H.Pylori
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2002. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 2002; 8(6): 1098-1102
Published online Dec 15, 2002. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i6.1098
PELA microspheres loaded H. pylori lysates and their mucosal immune response
Jian-Min Ren, Quan-Ming Zou, Fu-Kun Wang, Qiang He, Wei Chen, Wen-Kun Zen
Jian-Min Ren, Quan-Ming Zou, Fu-Kun Wang, Wen-Kun Zen, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Qiang He, Wei Chen, Department of Radiology, southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Jian-Min Ren, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China. renjianmin123@sina.com
Telephone: +86-23-68753046 Fax: +86-23-68753046
Received: August 24, 2001
Revised: September 2, 2001
Accepted: September 5, 2001
Published online: December 15, 2002

Abstract

AIM: To prepare poly (D,L-lactide)-polyethylene glycol copolymer (PELA) microspheres loaded H.pylori lysates or Cystografin and observe their targeting in gastrointestinal mucous membrane or analyze the mucosal immune responses by oral administration.

METHODS: PELA microspheres loaded H.pylori lysates or Cystografin were prepared by double emulsion evaporation method. Their distribution in gastrointestinal mucous membrane was observed by CT.Balb/c mice orally immunized in mucosal immune responses, whose antibody production in salivary and gut washing and antibody secreting cells in Peyer’s patches (PP) were estimated by ELISA and ELISPOT, respectively. The microspheres’ physical properties, such as particle size, protein level and morphology were investigated.

RESULTS: All prepared microspheres were found to have a smooth surface morphology from 3.20-4.05 μm in diameter and high encapsulation efficiency from 74.9%-82.2%. No significant correlation in their physical properties was shown, depending on their molecular weight at the similar composition ratio. Immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres elevated the saliva sIgA level at week 3 by approximately 3-4 times that with soluble antigen, which was greatly enhanced after boosting. At one week after last immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres (week 8), the specific sIgA-ASCs, IgG-ASCs and sIgA in salivary rose obviously. In intestinal Peyer’s patches, the specific sIgA-ASCs were 5.92-6.98 × 104/mL cell and IgG-ASCs were 3.47-4.02 × 104/mL cell, about 5-9 times higher than those with soluble antigen (P < 0.01). ASCs in intestine were more than those in stomach and the majority of the ASCs were sIgA-ASCs. The sIgA in gut washing fluid was 1.62-1.85 OD, about 3-6 times tthat of those with soluble antigen. There were significant differences of the ASCs and sIgA in gut washing fluid as compared with those of PBS and MS-0 (P < 0.05). There appeared to be good correlation between sIgA level in gut washing fluid and sIgA-ASCs in intestinal Peyer’s patches.

CONCLUSION: PELA microspheres may be used as vehicle to delivery antigen and adjuvant in designing oral vaccination.




INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is a major pathogen causing type B gastritis, peptic ulcer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue gastric lymphoma[1-12]. A triple antimicrobial therapy is often adopted for patients with infection[13-16], for Hp reinfection easily occurs and the drug resistance strains are increasing, therefore, antimicrobial treatment may be ineffective in prevention of reinfection[17-21]. Oral immunization is considered a convenient and safe method to induce mucosal immunity against infection. This has become a focus topic among the researchers[22-26].

The biodegradable and biocompatible microsphere as a vaccine delivery vehicle has many advantages[26]. The biodegradable polyesters (including polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA) and their copolymers (PLGA)) had been widely studied and used in biomedical engineering[27-30]. For hydrophobicity of the PLA and the PLGA, this type of material is usually not desirable for protein and peptide. Their degraded products, lactic acids or glycolic acids will create a local acidic environment that may be harmful to the surrounding tissues[31]. These microspheres loaded vaccines can be rapidly captured by phagocyte in the reticulo-endothelial system, while the microspheres (nanospheres) prepared with PLA-PEG-PLA (type A-B-A) triblock copolymers, which was produced by copolymerization of hydrophilic polyethylene glycol with lactide, showed longer circulating half life of the proteins in vivo[32]. They can overcome the disadvantages of the PLA or PLGA microspheres as drug vehicle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial culture

Hp971023, Hp980706, HpM bacterial strains were isolated by our laboratory. The strains were inoculated onto blood plat in the microaerobic cultivation at 37 °C for 48 h. The organisms were washed 3 times with 0.15 mol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and were harvested by centrifugation at 5 000rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The resulting suspensions was added to 0.15 mol/L PBS(pH7.4), EDTA 0.65 g/L and phenylmethylsufonyl fluoride (PMSF) 1 mmol/L and sonicated (200 W × 30 s × 10 times). The Hp lysate was collected by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 20 min. The protein concentration was determined by UV spectrophotometer (Beckman DU-640, USA).

