Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2016; 22(25): 5790-5799
Published online Jul 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5790
Table 3 Differences of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence patterns according to the Milan criteria at transplantation n (%)
FactorsWithin Milan (n = 16)Beyond Milan (n = 38)P value
Recipient age147.4 ± 5.953.9 ± 8.10.005
Recipient sex, male13 (81.3)33 (86.8)0.682
Etiology, hepatitis B12 (75.0)34 (89.5)0.127
MELD score110.9 ± 9.112.0 ± 8.20.692
GRWR11.27 ± 0.201.28 ± 0.260.919
Pre-transplant locoregional treatment13 (81.3)35 (92.1)0.346
Tumor marker at transplantation
AFP1213.0 ± 371.8829.6 ± 2040.70.043
HCC characteristics at pathology
Number11.2 ± 0.62.9 ± 2.0< 0.001
Maximal tumor size12.33 ± 1.105.93 ± 4.41< 0.001
Microvascular invasion7 (50.0)23 (63.9)0.368
E-S grade III-IV6 (46.2)19 (54.3)0.616
Recurrent HCC patterns
Recurrence rates8.90%33.60%< 0.001
Time interval, median (mo) (LDLT-HCC recurrence)7.0 (1-150)6.0 (1-46)0.157
mean: 24.1 ± 39.5mean: 11.5 ± 11.9
Single or Multiple0.735
Single5 (31.3)9 (23.7)
Multiple11 (68.7)29 (76.3)
Recurrence site0.555
Intrahepatic5 (31.3)7 (18.4)
Extrahepatic10 (62.5)27 (71.1)
Both1 (6.3)4 (10.5)
Survival after HCC recurrence, median (mo)12.0 (3-122)8.0 (1-62)0.224
mean: 24.0 ± 33.5mean: 10.4 ± 10.5