Published online Mar 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1185
Revised: January 5, 2011
Accepted: January 12, 2011
Published online: March 7, 2011
AIM: To investigate the utility of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay for the diagnosis of CMV gastrointestinal disease (GID).
METHODS: One hundred and thirty immunocompromised patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with a history of anti-CMV treatment and who had not undergone examination using the antigenemia assay were excluded. CMV-GID was defined as the detection of large cells with intranuclear inclusions alone or associated with granular cytoplasmic inclusions by biopsy. Biopsy sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemically stained with anti-CMV. We evaluated the association between CMV-GID and patient characteristics (symptoms, underlying disease, medication, leukocyte counts, and antigenemia assay). All patients were checked with an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test before endoscopic examination. White blood cell (WBC) counts were obtained from medical records within 1 wk of endoscopy. Leukopenia was defined as a total WBC count < 5000 cells/mm3. For HIV patients, we also checked CD4+ counts from medical records.
RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were retrospectively selected for analysis. Of the immunocompromised patients, 19 had malignant disease, 18 had autoimmune disease, 19 had disorders of biochemical homeostasis, three had undergone transplantation, and 45 had HIV infection. A total of 50 patients had received immunosuppressive therapy. No patients had inflammatory bowel disease. Fifty-five patients were diagnosed as having CMV-GID. Univariate analysis indicated an association between HIV infection, leukopenia, and positive antigenemia and CMV-GID (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that HIV infection and positive antigenemia were the only independent factors related to CMV-GID (P < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of antigenemia for CMV-GID were 65.4%, 93.6%, 91.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, patients with leukopenia displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Minimal differences in accuracy were seen among patients with or without leukopenia. HIV-infected patients displayed low sensitivity and high specificity. Accuracy barely differed between HIV-positive and -negative patients. In HIV-infected patients, CD4 count < 50 cells/μL resulted in low sensitivity and high specificity. Differences in accuracy among patients were minor, regardless of CD4 count. In patients who had undergone both quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigenemia assay, real-time PCR was slightly more accurate in terms of sensitivity than the antigenemia assay; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.312).
CONCLUSION: If the antigenemia test is positive, endoscopic lesions are acceptable for the diagnosis of CMV-GID without biopsy. The accuracy is not affected by HIV infection and leukopenia. Either PCR or the antigenemia assay are valid.