BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2026; 32(41): 121544
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121544
Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: From childhood to adulthood
Ali Islek, Gokhan Tumgor, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Adana 01330, Türkiye
Serap Ketenci İşlek, Department of Pediatric Genetic, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Türkiye
ORCID number: Ali Islek (0000-0001-6172-7797); Serap Ketenci İşlek (0009-0000-5360-0219); Gokhan Tumgor (0000-0002-3919-002X).
Author contributions: Islek A and Tumgor G contributed to the conception and design of the study, performed the literature review and drafted the manuscript; İşlek SK contributed to the genetic interpretation and provided critical input on molecular aspects of the study; Tumgor G contributed to clinical interpretation with a focus on pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology and critically revised the manuscript; all authors contributed to data interpretation, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: ChatGPT, Grammarly, and DeepL were used for English spelling and grammar correction. AI was used only for English language correction. Figure 1 was created with the aid of artificial intelligence. All AI-generated images were reviewed, verified, and approved by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the final content.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author: Gokhan Tumgor, MD, Professor, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, South Campus Street, Balcalı village, 15/10 Saricam, Adana 01330, Türkiye. gtumgor74@yahoo.com
Received: March 27, 2026
Revised: May 25, 2026
Accepted: June 8, 2026
Published online: November 7, 2026
Processing time: 175 Days and 16.7 Hours

Abstract

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a heterogeneous group of inherited cholestatic liver disorders characterized by impaired bile formation and secretion. Although traditionally classified into numbered subtypes, PFIC is now increasingly understood within a mechanism-based framework involving defects in canalicular transport, membrane lipid homeostasis, tight junction integrity, intracellular trafficking, and bile acid regulatory pathways. This evolving classification better accounts for the marked phenotypic variability, overlapping clinical presentations, and expanding genetic spectrum of the disease. From a clinical perspective, PFIC typically presents with cholestasis, pruritus, and growth impairment in infancy or early childhood. However, accumulating evidence indicates that disease expression may extend into adolescence and adulthood, with milder or atypical phenotypes increasingly recognized. Biochemical stratification, particularly based on gamma-glutamyl transferase levels, remains a key diagnostic entry point, but genetic testing is required for definitive diagnosis. Genotype-phenotype correlations, especially in ABCB11- and ABCB4-related diseases, have important implications for prognosis and malignancy risk. Furthermore, recent advances in pathophysiology have informed the development of targeted therapies, including ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors, while surgical approaches and liver transplantation remain essential in advanced disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular mechanisms, clinical features, diagnostic strategies, and current as well as emerging therapeutic approaches for PFIC.

Key Words: Bile acid transport; Cholestasis; Genotype-phenotype correlation; Ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors; Genetic diagnosis

Core Tip: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a genetically and mechanistically diverse group of cholestatic liver disorders whose clinical spectrum spans from childhood well into adulthood. The disease classification has evolved from a numerical system to a mechanism-based framework encompassing defects in canalicular transport, membrane stability, tight junction integrity, intracellular trafficking, and bile acid regulation. This comprehensive review underscores the significance of integrating early genetic testing with biochemical patterns, particularly gamma-glutamyl transferase levels, for accurate diagnosis. Genotype-phenotype correlations and extrahepatic manifestations are essential for prognostic assessment and individualized management. Emerging targeted therapies, including ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors, support a mechanism-driven approach to PFIC.



INTRODUCTION

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) comprises a genetically and mechanistically heterogeneous group of autosomal recessive cholestatic liver disorders caused by defects affecting key components of hepatobiliary bile formation and secretion[1,2]. The condition was first described by Clayton et al[3] in 1965 as “Byler disease”. The estimated incidence ranges from 1 in 50000 to 1 in 100000 live births, with no significant sex predilection[2,4].

Although PFIC was historically considered a disease exclusive to infancy and early childhood, the increasing utilization of genetic testing has revealed that it can also manifest in adolescence and adulthood with a broader clinical spectrum[4,5]. Concurrently, advances in molecular genetics have expanded the disease classification from the original three types to at least thirteen genetically defined subtypes, reflecting the heterogeneity of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms as reflected in multiple gene-specific entries in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database[1,6].

Clinically, PFIC is no longer regarded as a uniform disorder limited to jaundice, pruritus, and growth retardation. Rather, it encompasses a wide spectrum of cholestatic diseases with variable severity, ranging from intermittent or mild cholestasis to rapidly progressive liver failure[4,7]. Crucially, PFIC is associated with severe long-term complications, including cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and, in some cases, cholangiocarcinoma, affecting both pediatric and adult populations[1,4].

Emerging evidence indicates that variants in PFIC-related genes may also contribute to a broader range of cholestatic phenotypes beyond classical PFIC. These include adult-onset low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis (LPAC), benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC), drug-induced cholestasis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), and cryptogenic cholestatic liver disease[4,5]. In these conditions, PFIC-related variants may act as disease modifiers or susceptibility factors, contributing to phenotypic variability and disease severity[2,6].

From a therapeutic perspective, management of PFIC remains challenging. Conventional treatments, including ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and antipruritic medications, often provide limited efficacy, particularly in severe disease[7,8]. In recent years, novel pharmacologic agents targeting enterohepatic bile acid circulation, particularly selective ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors, have demonstrated promising clinical and biochemical improvements, marking a significant advance in the treatment landscape[9,10].

Despite these developments, the natural history of PFIC remains unfavorable in many. Fewer than half of individuals with PFIC1 retain their native liver into adulthood, and approximately 70% of patients ultimately require surgical biliary diversion or liver transplantation[11,12].

Pruritus represents one of the most debilitating clinical features of PFIC, significantly impairing quality of life[13]. In pediatric patients, severe and persistent itching often occurring both day and night can be profoundly distressing and may constitute an indication for liver transplantation even in the absence of advanced hepatic dysfunction[7].

In light of this expanding clinical and genetic spectrum, it has become increasingly clear that PFIC can no longer be adequately understood through a purely phenotype-based or numerical classification. Instead, current evidence supports a mechanism-based framework in which disease manifestations arise from defects affecting distinct yet interconnected components of hepatobiliary physiology[1,4]. These include canalicular transport systems, membrane lipid composition, tight junction integrity, intracellular trafficking pathways, and bile acid-regulated transcriptional networks.

This mechanistic perspective not only provides a more coherent explanation for the marked phenotypic heterogeneity observed across PFIC subtypes, but also establishes the foundation for genotype-driven diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies[5,7]. Accordingly, a detailed understanding of the molecular architecture underlying PFIC is essential for accurate disease classification, prognostic assessment, and the development of personalized treatment approaches.

Search strategy and study selection

Literature for this narrative review was retrieved through a structured, comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles published in English up to March 2026 were screened using combinations of the following terms: “Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis”, “PFIC”, “ABCB11”, “ABCB4”, “ATP8B1”, “TJP2”, “NR1H4”, “MYO5B”, “USP53”, “KIF12”, “ZFYVE19”, “VPS33B”, “PSKH1”, “cholestasis”, “bile acid transport” and “IBAT inhibitors”. The reference lists of all identified relevant articles were manually reviewed to identify additional studies. Priority was given to recent reviews, clinical guidelines, cohort studies, clinical trials, and key mechanistic papers. Given the narrative design of this review, formal evidence grading was not performed; however, structural emphasis was rigorously placed on clinically relevant and high-quality peer-reviewed publications.

MOLECULAR ARCHITECTURE OF PFIC: A MECHANISM-BASED MODULAR FRAMEWORK

PFIC comprises a heterogeneous group of monogenic disorders characterized by defective hepatocellular bile formation and secretion[14]. Although traditionally classified numerically (PFIC1-PFIC13; OMIM phenotypic series), contemporary hepatology supports a mechanism-based framework that reflects disruption of distinct yet interconnected components of the hepatobiliary transport machinery[15]. This modular perspective offers a more coherent explanation for the marked phenotypic variability, genotype-phenotype overlap, and the expanding spectrum of PFIC-related disorders[2,14]. The specific genes implicated in PFIC pathogenesis and their corresponding molecular mechanisms are structurally summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Mechanism-based classification of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. This schematic illustrates the principal molecular pathways involved in hepatocellular bile formation and secretion and summarizes the major mechanistic categories underlying progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Canalicular transport defects (e.g., ABCB11, ABCB4, ABCC2, ABCG5/ABCG8) impair bile acid, phospholipid, and organic anion secretion, whereas defects in membrane lipid homeostasis (ATP8B1) compromise canalicular membrane stability. Tight junction abnormalities (TJP2, USP53) disrupt epithelial barrier integrity and promote paracellular bile leakage, while intracellular trafficking and polarity defects (MYO5B, VPS33B, ZFYVE19) impair canalicular transporter localization. Nuclear receptor dysfunction (NR1H4) alters bile acid synthesis and transporter regulation, whereas defects in enterohepatic circulation (SLC51A/SLC51B) disrupt bile acid recycling. OST: Organic solute transporter; BSEP: Bile salt export pump; MDR3: Multidrug resistance protein-3; MRP2: Multi-drug resistance protein 2; BA: Bile acid; PC: Phosphatidylcholine; FXR: Farnesoid X receptor; PFIC: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. The authors used artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist in the generation of graphical content included in this manuscript. All AI-generated images were reviewed, verified, and approved by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the final content.
Table 1 Genes associated with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and related cholestatic disorders.
Gene (HGNC)
Locus
Mechanism
Protein
PFIC type/phenotype
OMIM
Inheritance
ABCB112q31.1Canalicular bile salt transport defectsBile salt export pumpCholestasis, benign recurrent intrahepatic 2605479AR
Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic 2601847AR
ABCB47q21.12Canalicular phospholipid salt transport defectsMultidrug resistance protein 3Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy 3614972AD, AR
Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic 3602347AR
Gallbladder disease 1600803AD, AR
ATP8B118q21.31Membrane lipid homeostasis/canalicular stabilityFamilial intrahepatic cholestasis protein 1Cholestasis, benign recurrent intrahepatic243300AR
Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy 1147480AD
Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic 1211600AR
TJP29q21.11Tight junction/epithelial barrier defectsTight junction protein 2Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic 4615878AR
Hypercholanemia, familial 1607748AR
USP534q26Tight junction/epithelial barrier defectsUbiquitin-specific peptidase 53Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 7, with or without hearing loss619658AR
NR1H412q23.1Transcriptional regulation of bile acid homeostasisNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H member 4Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 5617049AR
MYO5B18q21.1Intracellular trafficking and epithelial defectsMyosin VbCholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 10619868AR
Diarrhea 2, with microvillus atrophy, with or without cholestasis251850AR
VPS33B15q26.1Intracellular trafficking and epithelial defectsVacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 33BArthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, and cholestasis 1208085AR
Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 12620010AR
Keratoderma-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, autosomal recessive620009AR
ZFYVE1915q15.1Ciliopathy/cholangiocyte architecture defectsZinc finger FYVE domain-containing protein 19Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 9619849AR
SLC51A3q29Enterohepatic bile acid transport defectsOrganic solute transporter alphaCholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 6619484AR
KIF129q32Ciliopathy/cholangiocyte polarity defects Kinesin family member 12Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 8619662AR
SEMA7A15q24.1Signaling/inflammatory modulation Semaphorin-7ACholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 11619874AR
PSKH116q22.1Ciliopathy/epithelial polarity defects Protein serine kinase H1 Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 13620962AR
Canalicular transport defects

The adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette transporter family constitutes a large superfamily of transmembrane proteins with numerous members that form the core components of the hepatobiliary transport system and play a critical role in the canalicular secretion of biliary constituents. Among these, the transporters most closely related to hepatobiliary physiology include ABCB11 [bile salt export pump (BSEP)], ABCB4 [multidrug resistance protein-3 (MDR3)], ABCC2 (multi-drug resistance protein 2), and the ABCG5/ABCG8 heterodimer. Within the PFIC spectrum, the primary genetic determinants of canalicular transport defects are ABCB11 and ABCB4[16,17].

ABCB11 encodes the BSEP, a canalicular membrane transporter in hepatocytes that represents the rate-limiting step in the secretion of bile acids from the hepatocyte cytoplasm into the canalicular lumen[18]. Biallelic (homozygous or compound heterozygous) loss-of-function variants lead to intracellular bile acid accumulation, resulting in marked hepatocellular toxicity, severe early-onset cholestasis, and, in advanced cases, an increased risk of HCC in childhood[17,19,20]. ABCB11-associated phenotypes are not restricted to PFIC2; rather, they form a spectrum largely determined by residual BSEP activity and may include milder or episodic cholestatic conditions such as BRIC type 2 as well as susceptibility states such as ICP (Table 1). Accordingly, contemporary concepts support a mechanism-based framework for PFIC rather than a purely numerical classification[14,17,19,21,22].

From a genotype-phenotype perspective, protein-truncating variants such as nonsense/frameshift- are consistently associated with the most severe and early-onset presentations of the disease. Conversely, numerous missense variants retain partial residual activity through defects in protein folding, stability, or canalicular trafficking and therefore produce a more variable or comparatively milder clinical spectrum[17,19,21,23-27]. Although specific recurrent missense alleles [e.g., p.(Glu297Gly) and p.(Asp482Gly)] are frequently categorized as milder genotypes, large cohort data indicate that allelic combination is a major determinant of disease severity, and the presence of a “mild” missense variant in trans with a protein-truncating variant may still result in a severe phenotype[17,27,28]. Increasing evidence further suggests that heterozygous ABCB11 variants, while not typically causing a fully penetrant Mendelian disorder on their own, may act as susceptibility factors for cholestasis under environmental stressors such as hormones or drugs. This supports a gene-environment interaction model in which reduced transporter reserve predisposes to cholestasis when physiological demand increases[17,22,28].

ABCB4 encodes MDR3, an ATP-dependent phospholipid floppase localized to the hepatocyte canalicular membrane that translocates phosphatidylcholine from the inner to the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer into bile[14]. These phospholipids form mixed micelles with bile acids, thereby buffering the detergent activity of hydrophobic bile salts and preserving biliary epithelial integrity[17,29].

