Invited Commentary Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1999. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 1999; 5(3): 195-198
Published online Jun 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i3.195
The Hsp90 chaperone complex-A potential target for cancer therapy?
Beatrice D. Darimont, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
Author contributions: Darimont BD solely contributed to the work.
Correspondence to: Beatrice D. Darimont, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco. CA 941430450, USA. darimon@itsa.ucsf.edu
Fax: +1-415-5028644
Received: May 17, 1999
Revised: May 25, 1999
Accepted: April 29, 1999
Published online: June 15, 1999

Abstract



ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Down-regulation of Hsp90 could change cell cycle distribution and increase drug sensitivity of tumor cells.

MAJOR POINTS OF THE COMMENTED ARTICLE

Using an antisense RNA approach, Liu et al studied the consequence of lowering Hsp90 β expression in two human gastric (SGC7901, SGC7901/VCR), one hepatic (HCC7402) and one esophageal (Ec109) cancer cell line. For two of the investigated cell lines (SGC7901/VCR and Ec109) cell growth slowed down upon decrease of the Hsp90 β level due to an increase in G1 cell phase. The growth rate of the SGC7901 cell line was unaffected by lowering the concentration of Hsp90 β, however the duration of G1 was decreased while G2 increased. No Hsp90 β dependent change in the growth was detectable for the hepatic cancer cell line HCC7402, which expressed Hsp90 β in lower levels than the other cell lines. Upon lowering the Hsp90 β concentration, all cell lines became more sensitive to chemotherapeutic drugs. Increases in the efficacy of mitomycin C (MMC) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) were generally modest (0-5 fold), although the SGC7901 cell line exhibited a 24.8 fold increased sensitivity to MMC. With the exception of the cell line SGC7901/VCR, dramatic effects were observed on the sensitivity of the cell lines to ad riamycin (ADR) and vincristine (MMC) with a 104 fold and 3 × 104 fold increase in sensitivity of SGC7901 to VCR, or Ec109 to ADR, respectively.

COMMENTARY

Molecular chaperones are one of the life-guards of a living cell. They coordinate and execute basic and essential cell functions, such as facilitation of protein folding and oligomeric assembly of proteins, as well as the regulation of ligand binding and release, subcellular localization and turnover of proteins[1,2]. They are important for cell viability, and have been proposed to act as evolutionary tools, that produce a pool of mutant proteins under stress conditions[3,4]. Not surprisingly, aberrant chaperone action has been linked to numerous diseases[5-8], and the clinical interest in chaperones as targets for drug based treatments is increasing.

Hsp90 assembles into multiprotein complexes

Hsp90, a highly conserved and ubiquitously expressed chaperone of animal and plant cells, is one of the most abundantly expressed proteins (1%-2% of the cytoso lic protein in unstressed mammalian cells)[2,9-11]. Most eukaryotic cells contain at least two Hsp90 isoforms-the heat shock induced Hsp90 β and the usually less regulated Hsp90 β[12] Another close relative, Grp94, is expressed in the endoplasmatic reticulum[11,13]. Hsp90 assembles into large multiprotein complexes, that have partially overlapping compositions and include other chaperones such as Hsp70, Hip (“Hsp70-interacting protein”), Hop (“Hsp90-Hsp70 organizing protein”, also called p60, Sti1), p23, and one of three large immunophilins FKBP51, FKBP52 (Hsp56), or Cyp40, which are peptidyl prolyl isomerases[2,10].

Hsp90 folds and controls the activity of regulatory proteins involved in signaling

