World J Gastroenterol. 2005 May 21; 11(19): 2851-2857.
Published online 2005 May 21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2851.
Roles of histamine and its receptors in allergic and inflammatory bowel diseases
Hua Xie and Shao-Heng He.
Hua Xie, Shao-Heng He, Allergy and Inflammation Research Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515031, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Professor Shao-Heng He, Allergy and Inflammation Research Institute, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xin-Ling Road, Shantou 515031, Guangdong Province, China.
Telephone: +86-754-8900405 Fax: +86-754-8900192
Received April 30, 2004; Revised May 2, 2004; Accepted July 15, 2004;
Mast cell has a long history of being recognized as an important mediator-secreting cell in allergic diseases, and has been discovered to be involved in IBD in last two decades. Histamine is a major mediator in allergic diseases, and has multiple effects that are mediated by specific surface receptors on target cells. Four types of histamine receptors have now been recognized pharmacologically and the first three are located in the gut. The ability of histamine receptor antagonists to inhibit mast cell degranulation suggests that they might be developed as a group of mast cell stabilizers. Recently, a series of experiments with dispersed colon mast cells suggested that there should be at least two pathways in man for mast cells to amplify their own activation-degranulation signals in an autocrine or paracrine manner. In a word, histamine is an important mediator in allergic diseases and IBD, its antagonists may be developed as a group of mast cell stabilizers to treat these diseases.
Keywords: Allergic diseases, Immunoglobulin
Allergic diseases including allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, drug allergy, and allergic atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome, etc. are a group of common disorders which are regarded to be mediated by immunoglobulin (Ig) E. People at all ages in countries throughout the world suffer from these diseases. The prevalence of allergy has shown an increase in the last few years. At present it affects about 30-40% of world population and has become one of the three key diseases in the 21st century.
Since last two decades, inflammation has been known as the main pathophysiological characteristics of allergy. Mast cells are major participants of allergic reactions, and their activation may be all that is sufficient and necessary for the rapid development of microvascular leakage and tissue edema in sensitized subjects exposed to allergen. Mast cell is a key source of potent mediators of allergic inflammation including histamine, neutral proteinases, proteoglycans, prostaglandin D2, leukotriene C4 and certain cytokines[1]. Among them, histamine is the first mediator implicated in the pathophysiological changes of asthma when it was found to mimic several features of the disease, and James received the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1988 for his outstanding achievements in histamine research. Recently, some novel findings concerning histamine, mast cell and allergy or IBD have been reported and are summarized herein.
Mast cell has a long history of being recognized as an important mediator-secreting cell in allergic diseases. It has a high capacity to release an array of both preformed and newly generated mediators in response to environmental stimuli, especially allergen exposure. Cross linkage of IgE bound to high affinity receptors on mast cells not only results in the rapid release of autacoid mediators, but also the sustained synthesis and release of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors.
Mature mast cells are ubiquitous in human tissues and can thus participate in the processes of inflammation at different sites. Systemic anaphylaxis, a life-threatening disease, involves mast cell activation in multiple organs. In bronchial asthma, a disease characterized by widespread but potentially reversible bronchial obstruction, there are increased numbers of mast cells and a greater degree of continuous mast cell degranulation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatics compared with normal controls. Increased mast cell numbers and evidence for continuous degranulation of mast cells have been observed also in nasal lavage fluid and the nasal epithelium of the patients with allergic rhinitis.
Recent population surveys have estimated rates of prevalence of perceived food hypersensitivity of 12-20% in adults though this rate varied largely across different countries (e.g., Spain, 4.6%; Australia, 19.1%) despite a common standardized methodology[2]. Intestinal mast cells, as well as eosinophils, have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of food-allergy-related enteropathy.
Adverse drug reactions are common, but only 6-10% are immunologically mediated[3]. Although allergic drug reactions are just one type of adverse reactions to medications, they are clinically very important because of the morbidity and mortality they cause. Allergic drug reactions may result in anaphylaxis, urticaria, bronchospasm and angioedema. During these reactions, allergic drugs cause direct histamine release from mast cells.
Since its discovery in 1911, histamine has been recognized as a major mediator in allergic diseases. Histamine is a primary amine synthesized from histidine in the Golgi apparatus, from where it is transported to the granule for storage in ionic association with the acidic residues of the glycosaminoglycans side chains of heparin and with proteinases. The histamine content of mast cells dispersed from human lung and skin is similar at 2-5 pg/cell, and the histamine stored ranges from 10 to 12 µg/g in both tissues. Following mast cell activation, histamine is rapidly dissociated from the granule matrix by exchange with sodium ions in the extracellular environment. Proteoglycans comprise the major supporting matrix of the mast cell granule with the sulfate groups binding to histamine, proteinases and acid hydrolases. As only mast cells and basophils contain histamine in man (apart from histaminergic nerve), and there are few basophils in human tissues, histamine can be used as a marker of mast cell degranulation.
