Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2017; 23(37): 6845-6853
Published online Oct 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845
Published online Oct 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845
Table 5 Precision and reproducibility test results
| Sample Conc. (IU/mL) | 1.0×107 | 1.0×104 | 1.0×102 | |||||
| Tested Results Log10 (IU/mL) | Mean Value | CV | Mean Value | CV | Mean Value | CV | ||
| Intra assay precision1 | 6.97 | 0.23% | 4.06 | 1.10% | 2.29 | 3.10% | ||
| Inter assay precision | 1st Day2 | 6.94 | 0.91% | 4.19 | 1.82% | 2.26 | 3.79% | |
| 2nd Day2 | 6.95 | 1.04% | 4.31 | 1.49% | 2.41 | 3.25% | ||
| 3rd Day2 | 7.08 | 0.64% | 4.31 | 1.67% | 2.39 | 3.72% | ||
| 4th Day2 | 7.10 | 0.81% | 4.32 | 1.63% | 2.42 | 3.47% | ||
| Reproducibility3 | 7.02 | 1.36% | 4.28 | 2.08% | 2.37 | 4.41% | ||
- Citation: Li M, Chen L, Liu LM, Li YL, Li BA, Li B, Mao YL, Xia LF, Wang T, Liu YN, Li Z, Guo TS. Performance verification and comparison of TianLong automatic hypersensitive hepatitis B virus DNA quantification system with Roche CAP/CTM system. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(37): 6845-6853
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i37/6845.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845