Editorial
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2009; 15(45): 5641-5646
Published online Dec 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5641
Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy
Capecomorin S Pitchumoni, Balaji Yegneswaran
Capecomorin S Pitchumoni, Drexel University College of Medicine and Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
Capecomorin S Pitchumoni, Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
Balaji Yegneswaran, Drexel University College of Medicine/Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
Author contributions: Pitchumoni CS was involved in designing the format of the review, interpretation of data from various papers, providing expert opinion and writing the paper while Yegneswaran B was involved in collecting the literature for the paper and writing the paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Capecomorin S Pitchumoni, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, 254 Easton Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States. pitchumoni@hotmail.com
Telephone: +1-732-7458600 Fax: +1-732-7452980
Received: August 28, 2009
Revised: October 13, 2009
Accepted: October 20, 2009
Published online: December 7, 2009

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare event in pregnancy, occurring in approximately 3 in 10 000 pregnancies. The spectrum of AP in pregnancy ranges from mild pancreatitis to serious pancreatitis associated with necrosis, abscesses, pseudocysts and multiple organ dysfunction syndromes. Pregnancy related hematological and biochemical alterations influence the interpretation of diagnostic tests and assessment of severity of AP. As in any other disease associated with pregnancy, AP is associated with greater concerns as it deals with two lives rather than just one as in the non-pregnant population. The recent advances in clinical gastroenterology have improved the early diagnosis and effective management of biliary pancreatitis. Diagnostic studies such as endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and therapeutic modalities that include endoscopic sphincterotomy, biliary stenting, common bile duct stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy are major milestones in gastroenterology. When properly managed AP in pregnancy does not carry a dismal prognosis as in the past.

Key Words: Acute pancreatitis, Pregnancy, Pancreatitis in pregnancy


Citation: Pitchumoni CS, Yegneswaran B. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(45): 5641-5646
INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common problem with an annual incidence of 5 to 80 per 100 000 of the general population. The incidence of AP in pregnancy varies and is approximately 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10 000 births[1]. The wide variation in the incidence is influenced by the prevalence of its most important etiological factor i.e. gallstone disease. While biliary pancreatitis complicated 1 in 3300 pregnancies at a large public hospital in Dallas, Texas[2], in southern California 1 in 1500 women were affected[3]. In a retrospective study from USA spanning 10 years Legro and Laifer[4] identified 25 cases of AP in pregnancy. Eleven of these 25 patients were diagnosed in the first trimester of pregnancy when physicians had to clearly distinguish between hyperemesis gravidarum and AP. In another study 43 pregnant women out of 147 197 were diagnosed with AP[2]; 19% of these were diagnosed in the first trimester, 26% in the second, and 53% in the third trimester (one was postpartum), demonstrating that AP was more common with advancing gestational age, paralleling the frequency of gallstone diseases in pregnancy.

Older reviews of AP in pregnancy reported maternal and fetal mortality rates as high as 20% and 50% respectively[2,5-9]. The above data from the pre-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), pre-laparoscopic cholecystectomy era are not valid anymore. Contemporary reports document a much improved outcome of AP in pregnancy, when the management of AP secondary to gallstones has undergone substantial changes[10,11]. Hernandez et al[11] in 2007, based on a single center experience spanning 10 years, reported 34 episodes of AP with no maternal deaths and a fetal loss of only 4.7%. Date et al[12] in 2008 compared conservative and surgical management of cholecystitis in pregnancy and noted no difference in fetal mortality (2.2% vs 1.2%, P = 0.57), and there was no maternal mortality. The major changes are the availability of many options in abdominal imaging and less invasive therapeutic options. In addition to abdominal ultrasound (US) we have endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ERCP. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1986 is a milestone that has reduced the morbidity of surgical intervention by open abdominal surgery even in high-risk pregnant patients. Above all the safe applications of therapeutic ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) have permitted delaying cholecystectomy to safer periods in pregnancy or postpartum.