The allergic process is believed to consist of two phases: early and late. The early phase reaction is mainly induced by histamine released from mast cells. Histamine is a potent vasoactive agent, bronchial smooth muscle constrictor, and stimulant of nociceptive itch nerves. In addition to its known effects on glands, vessels and sensory nerves, recent data have provided further evidence of histamine’s proinflammatory actions[4]. Histamine binding specific cell receptors produces clinical allergic symptoms. This mediator also activates neutrophils and eosinophils as well as being a chemoattractant for these cells[5]. Histamine increases IL-8 level and evokes leukocyte rolling on endothelial cells. Thus histamine participates in both early and late-phase allergic responses.
Using segmental jejunal perfusion system with a two-balloon, six-channel small tube, Knutson and colleagues found that the histamine secretion rate was increased in patients with Crohn’s disease compared with normal controls, and the secretion of histamine was related to disease activity, indicating strongly that degranulation of mast cells was involved in active Crohn’s disease[6]. The highly elevated mucosal histamine levels were also observed in allergic enteropathy and ulcerative colitis[7]. Moreover, enhanced histamine metabolism was found in collagenous colitis and food allergy[8], and increased level of N-methylhistamine, a stable metabolite of the mast cell mediator histamine, was detected in the urine of patients with active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis[9,10]. Since increased level of N-methylhistamine was significantly correlated to clinical disease activity, the above findings further strongly suggest the active involvement of histamine in the pathogenesis of these diseases.
Interestingly, mast cells originated from the resected colon of active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis were able to release more histamine than those from normal colon when being stimulated with an antigen, colon-derived murine epithelial cell-associated compounds[11]. Similarly, cultured colorectal endoscopic samples from patients with IBD secreted more histamine towards substance P alone or substance P with anti-IgE than the samples from normal control subjects under the same stimulation[12]. In a guinea pig model of intestinal inflammation induced by cow’s milk proteins and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, both IgE titers and histamine levels were higher than normal control animals[13].
As a proinflammatory mediator, histamine is selectively located in the granules of human mast cells and basophils and released from these cells upon degranulation. To date, a total of three histamine receptors H1, H2 and H3 have been discovered in human gut[14,15]. It proves that there are some specific targets that histamine can work on in intestinal tract. Histamine was found to cause a transient concentration-dependent increase in short-circuit current, a measure of total ion transport across the epithelial tissue in the gut[16]. This could be due to that histamine interacts with H1 receptors to increase the secretion of Na and Cl ions from epithelium[17]. The finding that H1-receptor antagonist pyrilamine was able to inhibit anti-IgE induced histamine release and ion transport[18] suggested further that histamine is a crucial mediator responsible for diarrhea in IBD and food allergy. The ability of SR140333, a potent NK1 antagonist in reducing mucosal ion transport, was most likely due to its inhibitory actions on histamine release from colon mast cells[19].
Histamine has multiple effects that are mediated by specific surface receptors on target cells. Four types of histamine receptors have now been recognized pharmacologically. Histamine receptors were first differentiated into H1 and H2 by Ash and Schild in 1966, when it was found that some responses to histamine were blocked by low doses of mepyramine (pyrilamine), whereas others were insensitive. A third histamine receptor subtype, termed H3, was cloned in 1999 by Lovenberg and co-workers[20] and the fourth histamine receptor subtype, termed H4, was first reported in 2000 by Oda and co-workers[21].
H1 receptors
H1 receptors have been cloned from cows, rats, guinea pigs and humans. The published sequences suggest that there are surprisingly large differences among species. H1 receptors mediate most of the effects of histamine that are relevant to asthma. The cardinal features of asthma include smooth muscle spasm, mucosal edema, inflammation and mucous secretion. It has been demonstrated that at least two of these features, bronchospasm and mucosal edema, can be caused by H1-receptor stimulation. Northern analysis has demonstrated that there is a high level of expression of H1 receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in lung.
Ocular allergy presents unsolved mysteries in molecular and cellular mechanisms, the recent understanding of the key role of the T helper type 2 cytokines, adhesion molecules and chemokines may provide future avenues for pharmacological targeting of releasable inflammatory mediators. More potent topical mast cell stabilizers and H1 receptor antagonists have become commercially available for the management of the prevalent and benign forms of allergic conjunctivitis[22]. Immunostimulatory DNA sequences present an innovative and promising route for the treatment of ocular allergy, but clinical studies are needed to demonstrate their efficacy in humans.
