Basic Research Open Access
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2005; 11(4): 521-524
Published online Jan 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.521
A non-invasive method for gastrointestinal parameter monitoring
Wen-Xing Wang, Guo-Zheng Yan, Fang Sun, Ping-Ping Jiang, Wen-Qiang Zhang, Institute of Precision Engineering and Intelligent Microsystem, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
Gen-Fu Zhang, People’s Hospital of Pudong New District of Shanghai, Shanghai 201200, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30270382; High Technology Research and Development Program of China, No. 2002AA404280
Correspondence to: Guo-Zheng Yan, Institute of Precision Engineering and Intelligent Microsystem, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 1954, Huashan Road, Shanghai 200030, China. gzhyan@sjtu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-21-62932821 Fax: +86-21-62933721
Received: December 12, 2003
Revised: December 15, 2003
Accepted: February 1, 2004
Published online: January 28, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To propose a new, non-invasive method for monitoring 24-h pressure, temperature and pH value in gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS: The authors developed a miniature, multi-functional gastrointestinal monitoring system, which comprises a set of indigestible biotelemetry capsules and a data recorder. The capsule, after ingested by patients, could measure pressure, temperature and pH value in the gastrointestinal tract and transmit the data to the data recorder outside the body through a 434 MHz radio frequency data link. After the capsule passed out from the body, the data saved in the recorder were downloaded to a workstation via a special software for further analysis and comparison.

RESULTS: Clinical experiments showed that the biotelemetry capsules could be swallowed by volunteers without any difficulties. The data recorder could receive the radio frequency signals transmitted by the biotelemetry in the body. The biotelemetry capsule could pass out from the body without difficulties. No discomfort was reported by any volunteer during the experiment. In vivo pressure and temperature data were acquired.

CONCLUSION: A non-invasive method for monitoring 24-h gastrointestinal parameters was proposed and tested by the authors. The feasibility and functionality of this method are verified by laboratory tests and clinical experiments.

Key Words: Gastrointestinal monitoring system, pressure, Temperature, Hydrogen Ion Concentration



INTRODUCTION

Measurement of physiological parameters such as pressure and pH value is important for gastrointestinal motility study and diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders[1]. The conventional ways for internal monitoring and examining human digestive tract are the open-ended catheter method, bladder catheter method or by means of sensors embedded in flexible cannulae[2,3]. These approaches need pipes inserted into the alimentary tract of patients. As a result, these methods are invasive and can cause a great pain for the patients. In addition, patients must have an “empty stomach” when these conventional methods are performed. So the data acquired are limosis data and can not show the natural and real conditions of the alimentary tract. Furthermore, physicians can not collect the data from the whole gastrointestinal tract because catheters can not reach so far in the small intestine.

Gastrointestinal motility can also be studied through myoelectric activities of the intestine[4-7], small bowel sound recording[8-11], radio-opaque makers[12] or magnetic makers[13-17] and ultrasound methods[18-20]. These techniques have several disadvantages such as indirection, uncertainty, patient discomfort, and high cost.

To overcome these shortcomings, the authors developed a miniature, multi-functional gastrointestinal monitoring system employing micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS), wireless communication and packaging techniques. This device makes it possible to monitor a 24-h pressure, temperature and pH value in gastrointestinal tract. This device was initially developed for measuring the intestinal motility of constipation patients, but it can be employed in the gastrointestinal motility study and other motility disorder diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Overview

The whole monitoring system comprises four blocks: a biotelemetry capsule, a data recorder, an ultrasonic electrode waistcoat and a workstation (Figure 1). Two types of capsules have been developed currently. One is for pressure and temperature monitoring, called PT capsule, and the other is for pH monitoring, called pH capsule. The biotelemetry capsule is orally ingested by patients, and then it is propelled by peristalsis through the gastrointestinal tract and does not require a pushing force to propel it through the stomach, small bowel or colon. When the capsule passes through the alimentary tract, it transmits pressure, temperature or pH data to the data recorder attached to the body at a preset time interval of 1.15 s using radio frequency at approximately 434 MHz. The data recorder receives the data and stores them into a flash memory card. The position of the capsule in the body is detected by ultrasonic electrodes mounted on the key points of the body surface. The position data are also stored by the data recorder. Patients do not need to stay in the hospital. They could swallow the biotelemetry capsule, attach the recorder to their belt and go out to take part in their daily activities. After the capsule passes out from the body with stools, the recorder is sent to the physician’s office. The data stored in the recorder are downloaded to the workstation through a wired link, and then the physician analyses the data using a special software to pinpoint the problem area and assists in the diagnosis.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Components of the entire monitoring system.
Device design

