Basic Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2016; 22(13): 3558-3563
Published online Apr 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3558
Novel and safer endoscopic cholecystectomy using only a flexible endoscope via single port
Hirohito Mori, Nobuya Kobayashi, Hideki Kobara, Noriko Nishiyama, Shintaro Fujihara, Taiga Chiyo, Maki Ayaki, Tsutomu Masaki, Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Kita, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
Hirohito Mori, Takashi Nagase, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ehime Rosai Hospital, Niihama, Ehime 792-8550, Japan
Author contributions: Mori H was responsible for conceiving the research and drafting the article; Kobayashi N, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Fujihara S, Chiyo T, Ayaki M, Nagase T participated equally in the work; Masaki T provided a critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content and was responsible for the final approval of the manuscript.
Institutional animal care and use committee statement: Animal experiments were performed in the Preclinical Animal Laboratory of Kagawa University, Japan. All experimental procedures were performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of animals as established by Kagawa University, Japan.
Conflict-of-interest statement: To the best of our knowledge, no conflict of interest exists.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Hirohito Mori, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kita, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan. hiro4884@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-87-8912156 Fax: +81-87-8912158
Received: October 11, 2015
Peer-review started: October 12, 2015
First decision: November 5, 2015
Revised: November 9, 2015
Accepted: December 14, 2015
Article in press: December 14, 2015
Published online: April 7, 2016
Processing time: 168 Days and 15.2 Hours

Abstract

AIM: To apply the laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery concept, we investigated whether endoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed more safely and rapidly via only 1 port or not.

METHODS: Two dogs (11 and 13-mo-old female Beagle) were used in this study. Only 1 blunt port was created, and a flexible endoscope with a tip attachment was inserted between the fundus of gallbladder and liver. After local injection of saline to the gallbladder bed, resection of the gallbladder bed from the liver was performed. After complete resection of the gallbladder bed, the gallbladder was pulled up to resect its neck using the Ring-shaped thread technique. The neck of the gallbladder was cut using scissor forceps. Resected gallbladder was retrieved using endoscopic net forceps via a port.

RESULTS: The operation times from general anesthetizing with sevoflurane to finishing the closure of the blunt port site were about 50 min and 60 min respectively. The resection times of gallbladder bed were about 15 min and 13 min respectively without liver injury and bleeding at all. Feed were given just after next day of operation, and they had a good appetite. Two dogs are in good health now and no complications for 1 mo after endoscopic cholecystectomy using only a flexible endoscope via one port.

CONCLUSION: We are sure of great feasibility of endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port for human.

Key Words: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery; Endoscopic cholecystectomy; Single port; Safer and complete resection; Feasibility

Core tip: Endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port is a safety and reliable new flexible endoscopic surgery. Local injection of saline to the gallbladder bed makes it easier to resect the gallbladder bed from the liver. After complete dissection of the gallbladder bed, the neck of the gallbladder was clipped and cut safer and easier using ring-shaped thread method.



INTRODUCTION

In 2004, since Kalloo et al reported a study on the observation of abdominal cavity through stomach using oral flexible endoscope following incision of the stomach, natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using flexible endoscope has attracted attention as a minimally invasive surgical method[1-4]. It was impossible to suddenly succeed in developing a surgical method equivalent to laparoscopic surgery from the viewpoint of safety. On the other hand, laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery (LECS) was rapidly developed in Japan for the partial gastrectomy of gastric and duodenal tumors[5-9]. LECS is based on excellent concept of the combination and collaboration with endoscopist and surgeon, in other words, taking advantages of both flexible and rigid endoscopes to achieve super minimal invasive surgery.

By using the LECS concept and the technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we investigated whether endoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed more safely and rapidly via only single port or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Conceptual images of endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port

Only 1 blunt port was created, and a flexible endoscope with a tip attachment was inserted between the fundus of gallbladder and liver easily. Local injection of saline to the gallbladder bed enabled us to easily obtain sufficient space (Figure 1A). Resection of the gallbladder from the liver was performed without any damage or bleeding (Figure 1B). After complete resection of the gallbladder bed, the gallbladder was pulled up to resect its neck. A ring-shaped thread was placed via an endoscopic channel using grasping forceps. One side of the ring was clipped to the fundus of the gallbladder and the other to the abdominal wall (Figure 1C). The third clip was hooked to 1 side of the ring-shaped thread. The thread was hooked crosswise to the 2 supporting points of the gallbladder and abdominal wall and clipped (Figure 1D). The neck of the gallbladder was cut using scissor forceps (Figure 1E). Resected gallbladder was retrieved using endoscopic net forceps via a port (Figure 1F).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Conceptual images of endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port. A: Local injection of saline to the gallbladder bed; B: Resection of the gallbladder from the liver was performed without any damage or bleeding due to sufficient space of local injection; C: A ring-shaped thread was placed, and one side of the ring was clipped to the fundus of the gallbladder and the other to the abdominal wall; D: The third clip was hooked to 1 side of the ring-shaped thread. The thread was hooked crosswise to the 2 supporting points of the gallbladder and abdominal wall; E: The neck of the gallbladder was cut using scissor forceps; F: Resected gallbladder was retrieved using endoscopic net forceps.
In vivo dogs’ experiments

Two dogs (11 and 13-mo-old female Beagle) were used in this study (Hokuzan Rabesu Co., Nagano, Japan). Animal experiments were performed in the Preclinical Animal Laboratory of Kagawa University, Japan. A dog was maintained in a pathogen-free facility under controlled temperature (24 ± 2 °C) and humidity (55% ± 5%), with a 12-h light/dark cycle. All experimental procedures were performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of animals as established by Kagawa University.