Bphs controls Bordetella pertussis toxin (PTX)-induced vasoactive amine sensitization elicited by histamine (VAASH) and has an established role in autoimmunity. Ma and co-workers[23] reported that congenic mapping links Bphs to the histamine H1 receptor gene (HrH1/H1R) and that H1R differs at three amino acid residues in VAASH-susceptible and -resistant mice. HrH1-/- mice are protected from VAASH, which can be restored by genetic complementation with a susceptible Bphs/HrH1 allele, and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and autoimmune orchitis due to immune deviation. Thus, natural alleles of HrH1 control both the autoimmune T cells and vascular responses regulated by histamine after PTX sensitization.
H2 receptors
H2 receptors have been cloned from dogs and humans. Although H2 receptors are present in the airway, their clinical relevance is unclear, because H2 receptor antagonists have few measurable effects on airway function. Histamine stimulates an increase in cyclic AMP levels in lung fragments that is blocked by H2 receptor antagonists, indicating that H2 receptors are positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in lung.
Atopic diseases such as allergic rhinitis and asthma are characterized by increases in TH2 cells and serum IgE antibodies. The binding of allergens to IgE on mast cells triggers the release of several mediators, of which histamine is the most prevalent. Mazzoni and co-workers reported that histamine, together with a maturation signal, acts directly upon immature dendritic cells (DCs), which express H1 and H2, two active histamine receptors. Histamine, acting upon the H2 receptor for a short period of time, increased IL-10 production and reduced IL-12 secretion. As a result, histamine-matured DCs polarized naive CD4(+) T cells toward a TH2 phenotype, as compared with DCs that had matured in the absence of histamine. The TH2 cells favor IgE production, leading to increased histamine secretion by mast cells, thus creating a positive feedback loop that could contribute to the severity of atopic diseases[24].
H3 receptors
The identification of H3 receptor cDNA allowed several groups to reveal the complexity of the histamine-mediated systems. Comparison of the cDNA with available genome databases revealed that the gene encoding H3 receptor is located on chromosome 20 and contains at least two introns. In rats, H3 receptors consist of at least three functional isoforms, referred to as H3A, H3B and H3C, which vary in the length of their third intracellular loop (I3) (136 104 and 88 amino acids respectively). In humans, H3 receptor isoforms have been cloned, including one with an 80-amino-acid deletion of I3. Moreover, another isoform has been identified, in which the 80-amino-acid deletion is accompanied by an additional 8 amino acids at the C-terminal tail. Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the human isoforms have been found to be differentially expressed in various brain areas. The 80-amino-acid sequence located at the C-terminal portion of I3 plays an essential role in H3 agonist-mediated signal transduction. The existence of multiple H3 isoforms with different signal transduction capabilities suggests that H3-mediated biological functions might be tightly regulated through alternative splicing mechanisms. Otherwise, histamine H3 receptor activation inhibits neurogenic sympathetic vasoconstriction in porcine nasal mucosa, suggesting that histamine H3 receptors may play a role in the regulation of vascular tone and nasal patency in allergic nasal congestive disease[25].
H4 receptors
The discovery of the histamine H4 receptor adds a new chapter to the histamine story. The H4 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor and is most closely related to the H3 receptor, sharing 58% identity in the transmembrane regions. The gene encoding the H4 receptor was discovered initially in a search of the GenBank databases as sequence fragments retrieved in a partially sequenced human genomic contig mapped to chromosome 18[26]. About the histamine-binding site of H4 receptor, Shin reported that Asp94 (3.32) in transmembrane region (TM) 3 and Glu182 (5.46) in TM5 are critically involved in histamine binding. Asp94 probably serves as a counter-anion to the cationic amino group of histamine, whereas Glu182 (5.46) interacts with the N(tau) nitrogen atom of the histamine imidazole ring via an ion pair. These results resemble those for the analogous residues in the H1 histamine receptor but contrast with findings regarding the H2 histamine receptor. It indicates that although histamine seems to bind to the H4 receptor in a fashion similar to that predicted for the other histamine receptor subtypes, there are also important differences that can probably be exploited for the discovery of novel H4-selective compounds[27]. H4 receptor exhibits a very restricted localization, expression is primarily found in intestinal tissue, spleen, thymus and immune active cells, such as T cells, mast cells, neutrophils and eosinophils. It suggests an important role for the H4 receptor in the regulation of immune function and offers novel therapeutic potentials for histamine receptor ligands in allergic and inflammatory diseases[28].
Today, according to action on different receptors, the histamine receptor agonists (Table 1) and antagonists (Table 2) are classified into four subtypes, respectively. Among H1 receptor antagonists, the first generation antihistamines have considerable sedative effects caused by their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. The second generation of antihistamines to emerge in the market is devoid of these sedative effects. The third generation antihistamines, metabolites of the earlier drugs, have demonstrated no cardiac effects of the parent drugs and are at least potent[29].
