Román ALS, Muñoz F. Comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(22): 2723-2733
Corresponding Author of This Article
Antonio López San Román, PhD, Gastroenterology Ramón y Cajal Hospital, E28034 Madrid, Spain. email@example.com
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2011; 17(22): 2723-2733 Published online Jun 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i22.2723
Comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease
Antonio López San Román, Fernando Muñoz
Antonio López San Román, Gastroenterology Ramón y Cajal Hospital, E28034 Madrid, Spain
Fernando Muñoz, Digestive Diseases, Complejo Hospitalario Hospital, Altos de Nava, 24080 León, Spain
Author contributions: Both authors contributed equally in the conception, bibliographic research and writing of the paper.
Correspondence to: Antonio López San Román, PhD, Gastroenterology Ramón y Cajal Hospital, E28034 Madrid, Spain. firstname.lastname@example.org
Telephone: +34-91-3368000 Fax: +34-91-3368000
Received: August 12, 2010 Revised: September 29, 2010 Accepted: October 6, 2010 Published online: June 14, 2011
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be affected by other unrelated diseases. These are called comorbid conditions, and can include any secondary health problem that affects a person suffering from a primary or main disease, and which is neither linked physiopathologically to the primary condition, nor is it due to the treatments used for the primary condition or to its long-term anatomical or physiological consequences. Different comorbid conditions, as well as their influence on IBD, are discussed.
Citation: Román ALS, Muñoz F. Comorbidity in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(22): 2723-2733
COMORBODITY, THE CONTEXT, DEFINITION
It has always been difficult for physicians to attain a balance between specialization and the possession of general medical knowledge that makes it possible to optimize and expand the quality of care delivered to patients. The amount of information that a physician is supposed to manage is huge, and always growing. This is why, even when information tools are better than ever, we have perhaps reached a point in which Medicine achieves such a deep level of knowledge in specific areas, that sometimes the global perspective is lost. Or at least, is lost by physicians.
Health care professionals entrusted to assist patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) must remember that our patients are also unfortunately exposed to other health problems (Table 1). We are not dealing here with the extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, whose importance we recognize and that we have probably learned to manage in a satisfactory way. Neither are we concerned with the adverse effects caused by the diverse therapies applied to our patients, such as osteoporosis or infections in the immunocompromised patients, or with the long-term consequences of the anatomical and physiological alterations induced by the disease. The problem that now demands our attention relates to a series of health problems that do not have a direct relationship to IBD as such, but that could alter the diagnosis, presentation and management of the intestinal disease. These conditions are generically known as “comorbidities”. A working definition of comorbid conditions could include in this concept any secondary health problem that affects a person suffering from a primary or main disease, and which is neither linked physiopathologically to the primary condition, nor is it due to the treatments used for the primary condition or to its long-term anatomical or physiological consequences. The delimitation of what is and is not a comorbid condition is not easy, and we are sure that many readers will think that this review should have perhaps addressed a different scope of diseases. In fact, agreement between the authors has required some debate. Our selection may be incomplete, but we are sure that all the conditions that we have included deserve important consideration when caring for a patient with IBD.
Table 1 Putting comorbidity into context: secondary health problems in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
It is of paramount importance to differentiate comorbidity from multimorbidity. The first concept deals with the association of a group of diseases with a given condition, whereas multimorbidity refers to the association of multiple diseases in a single person. Another term bordering the concept of comorbidity, is that of patient complexity. In this concept, other extramedical factors are taken into account, such as personal, cultural or social situations that might significantly influence the way in which the health system has to take care of a given person.
Why is comorbidity important?
Firstly, it is obvious that comorbid conditions cannot be overlooked in a patient with IBD. The existence of comorbidity can significantly change several scenarios of medical practice. (1) Clinical manifestations of IBD and its activity can be altered or confused by associated diseases; (2) Prognosis of IBD will also be influenced; (3) Whenever a patient with significant comorbidity is seen by us, we step outside the realms of medical evidence. As a rule, randomized controlled trials exclude patients with comorbidity, and so their conclusions are not necessarily applicable to such situations; (4) The use of drugs for the treatment of IBD is limited by the increased importance their pharmacologic or collateral effects can have on a person with comorbid conditions; and (5) Frequently, it is more important than ever to set up multidisciplinary teams to empower patient care, or, at least, to assure that channels of collaboration and mutual consultation are as fluid and reliable as possible.
Is it possible to quantify comorbidity? What are its generic consequences?
Different sets of clinical indices have been developed and proposed for the specific study of comorbidity. Not all of them have been developed in the same way, nor have they been applied to similar populations. This is why they are not always comparable, and to pick one or another must be done very carefully. Charlson’s index is widely used, probably due to its unique combination of simplicity and performance. However, it has been validated in multiple populations, but not in IBD patients.
In the general population, multimorbidity is associated with a significantly worse quality of life[4-6]. The specific case of IBD has not been addressed yet, but it is known that in other chronic conditions there is an increased cost of care and a higher complexity of medical activities, which are accompanied by poorer outcomes and unfavorably influence indices such as emotional impact, ability to cope, mortality, days of admission or postoperative complications[8-11].
What is the quantitative importance of comorbidity in IBD?
Data on the importance of comorbidity in IBD patients are scarce. Its prevalence has been poorly studied, and refers to other related diseases such as pulmonary thromboembolism, arthritis or immune-based conditions. These immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, which include IBD itself, associate with each other and determine a higher risk for other chronic diseases, with a corresponding increase in resource costs.
Although the main determinant of quality of life in patients with IBD is activity of the disease, other comorbidities not directly related also have an impact on the physical scores, especially cardiovascular diseases[17-20].
It is not known whether the presence of several chronic diseases can determine poorer results following the medical treatment of this disease; however, it has been well described that they strongly influence surgical outcomes, because preoperative comorbidities are, alongside with age, the main predictors of the occurrence of postoperative complications[18-20].
Finally, among the identified causes of mortality in IBD are several processes that reflect the patient's comorbidity, such as postsurgical cardiovascular complications, age and infections. It is true that many factors favor infections in IBD patients, such as immunosuppressants and malnutrition, but both age and comorbidity probably have their corresponding effects.
The potential association between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and IBD is well known. However, we shall not deal with this condition here, and instead will focus on other liver diseases which can be observed in our patients, and may well alter the course of their disease.