Preparation of the PELA microspheres loaded Hp

PELA (weight ratio of D, L-lactide to PEG-2000, 95:5; the inherent viscosity of the PELA ranged from 0.1271 to 0.3329 dL/g measured in tetrahydrofuran at 25 °C) was synthesized according to procedures described in literature[32]. The PELA microspheres loaded Hp were manufactured using double emulsion evaporation method as describled[32,33]. One ml aqueous solution mixed 4% Hp lysate (inter-water phase) was emulsified with 10 mL of 6% (w/v) PELA in methylene chloride using T25B homogenizer (USA) at 8000 rpm for 5 min (w/o), After homogenization, 30 mL aqueous solution of 2% PVA (degree of polymerization n = 1500-1800) was added to the primary water-in oil (w/o) emulsion and the stirring was continued further for 5 min. The resulting w/o/w suspensions were stirred magnetically at 1200 rpm for 10-12 h at room temperature (over 25 °C) to evaporate the solvent. The microspheres were obtained by centrifugation and washed three to eight times with distilled water. The cleaned microspheres were lyophilized and stored at 4 °C under desiccation. If the aqueous solution mixed Hp lysate (inter-water phase) was replaced by pure water or some concentration of cystografin, the blank PELA microspheres and PELA-cystografin microspheres can be obtained respectively. The amount of protein loaded in the PELA microspheres was determined by dissolving a fixed amount of microspheres in methylene chloride, the protein content was measured with UV spectrophotometer (Beckman DU-640, USA). The protein loading efficiency was calculated directly by recovering the protein from the microspheres[34].

Measurement of microsphere size and morphology

The mean size of microspheres and distribution were calculated using a LeitzDiaplan light microscope (Wild MPS52, Japan) to measure the diameter of microspheres, whose amount was no less than 200. The surface structure of micropheres was examined by scanning electron microscopy (AMRAY, USA-China).

PELA-cystografin microspheres targeting

Miniture pigs (sus scorfa domestica) weighing 15-20 kg were used in the study. PELA-cystografin microspheres (mean diameter of 3.72 μm, the amount of cystografin loaded was about 16%) were suspended in 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution and 100 mL suspension (10 g PELA-cystografin microspheres) was orally administered by intubation feeding to miniture pigs. After 0, 3, 8 and 15 days, the distribution of PELA-cystografin microspheres in the all gastrointestinal tract was observed by CT. The pigs were killed and the images of all gastrointestinal tract were taken after being washed up.

Immunization procedures

BALB/c mice (female, 6-8 weeks old, and 18-25 g in weight) were offered by our experimental animal center. Mice were randomly assigned to one of the seven immunization groups (twenty mice per group). Before administration, mice stopped feeding for 2 h and then took orally 0.5 mL mixture of the Hanks’ equilibration salt and 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution (4:1 ratio) in order to neutralize gastric acid fluids. Each experimental group was orally immunized on week 0, 1 and 2. The immunized mice were given a booster immunization on week 7 with the same agents as the primary immunization. The first four groups were immunized by oral administration with different PELA-Hp microspheres (that is MS-1, MS-2, MS-3 and MS-4 group, 1mg Hp per mouse). The fifth group, sixth and seventh group of mice received free 1 mg of souble Hp lysate antigen, PBS solution or blank PELA microspheres under similar conditions, respectively. One week after the last immunizations (week 8), mice were killed and assayed by indirect ELISA and ELISPOT.

Detection of ASCs in lymphocytes from intestine and gastric mucosa

Peyer’s patches (PP) in intestine and gastric mucosa were selected[35] and placed into 0.5 mL 5% FCS RPMI-1640 medium. The tissues were ground and recovered on 70 μm cell strainer. The recovered tissues were harvested by centrifugation at 1 500 rpm for 15 minutes and washed two times to collect suspensions, which were added 15 mL 70% Percoll medium and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 15 minutes. Cell pellets are resuspended in 0.5 mL RPMI-1640 medium to form 5 × 105/mL. The cell suspensions were stained with 2% trypan blue. The cell viability and purity were assessed. The ELISPOT assay[36] was used to detect ASCs in the intestine and gastric tissues of the mice. Briefly, 96-well (Millipore) were coated with 0.2 mL H. pylori sonicate preparations dissolved in 0.05 mol/L sodium bicarbonate solution (50 μg protein per well) and left overnight at 4 °C. After washed three times in PBS, well plates were saturated with 2% BSA (100 μL per well) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The plates were washed once in RPMI-1640 and each well was added 0.2 mL 5 × 105/mL of the cell suspensions.