Table 1
Table 1
Agonists of histamine receptors.
Table 2
Table 2
Antagonists of histamine receptors.
Among them, H1 receptor antagonists loratadine and terfenadine were able to inhibit IgE-induced histamine release from human mast cells[78], which may at least partially explain their potent antiallergic activity[79]. However, the extent of H1 receptor antagonists binding to mast cells is quite different. Wescott et al[80], reported tripelennamine > pyrilamine > diphenhydramine in binding H1 receptor.
Fexofenadine, an effective H1 antihistamine, is the active metabolite of terfenadine, but they had different effects on histamine and tryptase release from mast cells. Terfenadine inhibited release of histamine and tryptase from mast cells during the early allergic response, whereas fexofenadine did not[81].
In combination with H1 antihistamines, H2 antihistamines famotidine, ranitidine or cimetidine suppressed effectively the chronic swelling. It is deduced that simultaneous blockage of both histamine H1 and H2 receptors may be necessary for sufficient inhibition of the microvascular permeability increase in some kinds of anaphylactic reactions, and that histamine, mainly interacting with H2 receptors, may play an important role in activation of a certain phase of chronic inflammation where mast cell degranulation is involved[82]. Metiamide, one H2 receptor antagonist, can reduce the histamine release from secreting mast cells in mast-cell mediated angiogenesis[83]. H3 antagonists, thioperamide and clobenpropit combined with H1 antihistamine loratadine, not the H2 antagonist ranitidine, reduced nasal congestion[84] in mast cell-deficient mice, indicating that its action was not associated with mast cell degranulation[85].
Tryptase has been proved to be a unique marker of mast cell degranulation in vitro as it is more selective than histamine to mast cells. Inhibitors of tryptase[86,87] and chymase[88] have been discovered to possess the ability to inhibit histamine or tryptase release from human skin, tonsil, synovial[89] and colon mast cells[90], suggesting that they are likely to be developed as a novel class of mast cell stabilizers. Recently, a series of experiments with dispersed colon mast cells suggested that there should be at least two pathways in man for mast cells to amplify their own activation-degranulation signals in an autocrine or paracrine manner, which may partially explain the phenomena that when a sensitized individual contacts allergen only once the local allergic response in the involved tissue or organ may last for days or weeks. These findings included that both anti-IgE and calcium ionophore were able to induce significant release of tryptase and histamine from colon mast cells, histamine is a potent activator of human colon mast cells and the agonists of PAR-2 and trypsin are potent secretagogues of human colon mast cells. Since tryptase was reported to be able to activate human mast cells[86] and H1 receptor antagonists terfenadine and cetirizine[78] were capable of inhibiting mast cell activation, the hypothesis of mast cell degranulation self-amplification mechanisms is that mast cell secretagogues induce mast cell degranulation, and release of histamine, which then stimulates the adjacent mast cells or positively feedbacks to further stimulate its host mast cells through H1 receptors, whereas released tryptase acts similarly to histamine, but through its receptor PAR-2 on mast cells.
Supported by the Li Ka Shing Foundation, Hong Kong, China, No. C0200001; the Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, China, No. 2003B31502
Parikh SA, Cho SH, Oh CK. Preformed enzymes in mast cell granules and their potential role in allergic rhinitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003;3:266-272.[PubMed] [DOI]
Crespo JF, Rodriguez J. Food allergy in adulthood. Allergy. 2003;58:98-113.[PubMed] [DOI]
Gruchalla RS. 10. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:S548-S559.[PubMed] [DOI]
Repka-Ramirez MS, Baraniuk JN. Histamine in health and disease. Clin Allergy Immunol. 2002;17:1-25.[PubMed]
He S, Peng Q, Walls AF. Potent induction of a neutrophil and eosinophil-rich infiltrate in vivo by human mast cell tryptase: selective enhancement of eosinophil recruitment by histamine. J Immunol. 1997;159:6216-6225.[PubMed]
Knutson L, Ahrenstedt O, Odlind B, Hällgren R. The jejunal secretion of histamine is increased in active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:849-854.[PubMed] [DOI]
Raithel M, Matek M, Baenkler HW, Jorde W, Hahn EG. Mucosal histamine content and histamine secretion in Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and allergic enteropathy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1995;108:127-133.[PubMed] [DOI]
