Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2016; 22(43): 9654-9660
Published online Nov 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9654
Synchronous occurrence of a hepatic myelolipoma and two hepatocellular carcinomas
Shao-Yan Xu, Hai-Yang Xie, Lin Zhou, Shu-Sen Zheng, Wei-Lin Wang, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Shao-Yan Xu, Hai-Yang Xie, Lin Zhou, Shu-Sen Zheng, Wei-Lin Wang, Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Shao-Yan Xu, Hai-Yang Xie, Lin Zhou, Shu-Sen Zheng, Wei-Lin Wang, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Shao-Yan Xu, Hai-Yang Xie, Lin Zhou, Shu-Sen Zheng, Wei-Lin Wang, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Author contributions: Xu SY collected case data, prepared the photos and wrote the manuscript; Xie HY, Zhou L, Zheng SS and Wang WL proofread and revised the manuscript; all authors approved the final version to be published.
Supported by the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) in China, No. 2013CB531403; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81572307.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No commercial or associative interest in any form has been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this paper.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Wei-Lin Wang, PhD, MD, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. wam@zju.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-571-87236466 Fax: +86-571-87236466
Received: September 7, 2016
Peer-review started: September 8, 2016
First decision: September 28, 2016
Revised: October 10, 2016
Accepted: October 19, 2016
Article in press: October 19, 2016
Published online: November 21, 2016

Abstract

Myelolipoma is a rare tumor composed of fat and bone marrow components, most of which are located in the adrenal gland. Myelolipoma in the liver is extremely rare. To date, only 10 cases have been reported in the English-language medical literature. In one of these cases, the hepatic myelolipoma was found within a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, we report the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient, a 26-year-old female who was admitted to our hospital because of a 4-d history of upper abdominal pain. The unenhanced computed tomography (CT) images showed a well-defined low-density mass with adipose components in the right liver lobe, 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm in size. Two inhomogeneous low-density masses were found in the left liver lobe, 8.6 cm × 7.7 cm and 2.6 cm × 2.6 cm in size. The masses in both the right and left liver lobes were heterogeneously enhanced in the contrast-enhanced CT images. Based on the results of the imaging examination, the mass in the right liver lobe was preliminarily considered to be a hamartoma, and the two masses in the left liver were preliminarily considered to be HCCs. We performed a right hepatectomy, a left hepatic lobectomy, and a cholecystectomy. Microscopic and immunohistochemical results revealed that the tumor in the right liver lobe was a hepatic myelolipoma, and that the two tumors in the left liver lobe were HCCs.

Key Words: Liver, Myelolipoma, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Hepatectomy, Hepatic lobectomy

Core tip: Hepatic myelolipoma is extremely rare. To date, only 10 cases have been reported in the English-language medical literature. In the present study, we report the first case of the synchronous occurrence of a hepatic myelolipoma and two hepatocellular carcinomas in different liver sections of one patient, who received a right hepatectomy, a left hepatic lobectomy, and a cholecystectomy. We also highlight the diagnosis and treatment of a hepatic myelolipoma and conduct a literature review to deepen the understanding of the subject.



INTRODUCTION

Myelolipoma is a rare benign tumor composed of fat and bone marrow components. The adrenal gland is the most common location[1,2]. Myelolipoma in the liver is extremely rare. To our knowledge, 10 cases have been reported in the English-language medical literature as individual case reports[3-12]. In one of the cases, the hepatic myelolipoma was found within a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[6]. Hepatic myelolipomas are usually incidentally discovered by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or autopsy examination. The first case of hepatic myelolipoma was reported in France by Grosdidier et al[13] in 1973, and it was found on a plain abdominal X-ray during a regular checkup for diabetes and obesity. Although hepatic imaging modalities will lead to detection of the tumor, the diagnosis of a hepatic myelolipoma has to be confirmed by a histopathologic examination of the resected specimen. In the present study, we present the eleventh case of hepatic myelolipoma to be reported in the English-language medical literature. This is also the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient. The clinical, imaging, and pathologic features of this case are described, and the subject of hepatic myelolipoma is briefly reviewed to deepen our understanding of it.

