Brief Article
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2009; 15(6): 727-731
Published online Feb 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.727
Usefulness of anti-ulcer drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcers induced by low doses of aspirin
Sayaka Nakashima, Shinichi Ota, Shin Arai, Kiyoko Yoshino, Mie Inao, Keiko Ishikawa, Nobuaki Nakayama, Yukinori Imai, Sumiko Nagoshi, Satoshi Mochida
Sayaka Nakashima, Shinichi Ota, Shin Arai, Kiyoko Yoshino, Mie Inao, Keiko Ishikawa, Nobuaki Nakayama, Yukinori Imai, Sumiko Nagoshi, Satoshi Mochida, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
Author contributions: Ota S designed the research; Nakashima S and Yoshino K performed the research; Nakashima S, Yoshino K, Arai S, Ota S and Mochida S analyzed the data; Nakashima S wrote the manuscript; Inao M, Ishikawa K, Nakayama N, Imai Y and Nagoshi S gave suggestions for the descriptions; Mochida S completed the paper; All authors participated in the treatment of patients.
Correspondence to: Satoshi Mochida, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama-cho, Iruma-gun, Saitama 350-0495, Japan. smochida@saitama-med.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-49-2761198
Fax: +81-49-2761198
Received: October 29, 2008
Revised: January 5, 2009
Accepted: January 12, 2009
Published online: February 14, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the usefulness of anti-ulcer drugs for the prevention and treatment of low-dose aspirin-induced peptic ulcer.

METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in 68 patients receiving daily low-dose aspirin (81 or 100 mg/day). The endoscopic findings were classified according to the Lanza score, and the scores were compared between groups categorized according to the concomitant use of anti-ulcer drugs and the types of drugs used. In another study, 31 hemorrhagic peptic ulcer patients who had been receiving low-dose aspirin were enrolled. The patients were randomly classified into the proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-treated group and the H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA)-treated group. The administration of low-dose aspirin was continued concomitantly, and endoscopic examinations were performed 8 wk later.

RESULTS: The Lanza scores (mean ± SD) of the gastro-mucosal lesions were 1.0 ± 1.9 and 1.9 ± 2.3 in 8 and 16 patients receiving prevention therapy with a PPI and an H2RA, respectively. Both scores were significantly smaller than the scores in 34 patients who were not receiving prevention therapy (4.7 ± 1.0) and in 10 patients receiving cytoprotective anti-ulcer drugs (4.3 ± 1.6). In the prospective study, 18 and 13 patients received a PPI and an H2RA, respectively. Endoscopic examinations revealed that the tissue in the region of the gastro-mucosal lesions had reverted to normal in all patients in the PPI-treated group and in 12 patients (92%) in the H2RA-treated group; no significant differences were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION: H2RA therapy was effective for both the prevention and treatment of low-dose aspirin-induced peptic ulcer, similar to the effects of PPIs, while cytoprotective anti-ulcer drugs were ineffective in preventing ulceration.

Keywords: Hemorrhagic ulcer, H2 receptor Antagonist, Low-dose aspirin, Peptic ulcer, Proton pump inhibitor