The etiological associations of AP during pregnancy are similar to those in the general population. AP in pregnancy is most often associated with gallstone disease or hypertriglyceridemia. Gallstones are the most common cause of AP during pregnancy responsible for more than 70% of cases[2]. The incidence of gallstone related diseases including acute cholecystitis and biliary pancreatitis complicating pregnancy is 0.05%-0.8%[13]. Even in patients who had prior cholecystectomy, a biliary etiology may exist. The prevalence of microlithiasis after cholecystectomy is 5%-10%[14,15]. The pathogenesis of AP in gallstone disease is attributed to lodging or impaction of a stone or microlithiasis in the ampulla of vater initiating premature activation of intracinar trypsinogen to trypsin.

AP OF BILIARY ETIOLOGY IN PREGNANCY

The prevalence rate of gallstones varies with ethnicity. Native American Indians, Mexicans, Latin Americans and Pima Indians all have a high incidence while the incidence is lower in Asia and Africa. Many studies have reported a high incidence of gallstones in the population from northern states of India[16,17]. Gallbladder disease is strongly related to the metabolic syndrome, a problem that is growing in incidence all over the world[18-21]. Rapid weight loss is a recently recognized factor for microlithiasis and gallstones[22]. Although pregnancy itself is a risk factor, the risk increases with parity[23]. Weight gain and hormonal changes predispose pregnant women to biliary sludge and gallstone formation[24]. Identification of a biliary etiology for AP is important because as in the non-pregnant patient recurrence of AP episodes will occur in one-third to two-thirds of patients unless gallstones are removed[10,11,25-27].

Pathogenesis of increased prevalence of gallstone in pregnancy

Cholesterol secretion in the hepatic bile increases in the second and third trimester compared to bile acids and phospholipids, leading to supersaturated bile; in addition, fasting and postprandial gallbladder volumes are greater, with reduced rate and volume of emptying. This large residual volume of supersaturated bile in the gallbladder of the pregnant patient leads to the retention of cholesterol crystals and eventual gallstones. The formation of biliary sludge and stones is strongly associated with frequency and number of pregnancies[23].

Up to 10% of patients develop stones or sludge over the course of each pregnancy, with obesity and increased serum leptin being risk factors[28]. After delivery gallbladder motility becomes normal when sludge as well as stones may disappear[26,27].

In evaluating pregnant patients with AP the four important questions to be answered are (1) does the patient have AP (establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes)? (2) if it is AP, what is the predicted severity? (3) is there a biliary etiology? and (4) what is the trimester of pregnancy?[29] The answer to the last question determines the choice of imaging studies and mode of therapy.

In the management initial blood tests are done to establish the diagnosis of AP and to assess the severity. Serum amylase and lipase levels are reliable markers of AP during pregnancy. The serum lipase level is unchanged during pregnancy, and the amylase level is either normal or only mildly elevated[30]. The alterations in blood chemistry in normal pregnancy do not hinder the assessment of severity. Elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase levels to > 3 times the upper limit of normal is a very sensitive biochemical marker of biliary pancreatitis[31,32]. Any abnormality of liver enzymes and bilirubin as well as rapid change in the levels should suggest a biliary etiology.

IMAGING STUDIES

Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) with no radiation to the fetus is the initial imaging technique of choice to identify a biliary etiology. Gallstones as a potential cause of AP are identified by AUS in most cases[33]. However, it is insensitive for the detection of common bile duct stones or sludge. When a common bile duct (CBD) stone is suspected based on AUS or biochemical abnormalities EUS, a semi-invasive procedure of the biliary tree is an accurate modality for detecting common bile duct stones[34]. However EUS requires expensive equipment, intravenous sedation and technical expertise. EUS can be considered the best imaging study to evaluate CBD, although not for gallbladder stones. In expert hands small gallstones as well as sludge can be picked up by EUS, however it is operator dependent. EUS is appropriate prior to the consideration of therapeutic ERCP in patients where non-invasive imaging such as MRCP is not available, contraindicated or inconclusive. EUS has a high positive predictive value nearing 100% in detecting CBD stones and in many instances EUS is superior to MRCP[35]. EUS entails no radiation exposure and is extremely safe apart from a minimal sedation related risk. If a common bile duct stone is detected, an ERCP with sphincterotomy can be performed following the EUS study during the same sedation.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRCP provide multi-planar large field of view images of the body with excellent soft-tissue contrast and images of bilio-pancreatic duct systems. MRCP does not require any contrast injections and has no risk of renal injury. MRCP is a preferred method of evaluating CBD in many clinical situations. There is paucity of data on the safety of MRI in the first trimester of pregnancy[36-38]. Some authors have raised concerns of thermal injury to the fetus in first trimester[39,40].