The predominant role of these complexes may be to facilitate the maturation, fun ctional regulation, cellular localization and stress-dependent protection and repair of proteins rather than to assist the folding of de novo synthesized proteins[14-16]. Interestingly, many of the substrates of these Hsp90 chaperone complexes are regulatory proteins, or proteins involved in structural organization such as actin and tubulin[2]. One of the best studied substrates of Hsp90 chaperone complexes are intracellular receptors, especially but not exclusively steroid receptors[10,17-22]. In vivo association of unliganded steroid receptors with Hsp90 chaperone complexes is required for optimal steroid binding[23-25], and may also affect receptor subcellular trafficking[26]. Hsp90 chaperone complexes also assist in the folding, maturation, membrane localization and degradation of many protein kinases[2,10,20], such as v-Src[27], Raf[28], eIF-2-α-kinase[29], casein kinase II (CK II)[30], mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)[31], cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)[32,33], and the cyclin-dependent kinase regulator Weel[34]. Association of these kinases with Hsp90 chaperone complexes is mediated by p50 cdc37, an homolog of the yeast cell cycle control protein, cdc37[33,35]. The ability to interact functionally with a wide variety of regulatory proteins suggests that Hsp90 chaperone complexes may also coordinate and establish crosstalk between different signal transduction pathways. A recent study by Le Bihan et al[36] gave evidence for modulation of progestin-and glucocorticosteroid receptor-mediated transcription by calcium/calmodulin kinases (CaMK types II and IV), presumably through Hsp90 chaperone complexes.

The role of Hsp90 in cell cycling and cancer

Hsp90 action has been connected to cell cycle and cell differentiation[2,37,38], most likely as a consequence of their role in folding and functional regulation of intracellular receptors, protein kinases and other potential substrates such as p53[9,39]. Moreover, the expression pattern of Hsp90 itself can be cell cycle dependent[40]. Increased levels of Hsp90 (mostly Hsp90 α ) have been found in various malignant cell lines and cancers and usually correlate with vigorous proliferation of the malignant cells[2,41-44].

In a complementary study Liu et al[45] (this issue) investigate the consequence of lowering Hsp90 β expression in several human cancer cell lines using an antisense RNA approach. In agreement with the trend seen in other studies[41-44], they find that in some but not all cancer cell lines growth slows upon decrease of the Hsp90 β level, with various changes in cell cycle phasing.For one cell line, the hepatic cancer cell line HCC7402, growth and cell cycle phasing is not affected by reduced expression of Hsp90 β. Thus, overexpression of Hsp90 is not essential for cancerous growth. In fact, in an invasive and tumorigenic subline of 8701-BC breast cells down-regulation of Hsp90 β has been observed[46]. In view of the differences in the regulation of Hsp90 α and Hsp90 β, it would be interesting to extend the studies of Liu et al to Hsp90 α, whose expression is usually more directly linked to the cell cycle than that of Hsp90 β.

Hsp90 as target for anti-tumor drugs

Pharmacologically, the influence of Hsp90 activity on tumor growth is well established. Hsp90 chaperone complexes are targets for several pharmacological drugs[2,9,47]. The antibiotic geldanamycin is an anti-tumor drug that binds to the ATP/ADP binding site in the N-terminal domain of Hsp90[48]. Geldanamycin interferes with the folding, maturation, cellular localization and degradation of various intracellular receptors and kinases[2,9,47], and initially was described as an inhibitor for cell cycle kinases[49]. Another, unrelated antibiotic, Radicicol, also binds to the ATP-ADP-binding site of Hsp90 and suppresses transformation by diverse oncogenes such as Src, Ras and Mos[50,51]. Geldanamycin prevents binding of p23 to Hsp90[19], however whether its anti-tumor activity is due directly to this interference remains to be investigated. Although the role of ATP/ADP in the function of Hsp90 is not fully understood, the functional consequence of the binding of these structurally unrelated antibiotics to the Hsp90 ATP/ADP-binding site marks this site as an interesting target for drug design. Other potential and probably more selective drug targets in the Hsp90 chaperone complex are the immunophilins FKBP51, FKBP52 or Cyp40 that bind the immunosuppressants FK506, rapamycin or cyclosporin A[10,19].

Hsp90 mediated multidrug resistance

In addition of being target for several pharmacological drugs, Hsp90 chaperone complexes influence the sensitivity of cells to many drugs, and high Hsp90 expression is often associated with multidrug resistance[52], a major impediment of successful cancer chemotherapy. In their present study, Liu et al[45] demonstrate that upon lowering the Hsp90 β concentration the sensitivity of cancer cell lines to chemotherapeutic drugs increases, however the extent of these changes was strongly dependent on the drug. With exception of some cancer cell lines, their Hsp90 β dependent increases in the efficacy are generally modest (0-5-fold) for the drugs mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide, and more dramatic (up to 3 × 104-fold) for the drugs adriamycin and vincristine.

