Lam AKY, Chan SSY, Leung M. Synchronous colorectal cancer: Clinical, pathological and molecular implications. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(22): 6815-6820
Corresponding Author of This Article
Alfred King-Yin Lam, Professor, Foundation Chair Professor and Head of Pathology, Cancer Molecular Pathology, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast QLD 4222, Queensland, Australia. email@example.com
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Synchronous colorectal cancer: Clinical, pathological and molecular implications
Alfred King-Yin Lam, Sally Sze-Yan Chan, Melissa Leung
Alfred King-Yin Lam, Sally Sze-Yan Chan, Melissa Leung, Cancer Molecular Pathology, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast QLD 4222, Queensland, Australia
ORCID number: $[AuthorORCIDs]
Author contributions: Lam AKY, Chan SSY and Leung M contributed to the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Alfred King-Yin Lam, Professor, Foundation Chair Professor and Head of Pathology, Cancer Molecular Pathology, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast QLD 4222, Queensland, Australia. firstname.lastname@example.org
Telephone: +61-7-56780718 Fax: +61-7-56780718
Received: October 3, 2013 Revised: December 6, 2013 Accepted: March 19, 2014 Published online: June 14, 2014
Synchronous colorectal carcinoma refers to more than one primary colorectal carcinoma detected in a single patient at initial presentation. A literature review has shown that the prevalence of the disease is approximately 3.5% of all colorectal carcinomas. This disease has a male to female ratio of 1.8:1. The mean age at presentation of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer is in the early half of the seventh decade. Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease), hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polyposis and serrated polyps/hyperplastic polyposis are known to have a higher risk of synchronous colorectal carcinoma. These predisposing factors account for slightly more than 10% of synchronous colorectal carcinomas. Synchronous colorectal carcinoma is more common in the right colon when compared to solitary colorectal cancer. On pathological examination, some synchronous colorectal carcinomas are mucinous adenocarcinomas. They are usually associated with adenomas and metachronous colorectal carcinomas. Most of the patients with synchronous colorectal cancer have two carcinomas but up to six have been reported in one patient. Patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma have a higher proportion of microsatellite instability cancer than patients with a solitary colorectal carcinoma. Also, limited data have revealed that in many synchronous colorectal carcinomas, carcinomas in the same patient have different patterns of microsatellite instability status, p53 mutation and K-ras mutation. Overall, the prognosis of patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma is not significantly different from that in patients with solitary colorectal carcinoma, although a marginally better prognosis has been reported in patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma in some series. A different management approach and long-term clinical follow-up are recommended for some patients with synchronous colorectal cancer.
Core tip: Synchronous colorectal carcinoma accounts for approximately 3.5% of colorectal carcinoma. This type of carcinoma has different clinical, pathological and molecular features from solitary colorectal carcinoma. There has been a lack of comprehensive reviews of this entity in recent years.
Citation: Lam AKY, Chan SSY, Leung M. Synchronous colorectal cancer: Clinical, pathological and molecular implications. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(22): 6815-6820
Synchronous colorectal carcinoma denotes more than one primary colorectal carcinoma detected in a single patient. Metachronous colorectal carcinoma is the presence of more than one primary colorectal carcinoma detected consecutively in a single person after a set time interval. In the literature, many studies have mixed these two entities together in their analysis.
The literature between 1981 and 2013 recorded in PubMed was searched for research papers on synchronous colorectal carcinoma. Keywords included “synchronous”, “colorectal”, “colon”, “rectum”, “cancer”, and “carcinoma”. Only original full-text publications were reviewed. The eligibility criteria included articles in English, with adequate sample numbers and description of the cases. Case reports were excluded. The demographic details were entered into a computer database. If the same cases were reported more than once, only one entry was entered. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 22.0 (IMB SPSS Inc., New York, United States). Overall, 51 series were selected with sufficient data for review[1-54]. The characteristics of the selected series are shown in Table 1. This is to ensure comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the disease entity in recent decades.
Table 1 Characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancer as compared to solitary colorectal cancer.
