased from Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (CSIR), Kolkata (Calcutta), India and quarantined for a week. They were housed 10 per cage under controlled conditions of a 12:12 hour light and dark cycle at 28 ± 3 °C. All rats were maintained on a semi purified basal diet (Lipton, Calcutta, India) and water ad libitum. All rats received human care according to the criteria outlined in the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication 86-23, revised 1985). Body weights were recorded every 2 weeks.


1, 2 Dimethylhydrazine (DMH) and Vanadium as Ammonium monovanadate was purchased from E. Merck Ltd, Bombay, India.

Experimental protocols

Rats were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. Group A: animals constituted the normal untreated controls and received saline vehicle intraperitoneally, once a week, throughout the entire course of experimental study, till 32 weeks. Group B: comprised of carcinogen control animals. 1,2 DMH was administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 20-mg/kg-body weight, once a week in 0.9% NaCl solution (pH7.2) for a total period of 16 weeks. Group C: included the experimental animals, which received both DMH and Vanadium treatment. Vanadium as ammonium monovanadate at a dose of 0.5-ppm was administered ad libitum through drinking water while DMH was injected in the same dose mentioned earlier for Group A animals. Vanadium treatment was initiated simultaneously with the DMH injection (termed day 0). Group D: animals were vanadium controls and received vanadium alone as ammonium monovanadate at a dose of 0.5 ppm ad libitum through drinking water. They were not subjected to any DMH injection.

Interim sacrifice was performed at 16 weeks from the day of initiation in order to evaluate the preventive efficacy of vanadium in the initial stages of carcinogenesis in terms of histology and ACF studies. The terminal sacrifice was carried out at end of 32nd week as shown in Figure 1. All animals were fasted overnight before termination and sacrifice under light ether anesthesia. The length of the colon was recorded.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Grouping and different time point of the experiment.
Histological evaluation and ACF assay

The method of Bird[7] was used to stain and highlight ACF. The number of ACF was evaluated in the 0.3% methylene blue stained colon. ACF was scored under a light microscope with 40 times magnification to transluminate the colon. Only ACF meeting the criteria given by McLellan and Bird were chosen. These included crypts of increased size with a thicker and deeply stained epithelial lining and increased pericrptal zone compared with normal crypts.

Morphometric evaluation

After the terminal sacrifice at 32 weeks, colons were excised from the rats, blotted dry, cut open longitudinally and the inner surface was examined whether there were visible macroscopic lesions (neoplastic tumors). Tumors were easily discernable in the inflammated sections of the colon. The number and size of the tumors were noted for tumor incidence, multiplicity and burden studies. Tumors were classified as adenomas/carcinomas based on the evidence of invasion through the muscularis mucosa. Those with clear-cut invasion were considered to be carcinomas while the rest were classified as adenomas[31]. The three main axes of each macroscopic tumor from rats were measured using a vernier caliper with 0.1 mm graduation. Preneoplastic lesions were not included in tumor counts.

Assay of GST and Cyt P-450 activities

To determine whether vanadium could modify liver GST and Cyt P-450 activities, livers were excised immediately from all rats necropsy. The livers were perfused with saline to remove blood and minced into small pieces. Aliquots from minced livers were processed to obtain the cytosolic fraction as described[32]. The activities of GST with 1,2-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene (DCNB) as substrates, and Cyt P-450 assay was determined as described[33-36]. All assays were performed with UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (Jasco V-530). One unit of enzyme activity was the amount of enzyme catalyzing the conversion of 1 µmol of substrate to produce per min at 25 °C. Cytosolic protein concentrations were determined by the method of Lowry et al[37] using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Immunohistochemistry of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)