The mechanisms underlying multidrug resistance appear to be complex and are not well understood. In many tumor cells multidrug resistance is associated with overexpression of either the 170 kDa P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or members of the ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily, such as the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) or the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), that act as drug export pumps[53-55]. A third form of multidrug resistance (atypical MDR) correlates with quantitative or qualitative alterations in topoisomerase iiα, that actively participates in the lethal action of cytotoxic drugs[56,57]. The mechanism of Hsp90 mediated multidrug resistance remains largely to be characterized. The contribution of Hsp90 might be a general strengthening of the stress response and the cellular resistance to cytotoxic drugs. However, in some drug resistant cell lines Hsp90 β was found to stabilize and enhance the function of Pgp[52] suggesting a more direct role of Hsp90 in regulating multidrug resistance.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Hsp90 chaperone complexes are vital and versatile coordinators and regulators of multiple signal transduction pathways. In higher organisms their action goes beyond that of a single cell and also affects complex regulatory systems such as the immune response. Hsp90, Grp94 and Hsp70 bind peptides and deliver them to MHC class I molecules, which increases the efficiency of the immune response[58] and often enhance tumor immunogenicity[59]. These pleiotropic functions make Hsp90 chaperone complexes ideal targets for the treatment of cancers.

Antisense Hsp90 mRNA expression, as used by Liu et al[45] is a powerful tool for regulating Hsp90 expression and reducing proliferation in some cancer cell lines. However, the inherent difficulty of selectively targeting antisense constructs to tumor cells impedes the usage of this strategy for clinical therapy. In contrast, the role of Hsp90, Grp94 and Hsp70 in tumor immunogenicity may offer new strategies for anti-tumor vaccination. Presently, the most promising strategy for an Hsp90 targeted therapy is the functional regulation of Hsp90 by drugs such as geldanamycin or radicicol. The solution of the molecular structures of Hsp90 : ATP/ADP and Hsp90 : geldanamycin complexes[48,60] allows the identification of structural features required for Hsp90 binding, and to develop new drugs with different pharmacological properties by structure based design. Other attractive targets for drug based regulation of Hsp90 chaperone complexes are the sites for the interaction with the kinase specific p50cdc37 or immunophilins that appear to mediate specificity by directing Hsp90 chaperone complexes to particular substrates. Future elucidation of the composition, structure and function of those complexes will certainly open new possibilities for the treatment of cancer.