Higher male to female ratio
More likely to be associated with precursor lesions such as adenoma, and in the settings of inflammatory bowel diseases, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and familial adenomatous polyposis
More noted in the proximal portion of the colon
Higher incidence of mucinous adenocarcinoma
Higher likelihood of having microsatellite instability
The prevalence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma ranged from 1.1% to 8.1%[1-54]. In some series, the number of cases analyzed was small and the figures quoted are unlikely to be representative. In contrast, in large population studies, many clinical and pathological characteristics of synchronous colorectal carcinoma were not analyzed. Differences in the range of prevalence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma were obtained from studies in Europe, Asia and America (Europe 1.1%-8.1%, Asia 1.1%-8.1%, and America 1.2%-7.0%). There were three large studies with > 10000 colorectal cancers analyzed. The prevalence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma in these three series was 3.1%, 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively[2,38,47]. Also, pooling the data from 39 series in which the prevalence of synchronous colorectal cancer could be found, the overall prevalence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma was 3.5% (3667 of 105686) of colorectal cancers[1-13,15,16,18,19,24,26-35,37-40,43,46-48,52-54].
Synchronous colorectal cancer is more often seen in men. In the majority of the series analyzed, the male to female ratio of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer was > 1. By pooling the data from the 38 series with the sex of the patients mentioned, the male to female ratio was 1.8 : 1.0 (2260 men vs 1241 women)[1-14,16-19,23,24,26-33,38-40,43,46-48,52-54]. It has also been shown that when compared to solitary colorectal carcinoma, synchronous colorectal carcinoma had a higher male to female ratio. There is no obvious reason for the higher male predominance for this entity. Investigations may help to detect if any genetic and environmental factors can contribute to the sex difference in prevalence.
AGE AT PRESENTATION
There is no common consensus on whether synchronous colorectal carcinoma occurs in a different age range when compared to solitary colorectal carcinoma. In the literature, the mean age at presentation of synchronous colorectal carcinoma ranged from 47 to 79 years[27,31]. By pooling the data from 32 series in the analysis, the mean age at presentation of patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma was 63[4,6-14,16,18,19,23,24,26-34,37,40,43,46,48,52-54]. In many of the series, the mean age at presentation for synchronous colorectal cancer was higher than solitary colorectal cancer. However, in a large series such as that presented by Latourniere and colleagues, the age at diagnosis for solitary colorectal and synchronous colorectal carcinoma was similar.
Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and familial adenomatous polyposis are known to have higher risk of synchronous colorectal cancer[5,45,46,51]. The reason behind this is obvious and related to a multiple field of dysplasia (adenomas) that can occur in these patients. Also, synchronous colorectal carcinoma is associated with more adenomas than solitary colorectal cancer[4,7,9,10,14,18]. In recent years, precursor multiple serrated sessile serrated adenoma/hyperplastic polyposis were more commonly noted in synchronous colorectal cancer[46,49].
Synchronous colorectal carcinoma is often reported in patients with ulcerative colitis. Liu et al reported a series of 108 patients with cancer associated with inflammatory bowel disease (95 with ulcerative colitis and 13 with Crohn’s disease), and 22 (20%) had synchronous colorectal carcinoma. All synchronous carcinoma was noted in the patients with ulcerative colitis. In another large series of 240 patients with colorectal carcinoma associated with inflammatory bowel diseases (176 with ulcerative colitis and 64 with Crohn’s disease), synchronous colorectal carcinoma occurred in both types of inflammatory bowel diseases. Similarly, patients with ulcerative colitis had a significantly higher risk of developing synchronous colorectal cancer than patients with Crohn’s disease.
A study performed by Greenstein and colleagues reported that synchronous carcinoma accounted for 2.5% of de novo colorectal carcinoma, 18% of ulcerative colitis-related carcinoma, and 21% of familial adenomatosis polyposis-related carcinoma. However, the relative prevalence of these predisposing factors in synchronous colorectal carcinoma was rarely documented. One of the reasons is that in many studies on synchronous colorectal carcinoma, patients with these predisposing lesions were excluded. Nevertheless, in a series obtained from a general population of colorectal carcinoma, patients with known predisposing conditions may account for slightly more than 10% of synchronous colorectal cancer. Thus, other unknown factors may be the cause of the synchronous colorectal carcinoma.
LOCATION OF SYNCHRONOUS CANCER
Common sites of synchronous colorectal cancer are the sigmoid colon or rectum. The relative frequencies of carcinoma in a different portion of the large intestine differ for synchronous and solitary colorectal carcinoma. When compared to solitary colorectal carcinoma, synchronous carcinoma appears to more often involve the proximal portion of the colon; in particular the ascending colon. These findings were in concurrence with the right-side predominance of some genetic predisposing factors. Some authors have reported that many synchronous colorectal carcinomas occurred in the same segment of the large intestine or close to each other[2,12,38]. In contrast, there a large proportion of cancers are noted in different segments of the large intestine. This stresses the importance of thorough preoperative examination of synchronous colorectal cancer.
Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a type of colorectal adenocarcinoma and accounts for approximately 14% of colorectal carcinomas. Mucinous adenocarcinoma is reported to be slightly more common in patients with synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma. It is worth noting that mucinous adenocarcinoma is a pathological feature of colorectal carcinoma in the setting of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), which can predispose to synchronous or metachronous colorectal carcinoma. In a large series of 102 patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma and 56 with metachronous colorectal carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma was not more common in synchronous colorectal carcinoma when compared to solitary colorectal carcinoma. In contrast, this type of carcinoma is more common in the metachronous (subsequent) carcinoma. In some cases, cancers in the same patient can be mucinous adenocarcinoma. The other cancers detected in the patients with synchronous colorectal carcinomas are usually smaller, with lower pathological grade and T staging than the index cancer. Also, metachronous carcinoma can also occur in some patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma.
The majority of patients with colorectal synchronous carcinoma reported in the literature had only two carcinomas in the large intestine. In some cases, more than two colorectal cancers were found in each patient. The percentages of patients with synchronous colorectal carcinomas with three or more cancers ranged from 1.8% to 16.7%[13,38]. Up to six synchronous carcinomas have been reported in the large intestine of a single patient[10,46].
The majority of research in molecular biology on synchronous colorectal carcinoma has focused on analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI)[41,43,52]. Microsatellites are simple repetitive DNA sequences scattered throughout the genome. Due to their repetitive nature, they are susceptible to errors during DNA replication, which are usually corrected by mismatch repair genes. Failure of the mismatch repair system results in accumulation of alterations in microsatellite lengths; a process described as MSI. MSI-positive colorectal carcinoma can occur in familial settings known as HNPCC[57-59]. Patients with HNPCC inherit a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes. However, many of the MSI-positive colorectal carcinomas are sporadic, resulting from methylation of mismatch repair genes, rather than by germline mutation as in HNPCC. Sporadic MSI cancers show methylation of MLH1 promoters; a condition which is strongly correlated to the V600E mutation of human gene braf (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1).
Some studies have shown that patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma have a higher proportion of MSI-positive cancers than patients with solitary colorectal carcinoma. Also, methylation of multiple genes or braf mutation status in these cancers suggests that many of these cancers are sporadic rather than familial[27,36,42,43]. It is likely that the higher portion of MSI cancers in synchronous colorectal cancer is sporadic and may be due to the local carcinogenic environment in the large intestine.
Patients with individual cancers discordant for MSI status have the worst clinical outcome, whereas those with individual cancers concordant for MSI-deficient status have the best outcome. This result concurs with the fact patients with MSI-positive colorectal carcinoma have better prognosis than those with MSI-negative carcinoma.
Other than MSI, K-ras and p53 mutations are commonly studied in colorectal carcinoma[57-61]. K-ras mutations are predictive markers of resistance to monoclonal antibody therapies for metastatic colorectal carcinoma, which targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. p53 mutations are common in human cancer and are often found in more aggressive cancer. In many studies, there is a portion of synchronous colorectal carcinoma with discordant MSI status, p53 mutation and K-ras mutation between the synchronous colorectal carcinomas in a given individual[14,17,23,40,41]. These findings suggest that the mechanism of formation of synchronous colorectal carcinoma is complex and is unlikely to be linked to known genetic mutations commonly found in colorectal carcinoma.
Lastly, genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferases (null GSRM1 phenotype) is associated with synchronous colorectal carcinoma. The glutathione S-transferases form a group of multi-gene isoenzymes involved in the cellular detoxification of both xenobiotic and endobiotic compounds. They are related to cancer risk characterization and chemotherapy resistance. This result needs to be confirmed in future studies.