Immunohistochemical staining for PCNA was performed by the avidin-biotin complex method (Sigma). Tissue sections were deparaffinized with xylene, hydrated through a graded ethanol series, immersed in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in absolute methanol for 30 minutes at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity and then washed in phosphate-buffered saline (pH7.2). Following incubation with normal rabbit serum at room temperature for 10 minutes to block background staining, the sections were incubated with an anti-PCNA antibody (mouse monoclonal PC 10; Sigma, USA; a 1:100 dilution) for 12 hours in a humidified chamber at room temperature. They were then reacted with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine and counterstained with Harris’ hematoxylin. For determination of PCNA-positive index, 10 full-length crypts (aberrant crypts, normal-appearing crypts or normal crypts) of each colon were examined. The number of PCNA positively stained nuclei in each crypt column was recorded. The PCNA positive index (number of positive stained nuclei X 100/total number of nuclei counted) was then calculated.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis for morphometric studies between different groups was performed by Fischer’s exact probability test for tumor incidence. Student’s t test was used to analyzed the tumor multiplicity and tumor burden.

Food and water intake

No appreciable change in food consumption was observed among different groups of rats. The daily food and water intakes were measured with a measuring cylinder and it was found that rats took on an average of 8-10 ml of water/day per rat.


All animals survived during the entire course of the experiment.

Body weight of rats

Figure 2 showed the body weight of the rats in different groups sacrificed on the 32nd weeks following the first DMH injection. DMH treatment did not appreciably decrease rat body weight when compared with saline treatment, for first few weeks but by the end of the experimental study at 32nd weeks, differences between normal and carcinogen control Group A were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In Group C, animals undergoing treatment with vanadium, maintained near normal body weights. Animals in vanadium control Group D displayed body weights close to those in normal Group B.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Depicts the body weights of different group of animals.
Aberrant crypt assay

The effect of vanadium on the growth and development of ACF, induced by DMH, in rats was given in Table 1. There was a remarkable decrease in the incidence of aberrant crypts, expressed in terms of percentage, from 100% in carcinogen group B to 66.07% in vanadium treatment Group C in early stages of colon carcinogenesis. The average yield of aberrant crypts for the carcinogen group was 112 ± 3.2 ACF/Colon and the range was 90-115 ACF/Colon. For the vanadium treatment Group C, this was significantly reduced (P < 0.001 when compared with Group B) to a mean value of 38 ± 3.1 and ranged between 15-40 ACF/Colon. There were no observable foci witnessed in rats of Group D which had administration of vanadium alone ad libitum throughout the experiment.

Table 1 Chemopreventive efficacy of vanadium on DMH-induced ACF in Sprague Dawley rats.
GroupNumber of rats/GroupNumber of ACF per rat colon (mean ± SE)Inhibition (%)
Normal Control A10--
DMH Control B10112 ± 3.2-
DMH + V C1038 ± 3.1a66.07
V Control D10--

Tissue sections of Group A displayed normal colonic architecture with no signs of apparent abnormality (Figure 3.1 a,b). In the Carcinogen group B, well-differentiated signs of neoplasia were evident. Nuclei were enlarged and hyper chromatic with mitosis. Simultaneously, there was a loss in nuclear polarity. Connective tissues showed edema and swelling of endothelial cells (Figure 3.2 a,b). In the vanadium treatment Group C, histology revealed no loss of nuclear polarity. Tubules were well formed while crypts lie parallel to each other. The size and shape of the cells were uniform. Occasionally, hyper chromatic nucleus was evident. However, connective tissue invasion was not seen. No oedema or infiltration of polymorph nuclear leucocytes was sighted (Figure 3.3 a,b). There were no signs of neoplasia or toxicity observed in Group D rats administered with vanadium supplementation (Figure 4.3 a,b).

