Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2025; 31(24): 105823
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i24.105823
Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of gastric filling score. A: Score 5. Smooth gastric mucosa without folds; B: Score 4. The height of mucosal folds was lower than the distance between the adjacent mucosal folds at greater gastric curvature; C: Score 3. The height of mucosal folds was roughly equivalent to the distance between the adjacent mucosal folds; D: Score 2. The height of mucosal folds is greater than the distance between the adjacent mucosal folds; E: Score 1. Gastric mucosa between folds was hard to observe.
Figure 2
Figure 2  CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The images of focal lesions. A: Gastric polyp; B: Gastric ulcer; C: Gastric submucosal mass; D: Gastric diverticulum; E: Small bowel polyp; F: Small bowel ulcer; G: Intestinal lymphangiectasia; H: Intestinal vascular malformation.