The prognosis of patients with synchronous carcinoma has been documented to be better, the same or worse than those with solitary colorectal carcinoma[2,19,20]. The variation is likely due to the differences in the sample size and length of clinical follow-up and needs to be interpreted with caution. The first prospective study on the effect of synchronous colorectal carcinoma on survival as compared to solitary colorectal cancer was presented by Nosho and colleagues in the United States in 2009. The study showed that synchronous colorectal carcinoma was significantly associated with poor prognosis. The reasons proposed are more related to the predicted clinical effects of the higher chance of complications and metastases in multiple colorectal carcinomas. However, in the majority of the studies and many of the recent studies involving a larger number of cases, the survival of patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma was reported to be no different from that of solitary colorectal carcinoma. In the studies by Hu and co-authors in 2012 and also from our group in 2011 and 2012[46,56], marginal survival benefits of patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma were noted. Hu and co-authors have proposed that the reason for the better survival rates in this type of carcinoma may be related to the genetic difference in a portion of cancers. Nevertheless, it is likely that the prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinoma depends on many factors, and the occurrence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma is not strong enough as an independent predictive factor for survival rates.
Extensive surgery is needed for patients with synchronous colorectal cancer with known predisposing factors such as familial adenomatous polyposis, ulcerative colitis or HNPCC. For other cases, appropriate surgical resection with colonoscopic examination of follow-up is recommended. If one of the synchronous cancers is early-stage colorectal cancer, colonoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal resection) may be used. Otherwise, dual colon resection may be needed if the synchronous cancers are a large distance apart and at an advanced stage. Depending on the resources available, life-long clinical follow-up of some patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma may be recommended.
Complete colonoscopy may not be possible in all patients to detect synchronous colorectal carcinoma before an operation due to the presence of synchronous carcinoma proximal to a stenosing colorectal carcinoma. Even with complete colonoscopy, synchronous carcinoma may also be missed as a result of its small size or being close to the main cancer. Computed tomography colonography has been used to detect synchronous cancers proximal to stenosing colorectal cancers. Nevertheless, it has limited capability in differentiating advanced adenoma from colorectal carcinoma.
Synchronous colorectal cancer is different from solitary colorectal cancer in many aspects. The features are summarized in Table 1. It is likely that both environmental and genetic factors account for the presence of synchronous colorectal carcinoma. These factors may lead to a higher risk of further cancer in this group of patients. However, there is yet no strong predictive parameter for the presence of synchronous cancer or metachronous cancer. The molecular biology of the tumors is complex. Long-term clinical follow-up is recommended for patients with synchronous colorectal cancers.
The authors would like to thank Ms Sharon Philips for her help in editing the manuscript.
P- Reviewers: Ghosn M, Morini S, Park SH, Quigley EMM S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: Kerr C E- Editor: Ma S
Welch JP. Multiple colorectal tumors. An appraisal of natural history and therapeutic options.Am J Surg. 1981;142:274-280.
Kaibara N, Koga S, Jinnai D. Synchronous and metachronous malignancies of the colon and rectum in Japan with special reference to a coexisting early cancer.Cancer. 1984;54:1870-1874.
Cunliffe WJ, Hasleton PS, Tweedle DE, Schofield PF. Incidence of synchronous and metachronous colorectal carcinoma.Br J Surg. 1984;71:941-943.
Langevin JM, Nivatvongs S. The true incidence of synchronous cancer of the large bowel. A prospective study.Am J Surg. 1984;147:330-333.
Greenstein AJ, Slater G, Heimann TM, Sachar DB, Aufses AH. A comparison of multiple synchronous colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis, familial polyposis coli, and de novo cancer.Ann Surg. 1986;203:123-128.
Finan PJ, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Synchronous and ‘early’ metachronous carcinomas of the colon and rectum.Br J Surg. 1987;74:945-947.
Wagner HE, Barbier PA, Luder PJ, Niederhäuser U. Prognosis in synchronous colorectal carcinomas.Z Gastroenterol. 1988;26:117-120.
Evers BM, Mullins RJ, Matthews TH, Broghamer WL, Polk HC. Multiple adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum. An analysis of incidences and current trends.Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:518-522.
Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Bergamaschi R, Schloegel M. Synchronous carcinoma of the colon and rectum: prognostic and therapeutic implications.Am J Surg. 1989;157:299-302.
Fegiz G, Ramacciato G, Indinnimeo M, Gozzo P, Valabrega S, De Angelis R, Barillari P. Synchronous large bowel cancer: a series of 47 cases.Ital J Surg Sci. 1989;19:23-28.
Greig JD, Miller DF. Synchronous and early metachronous carcinomas of the colon and rectum.Acta Chir Scand. 1989;155:287-289.