Figure 3
Figure 3 3. 1a: showing the normal colonic architecture view of rats sacrificed at end of week 16 (Low power). 3.1b: showing the normal colonic architecture view of rats sacrificed at end of week 16 (High power). 3.2a: representing the carcinogen-induced group B rats sacrificed at end of week 16 (Low power). 3.2b: representing the carcinogen-induced group B rats sacrificed at end of week 16 (High power). 3.3a: showing the treatment with vanadium group C rats sacrificed at the end of week 16 (Low power). 3.3b: showing the treatment with vanadium group C rats sacrificed at the end of week 16 (High power).
Figure 4
Figure 4 4. 1a: showing the carcinogen-induced group B rats sacrificed at end of week 32 (Low power). 4.1b: showing the carcinogen-induced group B rats sacrificed at end of week 32 (High power). 4.2a: showing the treatment with vanadium group C rats sacrificed at the end of week 32 (Low power). 4.2b: showing the treatment with vanadium group C rats sacrificed at the end of week 32 (High power). 4.3a: showing the vanadium control group D rats with no signs of toxicity sacrificed at the end of week 32 (Low power). 4.3b: showing the vanadium control group D rats with no signs of toxicity sacrificed at the end of week 32 (High power).
Colonic tumor analysis

Administration of ammonium monovanadate at the dose of 0.5 ppm, ad libitum through drinking water for each animal, brought about a significant reduction of tumor incidence in DMH-induced colon carcinogenesis (Table 2). In the carcinogen Group B, tumor incidence was 100% (Figure 4.1 a,b). It dropped to a significant 60% in the vanadium treated Group C (P < 0.01 when compared to DMH control group B by Fischer’s exact probability test) (Figure 4.2 a,b). The average number of tumor (classified as adenomas, carcinomas) per tumor bearing rat was also considered in the study. Rats treated with vanadium in Group C contained significantly few colonic adenomas and carcinomas (P < 0.05 by Student’s t test) compared to rats administered with DMH only (Table 2). In addition, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in colon tumor burden (sum of tumor sizes per animal) was also evident in Group C when compared to those in carcinogen control Group B. The results were statistically significant (Table 3). There were no marked changes observed in Group D (Figure 4.3 a,b).

Table 2 Chemopreventive efficacy of 0.5-ppm vanadium (supplemented ad libitum through drinking water) on the incidence and multiplicity of DMH induced rat colonic tumors.
GroupNumber of rats
Colon tumor incidence (percentage of tumor bearing rats)Total number of tumors
Colon tumor multiplicity (mean tumor/animal, Mean ± SD)
TotalTotal Tumor countsAdenomaCarcinomaAll neoplasiaAdenomaCarcinomaAll neoplasia
B101010097641209.7 ± 0.36.4 ± 0.112 ± 0.1
C100660a2316312.3 ± 0.21.6 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.1b
Table 3 DMH-induced colon tumor burden in Male Sprague Dawley rats fed Vanadium (0.5 ppm) ad libitum through drinking water.
GroupNumber of rats/groupMean colonic length (cm) (Y)Mean colon tumor burden (sum of the tumor size, mean ± SD) (cm)
AdenomaCarcinomaAll neoplasia (X)
B10243.67 ± 3.2b5.96 ± 9.79.56 ± 12.050.39
C10220.87 ± 1.61.19 ± 2.91.92 ± 2.93a0.08
Liver GST and CYT P-450 activities

Liver GST and Cyt P-450 activities at the end of the study were shown in Table 4. DMH treatment in Group B significantly elevated liver GST (P < 0.05) and Cyt P-450 (P < 0.001) activities using CDNB as a substrate when compared with those of Group A. GST activities in Group C was significantly greater than those in Group B (P < 0.02) and Cyt P-450 activities in Group C was also significantly greater than those in Group B (P < 0.001).

Table 4 Liver GST and Cyt P-450 activities (mean ± SE, n = 10).
GroupCyt P-450 activity (mU/mg protein)GST-CDNB (mU/mg protein)
A Normal Control0.62 ± 0.060.83 ± 0.10
B DMH-Control0.20 ± 0.03d0.45 ± 0.03a
C DMH + V0.41 ± 0.01e1.98 ± 0.09f
D V-Control0.47 ± 0.050.90 ± 0.19
PCNA-labeling index in ACF

The PCNA-labeling indices in ACF were shown in Table 5. The mean PCNA-labeling indices in ACF of Group C were significantly lower than that of Group B (P < 0.005 and P < 0.005, respectively).

