Published online Jun 7, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i21.2992
Revised: March 1, 2007
Accepted: March 8, 2007
Published online: June 7, 2007
AIM: To investigate the dynamic changes and signi-ficance of platelet activating factor receptor (PAF-R) mRNA and protein in pancreatic tissues of rats with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and effects of BN52021 (Ginkgolide B).
METHODS: Wistar male rats were randomly assigned to the negative control group (NC group), SAP model group (SAP group), and BN52051-remedy group (BN group), and each of the groups was divided into 6 subgroups at different time points after operation (1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h) (n = 10 in each). PT-PCR and Western blot methods were used to detect PAF-RmRNA and protein expression in pancreatic tissues of rats respectively. Pathological examination of pancreatic tissues was performed and the serum amylase change was detected.
RESULTS: Serum amylase and pathological results showed the that SAP model was successfully prepared, BN52021 was able to decrease serum amylase, and the pathological ratings in BN group at 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h significantly decreased compared with those in the SAP group (8.85 ± 0.39 vs 5.95 ± 0.19, 9.15 ± 0.55 vs 5.55 ± 0.36, 10.10 ± 0.65 vs 6.72 ± 0.30, P < 0.05). The result of PAF-mRNA showed dynamic changes in SAP and BN groups, which increased gradually in early stage, reached a peak at 3 h (0.71 ± 0.14 vs 0.54 ± 0.14, 0.69 ± 0.13 vs 0.59 ± 0.04, P < 0.05), and decreased gradually later. There were significant differences at each time point except 1 h and 2 h, when compared with those in the NC group (0.71 ± 0.14 or 0.69 ± 0.13 vs 0.47 ± 0.10, 0.38 ± 0.08 or 0.59 ± 0.04 vs 0.47 ± 0.09, 0.25 ± 0.07 or 0.29 ± 0.05 vs 0.46 ± 0.10, 0.20 ± 0.06 or 0.20 ± 0.04 vs 0.43 ± 0.09, P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between BN and SAP groups at each time point. The result of PAF-R protein showed that the change of PAF-R protein in the SAP group and the BN group was consistent with that of PAF-R mRNA. There were significant differences at each time point except 1 h, when compared with those in the NC group (0.90 ± 0.02 or 0.80 ± 0.05 vs 0.48 ± 0.02, 1.69 ± 0.06 or 1.58 ± 0.02 vs 0.48 ± 0.03, 1.12 ± 0.10 or 0.98 ± 0.03 vs 0.49 ± 0.09, 1.04 ± 0.14 or 0.87 ± 0.02 vs 0.52 ± 0.08, 0.97 ± 0.16 or 0.90 ± 0.05 vs 0.49 ± 0.10, P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between the BN group and the SAP group.
CONCLUSION: PAF-R plays an important role in occurrence and development of SAP. BN52021 exerts biological effects through competitively inhibiting the binding of increased both PAF and PAF-R expression rather than through decreasing PAF-R expression in pancreatic tissues.