Schwab D, Hahn EG, Raithel M. Enhanced histamine metabolism: a comparative analysis of collagenous colitis and food allergy with respect to the role of diet and NSAID use. Inflamm Res. 2003;52:142-147.[PubMed] [DOI]
Winterkamp S, Weidenhiller M, Otte P, Stolper J, Schwab D, Hahn EG, Raithel M. Urinary excretion of N-methylhistamine as a marker of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3071-3077.[PubMed] [DOI]
Weidenhiller M, Raithel M, Winterkamp S, Otte P, Stolper J, Hahn EG. Methylhistamine in Crohn's disease (CD): increased production and elevated urine excretion correlates with disease activity. Inflamm Res. 2000;49 Suppl 1:S35-S36.[PubMed] [DOI]
Fox CC, Lichtenstein LM, Roche JK. Intestinal mast cell responses in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Histamine release from human intestinal mast cells in response to gut epithelial proteins. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1105-1112.[PubMed] [DOI]
Raithel M, Schneider HT, Hahn EG. Effect of substance P on histamine secretion from gut mucosa in inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:496-503.[PubMed] [DOI]
Fargeas MJ, Theodorou V, More J, Wal JM, Fioramonti J, Bueno L. Boosted systemic immune and local responsiveness after intestinal inflammation in orally sensitized guinea pigs. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:53-62.[PubMed] [DOI]
Bertaccini G, Coruzzi G. An update on histamine H3 receptors and gastrointestinal functions. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:2052-2063.[PubMed] [DOI]
Rangachari PK. Histamine: mercurial messenger in the gut. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:G1-13.[PubMed]
Homaidan FR, Tripodi J, Zhao L, Burakoff R. Regulation of ion transport by histamine in mouse cecum. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;331:199-204.[PubMed] [DOI]
Traynor TR, Brown DR, O'Grady SM. Effects of inflammatory mediators on electrolyte transport across the porcine distal colon epithelium. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;264:61-66.[PubMed]
Crowe SE, Luthra GK, Perdue MH. Mast cell mediated ion transport in intestine from patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1997;41:785-792.[PubMed] [DOI]
Moriarty D, Goldhill J, Selve N, O'Donoghue DP, Baird AW. Human colonic anti-secretory activity of the potent NK(1) antagonist, SR140333: assessment of potential anti-diarrhoeal activity in food allergy and inflammatory bowel disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;133:1346-1354.[PubMed] [DOI]
Lovenberg TW, Roland BL, Wilson SJ, Jiang X, Pyati J, Huvar A, Jackson MR, Erlander MG. Cloning and functional expression of the human histamine H3 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;55:1101-1107.[PubMed]
Oda T, Morikawa N, Saito Y, Masuho Y, Matsumoto S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel type of histamine receptor preferentially expressed in leukocytes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36781-36786.[PubMed] [DOI]
Solomon A, Pe'er J, Levi-Schaffer F. Advances in ocular allergy: basic mechanisms, clinical patterns and new therapies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;1:477-482.[PubMed] [DOI]
Ma RZ, Gao J, Meeker ND, Fillmore PD, Tung KS, Watanabe T, Zachary JF, Offner H, Blankenhorn EP, Teuscher C. Identification of Bphs, an autoimmune disease locus, as histamine receptor H1. Science. 2002;297:620-623.[PubMed] [DOI]
Mazzoni A, Young HA, Spitzer JH, Visintin A, Segal DM. Histamine regulates cytokine production in maturing dendritic cells, resulting in altered T cell polarization. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1865-1873.[PubMed] [DOI]
Varty LM, Hey JA. Histamine H3 receptor activation inhibits neurogenic sympathetic vasoconstriction in porcine nasal mucosa. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;452:339-345.[PubMed] [DOI]
Nguyen T, Shapiro DA, George SR, Setola V, Lee DK, Cheng R, Rauser L, Lee SP, Lynch KR, Roth BL. Discovery of a novel member of the histamine receptor family. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;59:427-433.[PubMed]
Shin N, Coates E, Murgolo NJ, Morse KL, Bayne M, Strader CD, Monsma FJ. Molecular modeling and site-specific mutagenesis of the histamine-binding site of the histamine H4 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:38-47.[PubMed] [DOI]
Leurs R, Watanabe T, Timmerman H. Histamine receptors are finally 'coming out'. TRENDS Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:337-339. [DOI]
Oppenheimer JJ, Casale TB. Next generation antihistamines: therapeutic rationale, accomplishments and advances. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:807-817.[PubMed] [DOI]