During the long-term follow-up of a patient with IBD, a transient elevation in liver function tests is frequently observed. The cross-sectional prevalence of high aminotransferase levels varies between 5% and 50%, but more adjusted figures show, that around 20%-40% of patients have elevated aminotransferases at some time during the course of their disease, whereas a chronic alteration in such values can be detected in approximately 10% of these patients[21-23]. These elevations in liver function tests are usually discrete, in a range below twice the upper normal level[21,24]. There is no clear correlation between the degree of alteration of liver function tests and the presence of active IBD. An investigation of the underlying cause is frequently frustrating and unyielding, with a small percentage of definitive diagnoses.
The causes of altered hepatic biochemistry are many-fold, but the most frequent causes are steatosis and drug toxicity. The evaluation of such patients has to be sensible and reassuring. The first step is to categorize the type and degree of altered hepatic biochemistry. Four different situations could perhaps be defined: (1) Slight (< 2 × upper normal level) and transient elevation of aminotransferases (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase), γ-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin: it is probably appropriate not to alarm the patient and check the altered values after a short period, proceeding to investigate the cause if the alteration persists; (2) Sustained elevation has to be approached as it would in the general population, with special attention to the usual data in the anamnesis (epidemiological sources of exposure, potential liver toxics¡) and ordering a battery of tests that could pinpoint the cause of such elevation. No precise indications have been published to determine which tests should be explored, and in what order. A possible selection could include the following: hepatitis B and C serology, and anti-neutrophil-cytoplasma, antitransglutaminase, antinuclear, anti-smooth-muscle and antimitochondrial antibodies; exploring copper and iron metabolism and investigating other less frequent or characteristic causes of altered liver function tests, could be left for a second step. A liver ultrasound should be obtained at an early stage, to explore the presence of a bright pattern, indicative of steatosis, detect cholelithiasis and its complications, explore the bile ducts and rule out signs of chronic liver disease or portal hypertension; (3) Some alterations in the liver function tests tend to be more specific, and deserve a different approach, such as predominant cholestasis, suggesting PSC, or elevation of aminotransferases more than 10 times the upper normal level, indicative of acute hepatocellular damage, which should bring to mind the possibilities of acute viral or toxic hepatitis; and (4) The alteration of liver tests in a patient with previously normal values, after starting a new therapy (notably thiopurine immunusuppressors) has to be approached and managed as possible liver toxicity.
Some causes of altered liver tests deserve a special comment, due to their prevalence or their importance.
The range of lesions collectively known as steatosis (including both uncomplicated fatty liver and steatohepatitis) are more and more frequent in the general population, but also in IBD patients, in which it accounts for the majority of diagnoses when investigating altered liver tests. The usual causes of liver steatosis in the general population will also be present in IBD patients, such as metabolic syndrome, overweight/obesity and alcohol abuse. However, other possible reasons should be considered in our patients, notably glucocorticosteroid exposure, malnutrition and parenteral nutrition. It is an exclusion diagnosis, and only the presence of a bright liver pattern in the ultrasound examination has been signaled as relatively specific. More specific causes of liver disease have to be ruled out, notoriously those that can be appropriately managed, such as the viral hepatitides, autoimmune liver disease and drug-induced liver injury. A liver biopsy is rarely needed to confirm steatosis, but ultrasound follow-up will detect the potential development of portal hypertension or hepatocarcinoma.
Viral hepatitides B and C are, in older series, somehow more frequent in IBD patients than in the general population[28-31]. However, the current situation is different. In a Spanish national prospective study, the presence of markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was prospectively studied in a series of more than 2000 patients. Evidence of current or past infection was present in 9.7% of cases, which is similar to figures observed in the general population: in ulcerative colitis (UC), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was present in 0.8%, anti-HBc in 8% and anti-HCV in 1.3%, and in Crohn’s disease (CD) HBsAg was present in 0.6%, anti-HBc in 7.1% and anti-HCV in 2.3%. 12% of patients had serological evidence of effective anti-hepatitis B vaccination (anti-HBs without anti-HBc). Multivariate analysis determined that age, family history of hepatitis and moderate to severe IBD were associated with HBV infection or contact, whereas HCV was mainly associated with previous transfusion of blood or blood products, but only if this was performed before 1991, when anti-HCV screening became widespread in local blood banks. Similar data have been communicated by other authors. It is important to remember, that any prevalence of HCV and, especially, HBV markers has to be kept in mind, because the infection can reactivate under immunosuppressive therapy, necessitating prophylactic measures in some cases (antiviral therapy in HbsAg+ patients), and close follow-up in the remaining patients.
Helicobacter pylori disease
The prevalence of infection by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), as determined by serology, ranges between 15% and 50%. It is always lower than the corresponding prevalence in the general population, and is inversely correlated with sulfasalazine exposure[35-38]. The diminishing use of this drug makes it possible that this situation has changed lately. The positivity of the urea breath test is also lower then in the general population. However, the prevalence of peptic ulcer in transversal studies can reach 5%. It is important to remember, that about 15% of CD patients will show histologic or even endoscopic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and that the absence of H. pylori in these lesions is an important criterion when identifying them as truly related to IBD.
The indication for gastroprotection in patients exposed to glucocorticoids deserves a mention. The decision to co-prescribing proton pump inhibitors with glucocorticoids is quite usual, at least in our environment, but it is not sustained by medical evidence. Gastroprotection should only be indicated on rare occasions when NSAIDs and glucocorticoids are prescribed jointly. To automatically prescribe proton pump inhibitors in the general patient, will lead to unnecessary higher costs, exposure to yet another set of adverse events and, most importantly, an increased number of tablets taken daily, which generally adversely influences adherence to therapy.
Celiac disease /gluten-sensitive enteropathy
Celiac disease and CD share some physiopathological, epidemiological and clinical features. They frequently form part of the differential diagnosis. In older times, it was difficult to rule out celiac disease in a population with IBD, mainly due to the clinical superposition, but also to the possibility of finding very similar histologic changes (duodenal mucosal infiltrate, villous atrophy in Crohn’s) and some parallel serologic alterations (positivity of antigliadin antibodies). The higher specificity of both antiendomysium and antitransglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of celiac disease, has finally allowed the performance of studies on the prevalence of this condition in patients with an unequivocal diagnosis of IBD.