According to the Safety Committee of the Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging[41], MR procedures are indicated in pregnant women if other non-ionizing forms of diagnostic imaging studies are inadequate, or if the examination provides important information that would otherwise require exposure to ionizing radiation [i.e. X-Ray computerized tomography (CT), etc.]. Gallstone pancreatitis is generally associated with small gallbladder stones and sludge[42]. Small ductal stones in particular, located in the distal CBD could be missed by MRCP[43]. Claustrophobia remains the major barrier in the use of MRCP and MRI.

CT scan of the abdomen is the most commonly used imaging modality in diagnosing and later on in assessing severity of AP among adults. It is not recommended in pregnant patients because of the fear of radiation exposure to the fetus[44]. In general CT is not the preferred modality of imaging in all trimesters of pregnancy in view of a small radiation risk to the fetus.

ERCP solely as a diagnostic study has lost its value because of the risks of radiation, incidence of AP post procedure, and the availability of safer procedures such as EUS or MRCP. ERCP increases the risk of complications and death from 5% to 10% and 0.1% to 0.2% respectively[45]. However, the clinical usefulness of therapeutic ERCP when indicated is unchallenged. Persistent biliary obstruction worsens the outcome, increases the severity of AP, and predisposes to bacterial cholangitis. ERCP along with ES helps to extract impacted gallstones and drain infected bile in severe AP[46]. Several reports have shown that ERCP can be carried out successfully in the management of symptomatic choledocholithiasis in pregnancy[47,48]. A major concern of this procedure is harmful ionizing radiation to the fetus. Tham et al[49] reported their experience with ERCP in pregnancy (15 patients over 5 years) with fetal dose radiation measurement. The fetal radiation dose could be reduced to a level less than that considered teratogenic. Kahaleh et al[50] looked at 17 ERCPs performed in pregnant women between January 1995 and August 2003. They reported a mean gestational age of 18.6 wk, mean fluoroscopy time of 14 s and an estimated fetal radiation exposure of 40 mrad. By limiting fluoroscopy time, shielding the pelvis and fetus with lead and avoiding direct X-ray films, the fetal radiation dose can be reduced to far below the maximum permissible doses. Performing MRCP or EUS before ERCP helps to identify patients who require therapeutic ERCP thus reducing the number of ERCP[51].

MANAGEMENT

Several recommendations below are mostly based on expert opinion only and not confirmed by double blind/randomized controlled trials. The difficulties in performing such studies in critically ill pregnant patients are obvious.

Nutrition

Although successful outcomes can be achieved in obstetric patients requiring parenteral nutrition, the frequency of maternal complications secondary to centrally inserted central venous catheters (TPN) is greater than that reported in non-pregnant patients[52]. Peripherally inserted central catheters may be preferable when parenteral nutrition is required during pregnancy. Enteral nutrition by naso-jejunal feeding is preferable to TPN[11] in patients with severe AP. Enteral nutrition is physiological, helps the gut flora maintain the gut mucosal immunity, reduced translocation of bacteria, while simultaneously avoiding all the risks of TPN.

Antibiotics

The topic of prophylactic use of antibiotics is very controversial and the choice of antibiotic in pregnancy is difficult. However, in suspected cholangitis there is no controversy with regards to the need for appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients with mild AP, normal CBD size with no evidence for cholangitis do not need antibiotics. In a pregnant patient there are concerns with regard to the antibiotic being transplacentally transferred to the fetus with a risk of teratogenicity. Metronidazole passes freely across the placenta. However, recent studies do not show any association with an increased risk of teratogenic effects with metronidazole[53,54]. Imipenem (N-formimidoyl thienamycin), belonging to the carbapenem class of antibiotics, has a broad spectrum of activity. It is currently classified as a category C in terms of its risk to the fetus. Although limited animal studies have shown no teratogenic risk or adverse fetal effects, data in humans are not available[55]. Quinolones have been classified as category C because adverse effects have been noted in some animal studies. However, there are no adequate studies in humans; the benefits may outweigh the risks. Ampicillin-sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam are classified as category B with no evidence of risk in humans. Regardless of initial drug regimen, therapy should be modified to reflect the organisms recovered in blood cultures and the clinical status of the patient.