Schlicker E, Kozłowska H, Kwolek G, Malinowska B, Kramer K, Pertz HH, Elz S, Schunack W. Novel histaprodifen analogues as potent histamine H1-receptor agonists in the pithed and in the anaesthetized rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001;364:14-20.[PubMed] [DOI]
Seifert R, Wenzel-Seifert K, Burckstummer T, Pertz HH, Schunack W, Dove S, Buschauer A, Elz S. Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:1104-1115.[PubMed] [DOI]
Bell JK, McQueen DS, Rees JL. Involvement of histamine H4 and H1 receptors in scratching induced by histamine receptor agonists in Balb C mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142:374-380.[PubMed] [DOI]
Lamberti C, Ipponi A, Bartolini A, Schunack W, Malmberg-Aiello P. Antidepressant-like effects of endogenous histamine and of two histamine H1 receptor agonists in the mouse forced swim test. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123:1331-1336.[PubMed] [DOI]
Lecklin A, Etu-Seppälä P, Stark H, Tuomisto L. Effects of intracerebroventricularly infused histamine and selective H1, H2 and H3 agonists on food and water intake and urine flow in Wistar rats. Brain Res. 1998;793:279-288.[PubMed] [DOI]
Leurs R, Smit MJ, Meeder R, Ter Laak AM, Timmerman H. Lysine200 located in the fifth transmembrane domain of the histamine H1 receptor interacts with histamine but not with all H1 agonists. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;214:110-117.[PubMed] [DOI]
Assanasen P, Naclerio RM. Antiallergic anti-inflammatory effects of H1-antihistamines in humans. Clin Allergy Immunol. 2002;17:101-139.[PubMed]
Verster JC, Volkerts ER. Antihistamines and driving ability: evidence from on-the-road driving studies during normal traffic. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;92:294-303; quiz 303-355, 355.[PubMed] [DOI]
Aaronson DW. Comparative efficacy of H1 antihistamines. Ann Allergy. 1991;67:541-547.[PubMed]
Tillement JP, Testa B, Brée F. Compared pharmacological characteristics in humans of racemic cetirizine and levocetirizine, two histamine H1-receptor antagonists. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:1123-1126.[PubMed] [DOI]
Christophe B, Carlier B, Gillard M, Chatelain P, Peck M, Massingham R. Histamine H1 receptor antagonism by cetirizine in isolated guinea pig tissues: influence of receptor reserve and dissociation kinetics. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;470:87-94.[PubMed] [DOI]
Nishiga M, Fujii Y, Konishi M, Hossen MA. Effects of second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonists on the active avoidance response in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2003;30:60-63.[PubMed] [DOI]
Aslanian R, Mutahi Mw, Shih NY, Piwinski JJ, West R, Williams SM, She S, Wu RL, Hey JA. Identification of a dual histamine H1/H3 receptor ligand based on the H1 antagonist chlorpheniramine. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1959-1961.[PubMed] [DOI]
Sharma A, Hamelin BA. Classic histamine H1 receptor antagonists: a critical review of their metabolic and pharmacokinetic fate from a bird's eye view. Curr Drug Metab. 2003;4:105-129.[PubMed] [DOI]
Gelfand EW, Appajosyula S, Meeves S. Anti-inflammatory activity of H1-receptor antagonists: review of recent experimental research. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:73-81.[PubMed] [DOI]
Monroe EW. Desloratidine for the treatment of chronic urticaria. Skin Therapy Lett. 2002;7:1-2, 5.[PubMed]
Whitcup SM, Bradford R, Lue J, Schiffman RM, Abelson MB. Efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine: a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active- and vehicle-controlled environmental trial in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Clin Ther. 2004;26:29-34.[PubMed] [DOI]
Suzuki A, Yasui-Furukori N, Mihara K, Kondo T, Furukori H, Inoue Y, Kaneko S, Otani K. Histamine H1-receptor antagonists, promethazine and homochlorcyclizine, increase the steady-state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25:192-196.[PubMed] [DOI]
Kidd M, McKenzie SH, Steven I, Cooper C, Lanz R. Efficacy and safety of ketotifen eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1206-1211.[PubMed] [DOI]
Nelson HS. Prospects for antihistamines in the treatment of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:S96-100.[PubMed] [DOI]
Brockman HL, Momsen MM, Knudtson JR, Miller ST, Graff G, Yanni JM. Interactions of olopatadine and selected antihistamines with model and natural membranes. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2003;11:247-268.[PubMed] [DOI]
Mahgoub H, Gazy AA, El-Yazbi FA, El-Sayed MA, Youssef RM. Spectrophotometric determination of binary mixtures of pseudoephedrine with some histamine H1-receptor antagonists using derivative ratio spectrum method. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;31:801-809.[PubMed] [DOI]