Following the communication of isolated cases of associated Crohn’s and celiac disease, an intriguing study was published, in which a very high prevalence (15%-20%) of antigliadin or anti endomysium antibodies was detected in a short series of CD patients. The high specificity of these determinations could make it reasonable to deduce that this association is extraordinarily frequent. However, later investigations of better quality have been unable to confirm these results[45-47]. The systematic search for celiac disease in CD patients cannot be recommended, according to the available evidence.
On the other hand, and although data are scarce, it seems that both UC and CD are more frequent in persons with celiac disease than in the general population. This has been described in two clinical series, with an IBD prevalence about 10 times higher than expected[45,48].
Biliary and pancreatic diseases
Cholelithiasis is a very prevalent condition in the general population. Some circumstances explain its increased incidence in IBD patients, mainly the distortion of bile metabolism induced by the functional or anatomical alterations of the gut. Thus, it cannot strictly be considered a comorbid condition. The interest in cholelithiasis as a comorbid condition is mainly due to the possible overlap between its manifestations and those of the IBD or of extraintestinal manifestations, such as PSC. Management does not differ from the approach in the general population.
Pancreatic disease can ensue following the use of medications, the extraintestinal activation of inflammatory phenomena or can appear as an associated autoimmune disease. In any case, it cannot be listed as a comorbid condition.
Presently, obesity is considered an emerging epidemic in Western societies, where it is more prevalent in disadvantaged social classes. It also affects affluent classes in countries with emerging economies. The prevalence of this condition is growing, and some of its causes are sedentary behaviour, changing socioeconomic status and variations in traditional diets.
An increasing prevalence of obesity in patients with IBD has been described recently. In the past, this was considered an exception, but today, figures range from 15% to 20% in some series, with a further 40% of patients being overweight. Although there is no evidence that obesity alters the course of the disease, at least in CD, obesity is related to unfavorable outcomes such as colonic adenomas, surgical morbimortality, cardiovascular risk and thrombotic disease.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in developed countries and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, IBD patients are very likely to experience these entities throughout their life or, at least, be affected by some of the associated risk factors. The impact of CVD on IBD is the same as for the general population, increasing complications and remaining a common cause of mortality, especially when the disease is more severe or surgery is needed. Anecdotally, in the 1950s when Truelove et al published the first clinical trial with corticosteroids in UC, which demonstrated a decrease in mortality, the cause of death in 2 of the 5 patients who died was CVD, namely pulmonary thromboembolism. We will discuss IBD as a predisposing factor for CVD in more detail and the possible effects of IBD treatments on cardiovascular morbidity together with the undesired consequences of drugs used in the management of CVD for EII.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been considered a manifestation which is directly related to intestinal inflammatory activity, but in other chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis the incidence of VTE is not greater than in the general population. Furthermore, IBD patients in remission also have an increased risk of VTE, therefore additional factors other than inflammation are involved. This is why we have considered it a manifestation not directly linked with IBD.
In a recent population study, the incidence of VTE in IBD was 26 cases/10 000 person-years (PY) with a Hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% CI: 2.7-4.3). These data are similar to those observed in a previous Canadian population study, where the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 31.4/10 000 PY and 10.3/10 000 PY for pulmonary embolism (PE) for CD patients and 30/10 000 PY and 19.8/10 000 PY in patients with UC, respectively. Again, the risk was 3 times higher in IBD compared with controls. There was also a time trend which increased with an annual average of 17% in odds of VTE. There are no major differences between CD and UC, although the incidence in hospitalized patients may be somewhat higher in UC (OR = 1.32), probably because its frequency increases when the colon is involved. IBD activity increases the likelihood of VTE with rates up to 8 times higher than controls. Although VTE episodes are less frequent in outpatients, in this subgroup the differences with controls were even more marked (HR = 15.4) than during hospitalization periods (HR = 3.2). Similarly, although the majority of thromboembolic events occur in patients over 60 years, differences with controls are greatest in young patients (< 40). Other aspects that may increase the risk are involvement of the colon in the case of UC (pancolitis in 76% of episodes of VTE vs 2% of proctitis) and fistulizing pattern in CD.
Causes of thrombosis in IBD are many-fold; in most patients, recognized acquired prothrombotic factors can be identified, such as inflammation, immobilization, surgery, central catheters, corticosteroids, and smoking (Table 2)[62,63]. Nevertheless, in a significant percentage of patients (20%-50%) no obvious cause can be identified[64-66]. This supports the notion, that IBD itself acts as a predisposing factor for thrombosis. Inherited thrombophilias have no role in VTE associated with IBD because VTE is significantly less frequent than in thrombotic non-IBD subjects.
Table 2 Acquired thrombotic risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease.
Immobility (surgery or hospitalization)
Central venous catheters
Drug therapy: Corticosteroids, anti-TNF drugs?
Hyperhomocysteinemia (vitamin deficiencies)
Increased levels of lipoprotein A
TNF: Tumor necrosis factor.
The appearance of VTE in a patient with IBD carries a poor prognosis reaching a mortality of 22%-25%[65,66], significantly higher than the control group (OR = 2.1). Hospital stay also increased by 48% and associated health costs doubled.
The most common location of VTE is lower extremity DVT with or without PE, which would include three-quarters of all episodes, but many locations have been described such as cerebral sinus[68-71], retinal vein[72-75], portal venous system[76-81] and hepatic or cava veins[82-87]. Portal system thrombosis is particularly important both for its potential complications and for its non-negligible frequency, being reported in up to 6% of patients after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis[78,88]. A probable long-term complication is portal hypertension, which can be avoided with early anticoagulant therapy, for which clinical suspicion is fundamental, ordering an abdominal Doppler ultrasound and/or abdominal CT in the case of sudden onset of abdominal pain, fever or prolonged ileus after abdominal surgery.
Treatment of thromboembolic episodes of IBD is the same as in the general population and is based on the use of anticoagulation, first with heparin (usually low-molecular-weight heparins, LMWH) and then oral anticoagulants which should be sufficient for most patients. Occasionally other measures may be required, such as thrombolysis or placement of an inferior cava filter that can be used as an effective means of preventing pulmonary embolus when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or thromboembolism recurs in spite of anticoagulant therapy. These drugs have proven safe in clinical trials where their effectiveness was evaluated as primary treatment. The optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy is unknown, but in general will vary depending on the severity of thrombosis and bleeding risk. In the first episode, 6 mo provided adequate coverage, but will be extended if the risk factor has not disappeared (surgery, immobilization) opting for lifelong anticoagulation in the setting of an inherited hypercoagulable state[89,91]. Despite treatment, up to 13%-26% of patients have a recurrent thromboembolic event[65,92]. Similar rates were found in patients with prior colectomy, thus surgery does not seem to prevent recurrence.
