Propofol vs traditional sedative agents for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i30.3538

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 30

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3770)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

348

HTML

3114

Figures (1-6)

146

Tables (1-1)

162

Sum=3770

Aug 14, 2011 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (29)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2011; 17(30): 3538-3543
Published online Aug 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i30.3538

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot of meta-analysis of propofol vs traditional sedative agents in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure duration. IV: Inverse variance; TS: Traditional sedation.

Citation: Bo LL, Bai Y, Bian JJ, Wen PS, Li JB, Deng XM. Propofol vs traditional sedative agents for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(30): 3538-3543
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i30/3538.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i30.3538