Clinical Articles Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1996. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 1996; 2(4): 223-225
Published online Dec 15, 1996. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v2.i4.223
Restriction fragment length polymorphism of pepsinogen C gene in patients with gastric carcinoma and in high risk population of gastric carcinoma
Yuan Yuan, Ming Dong, An-Guang He, Cancer Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
Ping Lu, First College of Clinical Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
Xuan-Jie Wang, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhuanghe City
Chun-Lian Jin, College of Basic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
Yuan Yuan, Associate Professor; main field of study is the etiological analysis and early diagnosis of gastric carcinoma; having more than 40 papers published
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 39170339.
Correspondence to: Dr. Yuan Yuan, Associate Professor, Cancer Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
Telephone: +86-24-3866766-6351
Received: July 28, 1996
Revised: August 13, 1996
Accepted: October 10, 1996
Published online: December 15, 1996

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the difference of distribution of the pepsinogen C (PGC) gene polymorphism among different groups and to study its application value in screening of the high risk population of gastric carcinoma and its value as an indicator for gene diagnosis.

METHODS: The study consisted of two parts: study on the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of PGC gene in normal individuals and patients with gastric cancer, and study on the PGC gene polymorphism in members from a family at a high risk for stomach carcinoma and the follow-up survey. A total of 40 cases were analyzed including 11 healthy blood donors, 10 gastric carcinoma patients, and 19 members from a high risk family of stomach carcinoma. The Southern blot method was adopted in the study. The probe and restriction endonuclease used were PGC 301 and EcoR I, respectively. Gastroscopy and gastric mucosa biopsy were performed in the follow-up study.

RESULTS: There were three kinds of common PGC EcoR I allelic fragments (20 kb, 5.7 kb and 3.6 kb) and only one rare fragment (3.5 kb) in the normal subjects, and there was no difference in allelic fragments between the normal subjects and the patients. The incidence of the rare fragment and rare hybrid band type in the patients was higher than that in the normal subjects. The incidence of rare fragment and rare hybrid band type in the members from a high risk family was a little higher than that in normal subjects. After the 3-year follow-up by gastroscopy, one of the four members from the high risk family with PGC EcoR I rare fragment was found to suffer from early stomach cancer. The hybrid signal of EcoR I common allelic fragments in the gastric tumor tissue was weakened, even disappeared.

CONCLUSION: PGC EcoR I rare fragment and rare hybrid band type in the early diagnosis and screening of high-risk population of stomach carcinoma are probably of important application value. There is gastric normal differentiation gene (PGC gene) deletion in the stomach tumor tissue.

Key Words: Stomach neoplasms, PGC, Restriction fragment length polymorphism



INTRODUCTION

In recent ten years, with the application of molecular biological techniques in clinical medicine, as a method of gene diagnosis, the applying value of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in the diagnosis of cancer as well as the screening of high risk population of cancer has called wide attention of scholars. In 1985, Krontiris et al[1] first reported that the polymorphism of ras gene could be used in predicting the risk of cancer occurrence. From then on, there have been many studies focusing on the polymorphism analysis of tumor genes in hopes of finding out the specific genetic susceptible marker of cancer[2-5]. However, in few studies the polymorphism was analysed using some normal tissue differentiation genes. In fact, compared with the common tumor gene detection method, the polymorphism analysis of some normal tissue differentiation genes is even more specific for the diagnosis of some kinds of cancer.

In 1988, Azuma et al[6] first reported the polymorphism of pepsinogen C (PGC) gene. In 1993, Azuma et al[7] studied the ulcer located in the body of the stomach using the PGC polymorphism, and found that the frequency of PGC EcoR I rare fragment of the patients was significantly higher than that of the normal population. They thought that the PGC polymorphism could be regarded as a genetic susceptible marker of ulcer in the body of the stomach. So far there has been no report on the PGC polymorphism in patients with gastric carcinoma and in the high risk population. It is unknown if there is any difference between the polymorphism distribution of PGC, a gastric normal differentiation gene, in normal subjects and in patients with gastric carcinoma, and if the detection of the difference could be regarded as a marker in the early diagnosis of gastric carcinoma and in the screening of high risk population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

The study consisted of two parts. The first part was study on the PGC gene polymorphism in normal individuals and in patients with gastric cancer. The second part was study on the PGC gene polymorphism in members from a high risk family of gastric carcinoma and the follow-up survey. A total of 40 cases were analysed. Ten gastric tumor tissues were obtained surgically at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, and 11 normal blood samples were obtained from healthy donors without family histories of gastric cancer. Nineteen peripheral blood samples for the study were obtained in February 1990 from a high risk family of gastric carcinoma in Zhuanghe City of Liaoning Province which is a high risk area of gastric carcinoma. By that time, there had been four deaths due to gastric carcinoma in three generations in the family. Except the aged and the children, 11 cases were examined by means of gastroscopic biopsy. The results showed that one case suffered from atrophic gastritis and the other 10 suffered from superficial gastritis of different stages. No case of gastric cancer was found.