Management of underlying cause

Management of gallstones: In a pregnant woman with gallstones and CBD stones a major decision is on choice of procedure to clear the CBD of stones. The second decision is on timing and approach to cholecystectomy[56]. Factors which influence the decision include the trimester of pregnancy, presence or absence of CBD dilatation, cholangitis, and the severity of AP. AP patients with gallstones need to be evaluated for early cholecystectomy to prevent recurrence of AP later on in the pregnancy when it could be more serious and dangerous[25-27]. It is a well respected surgical concept that the second trimester is the best period for surgery since during this period organogenesis is complete and the uterus is not big enough to obliterate the surgical view for laparoscopic approach. It has also been recognized that cholecystectomy during the second trimester is safe for both the mother and the fetus[10,12,57].

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnant women offers all of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in non-pregnant patients - reduced hospital stay, decreased narcotic use and a quick return to a regular diet compared to open surgery in pregnant women[58]. In the second trimester the gravid uterus does not interfere with visualization of the operative field. The indications for surgery in pregnancy are severity of symptoms, obstructive jaundice, acute cholecystitis intractable to medical treatment and peritonitis.

Four retrospective studies comparing open cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not find any significant difference in maternal or fetal outcomes[12]. Gouldman et al[59] reviewed the available world literature on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy and found 107 patients who had cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Most had been performed in the second trimester, with 10 and 16 patients in the first and third trimesters, respectively. Premature labor was rare, with only 2 of the 16 reported patients (12.5%) in the third trimester developing preterm labor, and these were successfully treated with tocolytics. Overall results were good with excellent maternal (100%) and fetal (96%) survival. There is a recent view that states when surgical intervention is warranted, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in any trimester[60] but it is a minority view. Performance of cholecystectomy is desirable in the second trimester as organogenesis is complete, and spontaneous abortions are less frequent than in the first trimester[61].

ERCP with sphincterotomy and clearance of bile duct stones is indicated in patients with severe AP, with cholangitis, with strong evidence of persistent biliary obstruction, and in those who are post cholecystectomy as well as patients who are poor candidates for surgical therapy[25]. Pregnant women in the first and third trimester who are not ideal candidates for cholecystectomy fall in the last category. Biliary sphincterotomy rather than cholecystectomy may be appropriate when CBD stones are detected and cholecystectomy has to be delayed because of pregnancy. The effectiveness of ES in preventing further episodes of biliary pancreatitis, as an alternative to cholecystectomy in high risk patients has been demonstrated[48,62-69]. The indication for ERCP in patients with severe pancreatitis without significant cholestasis is controversial. At this time there is no evidence that therapeutic ERCP is required in all patients with biliary sludge during pregnancy.

The role of therapeutic ES in the management of pregnant patients with AP without CBD stones continues to be controversial[70]. Some advocate biliary stent placement rather than performing sphincterotomy and stone extraction and therefore, eliminating complications that accompany sphincterotomy. Farca et al[71] placed 10-French biliary stents without sphincterotomy in 10 patients, all of whom had uncomplicated pregnancies with normal deliveries. All underwent repeat ERCP with stent extraction and sphincterotomy post-partum and 8 had stones extracted. In 2 patients, the stent remained in place for 7 and 8 mo, respectively, without the development of occlusion and or cholangitis. However, stenting carries risks of stent occlusion and cholangitis and the need for a second procedure.

Hyperlipidemic pancreatitis: Hypertriglyceridemia is the second most common cause of AP, when the serum triglyceride is > 1000 mg/dL. In the third trimester of pregnancy, there is a three-fold rise in serum triglyceride levels[72]. This is thought to be due to estrogen-induced increases in triglyceride synthesis and very low-density lipoprotein secretion[72]. Hypertriglyceridemia may be more severe in persons with familial hyperlipidemia, predisposing them to develop pancreatitis[73]. Rarer causes of AP that need to be considered in the differential diagnosis are hyperemesis during the first trimester; hyperparathyroidism; preeclampsia; and genetic mutations[74-76] and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. AP can also complicate the course of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura during pregnancy[77] and pregnancy induced hypertension[78]. Medication and alcoholism are extremely rare causes of AP in pregnancy.