Meltzer EO, Casale TB, Gold MS, O'Connor R, Reitberg D, del Rio E, Weiler JM, Weiler K. Efficacy and safety of clemastine-pseudoephedrine-acetaminophen versus pseudoephedrine-acetaminophen in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in a 1-day, placebo-controlled park study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;90:79-86.[PubMed] [DOI]
Salmun LM. Antihistamines in late-phase clinical development for allergic disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002;11:259-273.[PubMed] [DOI]
Izquierdo I, Merlos M, García-Rafanell J. Rupatadine: a new selective histamine H1 receptor and platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist. A review of pharmacological profile and clinical management of allergic rhinitis. Drugs Today (Barc). 2003;39:451-468.[PubMed] [DOI]
Manohar M, Goetz TE, Humphrey S, Depuy T. H1-receptor antagonist, tripelennamine, does not affect arterial hypoxemia in exercising Thoroughbreds. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002;92:1515-1523.[PubMed]
Simpson K, Jarvis B. Fexofenadine: a review of its use in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Drugs. 2000;59:301-321.[PubMed] [DOI]
Yamaura K, Yonekawa T, Nakamura T, Yano S, Ueno K. The histamine H2-receptor antagonist, cimetidine, inhibits the articular osteopenia in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis by suppressing the osteoclast differentiation induced by histamine. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003;92:43-49.[PubMed] [DOI]
Scaccianoce S, Lombardo K, Nicolai R, Affricano D, Angelucci L. Studies on the involvement of histamine in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation induced by nerve growth factor. Life Sci. 2000;67:3143-3152.[PubMed] [DOI]
Vannay A, Fekete A, Müller V, Strehlau J, Viklicky O, Veres T, Reusz G, Tulassay T, Szabó AJ. Effects of histamine and the h2 receptor antagonist ranitidine on ischemia-induced acute renal failure: involvement of IL-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2004;27:105-113.[PubMed] [DOI]
Mannino S, Troncon MG, Wallander MA, Cattaruzzi C, Romano F, Agostinis L, Marighi PE, Walker A. Ocular disorders in users of H2 antagonists and of omeprazole. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1998;7:233-241.[PubMed] [DOI]
Mozdarani H. Radioprotective properties of histamine H2 receptor antagonists: present and future prospects. J Radiat Res. 2003;44:145-149.[PubMed] [DOI]
Arroyo MT, Lanas A, Sáinz R. Prevention and healing of experimental indomethacin-induced gastric lesions: effects of ebrotidine, omeprazole and ranitidine. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:313-318.[PubMed] [DOI]
Isomoto H, Inoue K, Furusu H, Nishiyama H, Shikuwa S, Omagari K, Mizuta Y, Murase K, Murata I, Kohno S. Lafutidine, a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist, vs lansoprazole in combination with amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2003;8:111-119.[PubMed] [DOI]
Sato H, Kawashima K, Yuki M, Kazumori H, Rumi MA, Ortega-Cava CF, Ishihara S, Kinoshita Y. Lafutidine, a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist, increases serum calcitonin gene-related peptide in rats after water immersion-restraint stress. J Lab Clin Med. 2003;141:102-105.[PubMed] [DOI]
Li L, Kracht J, Peng S, Bernhardt G, Elz S, Buschauer A. Synthesis and pharmacological activity of fluorescent histamine H2 receptor antagonists related to potentidine. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1717-1720.[PubMed] [DOI]
Esbenshade TA, Krueger KM, Miller TR, Kang CH, Denny LI, Witte DG, Yao BB, Fox GB, Faghih R, Bennani YL. Two novel and selective nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists A-304121 and A-317920: I. In vitro pharmacological effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:887-896.[PubMed] [DOI]
Apodaca R, Dvorak CA, Xiao W, Barbier AJ, Boggs JD, Wilson SJ, Lovenberg TW, Carruthers NI. A new class of diamine-based human histamine H3 receptor antagonists: 4-(aminoalkoxy)benzylamines. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3938-3944.[PubMed] [DOI]
Munzar P, Tanda G, Justinova Z, Goldberg SR. Histamine h3 receptor antagonists potentiate methamphetamine self-administration and methamphetamine-induced accumbal dopamine release. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:705-717.[PubMed] [DOI]
Faghih R, Phelan K, Esbenshade TA, Miller TR, Kang CH, Krueger KM, Yao BB, Fox GB, Bennani YL, Hancock AA. D-alanine piperazine-amides: novel non-imidazole antagonists of the histamine H3 receptor. Inflamm Res. 2003;52 Suppl 1:S47-S48.[PubMed] [DOI]