The cells were incubated at 37 °C in 10% CO2 for 4 h. The plates were washed three times in PBS-Tween and then added 100 μL biotinylated monoclonal IgA or IgG antibodies to specific mouse , which had been diluted 1:1500 and 1:2000 in 10% FCS-PBS, respectively. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2 hours. After three washes, the avidinperoxidase solution, diluted 1:2000 in PBS, was incubated at 37 °C for 30 minutes. After three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 μL substrate solution (containing 7.5% gelatin, 1 g/L 3,3’, 5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), 0.03% H2O2) was added to each well. The reaction was coagulated quickly in ice-water bath. After 10-30 minutes, the immunospots were counted under inverted microscope (Olymps, Tokyo, Japan). The number of ASC was the mean number of immunospots deducting the mean number of each contrast.

Assay of saliva sIgA and gut sIgA by ELISA

Saliva was collected from immunized mice[37]. Gut washing fluids was collected after the last immunization one week (week 8). Each well was coated with 100 μL of H. pylori lasate solution at concentration of 50 μg/mL in 0.05 mol/L sodium carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4 °C. After suction and three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 μL of 2% BSA solution in PBS was added to each well and further incubated for 1hour at 37 °C. The initial dilution of sample (saliva and gut washing fluids) was 1:20. 100 μL diluted samples was added to wells and incubated for 1hour at 37 °C. After three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 μL of biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgA incubated for 1hour at 37 °C. After washing three times with PBS-Tween, 100 μL of the avidinperoxidase solution was added and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. Then washed and added 100 μL substrate solution. The plates were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of 100 μL of 0.5 mol/L hydrochloric acid, and the color development was measured by plate reader set at 405 nm.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Student’s t test. Results were expressed as mean ± standard error. Differences were considered significant for values P < 0.05.

RESULTS
Properties and morphology of PELA-Hp microspheres

The properties of PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with different inherent viscosity of PELA (ranged from 0.1271-0.3329 dL/g) are shown in Table 1. The properties of microspheres were examined under light microscope in particle size and by UV spectrophotometer in protein loading and encapsulation efficiency. The morphology of microspheres was examined under scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of MS-2 is shown Figure 1.

Table 1 The properties of the PELA-Hp microspheres.
LotPELA[η] (dL/g)*Mean dimeter(μm)Protein loading (%,w/w)Encapsulation efficiency (%,w/w)
MS-20.20833.205.5382.2
MS-30.30543.535.4074.9
MS-40.33294.055.2779.5
Figure 1
Figure 1 Scanning electron micrographs of MS-2 loaded Hp.
PELA-cystografin microsphere targeting

The images of the miniature pig by oral administration with PELA-cystografin microsphere were observed by CT. The experiment could indirectly obtain the distribution of PELA microsphere in all gastrointestinal tract as time (day). The results suggested that PELA-cystografin microsphere mainly was distributed in the gastric cavity and at the surface of gastric mucosa after oral administration for three days. Then part of the microspheres gradually moved to enter the intestine by the stomach peristalsis and adhered to their surface (images not shown). After 15 days, the microspheres were found mainly distributed at the surface of intestine. The images are shown Figure 2.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Images of pig stomach and gut after oral administration. (a) blank PELA microsphere; (b) PELA-cystografin microsphere.
Mucosal immune responses of orally immunized PELA-Hp microspheres

Saliva sIgA responses after oral immunization with soluble antigen, PELA-Hp microspheres with different inherent viscosities of PELA (ranged from 0.1271 to 0.3329 dL/g) were measured at week 3, week 5 and week 8 (Table 2). Immunization with soluble antigen induced weak saliva IgA antibodies. Immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres elevated saliva sIgA level at week 3 (approximately 3-4 times higher than those with soluble antigen ) and greatly enhanced after boosting (week 8). The changes of saliva sIgA at different stages after oral immunization related to the properties of PELA.