The items examined were as follows: (1) The operation success rate with long survival; (2) The operation times from general anesthetizing to finishing the closure of the blunt port site; and (3) The resection times of gallbladder bed.

Experimental devices

Endoscopes: OLYMPUS GIF TYPE Q260J (Olympus Co. Tokyo, Japan). CO2 insufflation device: OLYMPUS UCR (Olympus Co. Tokyo, Japan); Endoscopic knives: Dual knife (KD-650L, Olympus Co. Tokyo, Japan); Generator device: ERBE VIO300D (Elektromedizin, Tübingen, Germany).

RESULTS

Under general anesthesia, only 1 port (12 mm in diameter) was inserted using an open technique (Figure 2A). A flexible endoscope with a tip attachment was inserted between the fundus of gallbladder and liver, and a layer of loose connective tissue was opened. Local injection of saline to the loose layer enabled us to easily obtain sufficient space and dissect the gallbladder from the liver without any damage or bleeding (Figure 2B). After complete dissection of the gallbladder bed (Figure 2C), the gallbladder was pulled up to dissect its neck. A 3-0 absorbable ring-shaped thread was placed via an endoscopic channel using grasping forceps. One side of the ring was clipped to the fundus of the gallbladder and the other to the abdominal wall (Figure 2D). The third clip was hooked to 1 side of the ring-shaped thread. The thread was hooked crosswise to the 2 supporting points of the gallbladder and abdominal wall and clipped (Figure 3A). After the neck of the gallbladder was cut using scissor forceps extending it and placing 2 clips on the central side and 1 clip on the peripheral side (Figure 3B), successful resection of the gallbladder was completed (Figure 3C). Resected gallbladder bed was very smooth without blood (Figure 3D).

Figure 2
Figure 2 In vivo two dogs’ experiments. A: Under general anesthesia, only 1 port (12 mm in diameter) was inserted using an open technique; B: A flexible endoscope with a tip attachment was inserted between the fundus of gallbladder (blue arrow) and liver (red arrow), and a layer of loose connective tissue was opened (yellow arrow); C: Complete dissection (yellow arrow) of the gallbladder bed (blue arrow) from liver (red arrow); D: One side of the ring-shaped thread was clipped to the fundus of the gallbladder and the other to the abdominal wall (yellow arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3 The ring-shaped thread technique. A: The thread was hooked crosswise to the 2 supporting points (yellow arrow) of the gallbladder (blue arrow) and abdominal wall. Red arrow revealed the liver; B: The neck of the gallbladder was cut using scissor forceps (yellow arrow: neck of the gallbladder; blue arrows: gallbladder vein; red arrow: gallbladder artery; green arrow: cystic duct); C: The gallbladder was completely resected and put upon (blue curved arrow) the liver (red arrow); D: Resected gallbladder bed was very smooth without blood and damage.

The operation times from general anesthetizing with sevoflurane to finishing the closure of the blunt port site were about 50 min and 60 min respectively. The resection times of gallbladder bed were about 15 min and 13 min respectively without liver injury and bleeding at all. Feed were given just after next day of operation, and they had a good appetite.

Two dogs are in good health now and no complications for 1 mo after endoscopic cholecystectomy using only a flexible endoscope via one port.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been established and performed safely all over the world[10,11]. As LC is safe and well-established surgical procedure, it needs to create 4 ports (5 mm-3 ports in right hypochondriac region, 12 mm-1 blunt (camera) port in the umbilical portion). Although high volume centers are able to perform single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SP-LC) safely, it is still challenging, limited and risky for surgeon to perform SP-LC in the city hospital[12]. In this experiment, to create 12 mm-1 ports in right hypochondriac region made it possible to complete flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy very easy and safety. When a flexible endoscope with a tip attachment was inserted between the gallbladder and liver, a layer of loose connective tissue was opened very easily. Moreover, local injection of saline to the loose layer to obtain sufficient space and dissect the gallbladder bed more safely. After complete dissection of the gallbladder bed, the neck of the gallbladder was clipped and cut using scissor forceps easily. The Ring-shaped thread technique was very useful to pull up the gallbladder and resect its neck. Endoscopic cholecystectomy using only one flexible endoscope via single port was as safe and feasible as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