CASE REPORT

On November 28, 2014, a 26-year-old female was admitted to our hospital because of a 4-d history of upper abdominal pain. Her abdomen was soft, lax, and non-distended, with no palpable mass. The patient had no history of hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Her family history was not significant. Abnormal laboratory results including alpha fetoprotein (AFP), 7529.2 ng/mL (normal, 20); carbohydrate antigen 125, 99.4 U/mL (normal, 0-35); serum creatinine, 42 μmol/L (normal, 45-84); serum sodium, 131 mmol/L (normal, 136-145); glutamyl transpeptidase, 103 U/L (normal, 7-32); fibrinogen, 4.45 g/L (normal, 2.00-4.00); and D-2-dimer, 9611 μg/L (normal, 0-700). The unenhanced CT images showed a well-defined low-density mass with adipose components in the right liver lobe, 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm in size (Figure 1A). Two inhomogeneous low-density masses were found in the left liver lobe, 8.6 cm × 7.7 cm and 2.6 cm × 2.6 cm in size (Figure 1B and C). In the contrast-enhanced CT images, the masses in both the right and the left liver lobe were heterogeneously enhanced (Figure 1D-F). Based on the results of the imaging examination, the mass in the right liver lobe was preliminarily considered to be a hamartoma, and the two masses in the left liver lobe were preliminarily considered to be HCCs.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography findings. A: An unenhanced computed tomography (CT) image showing a well-defined low-density mass (arrow) with adipose components in the right liver lobe, 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm in size; B and C: Two inhomogeneous low-density masses (arrows) are shown in the left liver lobe, 8.6 cm × 7.7 cm and 2.6 cm × 2.6 cm in size, respectively; D, E and F: In the contrast-enhanced CT image, the masses in both the right and left liver lobes are heterogeneously enhanced.

After sufficient pre-operative preparation, a laparotomy was performed. One mass was found in the V section of the right liver lobe, and two masses were found in the left liver lobe, reflecting what was seen in the CT scan. We completed a right hepatectomy and a left hepatic lobectomy. Because the gallbladder was close to the tumor, a cholecystectomy was also performed. The intraoperative frozen pathology revealed that the tumor in the right liver lobe was a hepatic myelolipoma, and that the two tumors in the left liver lobe were HCCs.

Macroscopically, the mass in the right liver lobe had a solid capsule that was 5.0 cm × 4.0 cm. The two masses in the left liver lobe were solid and were 9.5 cm × 6.5 cm × 5 cm and 3.2 cm × 2.0 cm in size, respectively. Microscopically, the tumor in the right liver lobe consisted of adipose tissue and hematopoietic elements containing erythroid tissue, megakaryocytes and myeloid colonies, consistent with a myelolipoma (Figure 2A and B). Tumor cells in the left liver lobe were in a funicular arrangement and showed invasive growth with significant atypia, compatible with malignant hepatic cancers (Figure 2C and D). Immunohistochemical investigation showed that hepatocyte and CD34 proteins were positive in the tumors of the left liver lobe (Figure 3), while AFP, GPC-3, HMB45, Melan-A and SMA were negative. Finally, the tumor in the right liver lobe was diagnosed as a hepatic myelolipoma, and the tumors in the left liver lobe were diagnosed as HCCs. After surgery, the patient developed an intra-abdominal infection and was hospitalized for 27 d. Unfortunately, two months later, a CT scan of the liver suggested the recurrence of the HCC. The patient received four transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and one iodine 131I metuximab injection in our hospital. However, the HCC metastasized to the lung eight months after surgery. The patient was then lost after nine months of follow-up.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Microscopic examination. A and B: The tumor (red arrow) in the right liver lobe consists of adipose tissue and hematopoietic elements containing erythroid tissue, megakaryocytes and myeloid colonies, consistent with a myelolipoma (A: HE, 100 ×; B: HE, 400 ×); C and D: The tumor cells (black arrow) in the left liver lobe are in a funicular arrangement and are growing invasively with significant atypia, compatible with a malignant hepatic cancer (C: HE, 100 ×; D: HE, 400 ×). The areas marked by green arrows are normal liver tissue. HE: Hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Immunohistochemical investigation. Hepatocyte (A) and CD34 (B) proteins were positive in the tumors of the left liver lobe (100 ×).
DISCUSSION