Footnotes

See article on page 199

Edited by Jing-Yun Ma

References
1.  Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature. 1996;381:571-579.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2714]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2534]  [Article Influence: 90.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Csermely P, Schnaider T, Soti C, Prohászka Z, Nardai G. The 90-kDa molecular chaperone family: structure, function, and clinical applications. A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;79:129-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Csermely P. Proteins, RNAs and chaperones in enzyme evolution: a folding perspective. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:147-149.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Rutherford SL, Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998;396:336-342.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1712]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1456]  [Article Influence: 56.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Welch WJ. Mammalian stress response: cell physiology, structure/function of stress proteins, and implications for medicine and disease. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:1063-1081.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Burdon RH. Heat shock proteins in relation to medicine. Mol Aspects Med. 1993;14:83-165.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Jindal S. Heat shock proteins: applications in health and disease. Trends Biotechnol. 1996;14:17-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Brooks DA. Protein processing: a role in the pathophysiology of genetic disease. FEBS Lett. 1997;409:115-120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Scheibel T, Buchner J. The Hsp90 complex--a super-chaperone machine as a novel drug target. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;56:675-682.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Pratt WB. The hsp90-based chaperone system: involvement in signal transduction from a variety of hormone and growth factor receptors. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998;217:420-434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 348]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 337]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Scheibel T, Buchner J. The Hsp90 family: an overview. In: Gething MJ, ed. Guidebook to molecular chaperones and protein catalyses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1997;147-151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Krone PH, Sass JB. HSP 90 alpha and HSP 90 beta genes are present in the zebrafish and are differentially regulated in developing embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;204:746-752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Gupta RS. Phylogenetic analysis of the 90 kD heat shock family of protein sequences and an examination of the relationship among animals, plants, and fungi species. Mol Biol Evol. 1995;12:1063-1073.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Nair SC, Toran EJ, Rimerman RA, Hjermstad S, Smithgall TE, Smith DF. A pathway of multi-chaperone interactions common to diverse regulatory proteins: estrogen receptor, Fes tyrosine kinase, heat shock transcription factor Hsf1, and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1996;1:237-250.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Johnson JL, Craig EA. Protein folding in vivo: unraveling complex pathways. Cell. 1997;90:201-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Nathan DF, Vos MH, Lindquist S. In vivo functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp90 chaperone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:12949-12956.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 278]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 292]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Smith DF, Toft DO. Steroid receptors and their associated proteins. Mol Endocrinol. 1993;7:4-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Bohen SP, Yamamoto KR. Modulation of steroid receptor signal transduction by heat shock proteins. In: The biology of heat shock proteins and molecular chaperones. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1994;313-334.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Pratt WB, Toft DO. Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:306-360.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Pratt WB. The role of the hsp90-based chaperone system in signal transduction by nuclear receptors and receptors signaling via MAP kinase. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:297-326.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 241]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Holley SJ, Yamamoto KR. A role for Hsp90 in retinoid receptor signal transduction. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6:1833-1842.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Pongratz I, Mason GG, Poellinger L. Dual roles of the 90-kDa heat shock protein hsp90 in modulating functional activities of the dioxin receptor. Evidence that the dioxin receptor functionally belongs to a subclass of nuclear receptors which require hsp90 both for ligand binding activity and repression of intrinsic DNA binding activity. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13728-13734.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Picard D, Khursheed B, Garabedian MJ, Fortin MG, Lindquist S, Yamamoto KR. Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo. Nature. 1990;348:166-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 594]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 596]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Bohen SP, Yamamoto KR. Isolation of Hsp90 mutants by screening for decreased steroid function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;11424-11428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Nathan DF, Lindquist S. Mutational analysis of Hsp90 function: interactions with a steroid receptor and a protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:3917-3925.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 330]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 344]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  DeFranco DB, Ramakrishnan C, Tang Y. Molecular chaperones and subcellular trafficking of steroid receptors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998;65:51-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Xu Y, Lindquist S. Heat-shock protein hsp90 governs the activity of pp60v-src kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7074-7078.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  van der Straten A, Rommel C, Dickson B, Hafen E. The heat shock protein 83 (Hsp83) is required for Raf-mediated signalling in Drosophila. EMBO J. 1997;16:1961-1969.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Uma S, Hartson SD, Chen JJ, Matts RL. Hsp90 is obligatory for the heme-regulated eIF-2alpha kinase to acquire and maintain an activable conformation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:11648-11656.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Miyata Y, Yahara I. The 90-kDa heat shock protein, HSP90, binds and protects casein kinase II from self-aggregation and enhances its kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:7042-7047.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Stancato LF, Silverstein AM, Owens-Grillo JK, Chow YH, Jove R, Pratt WB. The hsp90-binding antibiotic geldanamycin decreases Raf levels and epidermal growth factor signaling without disrupting formation of signaling complexes or reducing the specific enzymatic activity of Raf kinase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:4013-4020.