The biotelemetry capsule was made of the following functional blocks: batteries, a signal processor, a power manager, a radio frequency (RF) transmitter, micro sensors and an outer shell (Figure 2). The power source for the capsule was two commercially available high-density silver-oxide cell batteries. The nominal capacity of each cell battery was 40 mAh. To ensure durable and stable power supply for the capsule, a step-up direct-current to direct-current (DC-DC) converter with a regulated voltage output was implemented. Analog switches were implemented in the power manager to govern the power sequencing of the micro sensors under the control of the signal processor. In this way, the lifespan of the batteries was greatly prolonged.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Components of the biotelemetry capsule. 1: batteries; 2: signal processor; 3: power manager; 4: RF transmitter; 5: micro sensors; 6: outer shell; 7: antenna.

Several miniature biochemical and physical sensors were employed. These sensors included a biomedical absolute pressure sensor, a medical grade temperature sensor and an ion-selective field effect transistor (ISFET) pH sensor. The range and precision of each sensor are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Range and precision of each sensor.
SensorRangePrecision
Pressure-60 to +200 mmHg1% FS
Temperature34 to 42 °C±0.2 °C
pH1 to 13±0.2

To ensure a non-invasive measurement, an RF transmitter was constructed[21]. The RF carrier frequency was in the 434 MHz ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) frequency band. This frequency was selected because the maximal radiation was found to occur in this band[22-24]. Amplitude-shift keying (ASK) modulation scheme was adopted to lower the power consumption. The RF transmitting power of the transmitter was 0 dBm.

The outer shell was made of medical-grade silicone to ensure biocompatibility of the capsule. The sensors were surface mounted at the ends of the outer shell. All other parts were sealed in the shell by silicone (Figure 3). The weight and dimension of each capsule are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Weight and dimension of each capsule.
ParameterPT capsulepH capsule
Diameter (mm)1010
Length (mm)21.124
Weight (gram)2.95.2
Figure 3
Figure 3 Different biotelemetry capsules. Left, a pressure capsule; middle, a pH capsule; right, a pharmaceutical capsule.

The data recorder is a stand-alone unit that could communicate with the biotelemetry capsule to receive the collected data and then store them into its flash memory card (Figure 4). The data recorder could also store the capsule position information detected by the miniature ultrasonic electrodes embedded in the waistcoat. A universal synchronous asynchronous receiver transmitter (USART) port was designed to transmit the data to the workstation.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Data recorder and flash memory card. Left, data recorder; right, flash memory card.
Laboratory test and clinical experi ment

The monitoring system was checked and tested by Shanghai Medical Device Monitor and Test Center under State Food and Drug Administration, National Center of Measurement and Test for East China. The test results were listed in the next section.

To test and verify the in vivo performance of the monitoring system, fasting healthy volunteers, including 6 males and 1 female, were adopted. Their age ranged from 34 to 55 years (Table 3). No gastrointestinal preparations, such as cleaning of all fecal materials in the intestine and fasting before the examination, which were required by the traditional methods, were done before the experiment. The PT capsule, after sterilized, was taken with warm boiled water. The data recorder was attached to the belt of volunteers. The foods for volunteers were rice, vegetable and meat. Sleeping time was 8 to 10 h per day. X-ray films were acquired to verify the position of the biotelemetry capsule in the body (Figure 5).