Methods

The Southern blot method was adopted in the study. The gene probe used in the experiment was PGC 301 which was supplied by Dr. Azuma of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan. Gastric cancer genomic DNA was extracted from the surgical specimens using sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), EDTA, proteinase K, phenol and chloroform. After removing RNA with RNA enzyme, DNA was precipitated with alcohol of two times in volume, mixed in proper TE buffer solution, and kept for use at 4 °C. The DNA of normal people and members from a high-risk family was obtained from peripheral blood white cells. The extracting method was the same as that used in previous work[8]. Genomic DNA was digested with the stated restriction endonuclease EcoR I and electrophoresed on a 0.8% agarose gel. After electrophoresis, DNA was denatured, neutralized and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes according to the method of Southern blot. The α-32p dCTP PGC probe (3000 Ci/mmol, Amersham′s product) was labelled using a Random Primer Labelling Amersham′s Kit to a specific activity of 2 × 109 dpm/μg. Then, the nitrocellulose membranes were hybridized in a water bath at 42 °C, agitated overnight, and washed, followed by autoradiography at -80 °C for 3 to 5 d.

RESULTS

EcoR I RFLP analysis of PGC gene was performed in a total of 11 normal subjects, 10 patients with gastric carcinoma and 19 members from a high-risk family. The results showed that there were three kinds of common allelic fragments (20 kb, 5.7 kb and 3.6 kb) and only one rare fragment (3.5 kb) in the normal subjects. There was no difference in allelic fragments between the normal subjects and the patients, but the hybrid signal of common fragments of the patients was weakened and with deletion. Two patients had no 20 kb fragment, one had no 3.6 kb fragment, and five had 3.5 kb fragment (Table 1). The hybrid DNA bands were classified into five types. The common type was 20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb which appeared in nine normal subjects and four patients. There were four rare types. One was 20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb/3.5 kb which appeared in two normal subjects and four patients, and the other three were 20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb/3.5 kb; 5.7 kb/3.6 kb/3.5 kb; and 5.7 kb/3.6 kb which appeared only in the patients (Table 2).

Table 1 The distribution of pepsinogen C 301 alleles.
AlleleSize (kb)Normal subjectsPatients
n (%)n (%)
a120.022 (100)16 (80)
a25.722 (100)20 (100)
a33.620 (90)14 (70)
a43.52 (10)6 (30)
Table 2 The distribution of DNA band types.
Hybrid band typeNormal subjectsPatients
n (%)n (%)
Common type
a1/a2/a39 (82)4 (40)
Rare type
a1/a2/a3/a42 (8)3 (30)
a1/a2/a401 (10)
a2/a3/a401 (10)
a2/a301 (10)

There were three generations and 19 members in the high risk family of gastric carcinoma. The first generation had 2 members, the second had 12 and the third had 5. After examination of the PGC gene EcoR I RFLP, we found that the incidences of the three common allelic fragments, 20 kb, 5.7 kb and 3.6 kb, in the family members were 100%, 100% and 86.6%, respectively. The 3.5 kb rare fragment appeared in four family members (Table 3). There were three hybrid band types in the family, one common type (20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb) and two rare types (20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb/3.5 kb and 20 kb/5.7 kb/3.5 kb) (Table 4). We examined by means of gastroscopic biopsy and pathology and followed the four family members (all in the second generation) who had PGC gene EcoR I rare fragment. Two and a half years later, one of them, a 54-year-old male, was found to have early gastric carcinoma. This man underwent gastroscopic examination and was diagnosed as having atrophic gastritis in March 1990. He also underwent the examination of PGC gene EcoR I RFLP in the same period, and the results showed that the band type was 20 kb/5.7 kb/3.6 kb/3.5 kb. In October 1992, gastroscopic reexamination revealed that there was an irregular superficial erosion with unclear border on the back wall of the upper part of the lesser curvature of the stomach body. It was 3 cm × 2 cm in size with gray-yellow mucus on its surface and hyperemic edge. The lesion was diagnosed as early stomach carcinoma of type IIc and confirmed by gastric mucosa pathology as lowly differentiated carcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma.