Biallelic (homozygous or compound heterozygous) loss-of-function variants in ABCB4 lead to reduced phosphatidylcholine secretion, culminating in the formation of low-phospholipid bile. This impairment in mixed micelle formation increases exposure of the biliary epithelium to unbuffered, detergent bile acids, resulting in cholangiocellular vulnerability[30-32]. Importantly, this pathophysiology reflects a primary defect in bile composition and phospholipid homeostasis, rather than a direct impairment of bile acid export. This mechanistic distinction clearly differentiates ABCB4 deficiency from other forms of canalicular cholestasis driven by primary bile acid transport failure[14,17,32].

ABCB4 variants are not confined to PFIC3 but instead define a broad biological continuum. Depending on the level of residual MDR3 activity, the phenotypic spectrum ranges from severe fibrocholestatic liver disease to LPAC, ICP, and adult-onset cholangiopathic phenotypes. Current evidence indicates that phenotypic severity is largely determined by zygosity and variant type[14,17,30,31].

From a genotype-phenotype perspective, protein-truncating variants are generally associated with more profound phosphatidylcholine deficiency. In contrast, many missense variants produce partial defects in MDR3 folding or canalicular targeting, allowing variable residual phospholipid secretion. This variability in micellar stability and bile detoxification capacity likely underlies the marked phenotypic heterogeneity observed in ABCB4-related disease[14,17,30,33,34].

Heterozygous ABCB4 variants are often clinically silent in isolation; however, phenotypic expression may emerge under conditions that further limit micellar buffering capacity, such as pregnancy, estrogen exposure, infections, or cholestatic medications. These observations support a gene-environment interaction model in which ABCB4-related disorders reflect an underlying fragility of bile composition rather than a fixed binary defect[17,21,31] (Figure 1).

This schematic illustrates the principal molecular pathways involved in hepatocellular bile formation and secretion and summarizes the major mechanistic categories underlying PFIC. Canalicular transport defects (e.g., ABCB11, ABCB4, ABCC2, ABCG5/ABCG8) impair bile acid, phospholipid, and organic anion secretion, whereas defects in membrane lipid homeostasis (ATP8B1) compromise canalicular membrane stability. Tight junction abnormalities (TJP2, USP53) disrupt epithelial barrier integrity and promote paracellular bile leakage, while intracellular trafficking and polarity defects (MYO5B, VPS33B, ZFYVE19) impair canalicular transporter localization. Nuclear receptor dysfunction (NR1H4) alters bile acid synthesis and transporter regulation, whereas defects in enterohepatic circulation (SLC51A/SLC51B) disrupt bile acid recycling.

Membrane lipid homeostasis and canalicular stability

ATP8B1 encodes familial intrahepatic cholestasis protein 1 (FIC1), a member of the P4-type adenosine triphosphatase family that functions as a phospholipid flippase responsible for maintaining canalicular membrane lipid asymmetry and stability[35-37]. Biallelic pathogenic variants in ATP8B1 cause a phenotypic spectrum ranging from BRIC type 1 (BRIC1) to PFIC1. Unlike BSEP deficiency, ATP8B1 disease is primarily considered a disorder of membrane integrity rather than a direct bile salt export defect[38,39].

At the molecular level, ATP8B1 deficiency renders the canalicular membrane more susceptible to bile salt-induced injury, leading to hepatocellular damage and secondary disturbances in farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-regulated bile acid homeostasis[39]. Because ATP8B1 is expressed in multiple extrahepatic tissues, affected patients may present with chronic diarrhea, pancreatitis, growth failure, and sensorineural hearing loss; experimental animal models have further suggested possible systemic and neurodevelopmental involvement[35,40,41]. These features provide important clinical clues for distinguishing PFIC1 from other causes of low- gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) cholestasis.

The mutational spectrum of ATP8B1 is highly heterogeneous and includes missense, nonsense, frameshift, splice-site, and structural variants such as multi-exonic deletions and duplications. Residual FIC1 function is a major determinant of clinical severity: Missense variants tend to be associated with the milder BRIC1 phenotype, whereas truncating variants are more commonly linked to PFIC1[42-45]. Nevertheless, marked intrafamilial variability and phenotypic overlap indicate additional contributions from modifier genes, epigenetic influences, and environmental factors[41]. Notably, selected synonymous variants may also exert pathogenic effects through aberrant splicing or transcript instability when functionally validated[45].

Tight junction and epithelial barrier dysfunction

The integrity of hepatocellular tight junctions is critical for maintaining the blood-bile barrier and preserving hepatocyte polarity. Within the PFIC spectrum, tight junction-related cholestasis is primarily represented by TJP2 (PFIC4) and USP53 (PFIC7), whereas CLDN1 deficiency constitutes a PFIC-mimicking syndromic cholangiopathy rather than a classical PFIC subtype[14,46-48].

TJP2, also known as zona occludens-2, is an important cytoplasmic scaffold protein of the tight junction complex in epithelial cells. It connects transmembrane tight junction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, thereby maintaining intercellular barrier integrity. In the liver, tight junctions between hepatocytes form the bile-blood barrier, thereby preventing leakage of biliary components into the hepatic parenchyma. The integrity of this structure is essential for maintaining hepatocyte polarity and the physiological regulation of bile secretion[49-51].

Biallelic loss-of-function mutations in TJP2 destabilize the tight junction complex between hepatocytes, allowing bile acids and other toxic biliary components to leak into the intercellular space through the paracellular pathway, ultimately leading to hepatocellular injury and progressive cholestasis. In addition, TJP2 deficiency disrupts the proper canalicular localization of claudin-1, further compromising the integrity of the hepatobiliary barrier[49,50].

Experimental models indicate that the consequences of TJP2 loss extend beyond barrier dysfunction; TJP2-deficient livers demonstrate dilation of bile canaliculi, reduced microvillus density, and altered radixin distribution, along with decreased expression of key bile acid transporters such as ABCB11/BSEP. Together, these alterations impair bile acid excretion, promote intracellular bile acid accumulation, and contribute to progressive cholestatic liver injury[51].

The phenotypic spectrum of TJP2-related disease extends beyond classical biallelic loss-of-function mutations. Heterozygous TJP2 variants have been described in individuals with milder cholestatic phenotypes and may act as genetic susceptibility factors for ICP[49,52]. A representative example is the p.(Val48Ala) founder mutation identified in the Old Order Amish population. This missense variant, located in the PDZ1 (postsynaptic density protein-95/discs large/zona occludens-1) domain of TJP2, impairs claudin binding while retaining partial protein function and is associated with familial hypercholanemia-1. The phenotype is characterized by incomplete penetrance and variable clinical severity, and in some cases liver disease may improve with age. In certain individuals, the phenotype may be further modified by digenic inheritance involving BAAT[53]. In addition, because TJP2 is widely expressed in epithelial tissues, rare extrahepatic manifestations such as hearing loss have also been reported[54].

Recent studies indicate that TJP2 functions not only as a structural component of tight junctions but also as a regulator of Hippo signaling. Loss of TJP2 promotes nuclear translocation of the Hippo pathway effectors yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) and activation of proliferative transcriptional programs; in experimental models, TJP2 deficiency has been shown to induce hepatocyte-to-cholangiocyte transdifferentiation through Hippo pathway dysregulation[55]. Aberrant activation of YAP/TAZ signaling is a recognized driver of HCC development, suggesting a potential mechanistic link between TJP2 deficiency and tumorigenesis[56]. Notably, HCC reported in TJP2-related disease has predominantly occurred in patients with biallelic truncating variants causing complete loss of TJP2 function, suggesting that severe disruption of tight junction integrity and chronic bile acid-mediated hepatocyte injury may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis[46,57-59].

USP53, a protein expressed in epithelial tissues that contributes to the stabilization of the tight junction complex and the maintenance of hepatocyte polarity[60,61]. Although USP53 belongs to the deubiquitinating enzyme family, it lacks the catalytic histidine residue required for classical enzymatic activity, suggesting that its function is predominantly structural and regulatory rather than enzymatic[62]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that USP53 interacts with tight junction components, particularly TJP2, thereby contributing to the maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity; loss of this protein disrupts junctional organization and may lead to intrahepatic cholestasis characterized by low or normal GGT levels[47,61,62].

More recent experimental data indicate that the consequences of USP53 deficiency extend beyond tight junction instability. In particular, loss of USP53 has been shown to impair the canalicular trafficking of the BSEP (ABCB11) through disruption of the MYO5B- and Rab11-mediated recycling endosome pathway, resulting in intracellular retention of BSEP and reduced bile acid secretion. These findings suggest that the pathogenesis of USP53-related cholestasis cannot be explained solely by tight junction destabilization but likely reflects a more complex mechanism involving defects in the intracellular trafficking of apical membrane transporters[63]. Notably, current clinical data indicate that genotype-phenotype correlations remain poorly defined, suggesting that additional genetic or environmental modifiers may influence disease severity[60,64-66].

Nuclear receptor and transcriptional regulation

Nuclear receptors involved in bile acid signaling play a critical role in maintaining hepatobiliary homeostasis. Among these regulators, NR1H4 is the principal gene directly associated with PFIC in this functional group. NR1H4 encodes the FXR, a bile acid–activated nuclear receptor that functions as a key transcription factor regulating bile acid synthesis, hepatocellular transport, and enterohepatic circulation[67-69].

In hepatocytes, activation of FXR regulates the expression of several target genes involved in bile acid homeostasis. FXR induces the expression of the canalicular bile acid transporter (BSEP/ABCB11), thereby promoting the secretion of bile acids from hepatocytes into the bile canaliculi. In addition, FXR suppresses bile acid synthesis by inducing small heterodimer partner, which inhibits transcription of CYP7A1, the rate-limiting enzyme of bile acid synthesis. This coordinated negative feedback mechanism prevents intracellular bile acid accumulation and protects hepatocytes from bile acid-mediated toxicity[67,70].

Biallelic pathogenic variants in NR1H4 disrupt FXR-mediated transcriptional regulation, leading to impaired control of bile acid synthesis and secretion. In the absence of functional FXR signaling, bile acid synthesis cannot be adequately suppressed while canalicular export is simultaneously reduced, resulting in rapid intracellular accumulation of toxic bile acids and early-onset cholestatic liver injury. To date, approximately 15 patients with NR1H4-related disease have been reported worldwide, harboring 16 different pathogenic variants. However, the limited number of reported cases currently precludes robust genotype-phenotype correlations[71,72].

Intracellular trafficking, epithelial polarity and cytoskeletal regulation

VPS33B is a member of the Sec1/Munc18 protein family and functions as a trafficking protein involved in intracellular vesicular transport, membrane fusion, protein sorting, and the maintenance of apical-basolateral polarity in polarized cells. VPS33B interacts with soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor proteins and forms a complex with VIPAS39/VIPAR, enabling proper targeting of cargo proteins in polarized epithelial cells, hepatocytes, and megakaryocytes[73-75]. Consequently, VPS33B dysfunction results in a multisystem phenotype affecting the liver, renal tubules, epidermis, and platelets[74-78]. In the liver, VPS33B plays a crucial role in maintaining hepatocyte polarity. Experimental studies have shown that loss of VPS33B leads to mislocalization of apical membrane proteins and canalicular transport systems, while basolateral protein localization remains relatively preserved[76,79,80]. Current evidence suggests that VPS33B-related disorders represent a broad phenotypic spectrum ranging from severe arthrogryposis-renal dysfunction-cholestasis (ARC) syndrome to milder or incomplete ARC forms and autosomal recessive keratoderma-ichthyosis-deafness (ARKID) syndrome. Clinical variability appears to be largely determined by mutation type and residual protein function[75,77,81-83]. Notably, the presence of the p.(Gly131Glu) missense variant in at least one allele has been proposed to be associated with the milder cutaneous-dominant phenotype observed in ARKID syndrome[77,81,83].

Beyond VPS33B, accumulating evidence indicates that defects in intracellular trafficking pathways regulating epithelial polarity and cytoskeletal organization also contribute to cholestatic liver disease. In this context, ZFYVE19 encodes zinc finger FYVE-type containing protein 19, also known as abscission/NoCut checkpoint regulator, which participates in the regulation of the final stage of cytokinesis. ZFYVE19 interacts with vacuolar protein sorting-4 and functions as a regulatory component of the abscission checkpoint, ensuring accurate chromosomal segregation during cell division[84-86]. In addition, ZFYVE19 has been implicated in primary cilium formation and cellular polarity-associated pathways[85,86].

Genetic studies have demonstrated that biallelic loss-of-function variants in ZFYVE19 are associated with hereditary cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive hepatobiliary dysfunction[86-88]. Current data support the concept that the underlying pathogenic mechanism is loss of ZFYVE19 protein function[86,89,90]. Genotype-phenotype correlations remain poorly defined, as patients carrying the same pathogenic variant may exhibit variable clinical outcomes, suggesting the presence of additional genetic or environmental modifiers[88]. Experimental studies further support this mechanism; in ZFYVE19 -/- mouse models, genetic therapy restoring ZFYVE19 expression, together with bile acid-modulating treatments, has been shown to ameliorate hepatobiliary injury and attenuate liver fibrosis[89,90].

MYO5B encodes myosin Vb, an actin-based motor protein that regulates intracellular vesicular trafficking and recycling endosome transport in polarized epithelial cells. MYO5B interacts with Rab family GTPases, particularly Rab11 and Rab8, and plays a central role in the targeting and recycling of apical membrane proteins[91,92]. In hepatocytes, MYO5B regulates the vesicular trafficking and canalicular localization of key bile transporters, including BSEP and MDR3, through Rab11-dependent recycling pathways[93,94]. Disruption of MYO5B function leads to mislocalization of these canalicular transport proteins and impaired bile secretion, ultimately resulting in cholestasis[93,95,96].

Accumulating evidence points to MYO5B-related disorders comprise a broad phenotypic spectrum. Clinical manifestations range from isolated intestinal disease, such as microvillus inclusion disease, to predominant cholestatic liver disease or mixed intestinal-hepatic phenotypes. Genotype-phenotype correlations appear to depend largely on the type of variant, its location within the protein, and the degree of residual MYO5B function[93-98]. Variants causing complete loss of protein function are more commonly associated with severe intestinal disease, whereas variants allowing partial protein activity may preferentially impair hepatocellular transporter trafficking and present with isolated cholestatic liver disease[95]. Recent experimental studies further suggest that certain MYO5B variants, including heterozygous variants, may exert dominant-negative or toxic gain-of-function effects on hepatocellular trafficking pathways, thereby impairing canalicular transporter localization and contributing to intrahepatic cholestasis[93,96].

