Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2015; 21(45): 12954-12962
Published online Dec 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12954
Figure 1
Figure 1 Regimens of hybrid therapy, reverse hybrid therapy and other first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori therapies (standard triple therapy, sequential therapy, and concomitant therapy). Standard hybrid therapy consists of a proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin for 10-14 d, with addition of clarithromycin and metronidazole for the final 7 d; reverse hybrid therapy consists of a proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin for 10-14 d, with addition of clarithromycin and metronidazole for the initial 7 d. PPI: Proton pump inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Identification of eligible articles or abstracts.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot of hybrid therapy vs sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication; Estimates of odds ratio defined with the random effect model with 95%CI using intention-to-treat analysis. The hybrid therapy was more effective than sequential therapy in the non-Italian population (relative risk = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.01-1.18). In contrast, the hybrid therapy was less effective than sequential therapy in the Italian population (relative risk = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.83-0.98).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot of hybrid therapy vs concomitant therapy according to intention-to-treat analysis. There is no significant difference in eradication rate between 14-d hybrid therapy and 5 to 14-d concomitant therapy with the pooled relative risk is 0.98 (95%CI: 0.93-1.02).