Table 5 PCNA-labeling index of colonic mucosa of rats treated with DMH, supplemented with vanadium (V) 0.5-ppm ad libitium in drinking water (means ± SD).
GroupNo of ratsACF (Numbers of ACF or crypts)
A Normal control10-
B DMH control1035 ± 5 (10)
C DMH + V1023.6 ± 2a (10)
D V Control10-

Variable inhibitory effects of vanadium on the incidence of preneoplastic lesions (ACF) were observed during different phases of colorectal carcinogenesis. The finding of the histological and morphometric study clearly supports that trace element vanadium holds a promising anticancer potential with respect to colon carcinogenesis[38]. The results suggest that chemically induced carcinogenesis in the rat colon follows a distinct pathway where histogenesis obeys the ACF-adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the mid and distal colon and the ACF are an intermediate stage only existed in better-differentiated tumors. A linear relationship between AC formation and colon tumor induction for the same group of laboratory animals could also be established.

As there is strong correlation between ACF formation and colon carcinogenesis, the observation amply imply that supplementation by 0.5-ppm vanadium under the conditions of the experiment, can greatly affect the post initiation stages of colon carcinogenesis by altering the efficacy at which DMH can initiate foci appearance. Increased mitotic activity, which have been proposed as a biomarker of the early stages of colon cancer[39] was observed in most of the ACF induced by DMH administration alone. Treatment with vanadium greatly restored normalcy in the colonic epithelial cells. The ability of vanadium to reduce the number of ACF per colon also indicates that the anti-carcinogenic potential of vanadium could be mediated through an enhanced repair or remodeling of preneoplastic lesions[40].

In our observation, we have studied vanadium mediated inhibition of the tumor multiplicity coupled with tumor burden as a percentage of the colonic length. This observation is of interest if one considers that there was no major difference in body weights among the normal rats and rats in Group C. This is particularly important because nutritional deprivation causing body weight loss may parallel a decrease in tumor burden[41]. The variation in weight gain among the different groups under experiment, thus, do not seem to be significant when evaluating possible causes for the observed differences in the induction of AC or tumors.

Treatment of rats with drinking water supplemented with vanadium for 16 and 32 weeks not only decreased the number of preneoplastic foci but also caused a decrement in the tumor incidence/tumor multiplicity with a concomitant reduction in tumor burden as a percentage of colonic length. This strongly suggests the potentiality of vanadium in inhibiting/slowing tumorigenesis in the rat colon.

Phase II enzymes help to inhibit the formation of electrophiles and catalyze their conversion to inactivate conjugates making them more water soluble and readily excretable from the cell. It is the cellular balance between the Phase I activating enzymes and Phase II detoxifying enzymes that contribute to one’s risk of developing cancer[42]. GSTs catalyze the reaction of the compounds with thiol group of GSH, thus neutralize their electrophilic sites and render the product more water soluble[37]. 1, 2-DMH is a colon specific procarcinogen that is metabolically activated to the active carcinogen in the liver through a sequential radical generating mechanism[15] implying a need for detoxification through antioxidant as well as biotransfomation mechanism. Cellular GSH by itself or together with GST can function as a non-critical nucleophile for conjugation reactions and play an important role in the inactivation of electrophilic compounds[43]. Therefore, an elevation of GSH level indicates an increase in the systemic ability to detoxify electrophilic compounds including carcinogens. Data from several laboratories continue to suggest a relationship between decreased GST expression and an increased risk for cancer[44-46]. The decrease may be associated further with interference of protein synthesis and accumulation of electrophilic metabolites. Increased GST level towards normal value clearly indicates that the tumor genesis burden is not high, at the same time shows that vanadium is a good protective agent against DMH induced colon carcinogenesis.