Enterohepatic circulation components

In addition to defects affecting intracellular trafficking and hepatocellular polarity, disturbances in bile acid transport systems may also contribute to cholestatic phenotypes. The organic solute transporter α/β (OSTα/β), encoded by SLC51A and SLC51B, is a heterodimeric bile acid transporter expressed in the liver, intestine, and kidney. Localized to the basolateral membrane of hepatocytes and enterocytes, OSTα/β mediates the efflux of bile acids into the portal circulation and plays an important role in maintaining bile acid homeostasis[99-101]. To date, only a few cases associated with SLC51A have been reported. The first confirmed case involved a homozygous p.(Gln186Ter) variant presenting with early-onset diarrhea and cholestasis[102]. Three additional related patients carrying a homozygous p.(Ile282Thr) variant were reported with early-onset fat malabsorption and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency[103]. Although this variant was classified as a variant of uncertain significance, the cases were considered part of the broader clinical spectrum associated with SLC51A[103]. In addition, two siblings with biallelic SLC51B variants have been reported, presenting with chronic diarrhea, fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, and biochemical features of cholestatic liver disease, further supporting the role of the OSTα/β complex in bile acid homeostasis[104].

Recently identified PFIC genes

KIF12 encodes kinesin family member 12, a microtubule-dependent motor protein involved in intracellular cargo transport. Kinesin proteins regulate vesicular and protein trafficking along microtubules and play essential roles in intracellular transport, cytoskeletal organization, and the maintenance of epithelial cell polarity[105,106]. A significant proportion of the reported pathogenic variants have been shown to localize within the kinesin motor domain[105,107]. The molecular mechanism underlying KIF12-associated cholestasis has not yet been fully elucidated. However, current evidence suggests that KIF12 may participate in microtubule-dependent intracellular transport processes that are important for maintaining hepatocyte polarity and the correct localization of canalicular membrane proteins. Consequently, disruption of KIF12 function may impair intracellular trafficking of bile transporter proteins, leading to defective bile secretion and the development of cholestasis[105-109].

SEMA7A encodes semaphorin-7A, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein belonging to the semaphorin family that regulates cell adhesion, immune signaling, and cytoskeletal organization. Through interaction with β1-integrin receptors, SEMA7A participates in signaling pathways involved in inflammatory responses and tissue remodeling[110-113]. Experimental studies have demonstrated increased SEMA7A expression in fibrotic liver tissue and activation of hepatic stellate cells through integrin-mediated signaling pathways, suggesting a role in liver injury and fibrogenesis[111-114]. Recently, rare variants in SEMA7A have been reported in association with severe pediatric cholestatic liver disease presenting with a progressive intrahepatic cholestasis-like phenotype[115]. Although the precise molecular mechanism remains incompletely understood, dysregulation of SEMA7A-mediated signaling may contribute to hepatic inflammation, fibrogenesis, and disruption of hepatobiliary homeostasis, thereby promoting cholestasis[110,113-116]. However, due to the very limited number of reported cases, the role of SEMA7A in cholestatic liver disease remains to be further clarified.

PSKH1 encodes protein serine kinase H1, a serine/threonine kinase involved in intracellular trafficking and epithelial cell polarity. The protein localizes mainly to the Golgi apparatus and centrosomal compartments and is thought to regulate vesicular transport and membrane protein targeting[117,118]. Experimental evidence also suggests a role in ciliary biology, as homozygous PSKH1 p.(Leu219Pro) mutant mice develop situs inversus totalis, supporting a defect in ciliary function[119]. Recently, biallelic PSKH1 variants have been reported in patients with pediatric cholestatic liver disease and hepatorenal involvement, suggesting that PSKH1-associated disease represents an autosomal recessive ciliopathy affecting hepatobiliary function[120]. However, due to the limited number of reported cases, genotype-phenotype correlations remain incompletely defined.

Collectively, these findings indicate that disturbances in intracellular trafficking, epithelial polarity, ciliary function, and inflammatory signaling pathways may represent additional mechanisms underlying PFIC-like cholestatic liver disease.

SUBTYPE-SPECIFIC CLINICAL PROFILES

PFIC comprises multiple genetically defined subtypes, each associated with distinct molecular mechanisms, clinical features, and disease trajectories. Although there is substantial phenotypic overlap across subtypes, recognition of subtype-specific patterns is essential for accurate diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making[4,7].

PFIC1 (ATP8B1 deficiency)

PFIC1 is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in ATP8B1, encoding the phospholipid flippase FIC1, which is critical for maintaining canalicular membrane lipid asymmetry and stability. PFIC1 typically presents itself during infancy with cholestasis, severe pruritus, growth failure, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency in the setting of low or normal GGT levels[4]. Histopathology often demonstrates bland cholestasis with progressive portal and periportal fibrosis over time[7].

A hallmark of PFIC1 is its prominent extrahepatic involvement, reflecting the broad epithelial expression of ATP8B1. Patients frequently develop chronic diarrhea, pancreatitis or pancreatic insufficiency, sensorineural hearing loss, and failure to thrive[121]. These features distinguish PFIC1 from other low-GGT cholestatic disorders and support its classification as a multisystem epithelial disease rather than a purely hepatic condition. Importantly, extrahepatic manifestations may persist or even worsen after liver transplantation, with post-transplant diarrhea and graft steatosis reported in a subset of patients[121].

The clinical course is variable. Although historically considered relatively indolent, recent cohort data indicate that fibrosis may develop early in some individuals. Despite phenotypic variability, long-term native liver survival remains limited, with only approximately 44% of patients retaining their native liver into late adolescence or adulthood[12].

PFIC2 (ABCB11 deficiency)

PFIC2 results from biallelic pathogenic variants in ABCB11, encoding the BSEP, and represents a primary defect in hepatocellular bile acid secretion[4]. It typically presents in the neonatal or early infantile period with severe low-GGT cholestasis, rapidly progressive fibrosis, and early liver failure. Histologically, giant cell hepatitis and marked cholestasis are common, and immunohistochemistry often demonstrates reduced or absent BSEP expression[4].

PFIC2 is characterized by minimal extrahepatic involvement due to the liver-specific expression of ABCB11. However, it is one of the most clinically severe PFIC subtypes and shows a strong genotype-phenotype correlation. Residual BSEP function is a major determinant of disease severity. Patients harboring protein-truncating variants or severe loss-of-function genotypes generally demonstrate markedly reduced native liver survival[4,7].

A particularly important feature of PFIC2 is the increased risk of HCC at an early age. Cohort studies have shown that malignancy risk correlates with genotype severity, with substantially higher rates observed in patients with minimal residual BSEP activity[4]. These findings underscore the need for early and structured oncologic surveillance in this subgroup.

PFIC3 (ABCB4 deficiency)

PFIC3 is caused by biallelic variants in ABCB4, encoding MDR3, a phospholipid transporter responsible for phosphatidylcholine secretion into bile. Unlike PFIC1 and PFIC2, the primary defect in PFIC3 is impaired bile composition rather than defective bile acid export, resulting in increased biliary toxicity and cholangiocyte injury[4].

Clinically, PFIC3 is characterized by high-GGT cholestasis and typically presents later in childhood or adolescence, although earlier onset may occur in severe cases. Patients may develop hepatomegaly, pruritus, splenomegaly, portal hypertension, and progressive biliary fibrosis. Histologic findings often reflect chronic cholangiopathy[122].

The phenotypic spectrum of ABCB4-related disease extends beyond classical PFIC3. Biallelic variants are usually associated with severe pediatric disease, whereas heterozygous or milder variants may predispose to adult conditions such as ICP, LPAC, drug-induced cholestasis, and cryptogenic fibrosing cholangiopathy[4,122]. Genotype-phenotype correlations are complex and appear to be influenced by zygosity, variant type, and residual transporter function.

PFIC4 (TJP2 deficiency)

PFIC4 is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in TJP2, a key component of epithelial tight junction complexes[1,46]. The disorder is characterized by low or normal GGT cholestasis resulting from disruption of the hepatocyte bile-blood barrier and leakage of bile acids into the hepatic parenchyma[46,123].

Clinical presentation ranges from neonatal cholestasis to rapidly progressive liver failure requiring transplantation[1,124]. Histologically, PFIC4 shows cholestasis and progressive fibrosis, often culminating in cirrhosis[123]. Though extrahepatic manifestations are relatively uncommon, they may involve neurological or respiratory systems in some patients[1,124].

Recent studies have raised the possibility of an association between TJP2 deficiency and HCC, possibly mediated through chronic bile acid-induced injury and dysregulation of signaling pathways such as Hippo/YAP[123]. These findings highlight the need for careful long-term surveillance[59,124].

PFIC5 (NR1H4 deficiency)

PFIC5 is an aggressive cholestatic disorder caused by biallelic variants in NR1H4, encoding the bile acid-activated nuclear receptor FXR. Loss of FXR function leads to profound dysregulation of bile acid synthesis and transport[75,125].

Clinically, PFIC5 presents in the neonatal period with severe low-GGT cholestasis, markedly elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels, vitamin K-independent coagulopathy, and rapid progression to liver failure[75,125,126]. Additional features may include hypoglycemia, failure to thrive, and hepatosplenomegaly[75]. Despite high intestinal FXR expression, severe diarrhea is not consistently observed[75].

The natural history is characterized by rapid deterioration, with many patients requiring liver transplantation within the first year of life[75,76]. Interpretation of persistently elevated alpha-fetal protein levels may be challenging, as they generally reflect hepatocellular injury rather than malignancy in most cases[126,127].

PFIC6 (SLC51A deficiency)

PFIC6 is associated with biallelic variants in SLC51A, encoding the OSTα subunit of the OSTα/β bile acid transporter. This transporter mediates basolateral bile acid efflux from enterocytes and hepatocytes, and its deficiency disrupts enterohepatic circulation[2,6].

Clinically, PFIC6 presents with a combined hepatointestinal phenotype, including cholestasis, chronic diarrhea, steatorrhea, growth impairment, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency[2,6]. This distinguishes it from classical PFIC subtypes driven primarily by hepatocellular defects. Due to the limited number of reported cases, the full clinical spectrum and additional cases and longitudinal studies are needed to better define the clinical spectrum and long-term outcomes[2].

PFIC7 (USP53 deficiency)

PFIC7 is caused by pathogenic variants in USP53, a protein involved in tight junction stability and epithelial polarity[128,129]. The disease is relatively rare and may present later in childhood or adolescence compared with classical PFIC subtypes[128,130].

Clinical manifestations include cholestasis with pruritus, and the disease course may be milder in many patients[128]. Approximately 30-35 cases have been reported, with a notable clustering in Middle Eastern populations[128]. Emerging evidence suggests that some patients may respond favorably to IBAT inhibitors, indicating potential therapeutic relevance[131].

PFIC8 (KIF12 deficiency)

PFIC8 is a rare disorder associated with KIF12, a kinesin motor protein involved in intracellular trafficking and epithelial polarity[129,132]. It is generally associated with high-GGT cholestasis and presents in early life, although the phenotypic spectrum remains incompletely defined[6,132].

Notably, atypical presentations have been described, including cases without overt cholestasis but with chronic liver disease and pancreatitis, suggesting that KIF12-related disease may extend beyond classical cholestatic phenotypes[129]. More aggressive disease courses progressing to end-stage liver disease and early liver transplantation have also been reported[133].

PFIC9 (ZFYVE19 deficiency)

PFIC9 is caused by biallelic variants in ZFYVE19 and is increasingly recognized as a cholangiociliopathy[6,85]. It is characterized by high-GGT cholestasis, ductal plate malformation, congenital hepatic fibrosis, and progressive portal hypertension[85,134,135].

Patients often present with hepatosplenomegaly, pruritus, and complications of portal hypertension, including gastrointestinal bleeding[85]. Disease progression is common, and many patients ultimately require liver transplantation[85,87]. Experimental data further support a causal role for ZFYVE19 deficiency in hepatobiliary injury and fibrosis[90].

PFIC10 (MYO5B deficiency)

PFIC10 results from biallelic variants in MYO5B, which encodes myosin Vb, a motor protein involved in intracellular trafficking of apical membrane proteins[136,137]. The disease spectrum ranges from isolated cholestatic liver disease to microvillus inclusion disease or combined intestinal-hepatic phenotypes[75,95].

Although PFIC10 is classically associated with low-GGT cholestasis, biochemical variability has been observed, including cases with elevated GGT levels[136,138]. Clinical severity depends on the degree of intestinal involvement and residual protein function[95,137]. Preliminary clinical experience suggests that selected patients with MYO5B variants may benefit from odevixibat[139].

PFIC11 (SEMA7A deficiency)

PFIC11 is an extremely rare condition associated with variants in SEMA7A[115]. The limited available data describe a phenotype of cholestasis with elevated bile acids and relatively mild clinical features[115]. The biologic plausibility of this association is supported by broader evidence linking semaphorin 7A to fibrogenic and inflammatory signaling pathways[113,140]. Nevertheless, additional mechanistic and clinical studies are needed to establish the role of SEMA7A in PFIC[115].

PFIC12 (VPS33B deficiency)

PFIC12 represents a milder hepatic phenotype within the VPS33B-associated disease spectrum[141]. Patients present with low-GGT cholestasis and severe pruritus, often without the full features of ARC syndrome[141]. However, subtle extrahepatic findings, including renal, dermatologic, or skeletal abnormalities, may be present and require long-term follow-up[83,141]. Experimental studies further support a mechanistic role for VPS33B in cholestatic liver injury through disruption of epithelial polarity and trafficking pathways[79]. The broader phenotypic spectrum also includes ARKID syndrome, supporting marked genotype-dependent variability[77].

PFIC13 (PSKH1 deficiency)

PFIC13 is a recently described hepatorenal ciliopathy caused by biallelic PSKH1 variants[120]. It is characterized by progressive cholestatic liver disease with frequent renal involvement, including structural abnormalities and glomerular injury[120].

Clinical features include hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, ascites, and progressive fibrosis, with some patients requiring liver transplantation. The presence of multisystem involvement supports its classification as a ciliopathy rather than an isolated hepatic disorder[120].

