Viral Hepatitis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2002. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2002; 8(4): 699-702
Published online Aug 15, 2002. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i4.699
Detection of enteroviruses and hepatitis a virus in water by consensus primer multiplex RT-PCR
Jun-Wen Li, Xin-Wei Wang, Chang-Qing Yuan, Jin-Lai Zheng, Min Jin, Nong Song, Xiu-Quan Shi, Fu-Huan Chao
Jun-Wen Li, Xin-Wei Wang, Chang-Qing Yuan, Jin-Lai Zheng, Min Jin, Nong Song, Xiu-Quan Shi, Fu-Huan Chao, Department of Environment and Health, Institute of Health and Environmental Medicine of Tianjin, 1 Da Li Road, Tianjin 300050, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by Natural Science Foundation of China, No.39570609
Correspondence to: Dr. Jun-Wen Li, Department of Environment and Health, Institute of Health and Environmental Medicine of Tjianjin, 1 Da Li Road, Tianjin 300050, China. junwenli@eyou.com
Telephone: +86-22-84655345 Fax: +86-22-23328809
Received: January 28, 2002
Revised: March 10, 2002
Accepted: March 14, 2002
Published online: August 15, 2002
Abstract

AIM: To develop a rapid detection method of enteroviruses and Hepatitis A virus (HAV).

METHODS: A one-step, single-tube consensus primers multiplex RT-PCR was developed to simultaneously detect Poliovirus, Coxsackie virus, Echovirus and HAV. A general upstream primer and a HAV primer and four different sets of primers (5 primers) specific for Poliovirus, Coxsacki evirus, Echovirus and HAV cDNA were mixed in the PCR mixture to reverse transcript and amplify the target DNA. Four distinct amplified DNA segments representing Poliovirus, Coxsackie virus, Echovirus and HAV were identified by gel electrophoresis as 589-, 671-, 1084-, and 1128 bp sequences, respectively. Semi-nested PCR was used to confirm the amplified products for each enterovirus and HAV.

RESULTS: All four kinds of viral genome RNA were detected, and producing four bands which could be differentiated by the band size on the gel. To confirm the specificity of the multiplex PCR products, semi-nested PCR was performed. For all the four strains tested gave positive results. The detection sensitivity of multiplex PCR was similar to that of monoplex RT-PCR which was 24 PFU for Poliovrus, 21 PFU for Coxsackie virus, 60 PFU for Echovirus and 105 TCID50 for HAV. The minimum amount of enteric viral RNA detected by semi-nested PCR was equivalent to 2.4 PFU for Poliovrus, 2.1 PFU for Coxsackie virus, 6.0 PFU for Echovirus and 10.5 TCID50 for HAV.

CONCLUSION: The consensus primers multiplex RT-PCR has more advantages over monoplex RT-PCR for enteric viruses detection, namely, the rapid turnaround time and cost effectiveness.

Keywords: $[Keywords]