Table 2 Comparison of sIgA titres in saliva at different stages after oral immunization (-x ± s).
GroupsWeek 3Week 5Week 8
PBS0.081 ± 0.0260.074 ± 0.0230.080 ± 0.011
Ag0.197 ± 0.1770.199 ± 0.0930.225 ± 0.029
MS-00.090 ± 0.0410.071 ± 0.0130.110 ± 0.046
MS-10.416 ± 0.1830.567 ± 0.1360.891 ± 0.215
MS-20.399 ± 0.1790.608 ± 0.2090.882 ± 0.264
MS-30.346 ± 0.1260.674 ± 0.1280.957 ± 0.238
MS-40.304 ± 0.1050.523 ± 0.2110.944 ± 0.143

At one week after last immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres (week 8), the specific sIgA-ASCs,IgG-ASCs and sIgA were estimated by ELISPOT and ELISA.The results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Immune response induced with PELA-Hp microspheres at week 8 (n = 20, -x ± s).
GroupsPP sIgA-ASCs(1 × 104) IgG-ASCsStomach sIgA-ASCs(1 × 103) IgG-ASCsGut sIgA
PBS0.13 ± 0.040.16 ± 0.070.19 ± 0.080.23 ± 0.060.234 ± 0.08
Ag0.27 ± 0.110.29 ± 0.090.35 ± 0.110.36 ± 0.150.34 ± 0.17
MS-00.16 ± 0.070.17 ± 0.050.15 ± 0.060.21 ± 0.070.25 ± 0.08
MS-16.58 ± 1.383.78 ± 0.824.17 ± 1.090.74 ± 0.291.75 ± 0.46
MS-26.92 ± 1.774.02 ± 0.933.80 ± 1.341.02 ± 0.441.85 ± 0.38
MS-36.77 ± 1.463.56 ± 1.104.12 ± 0.831.81 ± 0.731.62 ± 0.81
MS-45.92 ± 1.923.47 ± 0.823.65 ± 1.041.88 ± 0.231.71 ± 0.70
DISCUSSION

The relationship between the properties of PELA-Hp microspheres and molecular weight of PELA copolymer are shown Table 1. All types of PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with the same component PELA, whose protein loading, encapsulation efficiency and size were 5.06%-5.40%, 74.9%-82.2% and 3.20-4.05 μm, respectively, were not significantly different This confirmed the previous investigations[38]. Morphology of PELA microspheres using double emulsion evaporation method were investigated under sanning electron microscopy. The obtained microspheres were all spherical, homogeneous particles and had smooth surface (as shown in Figure 1). The results coincided with the report of SY Kim et al[39], while Kofler et al[40] reported that the microspheres were porous particles with a rough surface. This is likely that different processing and manufacturing conditions of microspheres (such as o/wout-water phase, winter-water phase /o, stirring velocity, temperature etc), which result in morphologies of microspheres.

The images of the miniature pigs by oral administration of PELA-cystografin microspheres are shown in Figure 2. This indirectly clarified the conclusion arrived by Eldridge et al[41], which was that microspheres (mean diameter < 10 μm) after oral administration firstly adhered to the surface of the gastrointestinal mucous membrane, then arrived at their Peyer’s patches (PP) to induce mucosal and systemic immune responses. Therefore, our obtained microspheres (mean diameter < 5 μm) could induce mucosal and systemic immune responses by particle uptake into the PP. After oral administration, all types of PELA-Hp microspheres (week 8), the specific sIgA-ASCs, IgG-ASCs and sIgA in gut washing fluids obviously rose by ELISA and ELISPOT. The specific sIgA-ASCs and IgG-ASCs were approximately 5-9 times that with soluble antigen. ASCs in the intestine were more than those in stomach, and the majority of the ASCs were sIgA-ASCs. This result indicated that there appeared to be a good correlation between sIgA level in gut washing fluid and sIgA-ASCs in intestinal PP. The sIgA in gut washing fluid was about 3-6 times higher than those with soluble antigen (as shown in Table 3), that is very important for oral immunization to effectively induce mucosal immune response and protect against Hp infection[21,35]. The protein release of PELA-Hp microspheres was influenced by several parameters including PELA copolymer molecular weight, diameter, the ratio of lactide/PEG and the manufacturing technology. Immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres elevated the saliva sIgA level at week 3 (approximately 3-4 times higher than those with soluble antigen ) and greatly enhanced after boosting (week 8) (Table 2). At the same components of PELA (feed ratio of lactide/PEG = 95:5 in this study), after oral immunization for 3 weeks, mice with PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with lower molecular weight of PELA , the saliva sIgA level became higher than the mice with PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with higher molecular weight of PELA. However, after oral immunization for 8 weeks, there was no differences in antibody production level between those formulations. This result can be explained as follows: the initial burst release of Hp was bigger from PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with lower molecular weight PELA, meanwhile because low molecular weight of PELA was degraded easily and can not effectively protect Hp release from microspheres (t1/2 was short)[36], this means that mice orally immunized with PELA -Hp microspheres prepared with lower molecular weight PELA induced stronger mucosal and systemic immune responses after oral immunization in earlier stages. All types of PELA-Hp microspheres (η = 0.1271-0.3329 dL/g PELA, 1-2 month degradation in vitro) were degraded fully and released encapsulated antigens at week 8 irrespective of differences of copolymer molecular weights. We also found in this study that antigen release from microspheres can be controlled and accommodated by dictating the component and molecular weight of polymer. This will play an important role in designing oral vaccines for the protection against diseases in the future.

