Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2011; 17(30): 3538-3543
Published online Aug 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i30.3538
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 Flow diagram of included and excluded trials.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Forest plot of meta-analysis of propofol vs traditional sedative agents in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure duration. IV: Inverse variance; TS: Traditional sedation.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Forest plot of meta-analysis of propofol vs traditional sedative agents in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography recovery time. IV: Inverse variance; TS: Traditional sedation.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Forest plot of meta-analysis of propofol vs traditional sedative agents in occurrence of hypotension during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; TS: Traditional sedation.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Forest plot of meta-analysis of propofol vs traditional sedative agents in occurrence of hypoxia during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; TS: Traditional sedation.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 Funnel plot of trials of propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. OR: Odds ratio.