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 156]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 155]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Dai K, Kobayashi R, Beach D. Physical interaction of mammalian CDC37 with CDK4. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:22030-22034.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Stepanova L, Leng X, Parker SB, Harper JW. Mammalian p50Cdc37 is a protein kinase-targeting subunit of Hsp90 that binds and stabilizes Cdk4. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1491-1502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 380]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 397]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Aligue R, Akhavan-Niak H, Russell P. A role for Hsp90 in cell cycle control: Wee1 tyrosine kinase activity requires interaction with Hsp90. EMBO J. 1994;13:6099-6106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Kimura Y, Rutherford SL, Miyata Y, Yahara I, Freeman BC, Yue L, Morimoto RI, Lindquist S. Cdc37 is a molecular chaperone with specific functions in signal transduction. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1775-1785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 163]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 174]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Le Bihan S, Marsaud V, Mercier-Bodard C, Baulieu EE, Mader S, White JH, Renoir JM. Calcium/calmodulin kinase inhibitors and immunosuppressant macrolides rapamycin and FK506 inhibit progestin- and glucocorticosteroid receptor-mediated transcription in human breast cancer T47D cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1998;12:986-1001.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Sato N, Torigoe T. The molecular chaperones in cell cycle control. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;851:61-66.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Galea-Lauri J, Latchman DS, Katz DR. The role of the 90-kDa heat shock protein in cell cycle control and differentiation of the monoblastoid cell line U937. Exp Cell Res. 1996;226:243-254.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Sepehrnia B, Paz IB, Dasgupta G, Momand J. Heat shock protein 84 forms a complex with mutant p53 protein predominantly within a cytoplasmic compartment of the cell. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:15084-15090.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Jérôme V, Vourc'h C, Baulieu EE, Catelli MG. Cell cycle regulation of the chicken hsp90 alpha expression. Exp Cell Res. 1993;205:44-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Ferrarini M, Heltai S, Zocchi MR, Rugarli C. Unusual expression and localization of heat-shock proteins in human tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:613-619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 319]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 339]  [Article Influence: 10.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Yufu Y, Nishimura J, Nawata H. High constitutive expression of heat shock protein 90 alpha in human acute leukemia cells. Leuk Res. 1992;16:597-605.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Franzén B, Linder S, Alaiya AA, Eriksson E, Fujioka K, Bergman AC, Jörnvall H, Auer G. Analysis of polypeptide expression in benign and malignant human breast lesions. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:582-587.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Nanbu K, Konishi I, Komatsu T, Mandai M, Yamamoto S, Kuroda H, Koshiyama M, Mori T. Expression of heat shock proteins HSP70 and HSP90 in endometrial carcinomas. Correlation with clinicopathology, sex steroid receptor status, and p53 protein expression. Cancer. 1996;77:330-338.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Liu XL, Xiao B, Yu ZC, Guo JC, Zhao QC, Xu L, Shi YQ, Fan DM. Down-regulation of Hsp90 could change cell cycle distribution and increase drug sensitivity of tumor cells. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:199-208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Luparello C, Noël A, Pucci-Minafra I. Intratumoral heterogeneity for hsp90beta mRNA levels in a breast cancer cell line. DNA Cell Biol. 1997;16:1231-1236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Cardenas ME, Sanfridson A, Cutler NS, Heitman J. Signal-transduction cascades as targets for therapeutic intervention by natural products. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:427-433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of an Hsp90-geldanamycin complex: targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell. 1997;89:239-250.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1057]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1039]  [Article Influence: 38.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Uehara Y, Murakami Y, Suzukake-Tsuchiya K, Moriya Y, Sano H, Shibata K, Omura S. Effects of herbimycin derivatives on src oncogene function in relation to antitumor activity. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1988;41:831-834.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Sharma SV, Agatsuma T, Nakano H. Targeting of the protein chaperone, HSP90, by the transformation suppressing agent, radicicol. Oncogene. 1998;16:2639-2645.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 215]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 203]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Roe SM, Prodromou C, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. J Med Chem. 1999;42:260-266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 784]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 740]  [Article Influence: 29.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Bertram J, Palfner K, Hiddemann W, Kneba M. Increase of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance by hsp 90 beta. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:838-845.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Persidis A. Cancer multidrug resistance. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:94-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 244]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 236]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Bradshaw DM, Arceci RJ. Clinical relevance of transmembrane drug efflux as a mechanism of multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3674-3690.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Doyle LA, Yang W, Abruzzo LV, Krogmann T, Gao Y, Rishi AK, Ross DD. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:15665-15670.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1643]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1609]  [Article Influence: 61.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Volm M. Multidrug resistance and its reversal. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:2905-2917.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Nooter K, Stoter G. Molecular mechanisms of multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Pathol Res Pract. 1996;192:768-780.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Multhoff G, Botzler C, Issels R. The role of heat shock proteins in the stimulation of an immune response. Biol Chem. 1998;379:295-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Campbell FA, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hayes D. The role of tumor rejection antigens in host antitumor defense mechanisms. Cancer. 1995;75:2649-2655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Prodromou C, Roe SM, O'Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. Identification and structural characterization of the ATP/ADP-binding site in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. Cell. 1997;90:65-75.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 984]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 955]  [Article Influence: 35.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]