No formal recommendations exist for gestational hypertriglyceridemia treatment in pregnancy at present. Treatment of hyperlipidemic AP is mostly supportive. These treatments include low fat diet[79,80], antihyperlipidemic therapy[79,80], insulin[79-81] (to increase lipoprotein lipase activity), heparin[79-81] (to increase lipoprotein lipase activity), and even plasmapheresis[79,82].

CONCLUSION

AP in pregnancy remains a challenging clinical problem to manage, with a relatively limited but expanding evidence base. Among the various etiological factors for AP in pregnancy, gallstone disease is the most common one. Abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, EUS and MRCP are the available imaging studies in diagnosing a biliary etiology for AP. Potential radiation to the fetus is a major disadvantage with CT scan, restricting their use substantially. Diagnostic ERCP is to be avoided whenever possible owing to the associated risks including bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, fetal radiation, while abdominal ultrasound, MRCP and EUS do not carry these risks. The general management of AP in pregnancy is supportive and includes hospitalization, intravenous fluids, analgesia, and bowel rest. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is ideally performed in the second trimester when the risk to fetus is the least and only limited technical problems exist as a result of an enlarging uterus. Whenever laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not feasible and the index of suspicion for a stone in the CBD is high based on AUS, MRCP or by EUS, ES or stenting serves to prevent recurrence of AP and allows postponement of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a more suitable period. Hyperlipidemic pancreatitis and AP due to other etiologies are rare. The outcome of pregnant patients with AP has substantially improved with technical advances in imaging and therapeutic endoscopy.

Footnotes

Peer reviewers: Dr. Karel van Erpecum, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Utrecht, PO Box 855003508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Professor, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor O'Neill M E- Editor Lin YP