Footnotes

Edited by Ma JY

References
1.  Sepulveda AR, Graham DY. Role of Helicobacter pylori in gastric carcinogenesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31:517-35, x.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Vandenplas Y. Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:20-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Nakamura S, Aoyagi K, Furuse M, Suekane H, Matsumoto T, Yao T, Sakai Y, Fuchigami T, Yamamoto I, Tsuneyoshi M. B-cell monoclonality precedes the development of gastric MALT lymphoma in Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:1271-1279.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Hiyama T, Haruma K, Kitadai Y, Miyamoto M, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Sumii K, Shimamoto F, Kajiyama G. B-cell monoclonality in Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic atrophic gastritis. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:232-237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Wu C, Zou QM, Guo H, Yuan XP, Zhang WJ, Lu DS, Mao XH. Expression, purification and immuno-characteristics of recombination UreB protein of H.pylori. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:389-393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Hiyama T, Kamada T, Masuda H, Shimamoto F, Inoue K, Chayama K. High incidence of B-cell monoclonality in follicular gastritis: a possible association between follicular gastritis and MALT lymphoma. Virchows Arch. 2002;440:376-380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Wildner-Christensen M, Touborg Lassen A, Lindebjerg J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in bleeding peptic ulcer patients, evaluation of urea-based tests. Digestion. 2002;66:9-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Bobrzyński A, Beben P, Budzyński A, Bielański W, Plonka M, Konturek S. Incidence of complications of peptic ulcers in patients with Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and/or NSAID use in the era of Hp eradication. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:CR554-CR557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Sato Y, Iwafuchi M, Ueki J, Yoshimura A, Mochizuki T, Motoyama H, Sugimura K, Honma T, Narisawa R, Ichida T. Gastric carcinoid tumors without autoimmune gastritis in Japan: a relationship with Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:579-585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Gomollón F, Sicilia B. Helicobacter pylori: strategies for treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2001;10:1231-1241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Zhuang XQ, Lin SR. Research of Helicobacter pylori infection in precancerous gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:428-429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Peng ZS, Liang ZC, Liu MC, Ouyang NT. Studies on gastric epi-thelial cell proliferation and apoptosis in Hp associated gastric ulcer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1999;7:218-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Kawakami E, Ogata SK, Portorreal AC, Magni AM, Pardo ML, Patrício FR. Triple therapy with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and omeprazole for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children and adolescents. Arq Gastroenterol. 2001;38:203-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Fanti L, Ieri R, Mezzi G, Testoni PA, Passaretti S, Guslandi M. Long-term follow-up and serologic assessment after triple therapy with omeprazole or lansoprazole of Helicobacter-associated duodenal ulcer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:45-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Buzás György M, Székely E, Illyés G, Széles I. [Lansoprazole versus ranitidine bismuth citrate containing triple regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer]. Orv Hetil. 2000;141:1711-1714.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Catalano F, Catanzaro R, Bentivegna C, Brogna A, Condorelli G, Cipolla R. Ranitidine bismuth citrate versus omeprazole triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and healing of duodenal ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:59-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Ruggiero P, Peppoloni S, Berti D, Rappuoli R, Giudice GD. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:1127-1138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Velasco Benítez CA, Amorocho Pérez RD. [Treatment of gastritis-associated Helicobacter pylori infection in children]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2002;22:159-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Catalano F, Branciforte G, Catanzaro R, Bentivegna C, Cipolla R, Nuciforo G, Brogna A. Comparative treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer using pantoprazole at low and high doses versus omeprazole in triple therapy. Helicobacter. 1999;4:178-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Osato MS, Reddy SG, Piergies AA, Bochenek WJ, Testa RT, Graham DY. Comparative efficacy of new investigational agents against Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:487-492.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Kim BO, Shin SS, Yoo YH, Pyo S. Peroral immunization with Helicobacter pylori adhesin protein genetically linked to cholera toxin A2B subunits. Clin Sci (Lond). 