Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4946-4953
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4946
Table 2 Predictors of initial drainage effectiveness by univariate analysis n (%)
Effective (n = 49)Ineffective (n = 29)P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD74.0 ± 11.676.0 ± 7.50.39
Gender, male/female32/1721/80.78
Etiology, cholangiocarcinoma32 (65.3)18 (62.1)0.81
Bismuth type IV17 (34.6)19 (65.5)0.02
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), mean ± SD9.9 ± 6.310.0 ± 4.70.93
Cholangitis8 (16.3)5 (17.2)0.91
Impaired liver function5 (10.2)9 (31.0)0.03
Drainage method, endoscopic drainage43 (87.8)27 (93.1)0.71
Type of stent, metal stent7 (14.3)4 (13.8)1.00
Drainage areas
Unilateral/bilateral43/629/00.16
Drained liver volume (%), mean ± SD51.1 ± 18.633.5 ± 12.5< 0.01