Preliminary studies from our laboratory[47,48] have shown that under a certain optimum dose of 0.5 ppm, the trace element could lead to stable induction of GST activity without any apparent signs of toxicity. A probable mechanistic explanation could be increased transcription of GST gene and/or allosteric modification of the enzyme. Alternatively, this increase in GST activity by vanadium can be viewed as the host cellular response in boosting up the GSH-related conjugation system against the possible free radical mediated stress.

In the present study, we also report that vanadium functions as an anticarcinogen by altering the activity of Cyt P-450 related enzyme. Vanadium might have induced the Cyt P-450 level due to its property as a heavy metal. Since the dose used is non-toxic[40], it is having a positive action on inhibiting tumor promotion. The induction of Cyt P-450 may also be due to alteration of the ATP/ADP ratio by the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation thereby increasing the NADPH content rapidly for the mixed function oxidase system to act. Alternatively, vanadium may elevate the Cyt P-450 level by regulating the transcriptional activation of the P-450 gene[49]. Considering the relative persistence of oxidative damage, antioxidant defense and biotransformation alterations, we could predict that the biochemical markers measured in the liver may well be a prognostic marker of the distant neoplasm of the colon, even at the early stages of preneoplasia at 16 weeks.

Finally, PCNA-labeling index, an intermediate biomarker of carcinogenesis, was decreased in DMH-treated ACF by supplementation of vanadium in the drinking water. Cell proliferation plays an important role in multistage carcinogenesis with multiple genetic changes[50]. PCNA is an auxiliary protein of the DNA polymerase delta, reaching an expression peak during the S-phase of the cell cycle and playing an important role in cellular proliferation[51]. PCNA has been used as an intermediate biomarker in chemoprevention of colorectal cancer[52]. Zheng et al[53] observed that Vitamin A significantly decreased PCNA in the AOM-induced colorectal cancer animal model. Thus, the inhibitory effect of vanadium may be due, in part, to modification of cell proliferation through the above mechanisms.

One of the predominating factors which often limit the therapeutic efficacy of many antineoplastic elements and their complexes is their considerable toxic side effects associated with hepato and nephrotoxicity. However in the present study, supplementing vanadium at 0.5 ppm have shown no clinical signs of toxicity such as decrease in food and water intake, retarded growth or eventual death.

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that daily supplementation of 0.5 ppm vanadium in the form of ammonium monovanadate in the drinking water has a positive beneficial effect against chemically induced colonic preneoplastic progression in rats induced by DMH, which provides an effective dietary chemopreventive approach to disease management. However, other definitive bioassay including protein expression and documentation of specific molecular markers is now being planned in our laboratory to establish the surrogate end-point biomarker in vanadium-mediated cancer chemoprevention.