Treatment of thromboembolic episodes is important, but so is prevention. Possible measures include the control of disease activity, correcting vitamin and nutritional deficiencies, cessation of smoking, early mobilization after surgery or the use of intermittent pneumatic compression for patients at high risk of bleeding. Drug prophylaxis with LMWH is recommended in patients hospitalized with severe UC or when planning surgery. Outpatients with moderate flares and restricted mobility (old age, motor deficiencies¡) are probably also candidates for pharmacologic prevention.
Atherosclerosis and arterial thromboembolic disease
Early atherosclerosis: Early atherosclerosis is a common phenomenon in several immune-based inflammatory diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, and is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in these diseases, justifying the publication of specific recommendations. The inflammatory process is behind the emergence of this phenomenon with a prominent role for the cytokines IL-6 and TNF that are significantly associated with the severity of subclinical atherosclerosis, independent of Framingham risk score. Both cytokines are implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD, making possible the development of early atherosclerosis in these patients. Few data exist on this entity in IBD, although case reports of arterial occlusions in young patients with CD support this possibility. Furthermore, to assess the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis at an early stage, several methods have been proposed, such as assessment of the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery wall or the measurement of carotid artery stiffness; these have been shown to predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events[99,100]. Both parameters have been found to be altered in IBD patients compared to controls[101,102], although not uniformly in all studies.
Cardiovascular risk factors: There are few data on the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in IBD, apart from the known relationship with tobacco use. Only in the cohort study by Ha et al, where the controls were randomly selected, IBD patients had a higher frequency of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, with similar rates of diabetes mellitus. Plasma lipid levels were inversely correlated with inflammatory activity, thus do not appear to have a particularly decisive role in predisposition to atherosclerosis in patients with IBD. As mentioned earlier, inflammatory activity per se could promote the development of atherothrombotic complications and in relation to this, C-reactive protein has been identified as a risk factor both in chronic inflammatory diseases and in the general population[108,109]; unfortunately there are no specific data for IBD.
Arterial thrombotic events: Only two studies have evaluated the incidence of arterial events in IBD independently of venous thrombosis. The aforementioned study by Ha et al found an overall increased incidence compared to the control group, mainly due to a marked increased in the risk of acute mesenteric ischemia (HR = 11.2, P < 0.001). The risk of myocardial infarction, conversely, was only discretely increased (HR = 1.6) in women over 40 years; in contrast, stroke was elevated in women below that age. However, Bernstein et al, found an overall increase in the prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IRR = 1.26) and cerebrovascular disease (IRR = 1.32) regardless of age group, although the latter only applied to patients with CD. In any case, except for acute mesenteric ischemia, in which local factors are probably involved, the rates found were quite similar to those of the control population, and not necessarily clinically relevant.
IBD therapy and cardiovascular diseases
The deleterious effects of glucocorticoids on the cardiovascular system are well known[111,112]: among their adverse effects are hypertension, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and hyperlipidemia, determining in some contexts increased cardiovascular morbidity, as in renal transplantation. In other diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory activity control can reduce cardiovascular complications. In spite of this, there is no direct evidence that IBD treatments alter the thrombotic tendency of the disease; however, some drugs show a favorable profile on some of the factors involved. For example, aminosalicylates reduce platelet activation and azathioprine inhibits formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates. There are no specific data for IBD, but methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis has been shown to decrease the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in this disease and, more particularly, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Regarding anti-TNF drugs, the results are somewhat contradictory: initially, endothelial function and insulin resistance transiently improve. On the other hand, infliximab in particular, shows a potential adverse effect on the lipid profile. Likewise, thrombotic events associated with these drugs in patients without other risk factors have been described, although this needs to be confirmed.
Finally, it has to be noted, that some of the drugs used in the management of cardiovascular risk factors may be beneficial for IBD. Thus, the anti-diabetes drug rosiglitazone has been proven effective in the treatment of UC in two clinical trials[118,119], atorvastatin could have an antiinflammatory effect in CD and ACE inhibitors have an antifibrogenic effect[121,122], not yet explored in CD.
Anxiety and mood disorders have been extensively studied in IBD patients, whereas data on other conditions, such as psychoses, are scarce. However, there may be some connection, because some of the drugs used in the management of IBD, such as steroids, can precipitate psychotic manifestations and, on the other hand, the treatment of IBD may be followed by improvement of psychiatric illness.
As in other chronic diseases, the prevalence of anxiety and depression is higher in patients with IBD than in controls, both in hospital[125-128] and population cohorts[129-132]; their frequency is variable but approaches 24%-27%[129,133], which is two to three times higher than in a control population[129,131]. There are no great differences between UC and CD, or with other chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes.
Psychiatric comorbidity in IBD has been considered a risk factor for the onset of IBD itself, because it can precede its diagnosis[129,132]. However, the relative risks are low, and are limited to the year prior to diagnosis, which could represent the presence of symptoms of an undiagnosed somatic illness. Moreover, the frequency of anxiety and depression increases after diagnosis of IBD, suggesting that it is a consequence rather than a cause of the disease.
The role of daily stress and major life events in the precipitation of flares has also investigated, mainly because patients with higher perceived stress have a greater chance of disease reactivation[136,137]. However, there are several potential factors which may have contributed to this finding. In many studies, the sample size is not enough, and on the other hand, these results may be influenced by the fact that the influence of stress on disease activity is what patients, and probably many physicians, expect to be true. Furthermore, anxiety and depressive symptoms predicted an increased likelihood of functional symptoms, and have a decisive influence on variables such as abdominal pain and overall well-being, used in the calculation of indices for most common activity indices. In addition, episodes of recurrence are limited to a relatively restricted period following the initial outbreak, which could be attributed to an incomplete improvement of IBD. Finally, several studies did not find such an association[130,140,141] and the results of trials of psychological interventions in IBD have been negative. Thus, although anxiety and depression are more frequent around the periods of IBD activity, they did not seem to be risk factors for flares; also, more importantly, to wrongly assume that stress is responsible for disease exacerbation, may contribute in some way to induce unjustified and harmful feelings of guilt in some patients.
