Basic Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 1, 2004; 10(1): 91-95
Published online Jan 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i1.91
Figure 1
Figure 1 Typical HE staining. The bar is 100 μm. A, B: the lungs from control of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice; C, D: the lungs from 750 mg/kg DMAA group of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice. Arrows in-dicate atelectasis and hemorrhage.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Typical HE staining. The bar is 100 μm. A, B: the livers from control of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice; C, D: the livers from 750 mg/kg DMAA group of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice. The arrows indicate necrosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Typical HE staining. The bar is 100 μm. A, B: the kidneys from control of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice; C, D: the kid-neys from 750 mg/kg DMAA group of MT-/-and MT+/+ mice. The arrows indicate the swelling of glomerulus and the surrounding tubular tissue and urinary space compression.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Apoptosis in lungs of MT+/+ and MT-/- mice detected by TUNEL twenty-four hours after oral DMAA treatment. A: Typical apoptotic cells in alveolar area of MT-/- mice at a dose of 188 mg/kg body weight. Brown staining indicates the apoptotic cells. The bar is 20 μm. B: Typical apoptotic cells in bronchial area of MT-/- mice at a dose of 188 mg/kg body weight. Brown staining indicates apoptotic cells. The bar is 20 μm. C: AI in alveolar area. D: AI in bronchial area. All the values were expressed as -χ±s. ANOVA with subsequent post hoc’s test was performed for comparison of AI. a,bSignificant difference at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 when compared with the corresponding control group. c,dSignificant difference at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 when com-pared with the dose-matched MT-/- mice group.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Apoptosis in livers of MT+/+ and MT-/- mice detected by TUNEL twenty-four hours after oral DMAA treatment. A: Typical apoptotic cells in the liver of MT-/- mice at a dose of 188 mg/kg body weight. Brown staining indicates apoptotic cells. The bar is 20 μm. B. AI in the livers. All values were ex-pressed as -χ±s. ANOVA with subsequent post hoc’s test was performed for comparison of AI. a, bSignificant difference at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 when compared with the corresponding control group. c,dSignificant difference at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 when com-pared with the dose-matched MT-/- mice group.
Figure 6
Figure 6 MT concentration in livers of MT+/+ mice detected by radio-immunoassay. All the values were expressed as -χ±s. ANOVA with subsequent post hoc’s test was performed for comparison of AI. bSignificant difference at P < 0.01 when com-pared with the corresponding control group.