Faghih R, Dwight W, Pan JB, Fox GB, Krueger KM, Esbenshade TA, McVey JM, Marsh K, Bennani YL, Hancock AA. Synthesis and SAR of aminoalkoxy-biaryl-4-carboxamides: novel and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1325-1328.[PubMed] [DOI]
Chai W, Breitenbucher JG, Kwok A, Li X, Wong V, Carruthers NI, Lovenberg TW, Mazur C, Wilson SJ, Axe FU. Non-imidazole heterocyclic histamine H3 receptor antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1767-1770.[PubMed] [DOI]
Mikó T, Ligneau X, Pertz HH, Ganellin CR, Arrang JM, Schwartz JC, Schunack W, Stark H. Novel nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists: 1-(4-(phenoxymethyl)benzyl)piperidines and related compounds. J Med Chem. 2003;46:1523-1530.[PubMed] [DOI]
McLeod RL, Rizzo CA, West RE, Aslanian R, McCormick K, Bryant M, Hsieh Y, Korfmacher W, Mingo GG, Varty L. Pharmacological characterization of the novel histamine H3-receptor antagonist N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-N'-[[4-(1H-imidazol-4-ylmethyl)phenyl]-methyl]-urea (SCH 79687). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:1037-1044.[PubMed] [DOI]
Liedtke S, Flau K, Kathmann M, Schlicker E, Stark H, Meier G, Schunack W. Replacement of imidazole by a piperidine moiety differentially affects the potency of histamine H3-receptor antagonists. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003;367:43-50.[PubMed] [DOI]
Thurmond RL, Desai PJ, Dunford PJ, Fung-Leung WP, Hofstra CL, Jiang W, Nguyen S, Riley JP, Sun S, Williams KN. A potent and selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:404-413.[PubMed] [DOI]
Jablonowski JA, Grice CA, Chai W, Dvorak CA, Venable JD, Kwok AK, Ly KS, Wei J, Baker SM, Desai PJ. The first potent and selective non-imidazole human histamine H4 receptor antagonists. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3957-3960.[PubMed] [DOI]
Hofstra CL, Desai PJ, Thurmond RL, Fung-Leung WP. Histamine H4 receptor mediates chemotaxis and calcium mobilization of mast cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:1212-1221.[PubMed] [DOI]
Okayama Y, Benyon RC, Lowman MA, Church MK. In vitro effects of H1-antihistamines on histamine and PGD2 release from mast cells of human lung, tonsil, and skin. Allergy. 1994;49:246-253.[PubMed] [DOI]
Sugimoto Y, Umakoshi K, Nojiri N, Kamei C. Effects of histamine H1 receptor antagonists on compound 48/80-induced scratching behavior in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;351:1-5.[PubMed] [DOI]
Wescott SL, Hunt WA, Kaliner M. Histamine H-1 receptors on rat peritoneal mast cells. Life Sci. 1982;31:1911-1919.[PubMed] [DOI]
Allocco FT, Votypka V, deTineo M, Naclerio RM, Baroody FM. Effects of fexofenadine on the early response to nasal allergen challenge. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;89:578-584.[PubMed] [DOI]
Kaneta S, Yanaguimoto H, Kagaya J, Ishizuki S, Fujihira E. Effects of H2-antihistamines in murine models of immediate hypersensitivity and chronic inflammation. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1993;79:167-184.[PubMed]
Sörbo J, Jakobsson A, Norrby K. Mast-cell histamine is angiogenic through receptors for histamine1 and histamine2. Int J Exp Pathol. 1994;75:43-50.[PubMed]
McLeod RL, Mingo GG, Herczku C, DeGennaro-Culver F, Kreutner W, Egan RW, Hey JA. Combined histamine H1 and H3 receptor blockade produces nasal decongestion in an experimental model of nasal congestion. Am J Rhinol. 1999;13:391-399.[PubMed] [DOI]
Hossen MA, Sugimoto Y, Kayasuga R, Kamei C. Involvement of histamine H3 receptors in scratching behaviour in mast cell-deficient mice. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:17-22.[PubMed] [DOI]
He S, Gaça MD, Walls AF. A role for tryptase in the activation of human mast cells: modulation of histamine release by tryptase and inhibitors of tryptase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;286:289-297.[PubMed]
He S, McEuen AR, Blewett SA, Li P, Buckley MG, Leufkens P, Walls AF. The inhibition of mast cell activation by neutrophil lactoferrin: uptake by mast cells and interaction with tryptase, chymase and cathepsin G. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;65:1007-1015.[PubMed] [DOI]
He S, Gaça MD, McEuen AR, Walls AF. Inhibitors of chymase as mast cell-stabilizing agents: contribution of chymase in the activation of human mast cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291:517-523.[PubMed]
He S, Gaça MD, Walls AF. The activation of synovial mast cells: modulation of histamine release by tryptase and chymase and their inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;412:223-229.[PubMed] [DOI]
He SH, Xie H. Modulation of histamine release from human colon mast cells by protease inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:337-341.[PubMed]