Eu KW, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Synchronous colorectal cancer in an Oriental population.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;8:193-196.
Kimura T, Iwagaki H, Fuchimoto S, Hizuta A, Orita K. Synchronous colorectal carcinomas.Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;41:409-412.
Hayakumo T, Cho E, Nakajima M, Kato G, Kawai K, Azuma T. Point mutations in the c-K-ras 2 gene in multiple colorectal carcinomas.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;10:70-75.
Fante R, Roncucci L, Di GregorioC MG, Losi L, Benatti P, Pedroni M, Percesepe A, De Pietri S, Ponz de Leon M. Frequency and clinical features of multiple tumors of the large bowel in the general population and in patients with hereditary colorectal carcinoma.Cancer. 1996;77:2013-2021.
Passman MA, Pommier RF, Vetto JT. Synchronous colon primaries have the same prognosis as solitary colon cancers.Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:329-334.
Eguchi K, Yao T, Konomoto T, Hayashi K, Fujishima M, Tsuneyoshi M. Discordance of p53 mutations of synchronous colorectal carcinomas.Mod Pathol. 2000;13:131-139.
Chen HS, Sheen-Chen SM. Synchronous and “early” metachronous colorectal adenocarcinoma: analysis of prognosis and current trends.Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1093-1099.
Abe Y, Masuda H, Okubo R. Microsatellite instability of each tumor in sporadic synchronous multiple colorectal cancers.Oncol Rep. 2001;8:299-304.
Chirila DN, Popp RA, Balacescu O, Turdeanu NA, Constantea NA, Pop TR, Vesa SC, Ciuce C. GST gene variants in synchronous colorectal cancers and synchronous association of colorectal cancers with other cancers.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108:365-371.
Norrie MW, Hawkins NJ, Todd AV, Meagher AP, O’Connor TW, Ward RL. The role of hMLH1 methylation in the development of synchronous sporadic colorectal carcinomas.Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:674-680.
Oya M, Takahashi S, Okuyama T, Yamaguchi M, Ueda Y. Synchronous colorectal carcinoma: clinico-pathological features and prognosis.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:38-43.
Ueno M, Muto T, Oya M, Ota H, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T. Multiple primary cancer: an experience at the Cancer Institute Hospital with special reference to colorectal cancer.Int J Clin Oncol. 2003;8:162-167.
Dykes SL, Qui H, Rothenberger DA, García-Aguilar J. Evidence of a preferred molecular pathway in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer.Cancer. 2003;98:48-54.
Wang HZ, Huang XF, Wang Y, Ji JF, Gu J. Clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:2136-2139.
Nikoloudis N, Saliangas K, Economou A, Andreadis E, Siminou S, Manna I, Georgakis K, Chrissidis T. Synchronous colorectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8 Suppl 1:s177-s179.
Papadopoulos V, Michalopoulos A, Basdanis G, Papapolychroniadis K, Paramythiotis D, Fotiadis P, Berovalis P, Harlaftis N. Synchronous and metachronous colorectal carcinoma.Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8 Suppl 1:s97-s100.
Ikeda Y, Saku M, Kawanaka H, Muranaka T, Takeshita M, Watanabe J, Yoshida K, Sugimachi K. Distribution of synchronous and metachronous multiple colorectal cancers.Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:443-446.
Piñol V, Andreu M, Castells A, Payá A, Bessa X, Jover R. Synchronous colorectal neoplasms in patients with colorectal cancer: predisposing individual and familial factors.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1192-1200.
Velayos FS, Lee SH, Qiu H, Dykes S, Yiu R, Terdiman JP, Garcia-Aguilar J. The mechanism of microsatellite instability is different in synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:329-335.
Fukatsu H, Kato J, Nasu JI, Kawamoto H, Okada H, Yamamoto H, Sakaguchi K, Shiratori Y. Clinical characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancer are different according to tumour location.Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:40-46.
Latournerie M, Jooste V, Cottet V, Lepage C, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancers.Br J Surg. 2008;95:1528-1533.
Tziris N, Dokmetzioglou J, Giannoulis K, Kesisoglou I, Sapalidis K, Kotidis E, Gambros O. Synchronous and metachronous adenocarcinomas of the large intestine.Hippokratia. 2008;12:150-152.
Yalcinkaya U, Ozturk E, Ozgur T, Yerci O, Yilmazlar T. P53 expression in synchronous colorectal cancer.Saudi Med J. 2008;29:826-831.
