Frontier
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2016; 22(2): 471-489
Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.471
Table 1 Completed randomized Phase II and Phase III trials
TargetAgentsName of trial and settingPhaseNumber of patientsPFS (mo)P valueOS (mo)P valueResults
HER-2Fluoropyrimide/cisplain + Trastuzumab vs Fluoropyrimide/cisplainToGA, First lineIII5946.7 vs 5·5< 0.00113.8 vs 11.10.004PFS and OS was improved
HER-2Lapatinib plus once-per-week paclitaxel vs paclitaxelTYTAN, Second lineIII2615.4 vs 4.40.85011.0 vs 8.90.104No effect on PFS and OS
HER-2Cap/Ox plus lapatinib or Cap/Ox plus placeboLOGiC, First lineIII5456.0 vs 5.40.10012.2 vs 10.50.350No effect on PFS and OS
EGFRCisplatin and capecitabine + cetuximab vs cisplatin and capecitabineEXPAND, First lineIII9044.4 vs 5.60.3209·4 vs 10.70.950No effect on PFS and OS
EGFRmEOC plus panitumumab vs EOCREAL, First lineIII5536.0 vs 7.40.0688·8 vs 11.30.013No effect on PFS and OS
VEGFBevacizumab plus cisp/cape/fluorouracil vs plc plus cisplatin/capecitabine/fluorouracilAVAGAST, First lineIII7746.7 vs 5.30.00312.1 vs 10.10.100PFS was improved, No effect on OS
VEGFRamucirumab vs placeboREGARD, Second lineIII3552.1 vs 1.3< 0.0015.2 vs 3.80.047PFS and OS was improved
VEGFRamucirumab plus paclitaxel vs placebo plus paclitaxelRAINBOW, Second lineIII6654.4 vs 2.9< 0.0019.6 vs 7·40.017PFS and OS was improved
VEGFApatinib 850 mg vs apatinib 425 vs placeboNN, Third lineII1443.67 vs 3.20 vs 1.40< 0.0014.83 vs 4.27 vs 2.50< 0.001PFS and OS was improved
METRilotumumab 15 mg/kg per rilotumumab 7.5 mg/kg, or placebo plus ECXNN, First lineII1215.1 vs 6.8 vs 4.20.0169.7 vs 11.1 vs 8.90.100PFS and OS was improved
m-TOREverolimus 10 mg vs placeboGRANITE, ≥ Second lineIII6561.7 vs 1.40.7805.4 vs 4.30.124No effect on PFS and OS
Table 2 Finished Phase II studies
TargetAgentsName of Trial and SettingPhaseNumber of patientsPFS (mo)OS (mo)Results
HER-2LapatinibS0413, First lineII471.94.8Positive
HER-2Lapatinib plus ECF or ECX vs placebo plus ECF or ECXEORTC 40071, First lineII287.1 vs 5.913.8 vs 10.1Negative1
HER-2MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor)S1005, Second lineII701.85.1Negative
Pan-HERSaracatinib (Src inhibitor)NN, ≥ Second lineII211.87.8Negative
Pan-HERDacomitinibNN, ≥ Second lineII272.17.1Positive
EGFRCetuximab plus mFOLFOX6NN, First lineII405.59.9Positive
EGFRCetuximab plus FOLFIRINN, First lineII499.016.5Positive
EGFRPanitumumab with dose dense DCFNN, First lineII524.89.4Positive
VEGFBevacizumab plus irinotecan and cisplatinNN, First lineII478.312.3Positive
VEGFBevacizumab plus docetaxel/oxaliplatinNN, First lineII386.611.1Positive
m-TOREverolimus 10 mgNN, ≥ Second lineII532.710.1Positive
Table 3 Ongoing Phase II and III studies
TargetAgentsTrial numberSettingPhasePrimary end pointStatus
HER-2Arm A: pertuzumab + trastuzumab + cisplatin + fluoropyrimidine vs Arm B: placebo + trastuzumab + cisplatin + fluoropyrimidineNCT01774786First lineIIIOSRecruiting
HER-2Arm A: Docetaxel or paclitaxelNCT01641939First lineII/IIIPhase II: Dose of TDM-1Recruiting
Arm B: T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 wk
Arm C: T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg once a weekPhase III: OS
HER-3Arm A: MM-111 + Paclitaxel + TrastuzumabNCT01774851≥ Second lineIIPFSActive, not recruiting
Arm B: Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab
METArm A: Rilotumumab 15 mg/kg plus ECXNCT01697072First lineIIIOSActive, not recruiting
Arm B: Placebo plus ECX
METArm A: onartuzumab plus mFOLFOX6NCT01662869First lineIIIOSActive, not recruiting
Aram B: placebo plus mFOLFOX6
CTLA4Arm A: IpilimumabNCT01585987MaintanenceIIPFSActive, not recruiting
Arm B: Best Supportive Care
PD-1Arm A: Nivolumab (ONO-4538)NCT02267343≥ Second lineIIIOSRecruiting
Arm B: Placebo