Table 3 Volunteers and CIB time.
Volunteer no.SexAge (yr)CIB time (h)
1M4225.78
2M5233.83
3M3428.22
4F5011.72
5M5519.07
6M5433.12
7M4918.77
Figure 5
Figure 5 Biotelemetry capsule in the body shown on two X-ray films.
RESULTS

The laboratory testing data provided by the authorised institutes are shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6. The gauge data in the tables were readings shown by the monitoring system.

Table 4 Pressure data.
PressureGauge data
(kPa)
(mmHg)
Up
Down
Up
Down
-8-60-59.6-60-60.4-60.7
-4-30-29.3-28.9-30.4-30.6
0001.2-0.4-0.4
5.33403840.43839.3
10.67807980.77979.8
16120121.2121.8120.8121.2
21.33160161.7162.5159.9160.9
26200200.8199.8199.8199.8
Table 5 Temperature data.
Temperature (°C)Gauge data
3434.02
3635.91
3838.03
4040.06
4242.11
Table 6 pH data.
pHGauge data
12345
44.44.34.34.34.4
6.866.76.76.86.76.7
9.189.29.39.39.29.3

In 7 clinical experiments, all biotelemetry capsules could be swallowed without any difficulties. The data recorder could receive the RF signals transmitted by the biotelemetry in the body throughout the experiment. All biotelemetry capsules could pass out from the body without difficulties (Table 3). No break was found in all biotelemetry capsules in the surface test after they passed out from the body. No discomfort was reported by any volunteer during the experiment. A sample of pressure and temperature plot of clinical experiments is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Pressure and Temperature plots.
DISCUSSION

In vitro and in vivo tests verified the feasibility and functionality of the monitoring system. By means of micro sensors and wireless communication, this system could provide a non-invasive and direct method to measure and monitor gastrointestinal parameters. Intralumen pressure is an important parameter of gastrointestinal motility. Exposure to extreme weather or physical work conditions could lead to dangerous core temperature changes and clinical syndromes accompanying them. Core temperature measurement is the main tool for diagnosing these syndromes[25]. Intragastric pH value has been verified to be a standard indicator of duodenogastric reflux[26, 27]. There is a direct correlation between other diseases and gastrointestinal pH value[28,29]. This method could not only avoid discomforts and even great pains caused by conventional methods, but also give physicians the possibility to study multi-parameters of the entire gastrointestinal tract and to better diagnose gastrointestinal disorders. Although capsule endoscopy has been invented recently[30], it could not monitor a 24-h motility and other parameters which are quantitative indexes of gastrointestinal motility and other diseases.

The biotelemetry capsule system can be used to monitor a 24-h pH value for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease with proper improvement, and to evaluate the recovery state of patients after gastrointestinal operation.