Myelolipoma is a rare type of benign, nonfunctioning tumor of mesenchymal origin, which is composed of various proportions of fat and hematopoietic cells[14]. As such, it resembles a site of extramedullary hematopoiesis. The adrenal gland is the most common site of myelolipomas; autopsy series have revealed the prevalence of myelolipomas in the adrenal gland at autopsy to be 0.08%-0.8%[2,15,16]. Extraadrenal myelolipomas are very rare[17]. They have been reported in the parietal pleura[18], presacral area[19], intrathoracic paravertebral area[20], mediastinum[21,22], gastric antrum[23], perirenal tissue[24], and right iliac fossa[25]. To date, only ten cases of hepatic myelolipomas have been reported in the English-language medical literature[3-12] (Table 1). In one of these cases, the hepatic myelolipoma was found in a HCC[6]. In the present study, we report the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient. Table 2 summarizes the clinical data from all 11 cases of hepatic myelolipoma reported in the English-language medical literature, including the present study. Continuous variables were summarized as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD) and the range. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The mean age of these patients was 51.45 ± 16.74 years (range 25-76 years) and the male-female ratio was 5:6. Forty percent of patients were asymptomatic; most patients were symptomatic. The right liver lobe was the reported site of the myelolipoma in nine (81.82%) of the patients; the left liver lobe was the reported site in 2 patients. The mean tumor size was 6.69 ± 4.71 cm (range 1.4-15 cm). Seven patients (63.64%) underwent tumor resection.

Table 1 Summary of clinical data on patients with hepatic myelolipoma in the English literature.
Ref.YearSex/ageSymptomlocationImaging methodNumberSize (cm)Treatment
Present case2016F/26Upper abdomen painRight liver lobeCTSolitary5.0Resection
Menozzi et al[3]2016F/72AsymptomaticRight liver lobeUS, CT, CEUSSolitary3.5NA
Radhi[4]2010M/76Symptoms related to a urinary tract infectionSegment VIII of the right liverUS, CTSolitary3.2NA
Savoye-Coll et al[5]2000M/25AsymptomaticSegment IVMRISolitary9.0Left hepatectomy
Van et al[6]1994M/57AsymptomaticRight liver lobeUS, CTSolitary1.4Hemihepatectomy
Moreno et al[7]1991M/40Malaise, anorexia, feverRight liver lobeX-rays, CT, Radioisotope scanSolitary15.0Right hepatic lobectomy
Nishizaki et al[8]1989F/56Right upper abdominal painRight post segmentUS; CT, Hepatic arteriographySolitary5.5Right posterior segmentectomy
subcapsule
Kaurich et al[9]1988F/42AsymptomaticLeft liver lobeUS; CT, Hepatic arteriographySolitary6.0Resection
Mali et al[10]1986M/63HepatomegalyRight liver lobe subcapsuleUS; CTSolitary15.0No treatment
Rubin et al[11]1984F/56Abdominal pain, RUQ tendernessRight post segment subcapsuleCT, Hepatic arteriographySolitary8.0Resection
AFIP case[12]1976F/53NALeft liver lobeNASolitary2.0NA
Table 2 Summary of clinical data from all 11 cases of hepatic myelolipoma.
n (%) or mean ± SD (range)
Age (yr) (n = 11)
Mean51.45 ± 16.74 (25-76)
Sex (male/female), (male %) (n = 11)5/6 (45.45)
Symptoms (n = 10)
Asymptomatic4 (40.00)
Symptomatic (n = 10)
Abdominal pain3 (30.00)
Symptoms related to a urinary tract infection1 (10.00)
Malaise1 (10.00)
Anorexia1 (10.00)
Fever1 (10.00)
Hepatomegaly1 (10.00)
Location (n = 11)
Right liver lobe9 (81.82)
Left liver lobe2 (18.18)
Mean size (cm) (n = 11)6.69 ± 4.71 (1.4-15)
Operation (n = 11)
Resection7 (63.64)
No resection1 (9.09)
Not available3 (27.27)