CLINICAL SPECTRUM AND NATURAL HISTORY

PFIC encompasses a broad and evolving clinical spectrum, ranging from severe neonatal cholestatic liver disease to milder or later-onset phenotypes presenting in adolescence or adulthood[1,2]. Although PFIC was historically regarded as a disorder of infancy, increasing use of next-generation sequencing has demonstrated that disease expression is highly variable and depends on the underlying molecular defect, residual protein function, and, in some cases, environmental or hormonal triggers[4,7]. As a result, PFIC is now better understood as a continuum of cholestatic disorders rather than a single, uniform pediatric entity[5].

Age at onset and mode of presentation

Most classical PFIC subtypes present during infancy or early childhood, often with persistent cholestasis, jaundice, pruritus, and poor weight gain[2,8]. Early-onset disease is particularly characteristic of PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC4, PFIC5, PFIC6, PFIC10, PFIC12, and PFIC13. Among these, PFIC2 and PFIC5 are notable for especially early and aggressive onset, frequently in the neonatal period, with rapid progression to advanced liver disease[75,125]. In contrast, PFIC3 and PFIC7 may present later in childhood or adolescence, and adult-onset presentations are increasingly recognized in disorders related to ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, TJP2, and USP53[5,122,128]. These later presentations may manifest not as classical childhood PFIC, but as recurrent cholestasis, LPAC, ICP, drug-induced cholestasis, or otherwise unexplained chronic cholangiopathic liver disease[2,4].

Biochemical patterns: Low-GGT and high-GGT phenotypes

One of the most clinically useful frameworks in PFIC is the distinction between low- or normal-GGT cholestasis and high-GGT cholestasis[4,8]. PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC4, PFIC5, PFIC10, and PFIC12 typically present with low- or normal-GGT cholestasis, reflecting defects in bile acid export, membrane stability, tight junction integrity, nuclear regulation, or intracellular trafficking rather than primary cholangiocyte injury[1,7]. PFIC7 and PFIC11 may also fall within this low-GGT spectrum, although the number of reported cases remains limited[115,128]. By contrast, PFIC3, PFIC8, and PFIC9 are more often associated with elevated GGT levels, consistent with cholangiocellular injury, ductular involvement, or abnormalities in bile duct morphogenesis[85,122,132]. This biochemical distinction is highly valuable in the diagnostic approach, although exceptions do occur, and overlap between categories should be expected in rare or complex phenotypes[4].

Hepatic manifestations

Despite marked genetic heterogeneity, the core hepatic phenotype of PFIC includes cholestasis, jaundice, pruritus, hepatomegaly, and progressive fibrotic liver injury[1,2]. Pruritus is often one of the most debilitating features and may dominate the clinical picture even before advanced hepatic dysfunction becomes evident[13]. Progression from cholestasis to fibrosis, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and liver failure is observed across multiple subtypes, although the tempo varies considerably[4,7]. PFIC2 and PFIC5 are among the most aggressive forms, often progressing rapidly to liver failure in infancy[75,125]. PFIC3 more commonly follows a fibrocholangiopathic course with biliary fibrosis and portal hypertension, whereas PFIC9 is particularly associated with ductal plate malformation[122], congenital hepatic fibrosis, and progressive portal hypertensive disease[85]. PFIC4 may range from relatively mild neonatal cholestasis to severe liver failure requiring transplantation[46,124]. Altogether, these observations indicate that the hepatic spectrum of PFIC is far broader than the classical image of isolated pediatric cholestasis.

Extrahepatic manifestations and multisystem involvement

A major driver of phenotypic diversity in PFIC is the extent of extrahepatic involvement. PFIC1 is the prototypical multisystem form, with diarrhea, pancreatitis or pancreatic insufficiency, hearing loss, and growth failure reflecting the broader epithelial expression of ATP8B1[45,121]. PFIC6 may also show a combined hepatointestinal phenotype, with chronic diarrhea, steatorrhea, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency due to defective enterohepatic bile acid transport[2]. PFIC10 occupies a distinctive position because MYO5B deficiency may present with isolated cholestatic liver disease, severe microvillus inclusion disease, or a mixed intestinal-hepatic phenotype[95,137]. PFIC12, caused by VPS33B variants, may resemble an attenuated form of ARC syndrome, with subtle renal, musculoskeletal, or dermatologic manifestations in addition to cholestasis[141].

PFIC13 has emerged as a clear hepatorenal ciliopathy, with renal agenesis, hydronephrosis, glomerular injury, and interstitial fibrosis accompanying progressive liver disease[120]. Even in genes classically considered liver-predominant, such as TJP2 or USP53, extrahepatic findings including hearing abnormalities or developmental features have occasionally been reported[123,128]. These patterns emphasize that PFIC should not always be regarded as a purely hepatic disorder, but often as part of a broader epithelial, polarity, or ciliopathy spectrum.

Histopathology and clinicopathologic correlates

Histopathologic findings in PFIC vary substantially according to the underlying mechanism but frequently parallel the biochemical and clinical phenotype[4,7]. While PFIC1 classically presents bland cholestasis with progressive portal or periportal fibrosis over time, PFIC2 may show giant cell hepatitis, marked cholestasis, and reduced or absent BSEP expression on immunohistochemistry[1]. PFIC3 typically demonstrates biliary injury and progressive fibrosis consistent with chronic cholangiopathy[122]. PFIC4 is characterized by cholestasis and progressive fibrosis that may rapidly culminate in cirrhosis[123]. PFIC5 frequently shows markedly reduced or absent canalicular BSEP expression, reflecting the central role of FXR in regulating ABCB11 transcription[125]. PFIC9 is particularly distinctive, with ductal plate malformation, congenital hepatic fibrosis, bile duct proliferation, ductular reaction, and, in some patients, features of sclerosing cholangiopathy[85]. These histologic differences are clinically useful because they reflect the underlying biology and may guide both diagnosis and prognosis.

Malignancy risk and long-term outcomes

Long-term outcome in PFIC is highly variable and strongly subtype-dependent[4,7]. Some patients experience relatively indolent disease or intermittent cholestasis, whereas others progress rapidly to liver failure in the first months of life. Native liver survival is particularly poor in severe ABCB11- and NR1H4-related disease[12,75]. In ATP8B1 deficiency, fewer than half of affected individuals retain their native liver into adulthood[12]. Malignancy risk is another major determinant of prognosis. PFIC2 carries the strongest established association with early HCC, particularly in patients with severe genotypes and minimal residual BSEP function[1,4]. TJP2-related disease has also been linked to HCC in childhood, suggesting that chronic bile acid-mediated injury and severe epithelial barrier disruption may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis[59]. In PFIC5, persistently elevated alpha-fetoprotein may complicate surveillance because it can reflect severe hepatocellular injury even in the absence of malignancy[75,126]. Overall, the natural history of PFIC is shaped by both hepatic progression and subtype-specific complications, reinforcing the need for long-term surveillance strategies tailored to molecular diagnosis[4].

Consistent with this clinical heterogeneity, in our institutional experience, a cohort of 25 patients with PFIC demonstrated a predominance of ABCB4-related disease (PFIC3, 40%), followed by ABCB11 (PFIC2, 28%) and TJP2 (PFIC4, 20%), while rarer subtypes, including USP53 (PFIC7), KIF12 (PFIC8), and MYO5B (PFIC10), were each identified in single patients. This distribution underscores both the relative frequency of major subtypes and the considerable genetic heterogeneity encountered in clinical practice. Notably, a patient with USP53-related disease (PFIC7) showed rapid resolution of refractory pruritus following odevixibat therapy, whereas a patient with KIF12-related disease (PFIC8) presented with chronic liver disease and pancreatitis in the absence of overt cholestasis, a presentation not well described in the literature.

Expanding adult phenotypes

Although PFIC has traditionally been conceptualized as a strictly pediatric disorder, compiling evidence firmly establishes a broader hepatological continuum that extends well into adulthood. This is particularly evident in disorders related to ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, TJP2, and USP53, in which milder, atypical, or intermittent phenotypes may first present beyond childhood[4,5]. Among these, ABCB4-related disease represents the most thoroughly mapped adult phenotypes, encompassing LPAC, ICP, and drug-induced or recurrent cholestasis[2,4]. Similarly, heterozygous or hypomorphic variants in ABCB11 and ATP8B1 have been associated with BRIC and episodic cholestatic phenotypes in adolescence or adulthood. Emerging data also indicate that variants in TJP2 and USP53 may underlie unexplained chronic cholangiopathic or cryptogenic liver disease in adults, further expanding the clinical spectrum beyond classical PFIC[4,5].

Consequently, adult manifestations may therefore encompass recurrent cholestasis, pruritus, LPAC, ICP, drug-induced cholestasis, and chronic fibrosing cholangiopathy[14]. These phenotypes are often underrecognized and may be misclassified as idiopathic liver disease unless genetic testing is considered. In this context, PFIC-associated genes should increasingly be viewed as contributors to cholestatic susceptibility across the lifespan, rather than being restricted to severe pediatric disease.

Long-term outcomes are likewise highly relevant in adulthood[28]. Patients with residual function may survive into adult life with their native liver but remain at risk for progressive fibrosis, portal hypertension, and disease exacerbation under hormonal (e.g., pregnancy) or environmental triggers (e.g., medications). In contrast, severe genotypes particularly those involving ABCB11 or NR1H4 are associated with early disease progression and limited native liver survival, often necessitating transplantation in childhood[14,28].

Malignancy risk is another critical consideration. HCC is well established in severe ABCB11-related disease, with cases reported even in early childhood, but the risk may extend into adolescence and adulthood in long-term survivors[14,20]. In addition, TJP2-related disease has been increasingly associated with pediatric and early-onset HCC, suggesting that disruption of epithelial barrier integrity and chronic bile acid-mediated injury may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis[57-59]. Additionally, chronic cholangiopathic phenotypes, particularly those associated with ABCB4 or ductal plate abnormalities, may also raise concern for biliary malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma, although data remain limited[14,28,30].

Taken together, these comprehensive clinical observations highlight that PFIC represents a lifelong disorder with evolving clinical manifestations rather than a purely pediatric condition. These adult implications underscore the importance of long-term follow-up, early recognition of atypical phenotypes, and integration of genetic testing into adult hepatology practice, as well as the need for structured surveillance strategies tailored to molecular diagnosis.

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

The diagnostic evaluation of PFIC has evolved substantially with advances in molecular genetics. While PFIC was historically considered a diagnosis of exclusion, it is now increasingly approached as a genetically defined group of disorders in which early recognition and targeted testing play a central role. A structured diagnostic strategy integrating clinical presentation, biochemical profile, imaging, histopathology, and genetic analysis is essential for accurate classification and optimal management[4,7,142].

Initial clinical assessment

The diagnostic workup must initiate with a detailed clinical evaluation, encompassing the exact age at onset, family history, consanguinity, and the presence of extrahepatic features[4,7]. Early-onset cholestasis in infancy, particularly when accompanied by severe pruritus, growth failure, or fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, should raise strong suspicion for PFIC[2,7]. Furthermore, the recognition of extrahepatic manifestations may provide important diagnostic clues. For example, chronic diarrhea, pancreatitis, and hearing loss suggest ATP8B1 deficiency, whereas renal or syndromic features may indicate VPS33B- or PSKH1-related disease[120,121,141]. A careful drug history and evaluation of perinatal factors are also necessary to exclude secondary causes of cholestasis[4].

Biochemical evaluation

Serum biochemical analysis remains a cornerstone of the diagnostic approach, with particular emphasis on GGT levels[4,8]. PFIC subtypes are broadly categorized into low- or normal-GGT cholestasis and high-GGT cholestasis, which provides an important initial framework for differential diagnosis[1,2]. Specifically, low- or normal-GGT cholestasis is characteristic of PFIC1, PFIC2, PFIC4, PFIC5, PFIC10, and PFIC12, and reflects defects in hepatocellular bile acid transport, membrane integrity, tight junctions, or intracellular trafficking[1,7]. In contrast, elevated GGT levels are more typical of PFIC3, PFIC8, and PFIC9, where cholangiocellular injury or bile duct abnormalities predominate[85,122,132].

Complementary laboratory findings may further support specific diagnoses. Elevated serum bile acid levels are a consistent feature across PFIC subtypes. Markedly elevated alpha-fetoprotein may be observed in PFIC2 and PFIC5, whereas coagulopathy disproportionate to liver function suggests NR1H4 deficiency. Fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies and malabsorption may point toward PFIC1 or PFIC6[2,75,126].

Imaging studies

Abdominal ultrasonography serves as the indispensable, first-line imaging modality and is primarily used to exclude structural causes of cholestasis, such as biliary atresia, choledochal cysts, or obstructive lesions[4,8]. In PFIC, imaging findings are often nonspecific but may reveal hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or features of portal hypertension[2].

In certain subtypes, more specific findings may be present. For example, PFIC9 may demonstrate features of congenital hepatic fibrosis or ductal plate malformation, while PFIC13 may show renal abnormalities such as increased echogenicity or structural anomalies[85,129]. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or cholangiography may be helpful in selected cases to further evaluate biliary anatomy[4].

Histopathological evaluation

Liver biopsy remains a valuable diagnostic tool, particularly when genetic testing is inconclusive or unavailable[4,7]. Histopathological findings may provide important clues regarding the underlying disease mechanism.

Bland cholestasis is commonly observed in PFIC1, whereas PFIC2 may show giant cell transformation and marked hepatocellular injury. PFIC3 is characterized by biliary injury and fibrosis, reflecting its cholangiopathic nature. PFIC4 often demonstrates progressive fibrosis, while PFIC9 may show ductal plate malformation and congenital hepatic fibrosis[45,85,122,123].

Complementary immunohistochemical can further aid diagnosis. Reduced or absent BSEP expression supports PFIC2, whereas decreased MDR3 expression may indicate PFIC3. However, normal staining does not exclude disease, particularly in cases with residual protein function or trafficking defects[1].

Genetic testing

Genetic analysis has become the cornerstone of PFIC diagnosis and is now considered essential for definitive classification[4,142]. Genetic testing should be strongly considered in infants and children presenting with persistent cholestasis, particularly in the absence of biliary obstruction. Clinical and biochemical features that increase the likelihood of a genetic etiology include early-onset disease, low or normal GGT levels, severe pruritus, growth failure, and a family history of cholestatic liver disease or consanguinity.