Edited by Xu XQ

1.  Shike M, Winawer SJ, Greenwald PH, Bloch A, Hill MJ, Swaroop SV. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. The WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68:377-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Potter JD, McMichael AJ. Diet and cancer of the colon and rectum: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76:557-569.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Mukhtar H, Athar M. Dietary anticarcinogens and cancer prevention. Cleve Clin J Med. 1988;55:507-508.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Pitot HC. Fundamentals of Oncology. New York:. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1986;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Pozharisski KM, Likhachev AJ, Klimashevski VF, Shaposhnikov JD. Experimental intestinal cancer research with special reference to human pathology. Adv Cancer Res. 1979;30:165-237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Druckrey E. Organ-specific carcinogenesis in the digestive tract. In: Nakahara W, Takayama S, Sugimura T, Odashima S, eds. Topics in Chemical Carcinogenesis. Baltimore Maryland:. University Park. 1972;73-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Bird RP. Role of aberrant crypt foci in understanding the pathogenesis of colon cancer. Cancer Lett. 1995;93:55-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 409]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 418]  [Article Influence: 14.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  McLellan EA, Bird RP. Aberrant crypts: potential preneoplastic lesions in the murine colon. Cancer Res. 1988;48:6187-6192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  McLellan EA, Medline A, Bird RP. Dose response and proliferative characteristics of aberrant crypt foci: putative preneoplastic lesions in rat colon. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:2093-2098.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  McLellan EA, Medline A, Bird RP. Sequential analyses of the growth and morphological characteristics of aberrant crypt foci: putative preneoplastic lesions. Cancer Res. 1991;51:5270-5274.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Pereira MA, Barnes LH, Rassman VL, Kelloff GV, Steele VE. Use of azoxymethane-induced foci of aberrant crypts in rat colon to identify potential cancer chemopreventive agents. Carcinogenesis. 1994;15:1049-1054.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 147]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 149]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Pretlow TP, O'Riordan MA, Somich GA, Amini SB, Pretlow TG. Aberrant crypts correlate with tumor incidence in F344 rats treated with azoxymethane and phytate. Carcinogenesis. 1992;13:1509-1512.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 198]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Tanaka T, Mori H. Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by nonnutritive constituents in foods. J Toxicol Pathol. 1996;9:139-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Albano E, Tomasi A, Goria-Gatti L, Iannone A. Free radical activation of monomethyl and dimethyl hydrazines in isolated hepatocytes and liver microsomes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1989;6:3-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Pence BC. Dietary selenium and antioxidant status: toxic effects of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in rats. J Nutr. 1991;121:138-144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Herzfeld A, Greengard O. The effect of lymphoma and other neoplasms on hepatic and plasma enzymes of the host rat. Cancer Res. 1977;37:231-238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Jakoby WB, Ziegler DM. The enzymes of detoxication. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:20715-20718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Jakoby WB, Habig WH. Enzymatic basis of detoxification. Vol II Acad Press. 1980;12:63-94.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Mannervik B, Alin P, Guthenberg C, Jensson H, Tahir MK, Warholm M, Jörnvall H. Identification of three classes of cytosolic glutathione transferase common to several mammalian species: correlation between structural data and enzymatic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:7202-7206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 629]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 767]  [Article Influence: 19.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Ketterer B, Meyer DJ, Coles B, Taylor JB, Pemble S. Glutathione transferases and carcinogenesis. Basic Life Sci. 1986;39:103-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Sato K. Glutathione transferases as markers of preneoplasia and neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res. 1989;52:205-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Jakoby WB. Enzymatic basis of detoxification. New York: Acad Press. 1983;135-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Guengerich FP. Roles of cytochrome P-450 enzymes in chemical carcinogenesis and cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 1988;48:2946-2954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Chapkin RS, Lupton JR. Colonic cell proliferation and apoptosis in rodent species. Modulation by diet. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;470:105-118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Yamada K, Yoshitake K, Sato M, Ahnen DJ. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in normal, preneoplastic, and neoplastic colonic epithelium of the rat. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:160-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Nriagu JO. Advances in environmental science and technology.. Wiley J and Sons USA31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Bishayee A, Chatterjee M. Increased lipid peroxidation in tissues of the cat fish Clarias batrachus following vanadium treatment: in vivo and in vitro evaluation. Journal Inorganic Biochemistry. 