Original Article
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2009; 15(45): 5674-5684
Published online Dec 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5674
Figure 1
Figure 1 Urinary excretion patterns of 2Py and N1-methylnicotinamide in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. A and B: Representative HPLC chromatograms of urinary excretions of 2Py (indicated by arrow) and N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN) of a non-diabetic (Aa and Ba) and a diabetic (Ab and Bb) subject, before and after 100 mg nicotinamide loading at 7:00 am Urine samples taken at given time were normalized to equal volumes before HPLC analysis; C and D: Summaries of the results from the measurements shown in A and B, respectively. Bar graphs indicate mean ± SD.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Plasma N1-methylnicotinamide levels of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects after nicotinamide loading. A: Representative HPLC chromatograms of plasma N1-methylnicotinamide levels from a non-diabetic (a, b) and a diabetic (c, d) subject before (a, c) and 5 h after (b, d) 100 mg nicotinamide loading. 1: N1-methylnicotinamide; 2: Internal standard: N1-methylnicotinamide; B: Summary of the results from the measurements shown in A. Bar graph indicates mean ± SD.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Effects of nicotinamide and N1-methylnicotinamide on glucose metabolism of rats. A: Changes in blood glucose, muscle glycogen, plasma insulin and plasma N1-methylnicotinamide in rats treated with or without cumulative nicotinamide (0.5 or 2 g/kg) after glucose loading; B: Comparable effects of cumulative N1-methylnicotinamide (0.5 or 2 g/kg). NM: Nicotinamide; NMN: N1-methylnicotinamide. aP < 0.05 vs control, bP < 0.01 vs control, dP < 0.001 vs control. Bar graphs show mean ± SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Effects of N1-methylnicotinamide on H2O2 generation and NAD levels. A, B: Cumulative effects of nicotinamide (NM, 0.5 or 2 g/kg) and N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN, 0.5 or 2 g/kg) on rat plasma H2O2 levels; C: H2O2 concentrations in the supernatant of cultured human erythrocytes with or without 3 h exposure to different concentrations of NMN. For each concentration, n = 4; D, E: NAD (NAD+ and NADH) contents in muscle (D) and liver (E) of rats treated with saline (control) or a cumulative dose of 2 g/kg NMN; F: NAD and NADH contents and NAD/NADH ratio in the erythrocytes (RBCs) of rats with or without cumulative exposure to NMN; G: NAD and NADH contents, and NAD/NADH ratio in human RBCs with (n = 4) or without (control, n = 4) 4 h exposure to 10 μmol/L NMN in vitro. aP < 0.05 vs control, bP < 0.01 vs control. Bar graphs indicate mean ± SD.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Effects of aldehyde oxidase (AOX) inhibitors on plasma N1-methylnicotinamide levels and glucose metabolism in rats. A and B: Plasma N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN) levels 5 h after nicotinamide load (100 mg/kg, ip) in rats treated with or without AOX inhibitors tamoxifen (Tam, A) or olanzapine (Olan, B) (each group, n = 6). aP < 0.05 vs control, bP < 0.01 vs control; C: Liver AOX expression in rats with or without 7 wk tamoxifen treatment. The blot is representative of four independent experiments; D: Responses to a glucose tolerance test in rats after 9 wk treatment with tamoxifen with or without NMN (100 mg/kg per day) treatment in the last 2 wk. FBG: Fasting blood glucose; GTT (1 h): Blood glucose measured 1 h after glucose tolerance test. bP < 0.01 vs control. Bar graph indicates mean ± SD.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Role of skin in nicotinamide metabolism and insulin resistance. A: Representative HPLC chromatograms showing changes of sweat nicotinamide (NM) and N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN) concentrations in a subject before and 1, 2 and 3 h after 100 mg nicotinamide loading. 1 and 2 in Aa are NM and internal standard N1-ethylnicotinamide, respectively; 1 and 2 in Ab are NMN and internal standard N1-ethylnicotinamide, respectively; B: Summary of the measurements shown in A. bP < 0.0001 vs control; C: Comparison of plasma NMN and insulin levels, muscle and liver glycogen contents, and blood glucose between sham-burn (n = 7) and burn (n = 11) rats after glucose load. FBG: Fasting blood glucose; GTT: Blood glucose 1 h after glucose injection. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. cP < 0.05, dP < 0.01 vs control.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Proposed model of the role of nicotinamide overload in the development of type 2 diabetes. Normally, if nicotinamide intake is slightly more than the body needs, excess nicotinamide will be detoxified rapidly and eliminated mainly via the N1-methylnicotinamide to 2Py pathway, which involves liver and skin functions (left). Frequent excess nicotinamide intake, low N1-methylnicotinamide detoxification, or sweat gland inactivity induces a substantial rise in plasma N1-methylnicotinamide concentrations and residence time after each meal, and consequently induces oxidative stress and insulin resistance (right). The change trends are indicated by red arrows or line thickness.