Psychiatric comorbidity has a marked impact on the management of IBD because it is, together with disease activity, the main determinant of quality of life in these patients. Additionally, it is one of the factors associated with poorer adherence to treatment and determines a greater use of health resources. Thus, given the particular importance of these observations, and the frequent association of psychiatric symptoms with IBD, it is essential to identify and properly manage these conditions. In this sense, the use of screening tests with a good balance between sensitivity and specificity, such as the Anxiety and Depression Detector[143,144] or the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale, could be recommended as an initial screening tool. Treatment of psychiatric comorbidity in IBD does not differ from the general approach to these disorders, and the options include different types of psychotherapy or second-generation antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, with fewer side effects than traditional drugs (tricyclics and MAO inhibitors) and that may be initiated by the gastroenterologist pending evaluation by the appropriate specialist.
Throughout the evolution of a patient with IBD, these diseases are frequently associated with other non-related diseases which may change management and prognosis. On the one hand, decision making is complicated because the available evidence does not always apply, as in most clinical trials such patients are excluded. On the other hand, their existence entails taking into account the possible consequences of treatment on other comorbidities, both by the possibility of interactions and by the facilitation of potential adverse effects. Prognosis also changes, especially in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidity, which is associated with a greater overall morbidity and mortality, especially in the surgical context. Finally, the concomitant presence of several diseases requires collaboration and coordination among professionals for joint decision making, and implementation of the proper clinical circuits to facilitate medical attention.
Peer reviewer: Kazuichi Okazaki, Professor, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono-cho, Moriguchi City, Osaka, 570-8506, Japan
Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services.Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:357-363.
de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods.J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:221-229.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-383.
Fortin M, Dubois MF, Hudon C, Soubhi H, Almirall J. Multimorbidity and quality of life: a closer look.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:52.
Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:51.
Tooth L, Hockey R, Byles J, Dobson A. Weighted multimorbidity indexes predicted mortality, health service use, and health-related quality of life in older women.J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:151-159.
Perkins AJ, Kroenke K, Unützer J, Katon W, Williams JW, Hope C, Callahan CM. Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality.J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1040-1048.
Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Mosconi P, Rasmussen NK, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.Qual Life Res. 2004;13:283-298.
Fortin M, Soubhi H, Hudon C, Bayliss EA, van den Akker M. Multimorbidity's many challenges.BMJ. 2007;334:1016-7.
Putnam KG, Buist DS, Fishman P, Andrade SE, Boles M, Chase GA, Goodman MJ, Gurwitz JH, Platt R, Raebel MA. Chronic disease score as a predictor of hospitalization.Epidemiology. 2002;13:340-346.
Yan Y, Birman-Deych E, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS, Gage BF. Comorbidity indices to predict mortality from Medicare data: results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation.Med Care. 2005;43:1073-1077.
Cucino C, Sonnenberg A. The comorbid occurrence of other diagnoses in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2107-2112.
Bernstein CN, Nabalamba A. Hospitalization-based major comorbidity of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada.Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:507-511.
Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Blanchard JF. The clustering of other chronic inflammatory diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study.Gastroenterology. 2005;129:827-836.
Robinson D Jr, Hackett M, Wong J, Kimball AB, Cohen R, Bala M. Co-occurrence and comorbidities in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders: an exploration using US healthcare claims data, 2001-2002.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:989-1000.
Pizzi LT, Weston CM, Goldfarb NI, Moretti D, Cobb N, Howell JB, Infantolino A, Dimarino AJ, Cohen S. Impact of chronic conditions on quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:47-52.
Janke KH, Klump B, Gregor M, Meisner C, Haeuser W. Determinants of life satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:272-286.
De Silva S, Crespin M, Ma C, Prusinkiewicz M, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Mac Lean A, Buie D, Devlin S, Seow D. Predictors of complications following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis patients: A population-based study.Gut. 2009;58:A457.
Winther KV, Jess T, Langholz E, Munkholm P, Binder V. Survival and cause-specific mortality in ulcerative colitis: follow-up of a population-based cohort in Copenhagen County.Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1576-1582.
Castle SC, Uyemura K, Rafi A, Akande O, Makinodan T. Comorbidity is a better predictor of impaired immunity than chronological age in older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1565-1569.
Gisbert JP, Luna M, González-Lama Y, Pousa ID, Velasco M, Moreno-Otero R, Maté J. Liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease: long-term follow-up study of 786 patients.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1106-1114.
Mendes FD, Levy C, Enders FB, Loftus EV Jr, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Abnormal hepatic biochemistries in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:344-350.
Navaneethan U, Remzi FH, Nutter B, Fazio VW, Shen B. Risk factors for abnormal liver function tests in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for underlying inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2467-2475.
Soresi M, Giannitrapani L, Florena AM, La Spada E, Di Gesaro V, Rappa F, Alessandri A, Tripi S, Romano M, Montalto G. Reliability of the bright liver echo pattern in diagnosing steatosis in patients with cryptogenic and HCV-related hypertransaminasaemia.Clin Radiol. 2009;64:1181-1187.
Gisbert JP, González-Lama Y, Maté J. Thiopurine-induced liver injury in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1518-1527.
Nahon S, Cadranel JF, Chazouilleres O, Biour M, Jouannaud V, Marteau P. Liver and inflammatory bowel disease.Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:370-381.
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19:1-46.
Biancone L, Pavia M, Del Vecchio Blanco G, D'Incà R, Castiglione F, De Nigris F, Doldo P, Cosco F, Vavassori P, Bresci GP. Hepatitis B and C virus infection in Crohn's disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;7:287-294.
Chevaux JB, Bigard MA, Bensenane M, Oussalah A, Jarlot S, Belle A, Nani A, Bronowicki JP, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Inflammatory bowel disease and hepatitis B and C.Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:1082-1093.
Heathcote EJ. Demography and presentation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.Am J Med. 2008;121:S3-S11.
Loras C, Saro C, Gonzalez-Huix F, Mínguez M, Merino O, Gisbert JP, Barrio J, Bernal A, Gutiérrez A, Piqueras M. Prevalence and factors related to hepatitis B and C in inflammatory bowel disease patients in Spain: a nationwide, multicenter study.Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:57-63.
