Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2008; 14(6): 931-935
Published online Feb 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.931
Psychological intervention reduces postembolization pain during hepatic arterial chemoembolization therapy: A complementary approach to drug analgesia
Zi-Xuan Wang, Si-Liang Liu, Chun-Hui Sun, Qian Wang
Zi-Xuan Wang, Department of Interventional Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
Si-Liang Liu, Qian Wang, Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
Chun-Hui Sun, Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao 3rd People’s Hospital, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
Author contributions: Wang ZX designed the research; Wang ZX, Liu SL, Sun CH, and Wang Q performed the research; Liu SL, and Sun CH analyzed the data; and Wang ZX wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Zi-Xuan Wang, Department of Interventional Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, 1 Jiaozhou Rd, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China. prince_room@sina.com
Telephone: +86-532-82789228
Fax: +86-532-82836421
Received: November 22, 2007
Revised: January 1, 2008
Published online: February 14, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To assess whether psychological intervention reduces postembolization pain during hepatic arterial chemoembolization therapy.

METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-two patients, who required hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatic malignancy and postembolization pain, were randomized into control group (n = 46, receiving medication) and intervention group (n = 216, receiving psychological intervention and medication in turn). The symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90) was used to scale the psychological symptoms of the patients before operation. Pain was scored with a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS-10) before and after analgesia as well as after psychological intervention (only in intervention group).

RESULTS: All psychological symptomatic scores measured with SCL-90 in the intervention group were higher than the normal range in Chinese (P < 0.05). The somatization, phobia and anxiety symptomatic scores were associated with pain numerical rating score before analgesia (r = 0.141, 0.157 and 0.192, respectively, P < 0.05). Patients in both groups experienced pain relief after medication, psychotherapy or psychotherapy combined with medication during the procedure (P < 0.01). Only some patients in the intervention group reported partial or entire pain relief (29.17% and 2.31%) after psychological intervention. The pain score after analgesia in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: Severe psychological distress occurs in patients with hepatic malignancy. Psychological intervention reduces pain scores significantly during hepatic arterial chemoembolization therapy and is thus, highly recommended as a complementary approach to drug analgesia.

Keywords: Liver neoplasms, Radiology, Psychological intervention, Non-pharmacologica, Pain