Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review
Igor Braga Ribeiro, Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior, Antonio Afonso Miranda Neto, Igor Mendonça Proença, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata, Edson Ide, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Gustavo de Oliveira Luz, Sergio Eiji Matuguma, Spencer Cheng, Renato Baracat, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
Author contributions: Ribeiro IB performed the acquisition of data, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting the article, revising the article, final approval; do Monte Junior ES, Miranda Neto AA, Proença IM, de Moura DTH, and Minata MK conducted data analysis and interpretation, revised the article, and final approval; Ide E, and de Moura EGH conducted data analysis and interpretation, drafted the article, and final approval; dos Santos MEL, Matuguma SE, Cheng S, and Baracat R revised, edited and drafted the article, and final approval.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. Moura reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Olympus, outside the submitted work.
: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Igor Braga Ribeiro, MD, Research Scientist, Surgeon, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 225, 6o andar, bloco 3, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil. email@example.com
Received: December 10, 2020
Peer-review started: December 10, 2020
First decision: January 27, 2021
Revised: January 30, 2021
Accepted: March 18, 2021
Article in press: March 18, 2021
Published online: May 28, 2021