Table 3 The distribution of pepsinogen C 301 alleles.
AlleleSize (kb)Family members n (%)
a120.038 (100)
a25.738 (100)
a33.636 (86.8)
a43.55 (13.2)
Table 4 The distribution of DNA band types.
Hybrid band typeFamily members n (%)
Common type
a1/a2/a315 (78.94)
Rare type
a1/a2/a3/a43 (15.79)
a1/a2/a41 (5.26)
DISCUSSION

It was reported[9,10] that PGC was located on 6p21.1-Pter with 9 exons and PGC 301 was a 1224-bp cDNA clone containing exons 2-9 of the human PGC gene coding sequence. There was EcoR I RFLP between exons 7 and 8 in normal subjects because of DNA polymorphism. The frequencies of its polymorphic fragment were 82.5% (3.6 kb) and 17.5% (3.5 kb). In the present study, the analysis of EcoR I RFLP of normal subjects showed that there were 20 kb and 5.7 kb fragments in all normal subjects, but 3.6 kb and 3.5 kb fragments were distributed in polymorphism. The allelic fragment of 3.6 kb was 90% while that of 3.5 kb was 10%, which was a little different from 17.5% reported in previous studies. The reason may be the small sample size and different subjects. By increasing the sample size, its allelic fragment might be more accurately illustrated. No 20 kb fragment was found in 2 (20%) patients with gastric cancer, which might be due to the partial deletion of the PGC gene in gastric cancer. This is probably of important significance in the occurrence of gastric cancer. In addition, the frequency of 3.5 kb polymorphism fragment in gastric cancer patients was significantly higher than that in normal subjects, and the frequency of rare band type in patients was also higher than that in normal subjects. The atrophic gastritis in a member of high-risk family with 3.5 kb fragment finally developed into early gastric cancer. The results suggest that it is necessary to increase the sample number to investigate the significance of PGC rare fragment and rare hybrid band type for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer, and to further compare the changes and polymorphism of EcoR I fragment in gastric tumor tissue and other tissues of the patient. These are essential for illustrating the significance of changes in PGC gene structure in the occurrence of gastric cancer.

Footnotes

Original title: China National Journal of New Gastroenterology (1995-1997) renamed World Journal of Gastroenterology (1998-).

S- Editor: Tao T L- Editor: Wang TQ E- Editor: Zhang FF

References
1.  Krontiris TG, DiMartino NA, Colb M, Parkinson DR. Unique allelic restriction fragments of the human Ha-ras locus in leukocyte and tumour DNAs of cancer patients. Nature. 1985;313:369-374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Sugimura H, Caporaso NE, Modali RV, Hoover RN, Resau JH, Trump BF, Longergan JA, Krontiris TG, Mann DL, Weston A. Association of rare alleles of the Harvey ras protooncogene locus with lung cancer. Cancer Res. 1990;50:1857-1862.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Barkardóttir RB, Jóhannsson OT, Arason A, Gudnason V, Egilsson V. Polymorphism of the c-Ha-ras-1 proto-oncogene in sporadic and familial breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1989;44:251-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Shan XN, Yan M, Mao YP, Wang SJ, Zao SY. RFLPs of the human Ha-ras oncogene in normal individuals DNAs and tumour DNAs of patients with gastric carcinoma. Nanjing Tiedao Yixueyuan Xuebao. 1988;7:1-5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Yuan Y, Tang W, Lin HZ, Jin Z, Zhang YC, Ma ZB. RFLP of the Human Ha-ras Oncogene in Patient with Gastric Cancer. Zhongguo Yike Daxue Xuebao. 1991;20:4-6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Azuma T, Pals G, Taggart RT. RFLP for the human pepsinogen C gene (PGC). Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:9372.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Azuma T, Teramae N, Hayakumo T, Yasuda K, Nakajima M, Kodama T, Inokuchi H, Hayashi K, Taggart RT, Kawai K. Pepsinogen C gene polymorphisms associated with gastric body ulcer. Gut. 1993;34:450-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Yuan Y, Lin HZ, Zhang YC, Jin Z. The method of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood. Zhongguo Yike Daxue Xuebao. 1990;19:256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Taggart RT, Cass LG, Mohandas TK, Derby P, Barr PJ, Pals G, Bell GI. Human pepsinogen C (progastricsin). Isolation of cDNA clones, localization to chromosome 6, and sequence homology with pepsinogen A. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:375-379.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Pals G, Azuma T, Mohandas TK, Bell GI, Bacon J, Samloff IM, Walz DA, Barr PJ, Taggart RT. Human pepsinogen C (progastricsin) polymorphism: evidence for a single locus located at 6p21.1-pter. Genomics. 1989;4:137-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]