The etiology of hepatic myelolipoma remains uncertain. An ectopic adrenal gland is one hypothesis[8]. Most myelolipomas are reported in the adrenal gland. Anatomically, the right adrenal gland is adjacent to the right lobe of the liver, and an ectopic adrenal gland rarely appears in liver parenchyma[8]. Except for two cases, hepatic myelolipomas were found in the subcapsular region of the right liver lobe, including in our case. Emboli from bone marrow represent another hypothesis for the histogenesis of these lesions[4]. Although the gross appearance of a myelolipoma suggests a neoplastic origin, light and electron microscopy studies have revealed the polyclonal character of the hematopoietic cells[26]. The definitive stimulus that causes the hematopoietic and fat cells to proliferate remains enigmatic. Several studies have suggested that tissue necrosis is the basic stimulus[6,26]. For example, Van Hoe et al[6] speculated that the presence of foci of tumor necrosis may be associated with the development of a myelolipoma. Malignant tumors, hypertension, obesity, burns, and endocrinopathies have also been reported to be associated with the development of a myelolipoma[26].

The preoperative diagnosis of a hepatic myelolipoma is challenging. The appearance of myelolipomas on US, CT, and MRI images depends on the proportions of fat relative to myelogenous components[6]. US imaging reveals the myelolipoma to be a hyperechoic lesion[5,8]. Unenhanced CT images usually show that the tumor is well-encapsulated and has low-density areas varying from -69 to 28 HU as a result of intratumoral hemorrhage and varying proportions of fat and bone marrow elements[6,9]. On enhanced CT images, the tumor appears moderately enhanced. The area of low density remains hypoattenuated[27]. On T1-weighted MR images, the mass usually appears well marginated with a capsule, shows heterogeneous hyperintensity and contains necrosis. Hepatic arteriography reveals a hypervascular mass with an avascular zone[8,11]. On T2-weighted images, the mass shows heterogeneous low-signal intensity. After the administration of a gadolinium bolus, the lesion may show delayed heterogeneous enhancement[5,28]. Hepatic myelolipoma should be distinguished from other hepatic lesions that cause lipomatous masses, including lipomas, angiomyolipomas, metastatic dermoid tumors, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and focal fatty infiltration[29]. Areas of fatty degeneration can also be observed occasionally in HCCs and hepatic adenomas[30].

Although myelolipomas are benign, these types of tumor can be symptomatic and may increase in size. Thus, surgical intervention is warranted when the tumor is symptomatic or difficult to diagnose. In the present study, the hepatic myelolipoma could not be preoperatively diagnosed precisely. Furthermore, two HCCs were synchronously found in the left liver lobe. HCC is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide and has the third highest mortality among cancer patients[31,32], for whom surgical resection is the most common and effective therapeutic method. Accordingly, we performed a right hepatectomy and a left hepatic lobectomy to completely resect the hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs. Because the gallbladder was close to the tumor, a cholecystectomy was also performed. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical analyses of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs. Microscopically, the hepatic myelolipoma was composed of fat cells and hematopoietic cells, including mature and developing myeloid, erythroid, and megakaryocytic cells. Marrow-like areas were also clearly observed.

In conclusion, hepatic myelolipoma is extremely rare. To our knowledge, only 10 cases have been reported in the English-language medical literature. In one of these cases, the myelolipoma was found within a HCC. In the present study, we report the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient, who received a right hepatectomy, a left hepatic lobectomy, and a cholecystectomy.

COMMENTS
Case characteristics

A 26-year-old female was admitted to our hospital because of a 4-d history of upper abdominal pain.

Clinical diagnosis

Abdomen was soft, lax, and non-distended, with no palpable mass.