Chevaux JB, Nani A, Oussalah A, Venard V, Bensenane M, Belle A, Gueant JL, Bigard MA, Bronowicki JP, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C and risk factors for nonvaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients in Northeast France.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:916-924.
Esteve M, Saro C, González-Huix F, Suarez F, Forné M, Viver JM. Chronic hepatitis B reactivation following infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients: need for primary prophylaxis.Gut. 2004;53:1363-1365.
el-Omar E, Penman I, Cruikshank G, Dover S, Banerjee S, Williams C, McColl KE. Low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in inflammatory bowel disease: association with sulphasalazine.Gut. 1994;35:1385-1388.
Halme L, Rautelin H, Leidenius M, Kosunen TU. Inverse correlation between Helicobacter pylori infection and inflammatory bowel disease.J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:65-67.
Lidar M, Langevitz P, Barzilai O, Ram M, Porat-Katz BS, Bizzaro N, Tonutti E, Maieron R, Chowers Y, Bar-Meir S. Infectious serologies and autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: insinuations at a true pathogenic role.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1173:640-648.
Parente F, Molteni P, Bollani S, Maconi G, Vago L, Duca PG, Rembacken B, Axon AT, Bianchi Porro G. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and related upper gastrointestinal lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. A cross-sectional study with matching.Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1140-1146.
Pearce CB, Duncan HD, Timmis L, Green JR. Assessment of the prevalence of infection with Helicobacter pylori in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:439-443.
Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Steroid controversy in sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis.Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1294-1303.
López-Sanromán A, Bermejo F. Review article: how to control and improve adherence to therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24 Suppl 3:45-49.
Mariné Guillem M, Esteve Comas M. [Should the possibility of celiac disease be investigated in all patients with Crohn's disease?].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;32:169-170.
Schedel J, Rockmann F, Bongartz T, Woenckhaus M, Schölmerich J, Kullmann F. Association of Crohn's disease and latent celiac disease: a case report and review of the literature.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:376-380.
Tursi A, Giorgetti GM, Brandimarte G, Elisei W. High prevalence of celiac disease among patients affected by Crohn's disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:662-666.
Leeds JS, Höroldt BS, Sidhu R, Hopper AD, Robinson K, Toulson B, Dixon L, Lobo AJ, McAlindon ME, Hurlstone DP. Is there an association between coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel diseases? A study of relative prevalence in comparison with population controls.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1214-1220.
Mantzaris GJ, Roussos A, Koilakou S, Petraki K, Rontogianni D, Tsirogianni A, Triantafyllou G. Prevalence of celiac disease in patients with Crohn's disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:1029.
Merino O, Delgado L, Ituarte J, Moretó M. [Association between inflammatory bowel disease and celiac disease].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;31:165.
Yang A, Chen Y, Scherl E, Neugut AI, Bhagat G, Green PH. Inflammatory bowel disease in patients with celiac disease.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:528-532.
Lee SK, Kim MH. Updates in the treatment of gallstones.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;3:649-660.
Bermejo F, Lopez-Sanroman A, Taxonera C, Gisbert JP, Pérez-Calle JL, Vera I, Menchén L, Martín-Arranz MD, Opio V, Carneros JA. Acute pancreatitis in inflammatory bowel disease, with special reference to azathioprine-induced pancreatitis.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:623-628.
Seidell JC. Prevalence and time trends of obesity in Europe.J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25:816-822.
Tzotzas T, Krassas GE. Prevalence and trends of obesity in children and adults of South Europe.Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2004;1 Suppl 3:448-454.
Steed H, Walsh S, Reynolds N. A brief report of the epidemiology of obesity in the inflammatory bowel disease population of Tayside, Scotland.Obes Facts. 2009;2:370-372.
Hass DJ, Brensinger CM, Lewis JD, Lichtenstein GR. The impact of increased body mass index on the clinical course of Crohn's disease.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:482-488.
Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.JAMA. 2004;291:1238-1245.
Graef V, Baggenstoss AH, Sauer WG, Spittell JA Jr. Venous thrombosis occurring in non specific ulcerative colitis. A necropsy study.Arch Intern Med. 1966;117:377-382.
Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial.Br Med J. 1955;2:1041-1048.
Miehsler W, Reinisch W, Valic E, Osterode W, Tillinger W, Feichtenschlager T, Grisar J, Machold K, Scholz S, Vogelsang H. Is inflammatory bowel disease an independent and disease specific risk factor for thromboembolism?Gut. 2004;53:542-548.
Grainge MJ, West J, Card TR. Venous thromboembolism during active disease and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study.Lancet. 2010;375:657-663.
Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Houston DS, Wajda A. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study.Thromb Haemost. 2001;85:430-434.
Nguyen GC, Sam J. Rising prevalence of venous thromboembolism and its impact on mortality among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients.Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2272-2280.
Danese S, Papa A, Saibeni S, Repici A, Malesci A, Vecchi M. Inflammation and coagulation in inflammatory bowel disease: The clot thickens.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:174-186.
Koutroubakis IE. Therapy insight: Vascular complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2:266-272.
Oldenburg B, Van Tuyl BA, van der Griend R, Fijnheer R, van Berge Henegouwen GP. Risk factors for thromboembolic complications in inflammatory bowel disease: the role of hyperhomocysteinaemia.Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:235-240.
Solem CA, Loftus EV, Tremaine WJ, Sandborn WJ. Venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:97-101.
Talbot RW, Heppell J, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Vascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease.Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:140-145.
Spina L, Saibeni S, Battaglioli T, Peyvandi F, de Franchis R, Vecchi M. Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: role of inherited thrombophilia.Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2036-2041.
Ennaifer R, Moussa A, Mouelhi L, Salem M, Bouzaidi S, Debbeche R, Trabelsi S, Najjar T. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis as presenting feature of ulcerative colitis.Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2009;72:350-353.
Standridge S, de los Reyes E. Inflammatory bowel disease and cerebrovascular arterial and venous thromboembolic events in 4 pediatric patients: a case series and review of the literature.J Child Neurol. 2008;23:59-66.
Umit H, Asil T, Celik Y, Tezel A, Dokmeci G, Tuncbilek N, Utku U, Soylu AR. Cerebral sinus thrombosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a case report.World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:5404-5407.
Musio F, Older SA, Jenkins T, Gregorie EM. Case report: cerebral venous thrombosis as a manifestation of acute ulcerative colitis.Am J Med Sci. 1993;305:28-35.