Next-generation sequencing techniques, including targeted gene panels and whole-exome sequencing, enable the identification of pathogenic variants across the expanding PFIC spectrum[142]. Early implementation of these approaches is increasingly recommended, as it not only confirms the diagnosis but also reduces diagnostic delay, avoids unnecessary invasive procedures, and facilitates earlier initiation of mechanism-based therapies. In clinical practice, genetic testing is typically performed when initial clinical, biochemical, and imaging evaluations fail to identify a secondary cause of cholestasis.

Beyond establishing a definitive diagnosis, precise molecular characterization offers invaluable prognostic insights that directly shape therapeutic trajectories. For example, identification of truncating ABCB11 variants may predict severe disease and limited response to medical therapy, whereas certain missense variants may be associated with residual function and a more favorable course[4,7].

Concurrently, genetic testing allows identification of heterozygous variants that may act as susceptibility factors in conditions such as ICP or drug-induced cholestasis, thereby expanding the clinical relevance of PFIC-associated genes beyond classical pediatric disease[4,5]. Taken together, these observations highlight the broader clinical implications of molecular findings.

Crucially, the evolving molecular classification of PFIC has direct implications for clinical decision-making. Mechanism-based stratification facilitates more targeted diagnostic evaluation such as prioritizing genetic testing based on characteristic biochemical profiles and informs therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, recognition of syndromic or extrahepatic involvement in disorders such as ATP8B1, MYO5B, or VPS33B deficiency can guide multidisciplinary evaluation and long-term management. Ultimately, integrating molecular mechanisms into clinical workflows is essential for personalized care in PFIC. To further illustrate the clinical implications of this framework, a mechanism-based functional stratification integrating variant type, clinical features, and therapeutic considerations is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Mechanism-based clinical classification of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis integrating variant type, phenotype, and therapeutic implications.

Residual function present
Severe loss-of-function variants
Typical variant typeMissense variants; partial loss of function; reduced but preserved protein activityNonsense variants; frameshift variants; canonical splice-site variants; biallelic null variants
Mechanistic contextsCanalicular transport defects: Selected ABCB11, ABCB4 variants. Membrane lipid homeostasis/canalicular stability: Selected ATP8B1 variants. Tight junction/epithelial barrier dysfunction: Selected TJP2, USP53 variants. Intracellular trafficking/polarity defects: Selected MYO5B variantsCanalicular transport defects: Truncating ABCB11, severe ABCB4. Membrane lipid homeostasis/canalicular stability: Severe ATP8B1. Tight junction/epithelial barrier dysfunction: Severe TJP2. Nuclear receptor/transcriptional regulation: NR1H4. Intracellular trafficking/polarity defects: Severe MYO5B, VPS33B
Genotype-phenotype correlationMissense variants are often associated with residual protein activity. Genotype-phenotype correlation is evident in selected genes (e.g., ABCB11, ABCB4). Clinical severity varies widely depending on residual function. Milder or later-onset phenotypes may be observedTruncating or null variants are associated with absent protein function. Strong genotype-phenotype correlation with severe clinical presentation. Early-onset disease and rapid progression are common. Higher risk of complications (e.g., liver failure, malignancy in selected subtypes)
Clinical implicationsVariable severity. Later onset or slower progression may occur. Residual transporter activity may still permit bile flowEarly-onset, often neonatal or infantile. Rapid progression. Higher risk of advanced liver disease and complications
Therapeutic implicationsIBAT inhibitors: More likely to be beneficial. UDCA: Especially relevant in ABCB4-related disease. Rifampicin/symptomatic therapy: May be useful for pruritus. PEBD/internal diversion: Can be considered in refractory cases with preserved native liver functionIBAT inhibitors: Limited or less predictable benefit. PEBD/internal diversion: Earlier consideration in progressive disease. Liver transplantation: Often required in severe or rapidly progressive cases. Multidisciplinary management: Especially important when extrahepatic involvement is present
Key determinant: Residual protein function is the primary driver of disease severity and therapeutic response across all PFIC mechanisms
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

The differential diagnosis of PFIC includes a wide range of neonatal and pediatric cholestatic disorders. These include biliary atresia, Alagille syndrome, bile acid synthesis defects and other metabolic liver diseases (such as alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and mitochondrial disorders), infectious causes, and endocrine abnormalities[4,8].

Differentiating PFIC from these conditions requires integration of clinical, biochemical, imaging, histological, and genetic data. The absence of biliary obstruction, presence of low- or high-GGT patterns, and identification of pathogenic variants are key elements in establishing the diagnosis[7,142].

TOWARD A MECHANISM-BASED DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM

With the expanding understanding of PFIC pathophysiology, diagnostic strategies are increasingly shifting toward a mechanism-based approach. Initial classification based on GGT levels, followed by targeted genetic testing, allows effectively constricts the differential landscape[4,5]. This approach also facilitates early identification of patients who may benefit from specific therapies, such as IBAT inhibitors, and supports personalized management strategies based on genotype and predicted functional impact[5,7].

TREATMENT

The therapeutic landscape of PFIC has undergone a paradigm shift from predominantly supportive and surgical strategies toward targeted modulation of bile acid homeostasis. Current treatment approaches aim to reduce the intrahepatic bile acid pool, alleviate pruritus, delay disease progression, and minimize the need for liver transplantation. Concurrently, these strategies are uniquely personalized according to the underlying molecular mechanism and residual hepatocellular bile transport capacity[5,7].

Supportive and conventional pharmacologic therapy

Initial management remains centered on supportive measures, including optimization of nutrition and supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins. Cholestasis-associated malabsorption frequently results in deficiencies of vitamins A, D, E, and K, as well as impaired growth, necessitating early and sustained nutritional intervention[2,8].

Conventional pharmacologic therapies, including UDCA, rifampicin, cholestyramine, opioid antagonists, and antihistamines, constitute historical pillars of care, yet yield highly inconsistent and suboptimal therapeutic responses[7,11]. While UDCA may improve bile flow in certain subtypes such as PFIC3, its effect is generally insufficient in severe low-GGT PFIC (e.g., PFIC1 and PFIC2)[2,7]. Similarly, rifampicin and bile acid sequestrants may provide partial relief of pruritus, but many patients remain refractory, underscoring the need for mechanism-based therapies[7,128].

Surgical interruption of enterohepatic circulation

Surgical biliary diversion has historically served as the primary disease-modifying intervention by reducing enterohepatic bile acid recirculation. Partial external biliary diversion has demonstrated long-term efficacy, with approximately 50% of patients achieving sustained reductions in serum bile acid levels over nearly a decade of follow-up. Early postoperative normalization of bile acids is strongly associated with improved native liver survival[11,12].

However, outcomes are highly dependent on genetic subtype. Patients with PFIC2 tend to respond more favorably, whereas those with PFIC1 frequently exhibit suboptimal responses, with long-term liver transplantation rates reaching 50%-75%. PFIC3 patients also show limited benefit, with approximately 60% progressing to transplantation[11,143]. Internal diversion procedures offer improved cosmetic outcomes but lack robust long-term data, and ileal bypass is associated with high relapse rates due to intestinal adaptation[11].

Despite its efficacy in selected patients, the invasive nature and morbidity associated with surgical diversion have limited its widespread applicability, particularly in the era of emerging pharmacologic alternatives[7].

Liver transplantation

Liver transplantation remains the definitive treatment for advanced PFIC, particularly in patients with end-stage liver disease, refractory pruritus, or HCC[7,11]. Survival outcomes are favorable, with patient survival rates approaching 85% and graft survival around 77%[11]. Nevertheless, transplantation does not uniformly correct extrahepatic manifestations. In PFIC1, post-transplant complications such as chronic diarrhea, steatosis, and growth impairment frequently persist. In PFIC2, disease recurrence due to anti-BSEP antibodies has been reported, highlighting the complexity of disease biology[7,121]. These limitations emphasize the need for earlier and less invasive disease-modifying interventions.

IBAT inhibition: Targeting enterohepatic circulation

The introduction of IBAT inhibitors represents a major therapeutic advance. By blocking ileal bile acid reabsorption, these agents reduce the circulating bile acid pool and decrease hepatic exposure to toxic bile acids. This pharmacologic approach effectively mimics surgical biliary diversion while avoiding its invasiveness[9,10].

Odevixibat

Odevixibat is the most extensively studied IBAT inhibitor in PFIC. In the phase 3 PEDFIC-1 trial, involving pediatric patients with PFIC1 and PFIC2, odevixibat demonstrated significant improvements in both pruritus and biochemical parameters. Approximately 55% of treated patients achieved clinically meaningful pruritus reduction compared with 30% in the placebo group, while 33% achieved significant reductions in serum bile acid levels, compared with no responders in the placebo arm[9,10]. Therapeutic effects were observed as early as four weeks and sustained throughout treatment. Long-term extension studies confirmed durability of response, with additional benefits in sleep quality and growth parameters[10].

Real-world data further support these findings, demonstrating median reductions in serum bile acids of up to 80%-85%, along with pruritus response rates exceeding 70%. However, approximately one-quarter of patients remain non-responsive, and a subset of these ultimately require liver transplantation[144]. Notably, emerging evidence suggests that patients with PFIC7 (USP53 deficiency) may also exhibit clinical and biochemical improvement with odevixibat therapy, further supporting the potential applicability of IBAT inhibition beyond classical PFIC subtypes[145].

Importantly, treatment response appears strongly influenced by baseline disease severity and genotype. Patients with very high baseline bile acid levels (> 300 μmol/L) have a significantly increased risk of non-response. Similarly, individuals with truncating ABCB11 mutations and complete loss of BSEP function exhibit limited response, suggesting that residual bile secretion capacity is necessary for therapeutic efficacy[35,144].

Maralixibat

Maralixibat, another selective IBAT inhibitor, has been extensively studied in pediatric cholestatic disorders, particularly Alagille syndrome, and is increasingly being evaluated in PFIC. Clinical studies have demonstrated significant reductions in pruritus and serum bile acid levels, with sustained improvements over long-term follow-up[35].

In PFIC cohorts, maralixibat has shown comparable efficacy to odevixibat in reducing pruritus, although data remain more limited. Importantly, maralixibat has demonstrated a clear exposure-response relationship, with higher doses associated with greater reductions in serum bile acids and pruritus scores[35].

Long-term studies indicate that maralixibat therapy may delay progression to surgical intervention or transplantation in selected patients. As with odevixibat, treatment response appears dependent on residual bile acid transport function, and patients with complete transporter deficiency exhibit reduced responsiveness[35].

Other IBAT inhibitors

Linerixibat and additional IBAT inhibitors are currently under investigation, primarily in adult cholestatic disorders such as primary biliary cholangitis and ICP. Although PFIC-specific data are limited these molecular agents further validate the concept that targeting enterohepatic bile acid circulation is a broadly applicable therapeutic strategy across cholestatic diseases[10,35].

Comparative efficacy and positioning of IBAT inhibitors

The emergence of IBAT inhibitors has shifted the treatment paradigm toward earlier pharmacologic intervention. Compared with surgical biliary diversion, IBAT inhibition offers a non-invasive alternative with comparable mechanistic effects. While surgical approaches achieve long-term bile acid normalization in approximately half of patients, IBAT inhibitors provide clinically meaningful pruritus reduction in greater than 50% and biochemical improvement in approximately one-third of patients in controlled trials, with higher response rates observed in real-world settings[9,11,144].

However, IBAT inhibitors are not universally effective. Patients with advanced disease, very high bile acid levels, or complete loss-of-function mutations remain at high risk of treatment failure. In such cases, early transition to surgical or transplant strategies may be warranted[35,144].

Safety profile

The safety profile of IBAT inhibitors is highly favorable, with clinical trials demonstrating acceptable tolerability margins. The most common adverse events include diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and mild elevations in liver enzymes. Diarrhea is dose-dependent but typically manageable. Fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies are frequently observed but may reflect underlying disease rather than drug toxicity, necessitating ongoing monitoring and supplementation[9,10].

Integration into a mechanism-based treatment algorithm

Accumulating evidence strongly supports a highly structured, mechanism-based therapeutic hierarchy. In patients with moderate disease and preserved bile transport function, IBAT inhibitors should be considered early, potentially delaying or avoiding surgical intervention. In contrast, patients with severe disease, high bile acid burden, or complete transporter deficiency may require early consideration of biliary diversion or transplantation[5,7,35].

CONCLUSION

PFIC represents a genetically and mechanistically heterogeneous group of cholestatic liver disorders firmly establishing PFIC as a lifelong hepatological continuum rather than a strictly restricted pediatric entity. Advances in molecular genetics have shifted classification toward a mechanism-based framework, improving understanding of phenotypic variability and enabling more precise diagnosis. Accurate evaluation requires integration of clinical, biochemical, histopathological, and genetic data, while recognition of genotype-phenotype correlations and extrahepatic features is essential for prognostic assessment. Therapeutically, PFIC management is evolving toward mechanism-driven strategies. IBAT inhibitors have emerged as an important non-invasive option for selected patients, whereas surgical diversion and liver transplantation remain essential in advanced disease. Ultimately, PFIC exemplifies the transition toward precision medicine in hepatology, with ongoing advances expected to further refine diagnosis and improve long-term outcomes.