1994;54:277-284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Chakraborty A, Bhattacharjee S, Chatterjee M. Alterations in enzymes in an Indian catfish, Clarias batrachus (Linn.), exposed to vanadium. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995;54:281-288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Chakraborty A, Ghosh R, Roy K, Ghosh S, Chowdhury P, Chatterjee M. Vanadium: a modifier of drug-metabolizing enzyme patterns and its critical role in cellular proliferation in transplantable murine lymphoma. Oncology. 1995;52:310-314.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Chatterjee M, Bishayee A. Vanadium-A new tool for cancer prevention. Vanadium in Environment Part 2 1998; John Wiley & Sons.Inc. .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Jacobs LR. Enhancement of rat colon carcinogenesis by wheat bran consumption during the stage of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine administration. Cancer Res. 1983;43:4057-4061.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Benson AM, Batzinger RP, Ou SY, Bueding E, Cha YN, Talalay P. Elevation of hepatic glutathione S-transferase activities and protection against mutagenic metabolites of benzo(a)pyrene by dietary antioxidants. Cancer Res. 1978;38:4486-4495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Benson AM, Hunkeler MJ, Talalay P. Increase of NAD(P)H: quinone reductase by dietary antioxidants: possible role in protection against carcinogenesis and toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:5216-5220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 513]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 500]  [Article Influence: 11.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:7130-7139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  LOWRY OH, ROSEBROUGH NJ, FARR AL, RANDALL RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Bishayee A, Chatterjee M. Inhibitory effect of vanadium on rat liver carcinogenesis initiated with diethylnitrosamine and promoted by phenobarbital. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:1214-1220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Lipkin M. Biomarkers of increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancer: new application to studies of cancer prevention in human subjects. Cancer Res. 1988;48:235-245.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Farber E, Parker S, Gruenstein M. The resistance of putative premalignant liver cell populations, hyperplastic nodules, to the acute cytotoxic effects of some hepatocarcinogens. Cancer Res. 1976;36:3879-3887.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Waitzberg DL, Gonçalves EL, Faintuch J, Bevilacqua LR, Rocha CL, Cologni AM. Effect of diets with different protein levels on the growth of Walker 256 carcinosarcoma in rats. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1989;22:447-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Wilkinson J, Clapper ML. Detoxication enzymes and chemoprevention. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997;216:192-200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 140]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 145]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Uhlig S, Wendel A. The physiological consequences of glutathione variations. Life Sci. 1992;51:1083-1094.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 141]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 143]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Zhou T, Evans AA, London WT, Xia X, Zou H, Shen F, Clapper ML. Glutathione S-transferase expression in hepatitis B virus-associated human hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1997;57:2749-2753.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Szarka CE, Pfeiffer GR, Hum ST, Everley LC, Balshem AM, Moore DF, Litwin S, Goosenberg EB, Frucht H, Engstrom PF. Glutathione S-transferase activity and glutathione S-transferase mu expression in subjects with risk for colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:2789-2793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Clapper ML, Adrian RH, Murthy S. Proceedings Am. Gasteroenterol Assoc. 1997;3122, Washington D.C.97.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Bishayee A, Chatterjee M. Selective enhancement of glutathione S-transferase activity in liver and extrahepatic tissues of rat following oral administration of vanadate. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg. 1993;19:83-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Bishayee A, Chatterjee M. Time course effects of vanadium supplement on cytosolic reduced glutathione level and glutathione S-transferase activity. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1995;48:275-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Dahl AR, Hadley WM, Hahn FF, Benson JM, McClellan RO. Cytochrome P-450-dependent monooxygenases in olfactory epithelium of dogs: possible role in tumorigenicity. Science. 1982;216:57-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Cohen SM. Cell proliferation and carcinogenesis. Drug Metab Rev. 1998;30:339-357.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Hall PA, Levison DA, Woods AL, Yu CC, Kellock DB, Watkins JA, Barnes DM, Gillett CE, Camplejohn R, Dover R. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: an index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some neoplasms. J Pathol. 1990;162:285-294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1079]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1128]  [Article Influence: 33.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Zang XQ. Progress of study on suppresser, EGFR and PCNA in colorectal cancer. Xin Xiaohuabingxue Zazhi. 1996;4:327-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Zheng Y, Kramer PM, Lubet RA, Steele VE, Kelloff GJ, Pereira MA. Effect of retinoids on AOM-induced colon cancer in rats: modulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and aberrant crypt foci. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:255-260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]