References
1.  McKay AJ, O'Neill J, Imrie CW. Pancreatitis, pregnancy and gallstones. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:47-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Ramin KD, Ramin SM, Richey SD, Cunningham FG. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:187-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Swisher SG, Schmit PJ, Hunt KK, Hiyama DT, Bennion RS, Swisher EM, Thompson JE. Biliary disease during pregnancy. Am J Surg. 1994;168:576-579; discussion 580-581.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Legro RS, Laifer SA. First-trimester pancreatitis. Maternal and neonatal outcome. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:689-695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Ramin KD, Ramsey PS. Disease of the gallbladder and pancreas in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001;28:571-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Wilkinson EJ. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: a review of 98 cases and a report of 8 new cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1973;28:281-303.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Corlett RC Jr, Mishell DR Jr. Pancreatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;113:281-290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Montgomery WH, Miller FC. Pancreatitis and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1970;35:658-664.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Scott LD. Gallstone disease and pancreatitis in pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1992;21:803-815.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Swisher SG, Hunt KK, Schmit PJ, Hiyama DT, Bennion RS, Thompson JE. Management of pancreatitis complicating pregnancy. Am Surg. 1994;60:759-762.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Hernandez A, Petrov MS, Brooks DC, Banks PA, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A. Acute pancreatitis and pregnancy: a 10-year single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1623-1627.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Date RS, Kaushal M, Ramesh A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in pregnancy. Am J Surg. 2008;196:599-608.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Ko CW. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2263-2268.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Okoro N, Patel A, Goldstein M, Narahari N, Cai Q. Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for patients with postcholecystectomy pain and bile microlithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:69-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Quallich LG, Stern MA, Rich M, Chey WD, Barnett JL, Elta GH. Bile duct crystals do not contribute to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:163-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Singh V, Trikha B, Nain C, Singh K, Bose S. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Chandigarh: a community-based study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:560-563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Sapru S. Prevalence of biliary tract disease in India: a sonographic study in adult population in Kashmir. Gut. 1989;30:201-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Boland LL, Folsom AR, Rosamond WD. Hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and obesity as risk factors for hospitalized gallbladder disease. A prospective study. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:131-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Prospective study of abdominal adiposity and gallstone disease in US men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:38-44.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005;7:132-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Valdivieso V, Covarrubias C, Siegel F, Cruz F. Pregnancy and cholelithiasis: pathogenesis and natural course of gallstones diagnosed in early puerperium. Hepatology. 1993;17:1-4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Shiffman ML, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Brewer WH, Moore EW. Gallstone formation after rapid weight loss: a prospective study in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery for treatment of morbid obesity. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1000-1005.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Pandey M, Shukla VK. Lifestyle, parity, menstrual and reproductive factors and risk of gallbladder cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12:269-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Stampfer MJ, Maclure KM, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Willett WC. Risk of symptomatic gallstones in women with severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55:652-658.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Banks PA, Freeman ML. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2379-2400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Benson EA, Axon AT. Operations upon the biliary tract in patients with acute pancreatitis: aims, indications and timing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984;66:179-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Paloyan D, Simonowitz D, Skinner DB. The timing of biliary tract operations in patients with pancreatitis associated with gallstones. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;141:737-739.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Ko CW, Beresford SA, Schulte SJ, Matsumoto AM, Lee SP. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology. 2005;41:359-365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Bank S, Singh P, Pooran N, Stark B. Evaluation of factors that have reduced mortality from acute pancreatitis over the past 20 years. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;35:50-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Karsenti D, Bacq Y, Bréchot JF, Mariotte N, Vol S, Tichet J. Serum amylase and lipase activities in normal pregnancy: a prospective case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:697-699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Wang SS, Lin XZ, Tsai YT, Lee SD, Pan HB, Chou YH, Su CH, Lee CH, Shiesh SC, Lin CY. Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical tests in the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas. 1988;3:153-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Neoptolemos JP, Hall AW, Finlay DF, Berry JM, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. The urgent diagnosis of gallstones in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study of three methods. Br J Surg. 1984;71:230-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Block P, Kelly TR. Management of gallstone pancreatitis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;168:426-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Yusuf TE, Bhutani MS. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in diseases of the extrahepatic biliary system. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:243-250.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Lee YT, Chan FK, Leung WK, Chan HL, Wu JC, Yung MY, Ng EK, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:660-668.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:549-551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Kanal E, Gillen J, Evans JA, Savitz DA, Shellock FG. Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology. 1993;187:395-399.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:32-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB, Chen Q. Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:856-861.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ. MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Radiographics. 2004;24:1301-1316.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. SMRI Safety Committee. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;1:97-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Venneman NG, Renooij W, Rehfeld JF, VanBerge-Henegouwen GP, Go PM, Broeders IA, van Erpecum KJ. Small gallstones, preserved gallbladder motility, and fast crystallization are associated with pancreatitis. Hepatology. 