Differential diagnosis

Differential diagnoses included lipomas, angiomyolipomas, metastatic dermoid tumor, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Laboratory diagnosis

Abnormal laboratory results: alpha fetoprotein (AFP), 7529.2 ng/mL (normal, 20); carbohydrate antigen 125, 99.4 U/mL (normal, 0-35); serum creatinine, 42 μmol/L (normal, 45-84); serum sodium 131 mmol/L (normal, 136-145); glutamyl transpeptidase, 103 U/L (normal, 7-32); fibrinogen, 4.45 g/L (normal, 2.00-4.00); and D-2-dimer, 9611 μg/L (normal, 0-700).

Imaging diagnosis

The unenhanced computed tomography (CT) images showed a well-defined low-density mass with adipose components in the right liver lobe, 4.2 cm × 4.1 cm in size. Two inhomogeneous low-density masses were found in the left liver lobe, 8.6 cm × 7.7 cm and 2.6 cm × 2.6 cm in size. In the contrast-enhanced CT images, the masses in both the right and left liver lobes were heterogeneously enhanced. Based on the results of the imaging examination, the mass in the right liver lobe was preliminarily considered to be a hamartoma, and the two masses in the left liver lobe were preliminarily considered to be hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Pathological diagnosis

Macroscopically, the two masses in the left liver lobe were solid and were 9.5 cm × 6.5 cm × 5 cm and 3.2 cm × 2.0 cm in size, respectively. The mass in the right liver lobe had a capsule, was solid and 5.0 cm × 4.0 cm in size. Microscopically, the tumor in the right liver lobe consisted of adipose tissue and hematopoietic elements containing erythroid tissue, megakaryocytes and myeloid colonies, which was consistent with a myelolipoma. The tumor cells in the left liver lobe were in a funicular arrangement and had invasive growth with significant atypia, which was compatible with malignant hepatic cancer. Immunohistochemical investigation showed that hepatocyte and CD34 proteins were positive in the tumors of the left liver lobe, while AFP, GPC-3, HMB45, Melan-A, and SMA were negative. Finally, the tumor in the right liver lobe was diagnosed as a hepatic myelolipoma, and the tumors in the left liver lobe were diagnosed as HCCs.

Treatment

The authors performed a right hepatectomy, a left hepatic lobectomy and a cholecystectomy.

Related reports

Hepatic myelolipoma is extremely rare. To date, only 10 cases have been reported in the English-language medical literature.

Experiences and lessons

In the present study, the authors present the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient. Preoperative diagnosis of hepatic myelolipoma is challenging. Surgery is the most effective treatment for the tumor.

