Editorial
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2010; 16(8): 915-920
Published online Feb 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.915
Computed tomographic colonography: Hope or hype?
Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin
Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin, Digestive Diseases Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98101, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
Author contributions: Lin OST wrote this editorial.
Correspondence to: Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin, MD, MSc, Digestive Diseases Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, United States. otto.lin@vmmc.org
Telephone: +1-206-6257373-67694 Fax: +1-206-2236379
Received: November 30, 2009
Revised: January 4, 2010
Accepted: January 11, 2010
Published online: February 28, 2010
Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a promising emerging technology for imaging of the colon. This concise review discusses the currently available data on CTC technique, test characteristics, acceptance, safety, cost-effectiveness, follow-up strategy, and extracolonic findings. In summary, CTC technique is still evolving, and further research is needed to clarify the role of automated colonic insufflation, smooth-muscle relaxants, intravenous and oral contrast, software rendering, and patient positioning. Currently, full bowel preparation is still required to achieve optimal results. The sensitivity for detecting large polyps (> 1 cm) can be as high as 85%, with specificity of up to 97%. These test characteristics are almost comparable to those of conventional colonoscopy. Patient acceptance of CTC is generally higher than that for colonoscopy, especially in patients who have never undergone either procedure. CTC is generally safe, although uncommon instances of colonic perforation have been documented. In terms of cost-effectiveness, most decision analyses have concluded that CTC would only be cost-effective if it were considerably cheaper than conventional colonoscopy. The proper follow-up strategy for small polyps or incidental extracolonic findings discovered during CTC is still under debate. At present, the exact clinical role of virtual colonoscopy still awaits determination. Even though widespread CTC screening is not available today, in the future there may eventually be a role for this technology. Technological advances in this area will undoubtedly continue, with multi-detector row CT scanners allowing thinner collimation and higher resolution images. Stool-tagging techniques are likely to evolve and may eventually allow for low-preparation CTC. Perceptual and fatigue-related reading errors can potentially be minimized with the help of computer-aided detection software. Further research will define the exact role of this promising technology in our diagnostic armamentarium.

Keywords: Computed tomographic colonography, Colonoscopy, Colonic neoplasms, Cancer screening, Colonic polyps