References
1.  Amirneni S, Haep N, Gad MA, Soto-Gutierrez A, Squires JE, Florentino RM. Molecular overview of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:7470-7484.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 86]  [Cited by in RCA: 77]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Hassan S, Hertel P. Overview of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis. Clin Liver Dis. 2022;26:371-390.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (6)]
3.  Clayton RJ, Iber FL, Ruebner BH, McKusick VA. Byler disease. Fatal familial intrahepatic cholestasis in an Amish kindred. Am J Dis Child. 1969;117:112-124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
4.  European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on genetic cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2024;81:303-325.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 29.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
5.  Pinon M, Kamath BM. What's new in pediatric genetic cholestatic liver disease: advances in etiology, diagnostics and therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2024;36:524-536.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Vinayagamoorthy V, Srivastava A, Sarma MS. Newer variants of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. World J Hepatol. 2021;13:2024-2038.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
7.  McKiernan P, Bernabeu JQ, Girard M, Indolfi G, Lurz E, Trivedi P. Opinion paper on the diagnosis and treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. JHEP Rep. 2024;6:100949.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Gunaydin M, Bozkurter Cil AT. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Hepat Med. 2018;10:95-104.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Thompson RJ, Arnell H, Artan R, Baumann U, Calvo PL, Czubkowski P, Dalgic B, D'Antiga L, Durmaz Ö, Fischler B, Gonzalès E, Grammatikopoulos T, Gupte G, Hardikar W, Houwen RHJ, Kamath BM, Karpen SJ, Kjems L, Lacaille F, Lachaux A, Lainka E, Mack CL, Mattsson JP, McKiernan P, Özen H, Rajwal SR, Roquelaure B, Shagrani M, Shteyer E, Soufi N, Sturm E, Tessier ME, Verkade HJ, Horn P. Odevixibat treatment in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7:830-842.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in RCA: 140]  [Article Influence: 35.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Yi S, Kim I, Hager R, Strazzeri MM, Garrard L, Matsubayashi T, Mehta R. Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Odevixibat (Bylvay) for the Treatment of Pruritus With Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis. Gastro Hep Adv. 2025;4:100596.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Hüpper MN, Pichler J, Huber WD, Heilos A, Schaup R, Metzelder M, Langer S. Surgical versus Medical Management of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis-Case Compilation and Review of the Literature. Children (Basel). 2023;10:949.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  van Wessel DBE, Thompson RJ, Gonzales E, Jankowska I, Shneider BL, Sokal E, Grammatikopoulos T, Kadaristiana A, Jacquemin E, Spraul A, Lipiński P, Czubkowski P, Rock N, Shagrani M, Broering D, Algoufi T, Mazhar N, Nicastro E, Kelly D, Nebbia G, Arnell H, Fischler B, Hulscher JBF, Serranti D, Arikan C, Debray D, Lacaille F, Goncalves C, Hierro L, Muñoz Bartolo G, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Azaz A, Brecelj J, Dezsőfi A, Luigi Calvo P, Krebs-Schmitt D, Hartleif S, van der Woerd WL, Wang JS, Li LT, Durmaz Ö, Kerkar N, Hørby Jørgensen M, Fischer R, Jimenez-Rivera C, Alam S, Cananzi M, Laverdure N, Targa Ferreira C, Ordonez F, Wang H, Sency V, Mo Kim K, Chen HL, Carvalho E, Fabre A, Quintero Bernabeu J, Alonso EM, Sokol RJ, Suchy FJ, Loomes KM, McKiernan PJ, Rosenthal P, Turmelle Y, Rao GS, Horslen S, Kamath BM, Rogalidou M, Karnsakul WW, Hansen B, Verkade HJ; Natural Course and Prognosis of PFIC and Effect of Biliary Diversion Consortium. Impact of Genotype, Serum Bile Acids, and Surgical Biliary Diversion on Native Liver Survival in FIC1 Deficiency. Hepatology. 2021;74:892-906.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Mighiu C, O'Hara S, Ferri Grazzi E, Murray KF, Schattenberg JM, Ventura E, Karakaidos M, Taylor A, Brrang H, Dhawan A, Willemse J, Finnegan A. Impact of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis on caregivers: caregiver-reported outcomes from the multinational PICTURE study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:32.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Vitale G, Sciveres M, Mandato C, d'Adamo AP, Di Giorgio A. Genotypes and different clinical variants between children and adults in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a state-of-the-art review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20:80.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 18.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
15.  OMIM.   Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis, Phenotypic Series PS211600. [cited June 04, 2026]. Available from: https://www.omim.org/phenotypicSeries/PS211600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Ben Saad A, Bruneau A, Mareux E, Lapalus M, Delaunay JL, Gonzales E, Jacquemin E, Aït-Slimane T, Falguières T. Molecular Regulation of Canalicular ABC Transporters. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2113.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Zhao D, Wu GY. ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Defects and Their Roles in Hepatic Diseases. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2026;14:50-58.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Stieger B. Role of the bile salt export pump, BSEP, in acquired forms of cholestasis. Drug Metab Rev. 2010;42:437-445.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in RCA: 93]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Lapalus M, Mareux E, Amzal R, Drège E, Riahi Y, Petit S, Banet M, Falguières T, Callebaut I, Figadère B, Joseph D, Gonzales E, Jacquemin E. Correction of a Traffic-Defective Missense ABCB11 Variant Responsible for Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 2. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:5232.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Pimentel JM, Nobre S, Oliveira RC, Martins R, Cipriano MA. Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with progressive intrahepatic familial cholestasis type 2: a case report. Clin Transplant Res. 2024;38:241-245.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
21.  Mínguez Rodríguez B, Molera Busoms C, Martorell Sampol L, García Romero R, Colomé Rivero G, Martín de Carpi J. Heterozygous mutations of ATP8B1, ABCB11 and ABCB4 cause mild forms of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis in a pediatric cohort. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;45:585-592.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Zöllner J, Williamson C, Dixon PH. Genetic issues in ICP. Obstet Med. 2024;17:157-161.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Felzen A, Verkade HJ. The spectrum of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis diseases: Update on pathophysiology and emerging treatments. Eur J Med Genet. 2021;64:104317.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Al-Hussaini A, Lone K, Bashir MS, Alrashidi S, Fagih M, Alanazi A, AlYaseen S, Almayouf A, Alruwaithi M, Asery A. ATP8B1, ABCB11, and ABCB4 Genes Defects: Novel Mutations Associated with Cholestasis with Different Phenotypes and Outcomes. J Pediatr. 2021;236:113-123.e2.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
25.  Riaz H, Zheng B, Zheng Y, Liu Z, Gu HM, Imran M, Yaqoob T, Bhinder MA, Zhang DW, Zahoor MY. The spectrum of novel ABCB11 gene variations in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 in Pakistani cohorts. Sci Rep. 2024;14:18876.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bell EL, Truong JK, Jo Y, Kolpak A, Chunn L, Syverud N, Mahinic M, Durrant JR, Hoch E, Reddy B, Stoiber P, Miller JP, Ren Y, Moore J, Hughes RO, Garfield AS. An ABCB11 variant registry and novel knockin mouse model of PFIC2 based on the clinically relevant ABCB11 E297G variant. J Lipid Res. 2025;66:100840.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  van Wessel DBE, Thompson RJ, Gonzales E, Jankowska I, Sokal E, Grammatikopoulos T, Kadaristiana A, Jacquemin E, Spraul A, Lipiński P, Czubkowski P, Rock N, Shagrani M, Broering D, Algoufi T, Mazhar N, Nicastro E, Kelly DA, Nebbia G, Arnell H, Björn Fischler, Hulscher JBF, Serranti D, Arikan C, Polat E, Debray D, Lacaille F, Goncalves C, Hierro L, Muñoz Bartolo G, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Azaz A, Brecelj J, Dezsőfi A, Calvo PL, Grabhorn E, Sturm E, van der Woerd WJ, Kamath BM, Wang JS, Li L, Durmaz Ö, Onal Z, Bunt TMG, Hansen BE, Verkade HJ; NAtural course and Prognosis of PFIC and Effect of biliary Diversion (NAPPED) consortium. Genotype correlates with the natural history of severe bile salt export pump deficiency. J Hepatol. 2020;73:84-93.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in RCA: 98]  [Article Influence: 16.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
28.  Nayagam JS, Williamson C, Joshi D, Thompson RJ. Review article: liver disease in adults with variants in the cholestasis-related genes ABCB11, ABCB4 and ATP8B1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52:1628-1639.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Zheng Y, Rao Q, Han Y, He J. A novel heterozygous deletion in ABCB4 gene in a Chinese family with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and cholelithiasis: Case reports and literature review. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024;12:e2291.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
30.  Cao L, Ling X, Yan J, Feng D, Dong Y, Xu Z, Wang F, Zhu S, Gao Y, Cao Z, Zhang M. Clinical and genetic study of ABCB4 gene-related cholestatic liver disease in China: children and adults. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19:157.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
31.  Sticova E, Jirsa M. ABCB4 disease: Many faces of one gene deficiency. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19:126-133.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in RCA: 48]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Wang HH, Portincasa P, Liu M, Wang DQ. Genetic Analysis of ABCB4 Mutations and Variants Related to the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Low Phospholipid-Associated Cholelithiasis. Genes (Basel). 2022;13:1047.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
33.  Madry C, Elbahnsi A, Delaunay JL, Stary A, Lagaye S, Couvert P, Corpechot C, Lemoinne S, Chignard N, Boucherle B, Gautheron J, Décout JL, Callebaut I, Aït-Slimane T. ABCB4 disease-causing variants S242R, S346I, T437I and T1077M significantly impair its function and display differential sensitivity to potentiators. Sci Rep. 2025;15:44544.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Stättermayer AF, Halilbasic E, Wrba F, Ferenci P, Trauner M. Variants in ABCB4 (MDR3) across the spectrum of cholestatic liver diseases in adults. J Hepatol. 2020;73:651-663.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in RCA: 83]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
35.  Mkarem LE, Batika MAH, Bitar R. New hope in treating progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis in children. World J Hepatol. 2025;17:108253.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
36.  Andersen JP, Vestergaard AL, Mikkelsen SA, Mogensen LS, Chalat M, Molday RS. P4-ATPases as Phospholipid Flippases-Structure, Function, and Enigmas. Front Physiol. 2016;7:275.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 202]  [Cited by in RCA: 255]  [Article Influence: 25.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Chen G, Yang Y, Zhu X. P4‐ATPases as Phospholipid Flippases: From Membrane Dynamics to Human Disorders. Med Bull. 2025;1:121-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
38.  Prince A, Traughber CA, Shiravand Y, Bhandari N, Khan MR, Sharma S, Timinski K, Murray KF, Bull LN, Gulshan K. Enigmatic functions of ATP8B1: cholestasis, inflammation, phosphoinositide flipping, and cellular homeostasis. Cell Cycle. 2025;24:409-421.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Mizutani A, Sabu Y, Naoi S, Ito S, Nakano S, Minowa K, Mizuochi T, Ito K, Abukawa D, Kaji S, Sasaki M, Muroya K, Azuma Y, Watanabe S, Oya Y, Inomata Y, Fukuda A, Kasahara M, Inui A, Takikawa H, Kusuhara H, Bessho K, Suzuki M, Togawa T, Hayashi H. Assessment of Adenosine Triphosphatase Phospholipid Transporting 8B1 (ATP8B1) Function in Patients With Cholestasis With ATP8B1 Deficiency by Using Peripheral Blood Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Hepatol Commun. 2021;5:52-62.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Tamura R, Sabu Y, Mizuno T, Mizuno S, Nakano S, Suzuki M, Abukawa D, Kaji S, Azuma Y, Inui A, Okamoto T, Shimizu S, Fukuda A, Sakamoto S, Kasahara M, Takahashi S, Kusuhara H, Zen Y, Ando T, Hayashi H. Intestinal Atp8b1 dysfunction causes hepatic choline deficiency and steatohepatitis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6763.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Bull LN, Morotti R, Squires JE.   ATP8B1 Deficiency. 2001 Oct 15. In: GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Bing H, Li YL, Li D, Zhang C, Chang B. Case Report: A Rare Heterozygous ATP8B1 Mutation in a BRIC1 Patient: Haploinsufficiency? Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:897108.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Rhee ES, Kim YB, Lee S, Oh SH, Lee BH, Kim KM, Yoo HW. Novel ATP8B1 Gene Mutations in a Child with Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 1. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019;22:479-486.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Huang Y, Luo EP, Li M, Yang J, Gan JH, Zhao WF. Two novel ATP8B1 mutations involved in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 that is ameliorated by rifampicin: A case report. J Dig Dis. 2022;23:124-129.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Yang Y, Zhang J, Li LT, Qiu YL, Gong JY, Zhang MH, Li CH, Wang JS. Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Large ATP8B1 Deletion/Duplications as Second Mutations Missed by Exome-Based Sequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23:1491-1499.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Sambrotta M, Strautnieks S, Papouli E, Rushton P, Clark BE, Parry DA, Logan CV, Newbury LJ, Kamath BM, Ling S, Grammatikopoulos T, Wagner BE, Magee JC, Sokol RJ, Mieli-Vergani G; University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, Smith JD, Johnson CA, McClean P, Simpson MA, Knisely AS, Bull LN, Thompson RJ. Mutations in TJP2 cause progressive cholestatic liver disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46:326-328.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 269]  [Cited by in RCA: 222]  [Article Influence: 18.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
47.  Bull LN, Ellmers R, Foskett P, Strautnieks S, Sambrotta M, Czubkowski P, Jankowska I, Wagner B, Deheragoda M, Thompson RJ. Cholestasis Due to USP53 Deficiency. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;72:667-673.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
48.  Roehlen N, Roca Suarez AA, El Saghire H, Saviano A, Schuster C, Lupberger J, Baumert TF. Tight Junction Proteins and the Biology of Hepatobiliary Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:825.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Dixon PH, Sambrotta M, Chambers J, Taylor-Harris P, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides K, Knisely AS, Thompson RJ, Williamson C. An expanded role for heterozygous mutations of ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and TJP2 in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11823.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 127]  [Cited by in RCA: 111]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