Unal A, Sipahioglu MH, Akgun H, Yurci A, Tokgoz B, Erkilic K, Oymak O, Utas C. Crohn's disease complicated by granulomatous interstitial nephritis, choroidal neovascularization, and central retinal vein occlusion.Intern Med. 2008;47:103-107.
Buchman AL, Babbo AM, Gieser RG. Central retinal vein thrombosis in a patient with ulcerative colitis.Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1847-1849.
Larsson J, Hansson-Lundblad C. Central retinal vein occlusion in two patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Retina. 2000;20:681-682.
Keyser BJ, Hass AN. Retinal vascular disease in ulcerative colitis.Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:395-396.
Di Fabio F, Obrand D, Satin R, Gordon PH. Successful treatment of extensive splanchnic arterial and portal vein thrombosis associated with ulcerative colitis.Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:653-655.
Palkovits J, Häfner M, Rand T, Vogelsang H, Kutilek M, Gangl A, Novacek G. Portal vein thrombosis in ulcerative colitis complicated by bleeding from gastric varices.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:365-366.
Millan M, Hull TL, Hammel J, Remzi F. Portal vein thrombi after restorative proctocolectomy: serious complication without long-term sequelae.Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1540-1544.
Ball CG, MacLean AR, Buie WD, Smith DF, Raber EL. Portal vein thrombi after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: its incidence and association with pouchitis.Surg Today. 2007;37:552-557.
Fichera A, Cicchiello LA, Mendelson DS, Greenstein AJ, Heimann TM. Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a not uncommon cause of postoperative acute abdominal pain.Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:643-648.
Brinberg DE, Stefansson TB, Greicius FA, Kahlam SS, Molin C. Portal vein thrombosis in Crohn's disease.Gastrointest Radiol. 1991;16:245-247.
Vassiliadis T, Mpoumponaris A, Giouleme O, Hatzidakis A, Patsiaoura K, Zezos P, Vakalopoulou S, Kargiotis K, Gkisakis D, Katsinelos P. Late onset ulcerative colitis complicating a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:109-113.
Socha P, Ryzko J, Janczyk W, Dzik E, Iwanczak B, Krzesiek E. Hepatic vein thrombosis as a complication of ulcerative colitis in a 12-year-old patient.Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1293-1298.
Whiteford MH, Moritz MJ, Ferber A, Fry RD. Budd-Chiari syndrome complicating restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: report of a case.Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1220-1224.
Kraut J, Berman JH, Gunasekaran TS, Allen R, McFadden J, Messersmith R, Pellettiere E. Hepatic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari syndrome) in an adolescent with ulcerative colitis.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;25:417-420.
Maccini DM, Berg JC, Bell GA. Budd-Chiari syndrome and Crohn's disease. An unreported association.Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1933-1936.
Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Oncel M, Baker ME, Church JM, Ooi BS, Connor JT, Preen M, Einstein D. Portal vein thrombi after restorative proctocolectomy.Surgery. 2002;132:655-661; discussion 661-662.
Di Fabio F, Obrand D, Satin R, Gordon PH. Intra-abdominal venous and arterial thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease.Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:336-342.
Büller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.Chest. 2004;126:401S-428S.
Novacek G, Sobala A, Petritsch W, Haas T, Feichtenschlager T, Tilg H, Tillinger W, Reinisch W, Knoflach P, Fuchssteiner H. A nationwide multicenter study on venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease.Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-641.
Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SP. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.Gut. 2004;53 Suppl 5:V1-V16.
Grau L, Kovner C. Comorbidity, age, and hospital use among elderly Medicare patients.J Aging Health. 1991;3:352-367.
Meune C, Touzé E, Trinquart L, Allanore Y. Trends in cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 50 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1309-1313.
Peters MJ, Symmons DP, McCarey D, Dijkmans BA, Nicola P, Kvien TK, McInnes IB, Haentzschel H, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Provan S. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:325-331.
Rho YH, Chung CP, Oeser A, Solus J, Asanuma Y, Sokka T, Pincus T, Raggi P, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A. Inflammatory mediators and premature coronary atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1580-1585.
Levy PJ, Tabares AH, Olin JW. Lower extremity arterial occlusions in young patients with Crohn's colitis and premature atherosclerosis: report of six cases.Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:494-497.
Mitchell GF. Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection: Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk.Artery Res. 2009;3:56-64.
O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.N Engl J Med. 1999;340:14-22.
Dagli N, Poyrazoglu OK, Dagli AF, Sahbaz F, Karaca I, Kobat MA, Bahcecioglu IH. Is inflammatory bowel disease a risk factor for early atherosclerosis?Angiology. 2010;61:198-204.
Papa A, Danese S, Urgesi R, Grillo A, Guglielmo S, Roberto I, Bonizzi M, Guidi L, De Vitis I, Santoliquido A. Early atherosclerosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006;10:7-11.
Maharshak N, Arbel Y, Bornstein NM, Gal-Oz A, Gur AY, Shapira I, Rogowski O, Berliner S, Halpern Z, Dotan I. Inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with increased intimal media thickening.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1050-1055.
Bernstein CN, Rawsthorne P, Cheang M, Blanchard JF. A population-based case control study of potential risk factors for IBD.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:993-1002.
Ha C, Magowan S, Accortt NA, Chen J, Stone CD. Risk of arterial thrombotic events in inflammatory bowel disease.Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1445-1451.
Romanato G, Scarpa M, Angriman I, Faggian D, Ruffolo C, Marin R, Zambon S, Basato S, Zanoni S, Filosa T. Plasma lipids and inflammation in active inflammatory bowel diseases.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:298-307.
Graf J, Scherzer R, Grunfeld C, Imboden J. Levels of C-reactive protein associated with high and very high cardiovascular risk are prevalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.PLoS One. 2009;4:e6242.
Wilson PW, Pencina M, Jacques P, Selhub J, D'Agostino R Sr, O'Donnell CJ. C-reactive protein and reclassification of cardiovascular risk in the Framingham Heart Study.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1:92-97.
Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, Pepys MB, Thompson SG, Collins R, Danesh J. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis.Lancet. 2010;375:132-140.
Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Blanchard JF. The incidence of arterial thromboembolic diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:41-45.
Buchman AL. Side effects of corticosteroid therapy.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:289-294.
Sholter DE, Armstrong PW. Adverse effects of corticosteroids on the cardiovascular system.Can J Cardiol. 2000;16:505-511.
