Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2013; 19(37): 6199-6206
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199
SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: High risk of migration in the covered stent group
Oliver Waidmann, Jörg Trojan, Mireen Friedrich-Rust, Christoph Sarrazin, Wolf Otto Bechstein, Frank Ulrich, Stefan Zeuzem, Jörg Gerhard Albert
Oliver Waidmann, Jörg Trojan, Mireen Friedrich-Rust, Christoph Sarrazin, Stefan Zeuzem, Jörg Gerhard Albert, Medizinische Klinik 1, Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, D-60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Wolf Otto Bechstein, Frank Ulrich, Klinik für Allgemein und Viszeralchirurgie Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, D-60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Author contributions: Waidmann O and Albert JG designed the research; Waidmann O, Trojan J, Friedrich-Rust M, Sarrazin C, and Albert JG performed the research; Waidmann O, Bechstein WO, Ulrich F, Zeuzem S, and Albert JG analyzed the data; Waidmann O and Albert JG wrote the paper; all authors finally approved the version to be published.
Correspondence to: Dr. Jörg Gerhard Albert, Medizinische Klinik 1, Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. j.albert@med.uni-frankfurt.de
Telephone: +49-69-63015297 Fax: +49-69-63016247
Received: March 19, 2013
Revised: April 20, 2013
Accepted: June 8, 2013
Published online: October 7, 2013
Core Tip

Core tip: Gastrointestinal obstruction is a complication of advanced cancer disease. It heavily impacts on patients’ general condition. Endoscopic implantation of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) is a safe and established procedure for palliative treatment of tumor obstruction. Covered SEMS are considered favorable concerning reobstruction by inhibiting tumor ingrowth. In contrast, uncovered SEMS might harbor a lower risk of migration and dislocation. In the present study covered SEMS were retrospectively compared with uncovered SEMS in patients with small bowel or duodenal obstruction. Significantly higher migration rates were observed in the covered SEMS group without observing significant increase of the rate of patients with tumor ingrowth indicating that uncovered SEMS should be favored for palliative treatment of tumor obstruction of the duodenum or the small bowel.