Aslanian HR, Burgart LJ, Harrington JJ, Mahoney DW, Zinsmeister AR, Thibodeau SN, Ahlquist DA. Altered DNA mismatch repair expression in synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancers.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1385-1388.
Konishi K, Shen L, Jelinek J, Watanabe Y, Ahmed S, Kaneko K, Kogo M, Takano T, Imawari M, Hamilton SR. Concordant DNA methylation in synchronous colorectal carcinomas.Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009;2:814-822.
Nosho K, Kure S, Irahara N, Shima K, Baba Y, Spiegelman D, Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS, Ogino S. A prospective cohort study shows unique epigenetic, genetic, and prognostic features of synchronous colorectal cancers.Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1609-20.e1-3.
Gonzalo V, Lozano JJ, Muñoz J, Balaguer F, Pellisé M, Rodríguez de Miguel C, Andreu M, Jover R, Llor X, Giráldez MD. Aberrant gene promoter methylation associated with sporadic multiple colorectal cancer.PLoS One. 2010;5:e8777.
Kiran RP, Khoury W, Church JM, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Remzi FH. Colorectal cancer complicating inflammatory bowel disease: similarities and differences between Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis based on three decades of experience.Ann Surg. 2010;252:330-335.
Lam AK, Carmichael R, Gertraud Buettner P, Gopalan V, Ho YH, Siu S. Clinicopathological significance of synchronous carcinoma in colorectal cancer.Am J Surg. 2011;202:39-44.
Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA, de Wilt JH, Ouwendijk RJ, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME. Prevalence and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancer: a Dutch population-based study.Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35:442-447.
Derwinger K, Gustavsson B. A study of aspects on gender and prognosis in synchronous colorectal cancer.Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2011;5:259-264.
Mohammadi M, Kristensen MH, Nielsen HJ, Bonde JH, Holck S. Qualities of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp/lesion and its borderline variant in the context of synchronous colorectal carcinoma.J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:924-927.
Bae JM, Cho NY, Kim TY, Kang GH. Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancers: heterogeneity of clinical outcome depending on microsatellite instability status of individual tumors.Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:181-190.
Liu X, Goldblum JR, Zhao Z, Landau M, Heald B, Pai R, Lin J. Distinct clinicohistologic features of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal adenocarcinoma: in comparison with sporadic microsatellite-stable and Lynch syndrome-related colorectal adenocarcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1228-1233.
Hu H, Chang DT, Nikiforova MN, Kuan SF, Pai RK. Clinicopathologic features of synchronous colorectal carcinoma: A distinct subset arising from multiple sessile serrated adenomas and associated with high levels of microsatellite instability and favorable prognosis.Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1660-1670.
Şavlovschi C, Comandaşu M, Şerban D. Specifics of diagnosis and treatment in synchronous colorectal cancers (SCC).Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108:43-45.
Ueda E, Watanabe T, Umetani N, Ishigami H, Sasaki S, Nagawa H. Microsatellite instability of cancers and concomitant adenomas in synchronous multiple colorectal cancer patients.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21:149-154.
Lam AK, Gopalan V, Carmichael R, Buettner PG, Leung M, Smith R, Lu CT, Ho YH, Siu S. Metachronous carcinomas in colorectum and its clinicopathological significance.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:1303-1310.
King-Yin Lam A, Ong K, Ho YH. Colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: the clinicopathologic features and significance of p16 and p53 expression.Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1275-1283.
Pakneshan S, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK. Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer.Pathology. 2013;45:346-356.
Pritchard CC, Grady WM. Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.Gut. 2011;60:116-129.
Ogino S, Goel A. Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer.J Mol Diagn. 2008;10:13-27.
Weekes J, Lam AK, Sebesan S, Ho YH. Irinotecan therapy and molecular targets in colorectal cancer: a systemic review.World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3597-3602.
Lam AK, Ong K, Ho YH. hTERT expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma: correlations with p21, p53 expressions and clinicopathological features.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:587-594.
Di Pietro G, Magno LA, Rios-Santos F. Glutathione S-transferases: an overview in cancer research.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6:153-170.
Park SH, Lee JH, Lee SS, Kim JC, Yu CS, Kim HC, Ye BD, Kim MJ, Kim AY, Ha HK. CT colonography for detection and characterisation of synchronous proximal colonic lesions in patients with stenosing colorectal cancer.Gut. 2012;61:1716-1722.