50.  Sambrotta M, Thompson RJ. Mutations in TJP2, encoding zona occludens 2, and liver disease. Tissue Barriers. 2015;3:e1026537.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in RCA: 54]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
51.  Xu J, Kausalya PJ, Van Hul N, Caldez MJ, Xu S, Ong AGM, Woo WL, Mohamed Ali S, Kaldis P, Hunziker W. Protective Functions of ZO-2/Tjp2 Expressed in Hepatocytes and Cholangiocytes Against Liver Injury and Cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:2103-2118.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Vitale G, Gitto S, Raimondi F, Mattiaccio A, Mantovani V, Vukotic R, D'Errico A, Seri M, Russell RB, Andreone P. Cryptogenic cholestasis in young and adults: ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, and TJP2 gene variants analysis by high-throughput sequencing. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:945-958.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
53.  Carlton VE, Harris BZ, Puffenberger EG, Batta AK, Knisely AS, Robinson DL, Strauss KA, Shneider BL, Lim WA, Salen G, Morton DH, Bull LN. Complex inheritance of familial hypercholanemia with associated mutations in TJP2 and BAAT. Nat Genet. 2003;34:91-96.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 290]  [Cited by in RCA: 208]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Zhang J, Guo S, Mei TL, Zhou J, Guan DX, Wang GL. Novel mutation of the TJP2 gene in a Chinese child with progressive cholestatic liver disease coexistent with hearing impairment. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021;20:198-200.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
55.  Xu J, Kausalya PJ, Ong AGM, Goh CMF, Mohamed Ali S, Hunziker W. ZO-2/Tjp2 suppresses Yap and Wwtr1/Taz-mediated hepatocyte to cholangiocyte transdifferentiation in the mouse liver. NPJ Regen Med. 2022;7:55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
56.  Wang Y, Rui L. Targeting the Hippo- Yes-Associated Protein/Transcriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif Signaling Pathway in Primary Liver Cancer Therapy. Onco. 2024;4:217-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
57.  Zhou S, Hertel PM, Finegold MJ, Wang L, Kerkar N, Wang J, Wong LJ, Plon SE, Sambrotta M, Foskett P, Niu Z, Thompson RJ, Knisely AS. Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with tight-junction protein 2 deficiency. Hepatology. 2015;62:1914-1916.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in RCA: 55]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]
58.  Wei CS, Becher N, Friis JB, Ott P, Vogel I, Grønbæk H. New tight junction protein 2 variant causing progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 4 in adults: A case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:550-561.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Vij M, Shanmugam NP, Reddy MS, Sankaranarayanan S, Rela M. Paediatric hepatocellular carcinoma in tight junction protein 2 (TJP2) deficiency. Virchows Arch. 2017;471:679-683.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 34]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
60.  Vij M, Sankaranarayanan S. Biallelic Mutations in Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 53 (USP53) Causing Progressive Intrahepatic Cholestasis. Report of a Case With Review of Literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2022;25:207-212.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
61.  Ding J, Chi H, Qiu YL, Wang RX, Yang J, She HY, Zhang J, Ling V, Xing QH, Wang JS. Loss of hepatocyte Usp53 protects mice from a form of xenobiotic-induced liver injury. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2025;1871:167624.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Wendrich K, Gallant K, Recknagel S, Petroulia S, Kazi NH, Hane JA, Führer S, Bezstarosti K, O'Dea R, Demmers J, Gersch M. Discovery and mechanism of K63-linkage-directed deubiquitinase activity in USP53. Nat Chem Biol. 2025;21:746-757.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Ding J, She HY, Cheng Y, Sun HY, Feng JY, Liu T, Qiu YL, Wei BX, Zhang J, Su Y, Li YQ, Zhang JJ, Chen SY, Wang T, Yu Y, van IJzendoorn SCD, Wang JS, Xing QH. A novel mechanism involving USP53-regulated BSEP trafficking underlies low-GGT intrahepatic cholestasis. Hepatology.  2025.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Porta G, Rigo PSM, Porta A, Pugliese RPS, Danesi VLB, Oliveira E, Borges CCV, Ribeiro C, Miura IK. Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Associated With USP53 Gene Mutation in a Brazilian Child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;72:674-676.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Alam S, Lal BB, Ravindranath A, Bavdekar A, Dheivamani N, Snehavardhan P, Shah A, Tripathi PR, Nagral A, Srikanth KP, Shah I, Ramakrishna SH, Suchismita A, Waikar Y, Shah V, Nalwalla Z, Kumar K, Maria A, Sibal A, Sivaramakrishnan VM, Wadhwa N, Ashritha A, Sood V, Khanna R; Indian PFIC Registry. Natural course and outcomes of children with ubiquitin-specific protease 53 (USP53)-related genetic chronic cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024;79:1199-1208.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Nuzhnaya E, Cherevatova T, Lotnik E, Shagiazdanova A, Markova Z, Filimonova E, Parshina O, Buianova A, Bobreshova A, Marakhonov A, Semenova N. Case Report: Mild BRIC-like cholestasis despite a gross USP53 deletion-novel findings and literature review. Front Genet. 2025;16:1670664.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Chiang JYL, Ferrell JM. Discovery of farnesoid X receptor and its role in bile acid metabolism. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2022;548:111618.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 227]  [Cited by in RCA: 236]  [Article Influence: 59.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
68.  Gomez-Ospina N, Potter CJ, Xiao R, Manickam K, Kim MS, Kim KH, Shneider BL, Picarsic JL, Jacobson TA, Zhang J, He W, Liu P, Knisely AS, Finegold MJ, Muzny DM, Boerwinkle E, Lupski JR, Plon SE, Gibbs RA, Eng CM, Yang Y, Washington GC, Porteus MH, Berquist WE, Kambham N, Singh RJ, Xia F, Enns GM, Moore DD. Mutations in the nuclear bile acid receptor FXR cause progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10713.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 181]  [Cited by in RCA: 225]  [Article Influence: 22.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
69.  Alvarez L, Jara P, Sánchez-Sabaté E, Hierro L, Larrauri J, Díaz MC, Camarena C, De la Vega A, Frauca E, López-Collazo E, Lapunzina P. Reduced hepatic expression of farnesoid X receptor in hereditary cholestasis associated to mutation in ATP8B1. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:2451-2460.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in RCA: 88]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
70.  Rausch M, Samodelov SL, Visentin M, Kullak-Ublick GA. The Farnesoid X Receptor as a Master Regulator of Hepatotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:13967.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Li ZD, Li YC, Jing-Zhao, Wang JS, Xie XB. NR1H4 disease: rapidly progressing neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis and early death. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19:171.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Belhadj R, Maaloul I, Besghaier W, Kolsi R, Sabaouni N, Broly F, Kamoun T. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 5 due to a novel mutation in the NR1H4 gene. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25:870.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Cullinane AR, Straatman-Iwanowska A, Zaucker A, Wakabayashi Y, Bruce CK, Luo G, Rahman F, Gürakan F, Utine E, Ozkan TB, Denecke J, Vukovic J, Di Rocco M, Mandel H, Cangul H, Matthews RP, Thomas SG, Rappoport JZ, Arias IM, Wolburg H, Knisely AS, Kelly DA, Müller F, Maher ER, Gissen P. Mutations in VIPAR cause an arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction and cholestasis syndrome phenotype with defects in epithelial polarization. Nat Genet. 2010;42:303-312.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in RCA: 142]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Lo B, Li L, Gissen P, Christensen H, McKiernan PJ, Ye C, Abdelhaleem M, Hayes JA, Williams MD, Chitayat D, Kahr WH. Requirement of VPS33B, a member of the Sec1/Munc18 protein family, in megakaryocyte and platelet alpha-granule biogenesis. Blood. 2005;106:4159-4166.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 115]  [Cited by in RCA: 120]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Gissen P, Johnson CA, Morgan NV, Stapelbroek JM, Forshew T, Cooper WN, McKiernan PJ, Klomp LW, Morris AA, Wraith JE, McClean P, Lynch SA, Thompson RJ, Lo B, Quarrell OW, Di Rocco M, Trembath RC, Mandel H, Wali S, Karet FE, Knisely AS, Houwen RH, Kelly DA, Maher ER. Mutations in VPS33B, encoding a regulator of SNARE-dependent membrane fusion, cause arthrogryposis-renal dysfunction-cholestasis (ARC) syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004;36:400-404.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 286]  [Cited by in RCA: 242]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Caluianu M, Owen KA. A VPS33B CRISPR knockout study: In vitro evidence of an adhesion defect. PLoS One. 2026;21:e0343240.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Alter S, Hotz A, Jahn A, Di Donato N, Schröck E, Smitka M, von der Hagen M, Schallner J, Menschikowski M, Gillitzer C, Laass MW, Fischer J, Tzschach A. Novel VPS33B mutation in a patient with autosomal recessive keratoderma-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:2862-2866.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Ma SQ, Bai X, Cao LJ, Ma ZN, Ding ZX, Yu ZJ, Jiang M. [Rare VPS33B gene mutation combined with GP1BA mutation causes severe decrease in plasma VWF levels: a case report and literature review]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024;45:602-605.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Fu KL, Chen P, Zhou YY, Jiang YM, Gao Y, Zhang HZ, Guan LH, Wang CH, Liu JL, Huang M, Bi HC. Hepatic Vps33b deficiency aggravates cholic acid-induced cholestatic liver injury in male mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2022;43:933-940.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Hanley J, Dhar DK, Mazzacuva F, Fiadeiro R, Burden JJ, Lyne AM, Smith H, Straatman-Iwanowska A, Banushi B, Virasami A, Mills K, Lemaigre FP, Knisely AS, Howe S, Sebire N, Waddington SN, Paulusma CC, Clayton P, Gissen P. Vps33b is crucial for structural and functional hepatocyte polarity. J Hepatol. 2017;66:1001-1011.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Zhu Y, Chen D. Two novel mutations in VPS33B gene cause a milder ARC syndrome with prolonged survival in a 12-year-old patient: Case report. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1041080.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Rehman R, Gonzalez L, Kolbe K, Faizan MK, Brucker W, Cerezo C. Arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, cholestasis syndrome with a novel mutation in two siblings. Clin Case Rep. 2024;12:e8853.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Del Brío Castillo R, Squires JE, McKiernan PJ. A novel mutation in VPS33B gene causing a milder ARC syndrome phenotype with prolonged survival. JIMD Rep. 2019;47:4-8.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Thoresen SB, Campsteijn C, Vietri M, Schink KO, Liestøl K, Andersen JS, Raiborg C, Stenmark H. ANCHR mediates Aurora-B-dependent abscission checkpoint control through retention of VPS4. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:550-560.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in RCA: 109]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Mandato C, Siano MA, Nazzaro L, Gelzo M, Francalanci P, Rizzo F, D'Agostino Y, Morleo M, Brillante S, Weisz A, Franco B, Vajro P. A ZFYVE19 gene mutation associated with neonatal cholestasis and cilia dysfunction: case report with a novel pathogenic variant. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:179.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Yang J, Zhang YN, Wang RX, Hao CZ, Qiu Y, Chi H, Luan WS, Tang H, Zhang XJ, Sun X, Sheps JA, Ling V, Cao M, Wang JS. ZFYVE19 deficiency: a ciliopathy involving failure of cell division, with cell death. J Med Genet. 2024;61:750-758.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Xue MY, Huang LL, Zhu YY, Zheng Q. Case report: ZFYVE19 gene mutation is associated with familial cholestasis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1400475.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Li JQ, Zhu YY, Xue MY, Chi H, Xie XB, Lu Y, Wang JS. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of patients with ZFYVE19 variants. Dig Liver Dis. 2025;57:571-577.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Zhang Y, Tang D, Wang L, Yang J, Wu X, Xiao X, Wang JS. Prevention of Portal-Tract Fibrosis in Zfyve19(-/-) Mouse Model with Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Delivering ZFYVE19. Hum Gene Ther. 2023;34:1219-1229.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Wang L, Yu Y, Feng J, Zhang Y, Wang R, She H, Liu T, Ling V, Wang J. Therapeutic potential of tetrahydroxylated bile acids in reducing liver injury: Insights from the Zfyve19(-/-) mouse model. Pediatr Investig. 2026;10:60-69.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Dooley SA, Kolobova E, Burman A, Kaji I, Digrazia JR, Stubler R, Goldstein A, Packirisamy C, Coutts AW, Saqui-Salces M, Gao N, Engevik MA, Shub MD, Goldenring JR, Engevik AC. Myosin Vb Traffics P-Glycoprotein to the Apical Membrane of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Gastroenterology. 2025;168:84-98.e9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Roland JT, Bryant DM, Datta A, Itzen A, Mostov KE, Goldenring JR. Rab GTPase-Myo5B complexes control membrane recycling and epithelial polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2789-2794.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in RCA: 172]  [Article Influence: 11.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
93.  She HY, Qiu YL, Feng JY, Cheng Y, Chi H, van IJzendoorn SCD, Xing QH, Wang JS. A liver-specific mouse model for MYO5B-associated cholestasis reveals a toxic gain-of-function as underlying disease mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025;758:151669.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  Zhou Z, van IJzendoorn SCD. MYO5B Deficiency-Associated Cholestasis and the Role of the Bile Salt Export Pump. Cells. 2026;15:92.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Aldrian D, Vogel GF, Frey TK, Ayyıldız Civan H, Aksu AÜ, Avitzur Y, Ramos Boluda E, Çakır M, Demir AM, Deppisch C, Duba HC, Düker G, Gerner P, Hertecant J, Hornová J, Kathemann S, Koeglmeier J, Koutroumpa A, Lanzersdorfer R, Lev-Tzion R, Lima R, Mansour S, Meissl M, Melek J, Miqdady M, Montoya JH, Posovszky C, Rachman Y, Siahanidou T, Tabbers M, Uhlig HH, Ünal S, Wirth S, Ruemmele FM, Hess MW, Huber LA, Müller T, Sturm E, Janecke AR. Congenital Diarrhea and Cholestatic Liver Disease: Phenotypic Spectrum Associated with MYO5B Mutations. J Clin Med. 2021;10:481.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 43]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
96.  Sgodda M, Gebel E, Dignas L, Alfken S, Eggenschwiler R, Stalke A, Dröge C, Pfister ED, Baumann U, Luedde T, Esposito I, Keitel V, Cantz T. iPSC-based hepatic organoids reveal a heterozygous MYO5B variant as driver of intrahepatic cholestasis. Hepatol Commun. 2025;9:e0812.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Watson A, Harris RA, Engevik AC, Oezguen N, Nicholson MR, Dooley S, Stubler R, Satter LF, Karam LB, Kellermayer R. MYO5B and the Polygenic Landscape of Very Early-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease in an Ethnically Diverse Population. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2025;31:189-199.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Bowman DM, Meenderink LM, Thomas KS, Manning EH, Tyska MJ, Goldenring JR. Microvillus inclusion disease-causing MYO5B point mutations exert differential effects on motor function. J Biol Chem. 2025;301:108328.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Dawson PA, Hubbert M, Haywood J, Craddock AL, Zerangue N, Christian WV, Ballatori N. The heteromeric organic solute transporter alpha-beta, Ostalpha-Ostbeta, is an ileal basolateral bile acid transporter. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:6960-6968.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 307]  [Cited by in RCA: 291]  [Article Influence: 13.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
