Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1999. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 1999; 5(4): 283-285
Published online Aug 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i4.283
Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis: a comparison between old and most recent modalities used to evaluate this perennial problem
Raffaele Pezzilli, Francesco Mancini, Emergency Department, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna 40138, Italy
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Raffaele Pezzilli, Medicina d'Urgenzae Pron to Soccorso, Ospedale Sant'Orsola, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna 40138, Italy. pezzilli@orsola-malpighi.med.unibo.it
Telephone: +39-51-6364701 Fax: +39-51-6364794
Received: June 21, 1999
Revised: July 3, 1999
Accepted: July 19, 1999
Published online: August 15, 1999

Abstract
Key Words: pancreatitis/diagnosis, pancreatitis/radiography, severity assessment, evaluating studies



TEXT

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory process of the pancreatic gland. According to the Atlanta classification system, there are two forms of acute pancreatitis: mild acute pancreatitis, characterized by interstitial edema, which is self-limiting and severe acute pancreatitis characterized by local complications such as necrosis, abscesses, pseudocysts and the presence of organ dysfunction [1]. The mortality due to severe pancreatitis is about 25%-50% and is due mainly to infection of the necrosis[2]. Early identification of patients with severe acute pancreatitis is essential for the correct care of the disease and the avoidance of complications.

Over the past 20 years, many schemes have been proposed for identifying severe pancreatitis. The aim of this paper is to review the current criteria for the early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis.

CLINICAL CRITERIA

Bank et al[3] analyzed the incidence of cardiac, pulmonary, kidney, hematological, metabolic and neurological complications in 75 patients with acute pancreatitis and they reported a mortality rate of 56% if one or more complications were present. Subsequently, Agarwall and Pitchumoni[4]conducted a retrospective study involving 76 patients and proposed a scheme comprised of simplified clinical criteria. In both studies, a 48-hour observation period was necessary for the clinical criteria. Furthermore, these clinical assessments depend on the experience of the clinical team and are difficult to standardize.

CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CRITERIA

Ranson et al[5] identified a series of 11 criteria evaluated in 100 patients with acute pancreatitis in 1974. The Ranson score is still widely used at present in judging severity. Five of the 11 criteria are considered upon hospital admission and 6 in the following 48 h. They reported that most patients with less than two positive items survived; in those with 3 or 5 positive items, the mortality rate was about 20%, and in those with 6 or more positive items, the mortality reached about 50%. There is a correlation between 3 or more Ranson positive criteria and the high incidence of pancreatic necrosis and systemic complications. Later studies confirmed a sensitivity from 40% to 90%[4,6]. The Ranson score has been recently criticized for the following reasons: a good assessment of severity requires the determination of all items and requires 48 h of observation for the judgement of severity, thus delaying the proper treatment after the onset of pain. Talamini et al[7] have simplified the original Ranson score by evaluating only the items considered on admission and concluded that this simplified system is of little use for predicting severity. Finally, this criteria correlate to the severity of acute pancreatitis only at the opposite ends of the scheme (< 2 and > 6 items) but not between 3 and 5 positive items. Twelve to 24 h after the onset of pain, the score is completely useless. It can be applied only to biliary pancreatitis and the same authors have therefore proposed a new modified score[8].

Imrie et al[9] have proposed a score called the Glasgow score which seems to be more precise than that of Ranson, with a sensibility for the assessment of severe acute pancreatitis of 56%-85%[10,11].

Another simplified score has been set up by Fan et al[12], utilizing only two biochemical parameters (azotemia and glycemia). This score system has a sensitivity of about 75% in the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis.

More recently the APACHE II score[13] which takes into consideration age, presence of chronic associated diseases and some biochemical parameters has been proposed for the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Wilson et al[14] have reported a score of 6.3 in patients with mild acute pancreatitis, of 9.4 in those with severe pancreatitis and of 14.1 in those with fulminant pancreatitis.

BIOCHEMICAL CRITERIA

The search for a marker able to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis at the early stage is the aim of the present research in the field of pancreatology. The evaluation of the severity of acute pancreatitis by means of serum pancreatic enzyme determination has been a boon[15-17]. We recently evaluated serum amylase and lipase in 66 patients with acute pancreatitis[15]. Most of these patients were studied within 24 h from the onset of pain. Twenty patients had no alterations of the pancreatic gland at imaging, 36 had pancreatic edema and 10, pancreatic necrosis. The elevation of the serum pancreatic enzyme s overlapped in the three groups.

The determination of serum C-reactive protein[18] is at present widely used for the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Serum levels of t his protein greater than 100 mg/L indicate a severe acute pancreatitis in about 60%-80% of the cases. The determination of the C-reactive protein is easy to perform and inexpensive. However, its sensitivity is good only after the first 48 h from the onset of pain[6,19].

Granulocyte elastase has been evaluated in the search for biochemical markers able to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis even earlier than the C-reactive protein determination. This protein is released by activated neutrophils and it is able to damage cellular membranes and the extracellular matrix. Gross et al[20] and Dominguez-Munoz et al[21] have reported that 70%-80% of the patients with severe acute pancreatitis studied within 48 h from the onset of the pain were correctly identified using this protein. More recently interleukin 6, released by activated macrophages and the interleukin 8 released by neutrophils have been proposed as markers of the severity of acute pancreatitis. These two cytokines are released rapidly in severe forms of acute pancreatitis (within 24 h from the onset of pain) and have a specificity greater than that of C reactive protein (80%-100%)[22-24].