Footnotes

Edited by Wang XL and Kumar M

References
1.  Camilleri M. Disorders of gastrointestinal motility in neurologic diseases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990;65:825-846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Mathias JR, Sninsky CA, Millar HD, Clench MH, Davis RH. Development of an improved multi-pressure-sensor probe for recording muscle contraction in human intestine. Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30:119-123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Zhou L, Ke MY.  Textbook of gastrointestinal motility: Basic and clinical aspacts. Beijing: Science Press 1999; 369-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Powell AK, Fida R, Bywater RA. Motility in the isolated mouse colon: migrating motor complexes, myoelectric complexes and pressure waves. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:257-266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Martinez-de-Juan JL, Saiz J, Meseguer M, Ponce JL. Small bowel motility: relationship between smooth muscle contraction and electroenterogram signal. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22:189-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Van Schelven LJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Akkermans LM. Automated, quantitative analysis of interdigestive small intestinal myoelectric activity in rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:15-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Meseguer Anastasio MF, Ponce Marco JL, Martínez de Juan JL, Silvestre J, Saiz J. Relation between the bowel electromyogram and the intestinal pressure wave. An experimental study in dogs. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2001;93:779-793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Tomomasa T, Morikawa A, Sandler RH, Mansy HA, Koneko H, Masahiko T, Hyman PE, Itoh Z. Gastrointestinal sounds and migrating motor complex in fasted humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:374-381.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Liatsos C, Hadjileontiadis LJ, Mavrogiannis C, Patch D, Panas SM, Burroughs AK. Bowel sounds analysis: a novel noninvasive method for diagnosis of small-volume ascites. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48:1630-1636.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Mansy HA, Sandler RH. Detection and analysis of gastrointestinal sounds in normal and small bowel obstructed rats. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38:42-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Craine BL, Silpa ML, O'Toole CJ. Two-dimensional positional mapping of gastrointestinal sounds in control and functional bowel syndrome patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:1290-1296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Lee CH, Lee WT, Chen SL, Chen TM, Wang HJ, Yieh C, Chou TD. Evaluation of gastric emptying with radio-opaque marker in major burned patients. J Med Sci. 2003;23:151-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Kosch O, Osmanoglou E, Hartman V, Strenzke A, Weitschies W, Wiedenmann B, Mönnikes H, Trahms L. Investigation of gastrointestinal transport by magnetic marker localization. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002;47 Suppl 1 Pt 2:506-509.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Prakash NM, Brown MC, Spelman FA, Nelson JA, Read P, Heitkemper MM, Tobin RW, Pope CE. Magnetic field goniometry: a new method to measure the frequency of stomach contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1735-1740.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Andrä W, Danan H, Kirmsse W, Kramer HH, Saupe P, Schmieg R, Bellemann ME. A novel method for real-time magnetic marker monitoring in the gastrointestinal tract. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3081-3093.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Weitschies W, Cardini D, Karaus M, Trahms L, Semmler W. Magnetic marker monitoring of esophageal, gastric and duodenal transit of non-disintegrating capsules. Pharmazie. 1999;54:426-430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Weitschies W, Karaus M, Cordini D, Trahms L, Breitkreutz J, Semmler W. Magnetic marker monitoring of disintegrating capsules. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;13:411-416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  An YJ, Lee H, Chang D, Lee Y, Sung JK, Choi M, Yoon J. Application of pulsed Doppler ultrasound for the evaluation of small intestinal motility in dogs. J Vet Sci. 2001;2:71-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Wedmann B, Adamek RJ, Wegener M. Ultrasound detection of gastric antrum motility--evaluating a simple semiquantitative method. Ultraschall Med. 1995;16:124-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Huang CK, Chen GH, Nain HM, Wahn JR, Cheng YP, Chang CS, Liu JH, Ho KS. Use of real-time ultrasound for detection of gastric motility. Zhonghua YiXue ZaZhi (Taipei). 1995;55:137-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Wang W, Yan G, Ding G. A miniature bidirectional RF communication system for micro gastrointestinal robots. J Med Eng Technol. 2003;27:160-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Scanlon WG, Burns JB, Evans NE. Radiowave propagation from a tissue-implanted source at 418 MHz and 916.5 MHz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47:527-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 112]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Chirwa LC, Hammond PA, Roy S, Cumming DR. Electromagnetic radiation from ingested sources in the human intestine between 150 MHz and 1.2 GHz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50:484-492.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 144]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 143]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Scanlon WG, Evans NE, McCreesh ZM. RF performance of a 418-MHz radio telemeter packaged for human vaginal placement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44:427-430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Rav-Acha M, Heled Y, Slypher N, Moran DS. Core body temperature monitoring using the telemetric pill. Harefuah. 2003;142:197-202, 238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA, Stein HJ, Barlow AP, Gupta NC. Computerized identification of pathologic duodenogastric reflux using 24-hour gastric pH monitoring. Ann Surg. 1991;213:13-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Fuchs KH, Fein M, Maroske J, Heimbucher J, Freys SM. The role of 24-hr gastric pH-monitoring in the interpretation of 24-hr gastric bile monitoring for duodenogastric reflux. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:60-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Fallingborg J. Intraluminal pH of the human gastrointestinal tract. Dan Med Bull. 1999;46:183-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Press AG, Hauptmann IA, Hauptmann L, Fuchs B, Fuchs M, Ewe K, Ramadori G. Gastrointestinal pH profiles in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:673-678.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 162]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000;405:417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1994]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1297]  [Article Influence: 54.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]