Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2015; 21(38): 10898-10906
Published online Oct 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10898
Table 2 Cox proportional hazards model of prognostic factors for overall survival in 210 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)P valueHR (95%CI)P value
Age (yr), ≥ 60 vs < 600.766 (0.410-1.433)0.404
Gender, male vs female0.829 (0.296-2.321)0.721
Liver cirrhosis, yes vs no7.641 (1.853-31.509)0.0057.084 (1.694-29.614)0.007
ALT (U/L), > 75 vs ≤ 751.513 (0.771-2.970)0.229
Total bilirubin (μmol/L), > 34 vs ≤ 342.085 (0.822-5.288)0.122
Albumin (g/L), ≥ 35 vs < 350.242 (0.112-0.522)< 0.001
ALP (U/L), > 100 vs ≤ 1002.116 (1.148-3.899)0.0162.137 (1.153-3.964)0.016
AFP (ng/dL), > 400 vs ≤ 4000.956 (0.535-1.705)0.878
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.154 (1.204-3.853)0.010
Tumor number, multiple vs single1.048 (0.444-2.477)0.915
Portal vein thrombus: yes vs no3.348 (1.492-7.512)0.003
Microvascular invasion: yes vs no2.121 (1.151-3.911)0.0162.307 (1.217- 4.370)0.010
Histological differentiation, poor vs well and moderate2.888 (1.467-5.684)0.0022.375 (1.195-4.721)0.014
BCLC stage, B + C vs 0 + A2.110 (1.197-3.720)0.0102.155 (1.213-3.831)0.009
Preoperative LMR, > 3.23 vs ≤ 3.230.352 (0.199-0.623)< 0.0010.398 (0.219-0.725)0.003