100.  Ballatori N, Christian WV, Lee JY, Dawson PA, Soroka CJ, Boyer JL, Madejczyk MS, Li N. OSTalpha-OSTbeta: a major basolateral bile acid and steroid transporter in human intestinal, renal, and biliary epithelia. Hepatology. 2005;42:1270-1279.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 295]  [Cited by in RCA: 258]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Kunst RF, Verkade HJ, Oude Elferink RPJ, van de Graaf SFJ. Targeting the Four Pillars of Enterohepatic Bile Salt Cycling; Lessons From Genetics and Pharmacology. Hepatology. 2021;73:2577-2585.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Gao E, Cheema H, Waheed N, Mushtaq I, Erden N, Nelson-Williams C, Jain D, Soroka CJ, Boyer JL, Khalil Y, Clayton PT, Mistry PK, Lifton RP, Vilarinho S. Organic Solute Transporter Alpha Deficiency: A Disorder With Cholestasis, Liver Fibrosis, and Congenital Diarrhea. Hepatology. 2020;71:1879-1882.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 34]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
103.  Tronstad RR, Berland S, Tjora E, El Jellas K, Aukrust I, Kristensen K, Tveitnes D, Molven A, Marschall HU, Rao A, Dawson PA. Fat Malabsorption and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment in Children With Reduced Organic Solute Transporter-α (SLC51A) Expression. JPGN Rep. 2022;3:e229.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Sultan M, Rao A, Elpeleg O, Vaz FM, Abu-Libdeh B, Karpen SJ, Dawson PA. Organic solute transporter-β (SLC51B) deficiency in two brothers with congenital diarrhea and features of cholestasis. Hepatology. 2018;68:590-598.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
105.  Zheng Y, Guo H, Chen L, Cheng W, Yan K, Zhang Z, Li M, Jin Y, Hu G, Wang C, Zhou C, Zhou W, Jia Z, Zheng B, Liu Z. Diagnostic yield and novel candidate genes by next generation sequencing in 166 children with intrahepatic cholestasis. Hepatol Int. 2024;18:661-672.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Waheed N, Waris R, Naseer M, Razzaq A, Suleman S, Ullah A. Clinical exome sequencing reveals a novel pathogenic variant in KIF12 underlying cholestasis with highly variable phenotypes. Clin Genet. 2024;105:106-108.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
107.  Samanta A, Sarma MS, Srivastava A, Poddar U. Cholestatic Liver Disease in a Child with KIF12 Mutation. Indian J Pediatr. 2024;91:733-736.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
108.  Seth A, Brancale J, Dashti-gibson N, Florentino RM, Faccioli LAP, Liu Z, Konkwo C, Hong H, Soto-gutierrez A, Vilarinho S.   Liver Disease Reveals KIF12 as a Critical Regulator of Mitochondria, Lysosome and Cilia Localization. 2026 Preprint.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
109.  Vogel GF, Podpeskar A, Rieder D, Salzer H, Garczarczyk-Asim D, Wang L, Abuduxikuer K, Wang JS, Scharrer A, Faqeih EA, Aseeri AT, Vodopiutz J, Heilos A, Pichler J, Huber WD, Müller T, Knisely AS, Janecke AR. Kinesin family member 12-related hepatopathy: A generally indolent disorder with elevated gamma-glutamyl-transferase activity. Clin Genet. 2024;106:224-233.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
110.  Li X, Xie W, Pan Q, Zhang X, Zhang L, Zhao N, Xie Q, Ding J, Chai J. Semaphorin 7A interacts with nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 via integrin β1 and mediates inflammation. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21:24.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
111.  Tamagnone L, Comoglio PM. To move or not to move? Semaphorin signalling in cell migration. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:356-361.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in RCA: 128]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
112.  Xie J, Wang H. Semaphorin 7A as a potential immune regulator and promising therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:10.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
113.  De Minicis S, Rychlicki C, Agostinelli L, Saccomanno S, Trozzi L, Candelaresi C, Bataller R, Millán C, Brenner DA, Vivarelli M, Mocchegiani F, Marzioni M, Benedetti A, Svegliati-Baroni G. Semaphorin 7A contributes to TGF-β-mediated liver fibrogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:820-830.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in RCA: 46]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
114.  Zhang X, Lei J, Zhao N, Zhu Z, Ding J, Pan Q, Liu WY, Jin XZ, Lian LY, Zheng MH, Chai J. The SEMA7A(N559Y) mutation facilitates the development of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease by inducing ROS/NLRP3-mediated hepatic cell pyroptosis. Metabolism. 2026;176:156483.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
115.  Pan Q, Luo G, Qu J, Chen S, Zhang X, Zhao N, Ding J, Yang H, Li M, Li L, Cheng Y, Li X, Xie Q, Li Q, Zhou X, Zou H, Fan S, Zou L, Liu W, Deng G, Cai SY, Boyer JL, Chai J. A homozygous R148W mutation in Semaphorin 7A causes progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13:e14563.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
116.  Shen L, Sun X, Zheng R, Tao M, Chen S. Semaphorin 7A Induces Liver Inflammation and Promotes Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Cholestasis via ITGβ1/NF-κB Pathway. Arch Med Res. 2025;56:103244.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
117.  Brede G, Solheim J, Tröen G, Prydz H. Characterization of PSKH1, a novel human protein serine kinase with centrosomal, golgi, and nuclear localization. Genomics. 2000;70:82-92.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
118.  Brede G, Solheim J, Stang E, Prydz H. Mutants of the protein serine kinase PSKH1 disassemble the Golgi apparatus. Exp Cell Res. 2003;291:299-312.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
119.  Li Y, Klena NT, Gabriel GC, Liu X, Kim AJ, Lemke K, Chen Y, Chatterjee B, Devine W, Damerla RR, Chang C, Yagi H, San Agustin JT, Thahir M, Anderton S, Lawhead C, Vescovi A, Pratt H, Morgan J, Haynes L, Smith CL, Eppig JT, Reinholdt L, Francis R, Leatherbury L, Ganapathiraju MK, Tobita K, Pazour GJ, Lo CW. Global genetic analysis in mice unveils central role for cilia in congenital heart disease. Nature. 2015;521:520-524.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 279]  [Cited by in RCA: 366]  [Article Influence: 33.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
120.  Maddirevula S, Shagrani M, Ji AR, Horne CR, Young SN, Mather LJ, Alqahtani M, McKerlie C, Wood G, Potter PK, Abdulwahab F, AlSheddi T, van der Woerd WL, van Gassen KLI, AlBogami D, Kumar K, Muhammad Akhtar AS, Binomar H, Almanea H, Faqeih E, Fuchs SA, Scott JW, Murphy JM, Alkuraya FS. Large-scale genomic investigation of pediatric cholestasis reveals a novel hepatorenal ciliopathy caused by PSKH1 mutations. Genet Med. 2024;26:101231.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
121.  Pfister ED, Dröge C, Liebe R, Stalke A, Buhl N, Ballauff A, Cantz T, Bueltmann E, Stindt J, Luedde T, Baumann U, Keitel V. Extrahepatic manifestations of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis syndromes: Presentation of a case series and literature review. Liver Int. 2022;42:1084-1096.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
122.  Chen R, Yang FX, Tan YF, Deng M, Li H, Xu Y, Ouyang WX, Song YZ. Clinical and genetic characterization of pediatric patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3): identification of 14 novel ABCB4 variants and review of the literatures. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:445.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
123.  Tang J, Tan M, Deng Y, Tang H, Shi H, Li M, Ma W, Li J, Dai H, Li J, Zhou S, Li X, Wei F, Ma X, Luo L. Two Novel Pathogenic Variants of TJP2 Gene and the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms in Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 4 Patients. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:661599.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
124.  Halabi H, Kalantan K, Abdulhaq W, Alshaibi H, Almatrafi MA. A Rare Case of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 4: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus. 2023;15:e47276.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
125.  Himes RW, Mojarrad M, Eslahi A, Finegold MJ, Maroofian R, Moore DD. NR1H4-related Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis 5: Further Evidence for Rapidly Progressive Liver Failure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70:e111-e113.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
126.  Czubkowski P, Thompson RJ, Jankowska I, Knisely AS, Finegold M, Parsons P, Cielecka-Kuszyk J, Strautnieks S, Pawłowska J, Bull LN. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis - farnesoid X receptor deficiency due to NR1H4 mutation: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9:3631-3636.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
127.  Giang S, Gordon RL, Haas KB. A Diagnostic Quagmire: PFIC5 Presenting as a Rare Cause of Neonatal Cholestasis. ACG Case Rep J. 2021;8:e00558.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
128.  Alhebbi H, Peer-Zada AA, Al-Hussaini AA, Algubaisi S, Albassami A, AlMasri N, Alrusayni Y, Alruzug IM, Alharby E, Samman MA, Ayoub SZ, Maddirevula S, Peake RWA, Alkuraya FS, Wali S, Almontashiri NAM. New paradigms of USP53 disease: normal GGT cholestasis, BRIC, cholangiopathy, and responsiveness to rifampicin. J Hum Genet. 2021;66:151-159.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
129.  Maddirevula S, Alhebbi H, Alqahtani A, Algoufi T, Alsaif HS, Ibrahim N, Abdulwahab F, Barr M, Alzaidan H, Almehaideb A, AlSasi O, Alhashem A, Hussaini HA, Wali S, Alkuraya FS. Identification of novel loci for pediatric cholestatic liver disease defined by KIF12, PPM1F, USP53, LSR, and WDR83OS pathogenic variants. Genet Med. 2019;21:1164-1172.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 11.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
130.  Ahn S, Choi J, Jeong SH. The First Korean Adult Case of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 7 with Novel USP53 Splicing Variants by Next Generation Sequencing. Yonsei Med J. 2023;64:745-749.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
131.  Pepe A, Colucci A, Carucci M, Nazzaro L, Bucci C, Ranucci G, Di Giorgio A, Vajro P, Mandato C. Case Report: Add-on treatment with odevixibat in a new subtype of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis broadens the therapeutic horizon of genetic cholestasis. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1061535.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
132.  Ünlüsoy Aksu A, Das SK, Nelson-Williams C, Jain D, Özbay Hoşnut F, Evirgen Şahin G, Lifton RP, Vilarinho S. Recessive Mutations in KIF12 Cause High Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Cholestasis. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3:471-477.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
133.  Gautam V, Panda K, Kumar V, Agarwal S, Gupta S. Youngest Living Donor Liver Transplant for End-Stage Liver Disease in a 6-Month-Old With a Novel Aggressive Mutation in KIF12 Gene. Pediatr Transplant. 2024;28:e14804.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
134.  Ben Sabbahia D, Atrasssi M, Bennani N, Benmoussa A, Abkari A. ZFYVE19 gene mutation: A novel variant of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. JPGN Rep. 2024;5:552-556.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
135.  Özkeçeci CF, Arslan M, Başaran EG, Ergen YM, Bozdoğan Ö, Balamtekin N. Non-syndromic perspective on a unique progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis variant: ZFYVE19 mutation. Turk J Pediatr. 2024;66:505-510.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
136.  Cockar I, Foskett P, Strautnieks S, Clinch Y, Fustok J, Rahman O, Sutton H, Mtegha M, Fessatou S, Kontaki E, Papaevangelou V, Deheragoda M, Thompson RJ, Grammatikopoulos T. Mutations in Myosin 5B in Children With Early-onset Cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71:184-188.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
137.  Overeem AW, Li Q, Qiu YL, Cartón-García F, Leng C, Klappe K, Dronkers J, Hsiao NH, Wang JS, Arango D, van Ijzendoorn SCD. A Molecular Mechanism Underlying Genotype-Specific Intrahepatic Cholestasis Resulting From MYO5B Mutations. Hepatology. 2020;72:213-229.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
138.  Matarazzo L, Bianco AM, Athanasakis E, Serveres M, Francalanci P, Cenacchi G, Maggiore G, D'Adamo AP. MYO5B Gene Mutations: A Not Negligible Cause of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Infancy With Normal Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase Phenotype. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74:e115-e121.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
139.  Roquelaure B, Sciveres M, Grammatikopoulos T, Lurz E, Freudenberg F, Habes D, Thevathasan L, Elaraki F, Gonzales E. Odevixibat therapy in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis with MYO5B variants: a retrospective case series. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20:227.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
140.  Reilkoff RA, Peng H, Murray LA, Peng X, Russell T, Montgomery R, Feghali-Bostwick C, Shaw A, Homer RJ, Gulati M, Mathur A, Elias JA, Herzog EL. Semaphorin 7a+ regulatory T cells are associated with progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and are implicated in transforming growth factor-β1-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:180-188.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in RCA: 113]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
141.  Qiu YL, Liu T, Abuduxikuer K, Hao CZ, Gong JY, Zhang MH, Li LT, Yan YY, Li JQ, Wang JS. Novel missense mutation in VPS33B is associated with isolated low gamma-glutamyltransferase cholestasis: Attenuated, incomplete phenotype of arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, and cholestasis syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:2247-2257.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
142.  Karpen SJ, Kamath BM, Alexander JJ, Ichetovkin I, Rosenthal P, Sokol RJ, Dunn S, Thompson RJ, Heubi JE. Use of a Comprehensive 66-Gene Cholestasis Sequencing Panel in 2171 Cholestatic Infants, Children, and Young Adults. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;72:654-660.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 34]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
143.  Varol Fİ, Selimoğlu MA, Güngör Ş, Yılmaz S, Tekedereli İ. Single-center experience in management of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2021;22:310-315.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
144.  Di Giorgio A, Sciveres M, Fuoti M, Calvo P, Cananzi M, Lleo A, Gatti S, Indolfi G, Madeo A, Mandato C, Nuti F, Zanchi C, Carioli G, Ghirardi A, Nicastro E, D'Antiga L. Real-world experience with odevixibat in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. JHEP Rep. 2025;7:101309.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
145.  Ala AS, Sayar T, Islek A, Arikan C, Tumgor G. Managing PFIC 7 with odevixibat: Alleviation of pruritus and biochemical response. JHEP Rep. 2026;8:101593.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Türkiye

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or innovation: Grade C, Grade C

Scientific significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Barreyro FJ, Assistant Professor, Chief, MD, PhD, Argentina; Hori T, FACS, MD, PhD, Professor, Japan S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: A P-Editor: Lei YY

Write to the Help Desk