Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2022; 28(28): 3666-3681
Published online Jul 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3666
Table 2 Comparison of composition of drugs for treatment and disease states according to colonoscopy findings 2 and 5 yr after diagnosis before (group A) and after (group B) infliximab approval

Group A (n = 48)
Group B (n = 62)
P value
Maintenance treatment 2 year after diagnosis
None05 (8.1)0.045
5-Aminosalicylate47 (97.9)46 (74.2)0.001
Azathioprine43 (89.6)36 (58.1)0.001
Infliximab034 (54.8)< 0.001
Adalimumab00
Vedolizumab00
Ustekinumab 00
Tofacitinib00
Disease extent of Paris classification 2 years after diagnosis0.012b
Remission14 (29.2)31 (50.0)
E1 proctitis13 (27.1)11 (17.7)
E2 left colitis 2 (4.2)8 (12.9)
E3 right colitis6 (12.5)8 (12.9)
E4 pancolitis13 (27.1)4 (6.5)
Mayo endoscopic subscore 2 years after diagnosisa0.037b
0 normal or inactive15 (24.2)33 (53.2)
1 mild24 (50.0)21 (33.9)
2 moderate8 (16.7)8 (12.9)
3 severe1 (2.1)0
Group A (n = 24)Group B (n = 31)P value
Maintenance treatment 5 year after diagnosis
None2 (8.3)5 (16.1)0.394
5-aminosalicylate21 (87.5)15 (48.4)0.003
Azathioprine14 (58.3)14 (45.2)0.337
Infliximab018 (58.1)< 0.001
Adalimumab02 (6.5)
Vedolizumab01 (3.2)
Ustekinumab 00
Tofacitinib00
Disease extent of Paris classification 5 years after diagnosis0.016b
Remission3 (12.5)13 (41.9)
E1 proctitis9 (37.5)9 (29.0)
E2 left colitis 3 (12.5)4 (12.9)
E3 right colitis2 (8.3)2 (6.5)
E4 pancolitis7 (29.2)3 (9.7)
Mayo endoscopic subscore 5 years after diagnosisa< 0.001b
0 normal or inactive3 (12.5)13 (41.9)
1 mild6 (25.0)16 (51.6)
2 moderate14 (58.3)2 (6.5)
3 severe1 (4.2)0