2005;41:738-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2900-2904.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Kennedy A. Assessment of acute abdominal pain in the pregnant patient. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:64-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Janssen J, Halboos A, Greiner L. EUS accurately predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients with a low probability of biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:470-476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19:1-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Axelrad AM, Fleischer DE, Strack LL, Benjamin SB, al-Kawas FH. Performance of ERCP for symptomatic choledocholithiasis during pregnancy: techniques to increase safety and improve patient management. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:109-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Baillie J, Cairns SR, Putman WS, Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;171:1-4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Tham TC, Vandervoort J, Wong RC, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Ferrari AP, Lichtenstein DR, Van Dam J, Nawfel RD. Safety of ERCP during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:308-311.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Kahaleh M, Hartwell GD, Arseneau KO, Pajewski TN, Mullick T, Isin G, Agarwal S, Yeaton P. Safety and efficacy of ERCP in pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:287-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MB. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Endoscopy. 2003;35:1029-1032.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Russo-Stieglitz KE, Levine AB, Wagner BA, Armenti VT. Pregnancy outcome in patients requiring parenteral nutrition. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8:164-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Burtin P, Taddio A, Ariburnu O, Einarson TR, Koren G. Safety of metronidazole in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:525-529.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Caro-Patón T, Carvajal A, Martin de Diego I, Martin-Arias LH, Alvarez Requejo A, Rodríguez Pinilla E. Is metronidazole teratogenic? A meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;44:179-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
55.  Dinsmoor MJ. Imipenem-cilastatin. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1992;19:475-482.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
56.  Carr-Locke DL. Cholelithiasis plus choledocholithiasis: ERCP first, what next? Gastroenterology. 2006;130:270-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
57.  Lanzafame RJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy. Surgery. 1995;118:627-631; discussion 631-633.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
58.  Curet MJ, Allen D, Josloff RK, Pitcher DE, Curet LB, Miscall BG, Zucker KA. Laparoscopy during pregnancy. Arch Surg. 1996;131:546-550; discussion 550-551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
59.  Gouldman JW, Sticca RP, Rippon MB, McAlhany JC Jr. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy. Am Surg. 1998;64:93-97; discussion 97-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
60.  Bani Hani MN, Bani-Hani KE, Rashdan A, AlWaqfi NR, Heis HA, Al-Manasra AR. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:23-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
61.  McKellar DP, Anderson CT, Boynton CJ, Peoples JB. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:465-468.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
62.  Siegel JH, Veerappan A, Cohen SA, Kasmin FE. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary pancreatitis: an alternative to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:573-575.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
63.  Welbourn CR, Mehta D, Armstrong CP, Gear MW, Eyre-Brook IA. Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1995;37:576-579.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
64.  Hammarström LE, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:333-336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
65.  Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:761-765.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
66.  Al-Hashem H, Muralidharan V, Cohen H, Jamidar PA. Biliary Disease in Pregnancy With an Emphasis on the Role of ERCP. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
67.  Cappell MS. Colon cancer during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003;32:341-383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
68.  Baillie J. ERCP during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:237-238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
69.  Tenner S, Dubner H, Steinberg W. Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory parameters: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:1863-1866.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
70.  May GR, Shaffer EH. Should elective endoscopic sphincterotomy replace cholecystectomy for the treatment of high-risk patients with gallstone pancreatitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991;13:125-128.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
71.  Farca A, Aguilar ME, Rodriguez G, de la Mora G, Arango L. Biliary stents as temporary treatment for choledocholithiasis in pregnant patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:99-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
72.  Lippi G, Albiero A, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Scevarolli S, Franchi M, Guidi GC. Lipid and lipoprotein profile in physiological pregnancy. Clin Lab. 2007;53:173-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
73.  Achard JM, Westeel PF, Moriniere P, Lalau JD, de Cagny B, Fournier A. Pancreatitis related to severe acute hypertriglyceridemia during pregnancy: treatment with lipoprotein apheresis. Intensive Care Med. 1991;17:236-237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
74.  Witt H, Luck W, Hennies HC, Classen M, Kage A, Lass U, Landt O, Becker M. Mutations in the gene encoding the serine protease inhibitor, Kazal type 1 are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2000;25:213-216.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
75.  Inoue N, Ito T, Akashi T, Kawabe K, Oono T, Gibo J, Arita Y, Nawata H, Funakoshi A. Acute pancreatitis in the early stages of pregnancy associated with a PSTI gene mutation. Pancreas. 2004;29:242-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
76.  Witt H. Gene mutations in children with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2001;1:432-438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
77.  Elliott MA, Nichols WL. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:1154-1162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
78.  Marcovici I, Marzano D. Pregnancy-induced hypertension complicated by postpartum renal failure and pancreatitis: a case report. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19:177-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
79.  Bae JH, Baek SH, Choi HS, Cho KR, Lee HL, Lee OY, Yoon BC, Hahm JS, Lee MH, Lee DH. Acute pancreatitis due to hypertriglyceridemia: report of 2 cases. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005;46:475-480.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
80.  Mao EQ, Tang YQ, Zhang SD. Formalized therapeutic guideline for hyperlipidemic severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2622-2626.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
81.  Monga A, Arora A, Makkar RP, Gupta AK. Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis--treatment with heparin and insulin. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22:102-103.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
82.  Iskandar SB, Olive KE. Plasmapheresis as an adjuvant therapy for hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis. Am J Med Sci. 2004;328:290-294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]