2001;100:291-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Challacombe SJ, Sweet SP. Oral mucosal immunity and HIV infection: current status. Oral Dis. 2002;8 Suppl 2:55-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  van Ginkel FW, Nguyen HH, McGhee JR. Vaccines for mucosal immunity to combat emerging infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:123-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Mutwiri G, Bowersock T, Kidane A, Sanchez M, Gerdts V, Babiuk LA, Griebel P. Induction of mucosal immune responses following enteric immunization with antigen delivered in alginate microspheres. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002;87:269-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Ishizaka ST, Israel ZR, Gettie A, Mishkin EM, Staas JK, Gilley RM, Dailey PJ, Montefiori DC, Marx PA, Eldridge JH. Induction of mucosal antibody responses by microsphere-encapsulated formalin-inactivated simian immunodeficiency virus in a male urethral challenge model. Vaccine. 1999;17:2817-2825.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Allaoui-Attarki K, Pecquet S, Fattal E, Trollé S, Chachaty E, Couvreur P, Andremont A. Protective immunity against Salmonella typhimurium elicited in mice by oral vaccination with phosphorylcholine encapsulated in poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Infect Immun. 1997;65:853-857.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Wang MY, Levi AD, Shah S, Green BA. Polylactic acid mesh reconstruction of the anterior iliac crest after bone harvesting reduces early postoperative pain after anterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:413-416; discussion 416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Vasilic N, Madzarevic M, Kenney EB. Platelet-rich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral combined with guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. J Periodontal Res. 2002;37:300-306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Giardino R, Fini M, Nicoli Aldini N, Giavaresi G, Rocca M. Polylactide bioabsorbable polymers for guided tissue regeneration. J Trauma. 1999;47:303-308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Hoffman GT, Soller EC, McNally-Heintzelman KM. Biodegradable synthetic polymer scaffolds for reinforcement of albumin protein solders used for laser-assisted tissue repair. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2002;38:53-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Huang YY, Chung TW, Tzeng TW. A method using biodegradable polylactides/polyethylene glycol for drug release with reduced initial burst. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:93-100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Deng X, Zhou S, Li X, Zhao J, Yuan M. In vitro degradation and release profiles for poly-dl-lactide-poly(ethylene glycol) microspheres containing human serum albumin. J Control Release. 2001;71:165-173.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Yang YY, Chung TS, Ng NP. Morphology, drug distribution, and in vitro release profiles of biodegradable polymeric microspheres containing protein fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. Biomaterials. 2001;22:231-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Yang YY, Chia HH, Chung TS. Effect of preparation temperature on the characteristics and release profiles of PLGA microspheres containing protein fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. J Control Release. 2000;69:81-96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Ferrero RL, Thiberge JM, Labigne A. Local immunoglobulin G antibodies in the stomach may contribute to immunity against Helicobacter infection in mice. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:185-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Mattsson A, Lönroth H, Quiding-Järbrink M, Svennerholm AM. Induction of B cell responses in the stomach of Helicobacter pylori- infected subjects after oral cholera vaccination. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:51-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Ishii H, Nakagawa Y. Stress response to surgical procedures in the submandibular region and its influence on salivary secretion in mice. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46:387-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Matsumoto J, Nakada Y, Sakurai K, Nakamura T, Takahashi Y. Preparation of nanoparticles consisted of poly(L-lactide)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-lactide) and their evaluation in vitro. Int J Pharm. 1999;185:93-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Kim SY, Doh HJ, Ahn JS, Ha YJ, Jang MH, Chung SI, Park HJ. Induction of mucosal and systemic immune response by oral immunization with H. pylori lysates encapsulated in poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Vaccine. 1999;17:607-616.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Kofler N, Ruedl C, Klima J, Recheis H, Böck G, Wick G, Wolf H. Preparation and characterization of poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly-(L-lactic acid) microspheres with entrapped pneumotropic bacterial antigens. J Immunol Methods. 1996;192:25-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Eldridge JH, Staas JK, Meulbroek JA, Tice TR, Gilley RM. Biodegradable and biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres as an adjuvant for staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxoid which enhances the level of toxin-neutralizing antibodies. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2978-2986.  [PubMed]  [DOI]