There are 3 advantageous points in this procedure (EC). We described these advantages as follows: (1) Reduction of port: In general, we perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy creating 4 ports by open technique (1 blunt port 12 mm in diameter in umbilical portion which is used to insert a rigid endoscopic camera and make pneumoperitoneum to keep stable pressure, 1 port 12 mm in diameter in epigastric region, 2 port 5 mm in diameter in Rt. hypochondriac regions to assist pulling up the fundus of the GB). In this technique (EC), the most innovative points are not only to approach to the GB via single blunt port in Rt. hypochondriac region and make pneumoperitoneum keeping stable pressure, but also to use functional advantages of flexible endoscope such as cleaning its lens function, water jet function and manual insufflation/deflation function under stable pressure by pneumoperitoneum system of the blunt port. The concept of this technique (EC) isn’t similar to the NOTES at all, but LECS concept which approached via port created at the abdominal wall. This procedure (EC) requires only 1 port via abdominal wall without perforation of the gut wall to approach the abdominal cavity and GB bed; (2) Direction of approach to the GB: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) needs higher surgical technique than this technique using a flexible endoscope. This is because the approach direction by SILS is from the perpendicular direction to the GB bed, and this makes it difficult to resect GB without minor injury and bleeding of the liver. On the other hand, in the EC procedure, we can approach the GB bed from the parallel direction. It is very easy to inject the natural saline to the GB bed and dissect it using attachment from parallel direction by a flexible endoscope using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) method; and (3) The Ring-shaped thread technique: After dissected GB bed, it is difficult to obtain clear surgical view at the Calot triangle. However, the ring thread is inserted into the GB through the endoscopic channel using grasping forceps. After clipped at 2 points, the third clip hooks 1 side of the ring thread and slides the thread crosswise to pull up the GB and is then clipped.

In this study, there are several limitations as follows and needed more animal experiments to confirm safety of EC: (1) Small number experiments; and (2) EC requires endoscopist to learn the anatomy of only the Calot triangle and its anomaly.

We are sure of the feasibility of this surgical procedure “endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port’’ for human.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Makoto Oryu for technical and editorial assistance.

COMMENTS
Background

As natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using flexible endoscope has been expected as a minimally invasive surgery, it was difficult to perform NOTES equivalent to laparoscopic surgery from the viewpoint of safety. Recently, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) was rapidly developed in Japan for the partial gastrectomy, which is based on excellent concept of the combination and collaboration with endoscopist and surgeon.

Research frontiers

As the LECS was an excellent surgical concept, the authors applied the LECS concept for endoscopic cholecystectomy using only one flexible endoscope via single port.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Local injection of saline to the gallbladder bed made it possible to resect the gallbladder bed more rapidly and safely. The Ring-shaped thread technique was very useful to pull up the gallbladder and resect its neck.

Applications

Endoscopic cholecystectomy using only one flexible endoscope via single port was as safe and feasible as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Peer-review

Quite sure that the feasibility of this surgical procedure “endoscopic cholecystectomy via single port’’ for human.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Iizuka T, Neri V S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Fuchs KH, Meining A, von Renteln D, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Breithaupt W, Zornig C, Lacy A. Euro-NOTES Status Paper: from the concept to clinical practice. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1456-1467.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Autorino R, Yakoubi R, White WM, Gettman M, De Sio M, Quattrone C, Di Palma C, Izzo A, Correia-Pinto J, Kaouk JH. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): where are we going? A bibliometric assessment. BJU Int. 2013;111:11-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Mori H, Kobara H, Kobayashi M, Muramatsu A, Nomura T, Hagiike M, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y, Masaki T. Establishment of pure NOTES procedure using a conventional flexible endoscope: review of six cases of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endoscopy. 2011;43:631-634.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Fujihara S, Masaki T. Review of Pure Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. Gut Liver. 2015;9:590-600.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Imamura T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kobayashi H, Miyamae M, Hirajima S, Kawaguchi T, Kubota T, Kosuga T, Okamoto K. Gastric carcinoma originating from the heterotopic submucosal gastric gland treated by laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7:118-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Irino T, Nunobe S, Hiki N, Yamamoto Y, Hirasawa T, Ohashi M, Fujisaki J, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumors: a unique procedure that helps ensure the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2015;47:349-351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Mori H, Kobara H, Tsushimi T, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M, Yachida T, Tani J, Miyoshi H. Reduction effect of bacterial counts by preoperative saline lavage of the stomach in performing laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15763-15770.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Tsushimi T, Mori H, Harada T, Nagase T, Iked Y, Ohnishi H. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1: Report of a case. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:1021-1024.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Miyamoto Y, Asakuma M, Shimizu T, Komeda K, Inoue Y, Umegaki E, Uchiyama K. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumor resection. Endoscopy. 2014;46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E26-E27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Wolfe BM, Gardiner B, Frey CF. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Remarkable Development. JAMA. 2015;314:1406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Wells KM, Lee YJ, Erdene S, Erdene S, Sanchin U, Sergelen O, Presson A, Zhang C, Rodriguez B, deVries C. Expansion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a resource limited setting, Mongolia: a 9-year cross-sectional retrospective review. Lancet. 2015;385 Suppl 2:S38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Chuang SH, Yang WJ, Chang CM, Lin CS, Yeh MC. Is routine single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasible? A retrospective observational study. Am J Surg. 2015;210:315-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]