Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2013; 19(11): 1770-1777
Published online Mar 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1770
Psychosocial factors and their association with reflux oesophagitis, Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Paul Denver, Michael Donnelly, Liam J Murray, Lesley A Anderson
Paul Denver, Michael Donnelly, Liam J Murray, Lesley A Anderson, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Murray LJ was the PI of the FINBAR study; Anderson LA was the project co-ordinator for the FINBAR Study; Donnelly M conceptualised and designed the sub-study of psychological factors including their assessment and supported by Donnelly M; Anderson LA supervised the analysis and write-up of results undertaken by Denver P. All authors contributed to the writing and production of the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Lesley A Anderson, PhD, Lecturer in Epidemiology, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. l.anderson@qub.ac.uk
Telephone: +44-28-90632315 Fax: +44-28-90248017
Received: September 18, 2012
Revised: October 25, 2012
Accepted: November 14, 2012
Published online: March 21, 2013
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the role of psychological characteristics as risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), as well as the reflux-mediated precursor pathway.

METHODS: An all-Ireland population-based case-control study recruited 230 reflux oesophagitis (RO), 224 Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) and 227 OAC patients and 260 controls. Each case/control group completed measures of stress, depression, self-efficacy, self-esteem, repression and social support. A comparative analysis was undertaken using polytomous logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS: Compared to controls, OAC patients were almost half as likely to report high stress levels over their lifetime (P = 0.010, OR 0.51; 95%CI: 0.29-0.90) and 36% less likely to report having experienced depression (OR 0.64; 95%CI: 0.42-0.98). RO patients reported significantly higher stress than controls particularly during middle- and senior-years (P for trends < 0.001). RO patients were 37% less likely to report having been highly emotionally repressed (OR 0.63; 95%CI: 0.41-0.95). All case groups (OAC, RO and BO) were more likely than controls to report having had substantial amounts of social support (OR 2.84; 95%CI: 1.63-4.97; OR 1.97; 95%CI: 1.13-3.44 and OR 1.83; 95%CI: 1.03-3.24, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The improved psychological profile of OAC patients may be explained by response shift. The role of psychological factors in the development of OAC requires further investigation.

Keywords: Reflux oesophagitis, Barrett’s oesophagus, Oesophageal adenocarcinoma, Adjustment, Psychological, Psychosocial factors