Peer-review

This study highlights the diagnosis and treatment of the first case of the synchronous occurrence of hepatic myelolipoma and HCCs in different liver sections of one patient. This study also presents a literature review to deepen our understanding of hepatic myelolipoma. The information included is worthwhile to the reader.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Goral V, Lee CL S- Editor: Gong ZM L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Su HC, Huang X, Zhou WL, Dai J, Huang BX, Cao WL, Sun FK. Pathologic analysis, diagnosis and treatment of adrenal myelolipoma. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:E637-E640.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Olsson CA, Krane RJ, Klugo RC, Selikowitz SM. Adrenal myelolipoma. Surgery. 1973;73:665-670.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Menozzi G, Maccabruni V, Marini G, Froio E, Garlassi E. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) appearance of hepatic myelolipoma. J Ultrasound. 2016;19:61-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Radhi J. Hepatic myelolipoma. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010;19:106-107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Savoye-Collet C, Goria O, Scotté M, Hemet J. MR imaging of hepatic myelolipoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:574-575.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Van Eycken P, Baert AL, Marchal G. Myelolipoma in a hepatocellular carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:1111-1112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
7.  Moreno Gonzalez E, Seoane Gonzalez JB, Bercedo Martinez J, Santoyo Santoyo J, Gomez Sanz R, Vargas Castrijon J, Ballestin Carcavilla C, Garcia Mauriño ML, Colina Ruiz-Delgado F. Hepatic myelolipoma: new case and review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991;38:60-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Nishizaki T, Kanematsu T, Matsumata T, Yasunaga C, Kakizoe S, Sugimachi K. Myelolipoma of the liver. A case report. Cancer. 1989;63:930-934.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Kaurich JD, Coombs RJ, Zeiss J. Myelolipoma of the liver: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12:660-661.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Mali SP, Gratama S, Mulder H. Myelolipoma of the liver. Rofo. 1986;144:610-611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Rubin E, Russinovich NA, Luna RF, Tishler JM, Wilkerson JA. Myelolipoma of the liver. Cancer. 1984;54:2043-2046.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Ishak KG. Mesenchymal tumors of the liver. Hepatocellular carcinoma. London: John Wiley and Sons, Inc 1976; 247-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Grosdidier J, Boissel P, Macinot C, Drouin P. Hepatic myelolipoma. Apropos of a case. Nouv Presse Med. 1973;2:1777-1779.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Baisakh MR, Chattoraj A, Narayanan R, Mohanty R, Mishra M. Adrenal myelolipoma: A rare lesion of adrenal gland. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52:597-598.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Mcdonnell WV. Myelolipoma of adrenal. AMA Arch Pathol. 1956;61:416-419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Snearly RG, Ram MD. Myelolipoma of adrenal. Urology. 1978;11:411-413.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Bermúdez Naveira A, Fraga M, Aliste-Santos C, Cordeiro C, Muñoz-Barús JI. Unusual Forms of Adrenal and Extra-Adrenal Myelolipomas. Int J Surg Pathol. 2014;22:473-477.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Zhang DS, Li DH, Bi HX, Wu XF. [Gastric adenocarcinoma associated with myelolipoma of parietal pleura: a case report]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2006;35:437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Prahlow JA, Loggie BW, Cappellari JO, Scharling ES, Teot LA, Iskandar SS. Extra-adrenal myelolipoma: report of two cases. South Med J. 1995;88:639-643.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Rigoli E, Dallabernardina L. Intrathoracic myelolipoma. (intrathoracic tumor-like extramedullary erythropoiesis). Riv Anat Patol Oncol. 1964;25:LV-LXXX.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Migliore M, Calvo D, Criscione A, Caltabiano R, Platania N, Barbagallo G, Albanese V. An unsual symptomatic case of mediastinal myelolipoma treated by VATS approach. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85:85-87.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Himuro N, Minakata T, Oshima Y, Tomita Y, Kataoka D, Yamamoto S, Kadokura M. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary myelolipoma of the posterior mediastinum. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Yildiz BD. Giant Extra-Adrenal Retroperitoneal Myelolipoma With Incidental Gastric Mesenchymal Neoplasias. Int Surg. 2015;100:1018-1020.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Brandler TC, Reder I, Kahn L. Perirenal myelolipoma diagnosed on imprint: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:230-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Surabhi VR, Menias C, Prasad SR, Patel AH, Nagar A, Dalrymple NC. Neoplastic and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders of the perirenal space: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics. 2008;28:1005-1017.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bautista DV, Asch M, Kovacs K, Murray D. Adrenal myelolipomatous nodules mimicking adrenal neoplasms: report of three cases. Can J Surg. 1989;32:51-55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Orlandi A, Marino B, De Dona G, Cefaro A, Spagnoli LG. [Clinico-pathological considerations about a case of hepatic myelolipoma]. Ann Ital Chir. 1994;65:253-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Kenney PJ, Wagner BJ, Rao P, Heffess CS. Myelolipoma: CT and pathologic features. Radiology. 1998;208:87-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 186]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 200]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Roberts JL, Fishman EK, Hartman DS, Sanders R, Goodman Z, Siegelman SS. Lipomatous tumors of the liver: evaluation with CT and US. Radiology. 1986;158:613-617.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T, Ida M, Takanaka T, Kawamura I, Kakuda K, Miyata S. Fatty metamorphosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic features in 10 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:717-720.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-E386.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19774]  [Article Influence: 2197.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (17)]
32.  Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379:1245-1255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3249]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3477]  [Article Influence: 289.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]