The soluble receptor of interleukin 2, which is released by the activated lymphocytes is able to identify 70% of the patients with severe acute pancreatitis studied within 24 h from the onset of pain[25]. We have demonstrated[26] that the human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor, produced by the pancreatic acinar cells and the hepatocytes is able to correctly identify 70% of the cases studied within 24 h from the onset of pain. All these studies demonstrate that the immune system is early activated at an early phase during the course of acute pancreatitis. However, the determination of these proteins, except for C-reactive protein and granulocyte elastase, is not feasible for routine use. We hope that in the near future simple techniques for the determination of these proteins will be developed.

RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA

Balthazar et al[27] have demonstrated that contrast enhanced computed tomography is able to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis. They divided the severity of acute pancreatitis into 5 categories. In 83 patients with acute pancreatitis, they found that the mortality was nil in stages A, B and C, and re ached 17% in those of grade E. The findings of left-sided or bilateral effusion s on chest radiograph within 24 h of admission were associated with a severe outcome[28].

RADIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CRITERIA

Serum creatinine greater than 152.6 μmol/L and/or the presence of pathological chest radiographs (pulmonary densification and/or pleural effusions) are capable of identifying, within 24 h of admission t o the hospital, subgroups of both patients at higher risk of adverse clinical outcome and of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis[29].

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the Ranson, Glasgow and Fan criteria are at present useful in clinical practice for their simplicity and low costs. The APACHE II score gives useful information in patients with a more severe form of acute pancreatitis. Serum determination of interleukins may play a role in the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis only when rapid techniques for their determination are developed. At present, C-reactive protein is the marker which is the easiest to perform and which has the lowest cost. The evaluation of both chest radiographs and serum creatinine is also simple to carry out in the Emergency Room.

Footnotes

Edited by MA Jing-Yun

References
1.  Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Banks PA. Predictors of severity in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1991;6 Suppl 1:S7-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Bank S, Wise L, Gersten M. Risk factors in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78:637-640.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS. Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1986;1:69-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, Fink SD, Eng K, Spencer FC. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139:69-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Wilson C, Heads A, Shenkin A, Imrie CW. C-reactive protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1989;76:177-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Talamini G, Bassi C, Falconi M, Sartori N, Frulloni L, Di Francesco V, Vesentini S, Pederzoli P, Cavallini G. Risk of death from acute pancreatitis. Role of early, simple "routine" data. Int J Pancreatol. 1996;19:15-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Ranson JH. The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1979;189:654-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 239]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Imrie CW, Benjamin IS, Ferguson JC, McKay AJ, Mackenzie I, O'Neill J, Blumgart LH. A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1978;65:337-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O'Neill J, Gilmour WH, Carter DC. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1984;25:1340-1346.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 484]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 449]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  London NJ, Neoptolemos JP, Lavelle J, Bailey I, James D. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scanning and prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1989;76:268-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Fan ST, Choi TK, Lai EC, Wong J. Prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: an alternative approach. Gut. 1989;30:1591-1595.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818-829.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW. Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1260-1264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Miglioli M, Gullo L. Serum amylase and lipase concentrations and lipase/amylase ratio in assessment of etiology and severity of acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1265-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Platè L, Bongiovanni F, Morselli Labate AM, Miglioli M. Human pancreas-specific protein/procarboxypeptidase B: a useful serum marker of acute pancreatitis. Digestion. 1994;55:73-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Gullo L, Ventrucci M, Pezzilli R, Platé L, Naldoni P. Diagnostic value of serum elastase 1 in pancreatic disease. Br J Surg. 1987;74:44-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Bowen M, Cooper EH. C reactive protein: an aid to assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:207-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Cappelletti O, Barakat B. Serum C-reactive protein in acute biliary pancreatitis. Is it a reliable marker for the early assessment of severity of the disease? Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;29:554-557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Gross V, Schölmerich J, Leser HG, Salm R, Lausen M, Rückauer K, Schöffel U, Lay L, Heinisch A, Farthmann EH. Granulocyte elastase in assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis. Comparison with acute-phase proteins C-reactive protein, alpha 1-antitrypsin, and protease inhibitor alpha 2-macroglobulin. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:97-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Domínguez-Muñoz JE, Carballo F, García MJ, de Diego JM, Rábago L, Simón MA, de la Morena J. Clinical usefulness of polymorphonuclear elastase in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis: results of a multicentre study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1230-1234.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Heath DI, Cruickshank A, Gudgeon M, Jehanli A, Shenkin A, Imrie CW. Role of interleukin-6 in mediating the acute phase protein response and potential as an early means of severity assessment in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1993;34:41-45.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Gross V, Andreesen R, Leser HG, Ceska M, Liehl E, Lausen M, Farthmann EH, Schölmerich J. Interleukin-8 and neutrophil activation in acute pancreatitis. Eur J Clin Invest. 1992;22:200-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Miniero R, Fiocchi M, Cappelletti O, Morselli-Labate AM, Barakat B, Sprovieri G, Miglioli M. Serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and beta 2-microglobulin in early assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis. Comparison with serum C-reactive protein. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2341-2348.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Gullo L, Beltrandi E, Maldini M, Mancini R, Incorvaia L, Miglioli M. Behavior of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor, soluble CD8 and soluble CD4 in the early phases of acute pancreatitis. Digestion. 1994;55:268-273.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Platè L, Barakat B, Bongiovanni F, Miglioli M. Human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor in the assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis. A comparison with C-reactive protein. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19:112-117.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, Megibow AJ, Caccavale R, Cooper MM. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. 1985;156:767-772.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Pezzilli R, Billi P, Barakat B, Broccoli P, Morselli Labate A. The use of the peripheral leukocyte count and chest X-rays in early assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis in comparison with the Ranson score system. Panminerva Med. 1999;41:39-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Talamini G, Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Rabitti PG, Billi P, Bassi C, Cavallini G, Pederzoli P. Serum creatinine and chest radiographs in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1999;177:7-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]