Knight SR, Morris PJ. Steroid avoidance or withdrawal after renal transplantation increases the risk of acute rejection but decreases cardiovascular risk. A meta-analysis.Transplantation. 2010;89:1-14.
Westlake SL, Colebatch AN, Baird J, Kiely P, Quinn M, Choy E, Ostor AJ, Edwards CJ. The effect of methotrexate on cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:295-307.
Toms TE, Panoulas VF, John H, Douglas KM, Kitas GD. Methotrexate therapy associates with reduced prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis patients over the age of 60- more than just an anti-inflammatory effect? A cross sectional study.Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R110.
Kerekes G, Soltész P, Dér H, Veres K, Szabó Z, Végvári A, Shoenfeld Y, Szekanecz Z. Effects of biologics on vascular function and atherosclerosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1173:814-821.
Petitpain N, Gambier N, Wahl D, Chary-Valckenaere I, Loeuille D, Gillet P. Arterial and venous thromboembolic events during anti-TNF therapy: a study of 85 spontaneous reports in the period 2000-2006.Biomed Mater Eng. 2009;19:355-364.
Liang HL, Ouyang Q. A clinical trial of combined use of rosiglitazone and 5-aminosalicylate for ulcerative colitis.World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:114-119.
Lewis JD, Lichtenstein GR, Deren JJ, Sands BE, Hanauer SB, Katz JA, Lashner B, Present DH, Chuai S, Ellenberg JH. Rosiglitazone for active ulcerative colitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Gastroenterology. 2008;134:688-695.
Grip O, Janciauskiene S, Bredberg A. Use of atorvastatin as an anti-inflammatory treatment in Crohn's disease.Br J Pharmacol. 2008;155:1085-1092.
Hume GE, Radford-Smith GL. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in Crohn's disease management.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;2:645-651.
Wengrower D, Zanninelli G, Pappo O, Latella G, Sestieri M, Villanova A, Faitelson Y, Pines M, Goldin E. Prevention of fibrosis in experimental colitis by captopril: the role of tgf-beta1.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:536-545.
Warrington TP, Bostwick JM. Psychiatric adverse effects of corticosteroids.Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1361-1367.
Reimer J, Fink T, Bläker M, Schäfer I, Otte C. Successful treatment of psychosis with infliximab in a patient with Crohn's disease.Schizophr Res. 2009;109:194-195.
Kovács Z, Kovács F. Depressive and anxiety symptoms, dysfunctional attitudes and social aspects in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease.Int J Psychiatry Med. 2007;37:245-255.
Filipović BR, Filipović BF, Kerkez M, Milinić N, Randelović T. Depression and anxiety levels in therapy-naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease and cancer of the colon.World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:438-443.
Addolorato G, Capristo E, Stefanini GF, Gasbarrini G. Inflammatory bowel disease: a study of the association between anxiety and depression, physical morbidity, and nutritional status.Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1013-1021.
Walker EA, Gelfand MD, Gelfand AN, Creed F, Katon WJ. The relationship of current psychiatric disorder to functional disability and distress in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1996;18:220-229.
Walker JR, Ediger JP, Graff LA, Greenfeld JM, Clara I, Lix L, Rawsthorne P, Miller N, Rogala L, McPhail CM. The Manitoba IBD cohort study: a population-based study of the prevalence of lifetime and 12-month anxiety and mood disorders.Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1989-1997.
Lerebours E, Gower-Rousseau C, Merle V, Brazier F, Debeugny S, Marti R, Salomez JL, Hellot MF, Dupas JL, Colombel JF. Stressful life events as a risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease onset: A population-based case-control study.Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:122-131.
Fuller-Thomson E, Sulman J. Depression and inflammatory bowel disease: findings from two nationally representative Canadian surveys.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:697-707.
Kurina LM, Goldacre MJ, Yeates D, Gill LE. Depression and anxiety in people with inflammatory bowel disease.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:716-720.
Iglesias M, Barreiro de Acosta M, Vázquez I, Figueiras A, Nieto L, Lorenzo A, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Psychological impact of Crohn's disease on patients in remission: anxiety and depression risks.Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101:249-257.
Graff LA, Walker JR, Bernstein CN. Depression and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of comorbidity and management.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1105-1118.
Mikocka-Walus AA, Turnbull DA, Moulding NT, Wilson IG, Andrews JM, Holtmann GJ. Controversies surrounding the comorbidity of depression and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a literature review.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:225-234.
Mittermaier C, Dejaco C, Waldhoer T, Oefferlbauer-Ernst A, Miehsler W, Beier M, Tillinger W, Gangl A, Moser G. Impact of depressive mood on relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective 18-month follow-up study.Psychosom Med. 2004;66:79-84.
Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo V, Scribano ML, Andreoli A, Luzi C, Arcà M, Berto E, Milite G, Marcheggiano A. Stress and exacerbation in ulcerative colitis: a prospective study of patients enrolled in remission.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1213-1220.
Gómez-Gil E, Vidal A, Panés J, Jaén J, Peri JM, Fernández-Egea E, Piqué JM. [Relationship between patient's subjective stress perception and the course of inflammatory bowel disease].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;26:411-416.
Farrokhyar F, Marshall JK, Easterbrook B, Irvine EJ. Functional gastrointestinal disorders and mood disorders in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and impact on health.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:38-46.
Maunder RG, Levenstein S. The role of stress in the development and clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiological evidence.Curr Mol Med. 2008;8:247-252.
Vidal A, Gómez-Gil E, Sans M, Portella MJ, Salamero M, Piqué JM, Panés J. Life events and inflammatory bowel disease relapse: a prospective study of patients enrolled in remission.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:775-781.
Vidal A, Gómez-Gil E, Sans M, Portella MJ, Salamero M, Piqué JM, Panés J. Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients: the role of psychopathology and personality.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:977-983.
Means-Christensen AJ, Sherbourne CD, Roy-Byrne PP, Craske MG, Stein MB. Using five questions to screen for five common mental disorders in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of the Anxiety and Depression Detector.Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:108-118.
Goldberg DP, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Dimensions of neuroses seen in primary-care settings.Psychol Med. 1987;17:461-470.
Díaz Sibaja MA, Comeche Moreno MI, Mas Hesse B. [Protocolized cognitive-behavioural group therapy for inflammatory bowel disease].Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007;99:593-598.